Literature DB >> 34352023

Non-microbial methane emissions from tropical rainforest soils under different conditions.

Gaohui Jia1, Qiu Yang1, Huai Yang2, Yamin Jiang1, Wenjie Liu1,3, Tingting Wu4, Han Mao1, Tianyan Su1, Zhenghong Tan1, Xu Wang1, Juelei Li5.   

Abstract

Non-microbial methane (NM-CH4), emissions from soil might play a significant role in carbon cycling and global climate change. However, the production mechanisms and emission potential of soil NM-CH4 from tropical rainforest remain highly uncertain. In order to explore the laws and characteristics of NM-CH4 emission from tropical rainforest soils. Incubation experiments at different environmental conditions (temperatures, soil water contents, hydrogen peroxide) and for soils with different soil organic carbon (SOC) contents were conducted to investigate the NM-CH4 emission characteristics and its influence factors of soils (0-10cm) that collected from a tropical rainforest in Hainan, China. Incubation results illustrated that soil NM-CH4 release showed a linear increase with the incubation time in the first 24 hours at 70 °C, whereas the logarithmic curve increase was found in 192 h incubation. Soil NM-CH4 emission rates under aerobic condition were significantly higher than that of under anaerobic condition at first 24 h incubation. The increasing of temperature, suitable soil water contents (0-100%), and hydrogen peroxide significantly promoted soil NM-CH4 emission rates at the first 24 h incubation. However, excessive soil water contents (200%) inhibited soil NM-CH4 emissions. According to the curve simulated from the NM-CH4 emission rates and incubation time at 70 °C of aerobic condition, soil would no longer release NM-CH4 after 229 h incubation. The NM-CH4 emissions were positively corelated with SOC contents, and the average soil NM-CH4 emission potential was about 6.91 ug per gram organic carbon in the tropical mountain rainforest. This study revealed that soils in the tropical rainforest could produce NM-CH4 under certain environment conditions and it supported production mechanisms of thermal degradation and reactive oxygen species oxidation. Those results could provide a basic data for understanding the soil NM-CH4 production mechanisms and its potential in the tropical rainforest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34352023      PMCID: PMC8341527          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255725

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Methane (CH4), an important greenhouse gas, which contribution to the greenhouse effect is second only to CO2, and has a major impact on atmospheric chemistry and climate [1]. The concentration of CH4 in the atmosphere has been increasing since the industrial revolution. It is expected that by the 2030s, the amounts of CH4 released by human activities will increase by about 25% [2], which may have a major impact on climate change in the future. Nearly 15 to 30 percent of CH4 in the atmosphere come from soils each year [3]. Studies focus on CH4 emission mechanisms and potential from soil are critical in understanding carbon cycling and global climate change projections. Generally, there are two production mechanisms of soils for atmospheric CH4, one is microbial CH4 and the other is non-microbial methane (NM-CH4) [4]. Soil microbial CH4, produced by the methanogenesis of methanogen, which was considered to be the mainly sources of soil CH4 emissions. Hao et al. [5] first observed that CH4 could be released from the soil in the savanna grassland during the dry season, and the CH4 emission was also detected in the forest soil. Subsequently, Andersen et al. [6] and Fischer and Hedin [7] found soil CH4 emission in aerobic soils. There are many explanations for the possible underlying mechanisms for this phenomenon, which are based on the microbial perspectives. Rimbault et al. [8] reported that the soil aerobic bacteria which could produce a small amount of CH4 under certain conditions, while Peter and Conrad [9] reported that the existence of soil anaerobic microhabitats can explain this phenomenon. Compared with microbial CH4, soil NM-CH4 has received less attention in the past decades. The production of soil NM-CH4 is more extensive than we originally thought in the soil environment. Soil NM-CH4 emission is an instantaneous reaction product of organic compounds under environmental pressures, which was caused by the cutting off the methyl functional groups of organic compounds [10]. The sources of NM-CH4 mainly include energy utilization [11], biomass combustion [12], and geological release [13]. In recent years, it has been discovered that plants [14], animals [15], and marine surface water [16] can also produce NM-CH4 under high temperature [17,18], strong ultraviolet radiation [19] and rich reactive oxygen [20]. Since plants were proved to release NM-CH4, some research scholars wonder whether soil could also release NM-CH4 [21]. This new perspective was first demonstrated by Kammann et al. [22], who found that soil samples can still release large amounts of CH4 even after homogenization (the anaerobic habitats in oil have been destroyed). Then, several recent studies have also confirmed that soil can produce NM-CH4 under aerobic conditions [10,23-25]. Although some researches on soil NM-CH4 emissions and its influencing factors were reported in recent years [22-25], the production mechanisms and emission potential of the NM-CH4 from tropical rainforest soil remain highly uncertain because of limited study. Tropical rainforests, as one of the most important components of forest, are of great importance for the global carbon cycle. To study NM-CH4 emissions of tropical rainforest soils is of great importance in understanding the carbon cycle of forest ecosystems and CH4 emission reducing. The Jianfengling Long-term Research Station of Tropical Forest Ecosystem is an unique platform to address the release mechanisms and potential of soil NM-CH4 emissions. Soil samples at depth of 0–10 cm were collected from 6 plots (20 m × 20 m) in Jianfengling Long-term Research Station of Tropical Forest Ecosystem, and the NM-CH4 emission rates from soil incubation experiments were observed under four different incubation conditions. The aims of this study are to understand the possible releasing mechanisms and potential of soil NM-CH4 emissions in tropical rainforest. In this study we hypothesized that NM-CH4 releases rates would decrease with incubation time, and the soil NM-CH4 could be influenced by different temperature, water content condition, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and soil organic carbon contents.

Materials and methods

Study area

The study area located in Jianfengling National Nature Reserve (18.33°~18.95°N, 108.48°~ 109.20°E, altitude range: 0-1412m), south-west Hainan Island, China. This area is characterized by a tropical rainforest climate with a mean annual precipitation of approximately 2400 mm (of which 80–90% falls in May–October) and a mean annual temperature of 24.5 °C [26]. The most common soil type is the montane lateritic red or yellow earth [26]. In addition, the study area is highly habitat heterogeneity with rich species composition and complex structure, the dominant species are Lauraceae, Fagaceae, and Rubiaceae. Moreover, the average canopy height in this area is 28.0 m, the density of trees with DBH (diameter at breast height) above 5 cm and 10 cm could reach 170 species and 150 species per hectare, respectively [27,28].

Soil sampling

Total six plots with each of 3 equal-sized subplots (20 × 20 m = 400 m2) set in, were selected in the Jianfengling Long-term Research Station of Tropical Forest Ecosystem (each location is approved by National Park Administration of Hainan Tropical Rainforest) (Table 1). On April 20, 2019, soil samples at the depth of 0–10 cm were randomly collected from the subplot. In each subplot, five soil cores of 10 cm diameter from the middle to the four corners were mixed to form a composite sample. 18 soil samples were collected in the 6 sites. We also collected two samples with the same sampling method in JFL1 site, and total twenty soil samples were collected. The soil samples were packed in bags in a constant cool temperature, and then transported into the laboratory and stored at 4 °C in a refrigerator. After a week of soil stabilization, soils were passed through a 2 mm diameter mesh and divided into two parts. The first part was air-dried, homogenized, and used for the analysis of soil properties and the other was stored in the 4 °C for the incubation experiment.
Table 1

Geographical information of soil sampling sites in the tropical rainforest.

SitesLatitude (N)Longitude (E)Altitude (m)Slope (°)Aspect
JFL118°43′54.74″108°53′10.04″8722.9north
JFL218°43′53.23″108°53′17.13″85510.8northeast
JFL318°43′53.20″108°53′22.90″8847.8north
JFL418°43′55.71″108°53′30.93″8102.0northeast
JFL518°43′54.05″108°53′30.23″8927.6north
JFL618°43′59.70″108°53′39.10″8304.5southwest
RF119°01′12.01″109°58’11.99"1271.0-
In addition, in order to study the relationships between SOC (soil organic carbon) and NM-CH4 emissions, the other twenty soil samples were collected from tropical rubber forest (RF1) in June, 2019 (Table 1).

Soil chemical analysis

SOC was determined by concentrated sulfuric acid-potassium dichromate oxidation method [29]. Soil total nitrogen (TN) and soil total phosphorus (TP) were extracted by semimicro kelvin method and determined by automatic flow analyzer (PROXIMA 1022/1/1, ALLIANCE instruments, France) [30]. Soil water content (SWC) was determined by drying method. Soil pH value was determined by potentiometric method (the soil water ratio = 1:2.5), the basic physical and chemical indexes of soil were showed in Table 2.
Table 2

Descriptive statistics of the soil properties in the tropical rainforest of Jianfengling National Nature Reserve.

VariableMaxMinAverageSTDEVeCVf
SOCa (g/kg)42.4431.2336.185.590.151
TNb (g/kg)1.660.831.330.290.066
TPc (g/kg)0.140.060.100.030.050
SWCd (%)23.0013.8518.753.180.025
pH value6.105.115.460.260.015

a soil organic carbon.

b Soil total nitrogen.

c soil total phosphorus.

d soil water content.

e standard deviation.

f coefficient of variation.

a soil organic carbon. b Soil total nitrogen. c soil total phosphorus. d soil water content. e standard deviation. f coefficient of variation.

Incubation experiment

Autoclaving is the most widely used sterilization method [10]. We firstly sterilized the soil with high-pressure steam (30 min, 121 °C) to eliminate the influence of microbial CH4, then freeze-drying and homogenization the soil. Finally, about 10 g of soils were transferred to a 100 mL serum bottle, which was then sealed with a high temperature resistant butyl rubber stopper. Before others experiments, the soil NM-CH4 emission characteristics at first 192 h (air samples collected at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168 and 192 h respectively) were studied from the incubation experiment in aerobic and anaerobic environment at 70 °C with natural soil water contents. The incubation treatments are as follows, different temperature, various soil water contents, hydrogen peroxide, and SOC contents. To study effects of different temperature on NM-CH4 emissions, the incubation experiments with natural soil water contents were conducted at 30 °C, 40 °C, 50 °C, 60 °C and 70 °C. The different incubation temperatures were achieved through incubators, and the anaerobic environment was created by blowing high-purity nitrogen [31]. According to the natural water contents of the soil samples, ultrapure water or freeze-drying were applied to adjust the soil water content into 8 gradients, which are 0%, 5%, 10%, 30%, 50%, 70%, 100%, and 200%, and the incubation was in aerobic environment at 70 °C for 24 hours. Because the incubation experiments with different temperatures showed that 70 °C was most beneficial to soil NM-CH4 emissions. The mass concentration of H2O2 concentrations were setting at 0%, 0.1%, 0.25%, 0.5%, 1%, and 2%. The incubation experiment was conducted in aerobic environment at 30 °C (with natural soil water contents) for 24 hours. Because the incubation experiments with different temperatures showed that the NM-CH4 emissions at 30 °C are weak, which can avoid the influences of temperature on NM-CH4 emissions. Besides the twenty soil samples from the Jianfenling tropical rainforest, the other 20 soil samples were collected from the tropical rubber forest (Table 1). The NM-CH4 emission characteristics for the forty soil samples were measured by incubation experiment in aerobic environment at 70 °C (with natural soil water contents) for 24 hours.

CH4 concentration measurement

Air samples sampling was performed before and after incubation. Before sampling, syringe was used to blow several times to mix the gas and then took 1 ml gas sample. This operation was carried out to minimize the interference to the sample in the incubation flask. For the continuous observation experiment, an equal volume of compressed air or high-purity nitrogen needs to be injected into the incubation flask right after the extraction of gas sample to maintain the pressure inside the incubation flask. The CH4 concentrations in air samples were measured by a gas chromatograph (7890A, Agilent Co., USA) [26]. The gas chromatograph was equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID). The operating temperature was 250 °C and oven temperature was maintained at 90 °C. The fuel gas was H2 (40 mL min-1) and the combustion supporting gas was air (400 mL min-1). The standard gas concentration of CH4 was 2.0 ppmv, provided by Beijing AP-BAIF Gases Industry Co., Ltd.

Data analysis

The emission rates of CH4 was calculated based on the change of CH4 concentration inside the incubation flask [14]. The total CH4 emission fluxes for different SOC contents samples in 229 h incubation were calculated by fluxes in first 24 h divided the proportions of it to total fluxes. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison tests was used to establish significant differences of soil NM-CH4 emission among the temperature gradient, the concentration of H2O2 solution, soil water content. The difference at P<0.05 level considered to be statistically significant. The statistical analyses were carried out in SPSS 22.0. Figures were generated using the software Origin 2018.

Results

Soil NM-CH4 emission characteristics as incubation time increasing

The concentration of soil NM-CH4 emission was measured at different incubation time, and results indicated that the emission flux of soil NM-CH4 increased with incubation time in the first 129 h (Fig 1). Within 24 h, the NM-CH4 emission flux showed a significant positive linear correlation with the time change (P<0.01 R2 = 0.98). However, within 192 h, the NM-CH4 emission rate showed a gradual decrease trend. In addition, the relationship between NM-CH4 emission rate and incubation time was explained by the logarithmic function y = -0.19ln(x-10.19) + 0.11 (R2 = 0.97) (Fig 2), which indicated that the soil would no longer release NM-CH4 when the incubation time was up to 229 h. The soil NM-CH4 emission at first 24 h account for 33.14% of total emission amounts in aerobic environment at 70 °C with natural soil water contents, which means that substrates related to NM-CH4 emission during this period are sufficient. Therefore, it is important to study NM-CH4 emissions within 24 hours.
Fig 1

Emission flux of soil NM-CH4 in aerobic environment at 70 °C with natural soil water contents in first 192 h.

Fig 2

Fitting relationship between NM-CH4 emission rates and incubation time in aerobic environment at 70 °C with natural soil water contents in first 192 h.

Influence of temperature on soil NM-CH4 emission

To study the effect of temperature on soil NM-CH4, soil samples were incubated at temperatures ranging from 30 to 70 °C with natural soil water contents under aerobic and anaerobic conditions, respectively. The results indicated that the CH4 emission rate gradually increased (+1.11×10−3–0.15 μg/g SOC/h) with increasing of temperature at first 24 h (Fig 3). At lower temperatures (≤50 °C) conditions, the CH4 emission rate was less sensitive to temperature change, and no significantly change was observed in the CH4 emission rate, especially in the anaerobic environment (the emission rate of NM-CH4 were lower than 0.06 μg/g SOC/h). However, the CH4 emission rates changed dramatically when the temperature was high (60–70 °C) in both aerobic and anaerobic conditions, and the emission rates increased by 1–3 times per 10 °C (the emission rates of NM-CH4 ranged from 0.05 to 0.15 μg/g SOC /h). In addition, there was a significant positive correlation between the emission rates of NM-CH4 under aerobic and anaerobic conditions (P<0.05), and the emission rates under aerobic condition was always higher than that of under the anaerobic condition in a certain temperature.
Fig 3

The emission rates of NM-CH4 at different incubation temperature from 30°C to 70 °C and under aerobic and anaerobic conditions.

Influence of H2O2 on soil NM-CH4 emissions

To study the relationships between soil NM-CH4 emission and H2O2 contents, the soil samples were added with 5 ml H2O2 solution with different concentration (0%, 0.1%, 0.25%, 0.5%, 1% and 2%) at 30 °C with natural soil water contents. The results revealed that the NM-CH4 emission rates increased with the increasing of H2O2 contents (+0.07–0.77 μg/g SOC/h), and the emission rates showed a significant positive linear correlation with H2O2 concentration (P<0.01, R2 = 0.96) (Fig 4).
Fig 4

The emission rates of NM-CH4 at different concentrations of H2O2 (0, 0.1%, 0.25%, 0.5%, 1%, 2%) in aerobic environment at 30 °C.

Emission characteristics of soil NM-CH4 at different soil water contents

The emission characteristics of soil NM-CH4 in tropical rainforest at 70 °C were showed in Fig 5. The results of the study indicated that there was a mutation of NM-CH4 emission rates when soil water contents increased from 0% to 5%. The results also showed that soil water contents increasing promoted NM-CH4 emissions (+0.02–0.31 μg/g SOC/h), and the effect decreased significantly at first and then decreased gradually. In addition, the CH4 emission rate reached the peak at the soil water content of 5% (0.42 μg/g SOC/h). When the soil water content was 200%, the emission rate was 0.05μg/g SOC/h, which was lower than that of at soil water content of 0% (0.07 μg/g SOC/h). The results indicated that the excessive soil water contents inhibited the NM-CH4 emissions.
Fig 5

The emission rates of NM-CH4 at different soil water contents (0%, 5%, 10%, 30%, 50%, 100%, 200%) treatments in aerobic environment at 70 °C.

Relationships between SOC contents and soil NM-CH4 emissions

The soil NM-CH4 emission fluxes were positively correlated with SOC in the both tropical rubber forest (P<0.01, R2 = 0.81) and tropical rainforest (P<0.01, R2 = 0.79), respectively. In addition, the total soil NM-CH4 emission fluxes in the tropical rainforest (0.21±0.05 ug/g(dw)) were higher than those of in the tropical rubber forest (0.06±0.02 ug/g(dw)) (Fig 6). The average NM-CH4 emission fluxes were 6.91 μg per gram organic carbon in the tropical forest of Hainan.
Fig 6

The relationships between soil NM-CH4 emission fluxes and SOC in the tropical rainforest of Hainan.

Discussion

Soil NM-CH4 emission characteristics at different incubation time

There was a linear relationship between soil NM-CH4 emissions and incubation time at the first 24 h (Fig 1), which was consistent with the results of Hurkuck et al. [24]. Our results also showed that soil NM-CH4 emission rates gradually decreased as the incubation time increasing from 24 h to 192 h. The NM-CH4 emission rates were determined by the type and contents of NM-CH4 precursors in soil [4]. It could be deduced that some of the precursors are consumed as the incubation time increased, resulting in a gradual decrease in the NM-CH4 emission rates after 24 h in this study. Moreover, it could be concluded that there was no soil NM-CH4 emission after 229 hours incubation from the logarithmic function (Fig 2), which may due to the contents of NM-CH4 precursors were nearly exhausted. The emission rates of soil NM-CH4 at first 24 h were higher in aerobic condition than those of in anaerobic conditions (Fig 3). Wang et al. [10] also found that the NM-CH4 emission rates under aerobic condition was higher than that under anaerobic condition, and the differences intensified with the increase of temperature. Therefore, the following discussion focused on the influences of different temperature, H2O2 concentration, soil water contents and SOC contents on NM-CH4 emission rates at first 24 h under aerobic incubation.

Higher temperature, H2O2 concentration, soil water content promoted soil NM-CH4 emission

The thermal degradation mechanism as a major mechanism of NM-CH4 production is gradually accepted [4]. Previous studies reported that there were many functional groups including methyl, methoxy and methyl sulfide (NM-CH4 precursors) existed in soil and they could produce CH4 [18,32]. The NM-CH4 emission rates increased gradually with the increasing of incubation temperature at first 24 h in this study (Fig 3). It indicated that high temperature could accelerate the NM-CH4 emission, because the higher temperature could dissociate much more soil chemical bonds of NM-CH4 precursors [10,23,25], and resulting in higher CH4 production and emission rates. Reactive oxidative species (ROSs, such as hydroxyl radical) are highly oxidative [33], capable of cleaving functional groups that can produce NM-CH4. Soil biological activities can exude ROSs and soil itself can also produce ROSs through photochemical reactions with certain mineral oxides [34,35]. The results in this study showed that the soil NM-CH4 emission rates were positively correlated with the H2O2 concentration at the first 24 h (Fig 4). The results of Jugold et al. [25] also found a similar pattern in aerobic soil. However, these results were different from the result of Wang et al. [10] that there was a logarithmic growth relationship between CH4 emission rates and H2O2 concentration. The interesting thing is, some researchers have found the different patterns in plants, for example, Wang et al. [31] found that the plant pectin showed a logarithmic emission characteristic, while the dry leaves showed a linear emission characteristic. Those indicated that the carbon sources may be an important factor affecting CH4 emission under the different H2O2 concentrations environment. It is important to study the effect of soil water content on the release of NM-CH4, because soil water content always changed in forest due to precipitation and evaporation. In this study, NM-CH4 emission rates had a sudden increased as soil water content increasing from 5% to 10%, and it gradually decreased with soil water content increased from 10% to 100% at the first 24 h (Fig 5), which indicated that appropriate water can effectively promote NM-CH4 emissions. However, CH4 emission rate was decreased when soil waters content reached 200%, indicating the excessive soil water would inhibit NM-CH4 emissions. The results are consistent with the previous results from Wang et al. [10] and Jugold et al. [25]. Soil water contents could affect NM-CH4 release from chemical degradation of organic compounds, and it also affects oxygen concentration and the microenvironment where methanogenesis takes place [24]. More research is needed on the mechanisms of soil water contents affecting NM-CH4 emissions in the future. For example, what is the internal mechanism of moisture affecting soil NM-CH4 emission, how to explain its internal mechanism at the level of organic chemistry, and where is the critical point of the impact of moisture on soil NM-CH4 emission?

Potential of NM-CH4 emission

This study found that the soil NM-CH4 emission fluxes were significantly positively correlated with SOC content (Fig 6). When conducting experiments on NM-CH4 emission from aggregates, Wang et al. found that there is a significant positive correlation between the NM-CH4 emission rate of soil aggregates and the concentration of organic carbon, indicating that the role of the amount of organic carbon can determine soil NM-CH4 emissions [10]. Similarly, the studies of Gu et al. and Hurkuck et al. also reported that there is a significant positive correlation between the release rate of soil NM-CH4 and the soil organic carbon content [23,24]. It supported that soil NM-CH4 was derived from soil organic matter. But what needs to be further clarified is which organic molecules or structures in the soil are involved in the process of soil NM-CH4 release. In the study of plant materials, it is found that the methoxy groups in pectin and lignin can be used as precursors of NM-CH4 production [18,20], which provides ideas for the study of soil NM-CH4 sources. Mao et al. used solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance technology to study soil humic acid, and found it contains the methyl-containing functional groups such as alkoxy, alkyl and alkyl groups [36]. This indicated that the humic acid was one of the precursors of soil NM-CH4 emissions. How large is soil NM-CH4 emissions in tropical forest? Our results showed that the average NM-CH4 emission fluxes were 6.91 μg per gram organic carbon in the tropical forest of Hainan. This study first reported the emission potential of soil NM-CH4, which could provide basic data for understanding the production mechanisms and potential of soil NM-CH4 in the tropical rainforest. In fact, the production of NM-CH4 in the natural environment is the result of combined different factors (such as temperature, oxygen, soil water, etc.).

Conclusion

The NM-CH4 could be produced in tropical rainforest soils under some condition. The NM-CH4 emission would last about 229 h, and it exhibits a linear increase at first 24 h, but the increase rates decreased gradually as the incubation time increasing. The emission rates of NM-CH4 under aerobic condition was higher than that under anaerobic condition at high temperature environment. The high temperature and H2O2 concentrations could significantly promote the emission of NM-CH4 in tropical rainforest soil. The increasing of soil water contents from 0 to 100% could promote the NM-CH4 emission, while the excessive high soil water content inhibited the NM-CH4 emission. There was significant positive correlation between SOC and NM-CH4 emissions flux, which indicated that a great potential for NM-CH4 emissions in tropical rainforest soils with high SOC. In-depth research on NM-CH4 plays an important role in further understanding the emission mechanism of soil CH4 and more accurate prediction of climate change. However, the current researches on soil NM-CH4 mainly concentrated on indoor incubation. How to conduct field in-situ observation (For example, two gaseous chemical reagents, monochloromethane and difluoromethane, are often used as inhibitors of CH4 producing bacteria and CH4 oxidizing bacteria, respectively. Can the two gases be directly used in the field and to achieve the purpose of inhibiting biomethane, thereby determining the release rate of NM-CH4 under natural conditions), intuitively estimate its proportion to total CH4, and explore more emission substrates and emission paths (For example, can the emission substrate and path be determined by the method of element labeling) still need to be further studied. This study found that temperature and moisture have a significant impact on NM-CH4 emissions. The high-temperature and high-humidity soil environment of tropical forests, coupled with abundant organic carbon storage, can be considered as the best site for in-situ observation of microbial CH4 and NM-CH4. As we all know, model simulation is the best way to predict the current global change trend. If the process of NM-CH4 is ignored, it may further increase the uncertainty of the regional and global carbon cycles predicted by current biogeochemical models. Therefore, based on the research that can distinguish between microbial CH4 and NM-CH4, algorithms for the production and emission of NM-CH4 can be developed, verified, and integrated into the land surface model to better understand and predict large temporal and spatial changes. 26 Apr 2021 PONE-D-20-33065 Nonmicrobial methane emissions from tropical rainforest soils PLOS ONE Dear Dr. Liu, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. Please submit your revised manuscript by Jun 10 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file. Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript: A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'. A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'. An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'. If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter. If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols. We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Kind regards, Dai-Viet N. Vo, Ph.D. Academic Editor PLOS ONE Journal Requirements: When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements. 1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at and 2. In your Methods section, please provide additional information regarding the permits you obtained to collect samples for the present study. Please ensure you have included the full name of the authority that approved the field site access and, if no permits were required, a brief statement explaining why. 3. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ [Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.] Reviewers' comments: Reviewer's Responses to Questions Comments to the Author 1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented. Reviewer #1: Partly Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: No ********** 3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available? The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English? PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: No ********** 5. Review Comments to the Author Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters) Reviewer #1: This incubation experimental study shows variations of NM-CH4 emission from tropical rainforest soils under different environmental conditions. The results confirm, as conclusively stated by the authors, the production mechanism of NM-CH4 emission by thermal degradation and reactive oxygen species oxidation. However, I’m expecting new findings beyond the results in previous studies except for the blank filling with new soil samples of rainforests in this study. Some other concerns are of the experimental treatments in the incubation. 1. Before other experiments, the soil NM-CH4 emission characteristics in the first 192h were studied from incubation experiments in aerobic and anaerobic environments at 70 °C with natural soil water content (Line 127-129). The temperatures up to 70 °C are not naturally realistic in forest soils, please explain your rationale of making the experimental temperatures (Line 133) beyond natural realities. 2. The anaerobic environment was created by blowing high-purity nitrogen in the experiment, the same as in Wang et al. (2011b) (Line134-135). In the study of Wang et al (2011b), they treated plant tissues and the anaerobic condition can be reasonably created and maintained by blowing high purity nitrogen. But in soil samples, there are tiny pores that trap oxygen in soil aggregations. I wonder the efficiency of erasing the oxygen in soil samples by merely blowing high-purity nitrogen. Some supplementary treatments are needed to ensure or check the anaerobic condition after blowing nitrogen. 3. What’s the situation of 200% soil water content (Line 138)? 4. The experimental results showed that the soil would no longer release NM-CH4 when the incubation time was 229 h (Line 180). The degradation of soil organic matters, which is the source of NM-CH4 production and emission, is a long term process up to hundreds to thousands years. Without mechanical explanation of the experimental phenomena, it’s hard to believe that the long term continuous degradation of SOM produces no NM-CH4 after 229h. 5. Fig. 5 shows that the NM-CH4 emission increased when soil water contents rose from 0% to 5%, and thereafter, more soil water content inhibited significantly the NM-CH4 emission. It seems that water molecules play key roles in the process of NM-CH4 production in soils. Could the authors explain it in the context of organic chemistry? 6. The total soil NM-CH4 emission fluxes in the tropical rainforest were higher than those in the tropical rubber forest (Line 232-234). This implies that the types of ecosystems (may also be the chemical composition of SOM in ecosystems) are key factors in NM-CH4 emission. I recommend some discussion of the results in this study to the published literatures (e.g. Wang et al., 2013). Reviewer #2: Manuscript ID: PONE-D-20-33065 Title: Nonmicrobial methane emissions from tropical rainforest soils Recommendation: Major revision Comments: Title: The title seems not complete, need to be more specific to your research. Keywords: add one keyword: “tropical rainforest soils” Abstract • State the aim and the novelty of the study. Materials and methods • Citations needed. Please cite the papers of where the methods are adapted from. Incubation experiment: • Why choose the first 192h for incubation experiments? • Why choose these 8 gradients, 0%, 5%, 10%, 30%, 50%, 70%, 100%, and 200%? Same question for “The mass concentrations of H2O2 were set at 0%, 0.1%, 0.25%, 0.5%, 1%, and 2% “ • Line 146, (table 1), should be Table 1. CH4 concentration measurements: • Does this method part refer to any reference? Results and discussions • Line 285-286: “More research is needed on the mechanisms of soil water content affecting NM-CH4 emissions in the future.” Please clarify which specific research can be done, give your suggestions. • Line 298-301: “How to conduct field in situ observations, intuitively estimate its proportion to total CH4 emissions, and explore more emission substrates and emission paths still needs to be further studied.”Can you give some solutions in response to this problem? E.g. What methods can be conducted to solve this problem? Conclusion • Please state the importance of the study and how it can contribute to the research community. • Please include the detailed limitations and what can be done for the future studies ********** 6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files. If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public. Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy. Reviewer #1: No Reviewer #2: No [NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.] While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step. 2 Jul 2021 Response to Reviewers Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx Click here for additional data file. 23 Jul 2021 Non-microbial methane emissions from tropical rainforest soils under different conditions PONE-D-20-33065R1 Dear Dr. Liu, We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements. Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication. An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org. Kind regards, Dai-Viet N. Vo, Ph.D. Academic Editor PLOS ONE Additional Editor Comments (optional): The paper has been properly revised. Thus, it can be considered for publication. Reviewers' comments: Reviewer's Responses to Questions Comments to the Author 1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation. Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed ********** 2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available? The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English? PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 6. Review Comments to the Author Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters) Reviewer #1: The authors response to all comments raised by the reviewers. I must admit the complexity in the NM-CH4 emission procedures and recommend acceptance of the MS for publication in view that the methods and results of the study are sound in spite that it's hard to fully understand the mechanism of some phenomena of the incubation. Reviewer #2: The authors have adequately addressed all of the comments. The manuscript can be accepted for publication ********** 7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files. If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public. Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy. Reviewer #1: No Reviewer #2: No 28 Jul 2021 PONE-D-20-33065R1 Non-microbial methane emissions from tropical rainforest soils under different conditions Dear Dr. Liu: I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org. If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org. Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access. Kind regards, PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff on behalf of Dr. Dai-Viet N. Vo Academic Editor PLOS ONE
  13 in total

1.  Methanogenic and other strictly anaerobic bacteria in desert soil and other oxic soils.

Authors:  V Peters; R Conrad
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Effects of temperature, ultraviolet radiation and pectin methyl esterase on aerobic methane release from plant material.

Authors:  D Bruhn; T N Mikkelsen; J Obro; W G T Willats; P Ambus
Journal:  Plant Biol (Stuttg)       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.081

3.  Abiotic methanogenesis from organosulphur compounds under ambient conditions.

Authors:  Frederik Althoff; Kathrin Benzing; Peter Comba; Colin McRoberts; Derek R Boyd; Steffen Greiner; Frank Keppler
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  l-Methionine, a Precursor of Trace Methane in Some Proteolytic Clostridia.

Authors:  A Rimbault; P Niel; H Virelizier; J C Darbord; G Leluan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Aerobic and anaerobic nonmicrobial methane emissions from plant material.

Authors:  Zhi-Ping Wang; Zong-Qiang Xie; Bao-Cai Zhang; Long-Yu Hou; Yi-Hua Zhou; Ling-Hao Li; Xing-Guo Han
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Release of methane from aerobic soil: an indication of a novel chemical natural process?

Authors:  Miriam Hurkuck; Frederik Althoff; Hermann F Jungkunst; Alke Jugold; Frank Keppler
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 7.086

7.  Widespread production of nonmicrobial greenhouse gases in soils.

Authors:  Bin Wang; Manuel Lerdau; Yongli He
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 10.863

8.  Methane emissions from terrestrial plants under aerobic conditions.

Authors:  Frank Keppler; John T G Hamilton; Marc Brass; Thomas Röckmann
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-01-12       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  Reactive oxygen species: metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction.

Authors:  Klaus Apel; Heribert Hirt
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 26.379

10.  The role of ultraviolet radiation, photosensitizers, reactive oxygen species and ester groups in mechanisms of methane formation from pectin.

Authors:  David J Messenger; Andy R McLeod; Stephen C Fry
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2008-09-22       Impact factor: 7.228

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.