James S Martin1, Claire J Mackenzie1, Ian H Gilbert1. 1. Wellcome Centre for Anti-Infectives Research, Division of Biological Chemistry and Drug Discovery, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 5EH, U.K.
Abstract
A selection of 3,4-diaminoindoles were required for a recent drug discovery project. To this end, a 10-step synthesis was developed from 4-nitroindole. This synthesis was subsequently adapted and used to synthesize 3,5-; 3,6-; and 3,7-diaminoindoles from the corresponding 5-, 6-, or 7-nitroindole. These novel intermediates feature orthogonal protecting groups that allow them to be further diversified. This is the first reported synthesis of these types of compounds.
A selection of 3,4-diaminoindoles were required for a recent drug discovery project. To this end, a 10-step synthesis was developed from 4-nitroindole. This synthesis was subsequently adapted and used to synthesize 3,5-; 3,6-; and 3,7-diaminoindoles from the corresponding 5-, 6-, or 7-nitroindole. These novel intermediates feature orthogonal protecting groups that allow them to be further diversified. This is the first reported synthesis of these types of compounds.
Indoles are an important
feature of many drugs.[1] A recent search
through DrugBank revealed 100 compounds
in which an indole was a component. A search of ChEMBL indicated that
there were 1688 structures with a 3-aminoindole embedded in the structure.
Further, indoles are found in many natural products[2] and dyes.[3]During a recent
drug discovery campaign, we required a selection
of 3,4-diaminoindoles. It was important that each amino group could
be differentially derivatized in order to carry out a hit expansion.
However, literature searches revealed that the only published examples
of diaminoindoles are 2,3-diaminoindole[4] and 6,7-diaminoindole.[5] Some dinitroindoles
are known;[6] however, conversion of these
to diaminoindoles has not been reported. A 2-substituted 3-amino-4-nitroindole
is also known.[7] It is unusual that such
simple cores are unknown in the literature. Our initial focus was
on the synthesis of 3,4-diaminoindoles; however, this synthesis turned
out to be problematic. In this article, we describe our synthesis
of the differentially protected 3,4-diaminoindole, which was suitable
for further modification. Once this was successfully completed, the
3,5-, 3,6-, and 3,7-analogues were also prepared, with all shown in Figure .
Figure 1
Top—Indole numbering
scheme. Middle—3,4-Diaminoindole
and 3,5-diaminoindole. Bottom—3,6-Diaminoindole and 3,7-diaminoindole.
Top—Indole numbering
scheme. Middle—3,4-Diaminoindole
and 3,5-diaminoindole. Bottom—3,6-Diaminoindole and 3,7-diaminoindole.
Results and Discussion
To illustrate
the challenges of preparation of the diaminoindoles,
we report some of our initial approaches to access this system. It
is known that the most reactive position on an indole ring is the
3-position, so we focused on introducing the required amine here.
The synthesis was started with the nitrogen on the phenyl ring masked
as a nitro group or as the Boc-protected or Cbz-protected amine. However,
our attempts to functionalize the 3-position via typical means such
as Buchwald–Hartwig couplings, nitrations, and azidations proved
unsuccessful (Scheme ).
Scheme 1
Attempted Synthesis of 3-Amino-4-nitroindoles 2,4-(Boc)amino-3-nitroindole 4, and 3-Azido-4-nitroindole 6
We had previously found that
a Curtius rearrangement could be used
to convert indole-3-carboxylic acids into the corresponding indole-3-isocyanates,
which could subsequently be converted to 3-aminoindoles and related
derivatives. However, the required 4-aminoindole-3-carboxylic acid
intermediate is not commercially available or synthetically known.
Typically, indole-3-carboxylic acids can be synthesized by reacting
indoles with trifluoroacetic anhydride (TFAA) to give the corresponding
trifluoroketone, which subsequently undergoes base hydrolysis in a
pseudo-haloform reaction to give the carboxylic acid,[8] or alternatively by oxidation of the corresponding aldehyde.[9]However, we found that in the case of 4-nitroindole
or protected
4-aminoindoles, these routes were unsuccessful.Instead, it
was proposed that brominating the 3-position of 4-nitroindole
to give 7 would allow a lithium halogen exchange to occur
by treating with n-butyl lithium, and the resulting
anion could be quenched with CO2 to give the required carboxylic
acid 8 as shown in Scheme . However, no lithium halogen exchange was observed
in this case, likely due to the electron withdrawing effect of the
nitro group.
Scheme 2
Top—Attempted Synthesis of 4-Nitro-1-TIPS-indole-3-carboxylic
Acid 8; Bottom—Synthesis of tert-Butyl 4-((tert-Butoxycarbonyl)amino)-1-(triisopropylsilyl)-1H-indole-3-carboxylate 12
An analogous reaction was attempted where the nitro group
was substituted
with the Cbz-protected amine 9 and the CO2 substituted with Boc anhydride (Scheme ). This reaction was unsuccessful, and instead,
the di-Boc-protected amine 10 was found to be the main
product. It was observed that by brominating this product and then
treating it with n-butyl lithium, a novel Boc migration
occurred, yielding ester 12. This presumably occurred
via lithiation, followed by transfer of the Boc group to the 3-position
of the indole as shown in Scheme . This allowed access to the carboxylic acid and subsequently
the synthesis of the desired
3,4-diaminoindoles.This key step allowed us to prepare the
diprotected 3,4-diaminoindole
(Scheme ). A number
of different strategies, protecting groups, and orders of reactions
were investigated. Eventually, the following route was found to be
successful. 4-Nitroindole 13 was protected with a triisopropylsilyl
(TIPS)-protecting group 14, and the nitro group reduced
to amine 15 using hydrogen and palladium on carbon. The
di-Boc-protected compound 10 was formed in two steps,
initially via treatment with Boc anhydride and 4-dimethylaminopyridine
(DMAP) to give the mono-protected compound 16 and then
with more forcing conditions using n-butyl lithium
and Boc anhydride. Bromination with N-bromosuccinimide
(NBS), followed by rearrangement using n-butyl lithium,
gave the required ester 12. Deprotection of the indole
NH was achieved using tetra-n-butylammonium fluoride (TBAF) to give
indole 17. The remaining Boc group and tert-butyl ester were cleaved using TFA, and the free amine 18 reprotected with Cbz to give carboxylic acid 19. Treating
this acid with diphenylphosphoryl azide (DPPA) in DCM gave the acyl
azide which was then heated in tert-butanol to induce
the rearrangement to give the isocyanate and subsequently the required
bisprotected 3,4-diaminoindole 20. The overall yield
of this synthesis was 15% over 10 steps.
Scheme 3
Synthesis of Benzyl tert-Butyl (1H-Indole-3,4-diyl)dicarbamate 20
It was noted that no other
examples of 3,x-diaminoindoles
were identified in the literature, so the synthesis of 3,4-diaminoindole
was modified to allow access to these compounds. It was found that
the first step, forming the protected indole, was extremely challenging
with 7-nitroindole and ultimately the product was unstable.It was subsequently found that on attempting to lithiate the 3-bromo
derivatives of 5- and 6-aminoindole 22a and 22b later in this synthesis, no transfer of a carboxylate occurred.
This is probably due to the lack of proximity of the diprotected amino
group to the lithiated center (Scheme ).
Scheme 4
Attempted Synthesis of tert-Butyl
5-(Boc)aminoindole-3-carboxylate 23a and tert-Butyl 6-(Boc)aminoindole-3-carboxylate 23b
The pseudo-haloform reaction had previously
been shown not to work
when attempting the synthesis of 3,4-diaminoindole but was attempted
again here as shown in Scheme as the reactivity of these compounds appeared significantly
different from that seen when synthesizing 3,4-diaminoindole. Reacting
the appropriate nitroindoles 24a–c with TFAA gave
trifluoroketones 25a–c which were readily hydrolyzed
to carboxylic acids 26a–c using sodium hydroxide.
Attempting to reduce the nitro groups to amines using hydrogen and
palladium resulted in a lot of degradation to give a complex mixture,
so alternatives were investigated. A transfer hydrogenation using
ammonium chloride and iron gave the expected amino acid cleanly.
Scheme 5
Synthesis of Benzyl tert-Butyl (1H-Indole-3,5-diyl)dicarbamate 31a, Benzyl tert-Butyl (1H-Indole-3,6-diyl)dicarbamate 31b, and Benzyl tert-Butyl (1H-Indole-3,7-diyl)dicarbamate 31c
However, residual ammonium
chloride could not be completely separated
from the product and inhibited the next step. To allow separation
of the product and ammonium chloride, various carboxylic acid-protecting
groups were investigated. In the case of a methyl group or a trimethylsilylethoxymethyl
(SEM) group, the required chemistry was found to be successful; however,
the protecting groups could not be cleaved. Ultimately, the methoxymethyl
(MOM)-protecting group was found to facilitate the required chemistry
and could be cleaved when required using TFA. Therefore, the carboxylic
acids were protected as MOM esters 27a–c. The
nitro groups were then reduced with iron and ammonium chloride to
give amines 28a–c. The resulting amino compounds
could be protected with a Cbz group to give the protected amino acids 29a–c. Removal of the MOM-protecting groups with TFA
gave carboxylic acids 30a–c; the Curtius rearrangement
could then be carried out. The carboxylic acid was converted to the
acyl azide using DPPA; then, by heating in tert-butanol,
the desired bisprotected diaminoindoles 31a–c were
isolated.The final 3,4-, 3,5-, 3,6-, and 3,7-diaminoindoles
synthesized
here feature an orthogonal protecting group on each amine, allowing
them to be selectively functionalized at each position to give compounds
of interest to ongoing drug discovery projects.
Conclusions
Here,
we have developed the first reported synthesis of 3,4-diaminoindole,
a novel core of interest in a drug discovery campaign. This synthesis
was further developed to produce the novel 3,5-, 3,6-, and 3,7-diaminoindoles.
These compounds are protected with orthogonal protecting groups to
allow required chemistry to be undertaken on these attractive intermediates.
This represents the first known route to this class of compounds.
Experimental Section
General Methods
Chemicals and solvents were purchased
from commercial sources and were used without any further purification
unless noted otherwise. Air- and water-sensitive reactions were carried
out under an inert nitrogen atmosphere in oven-dried glassware. Reactions
which required heating were heated in DrySyn heating blocks. Analytical
thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was performed on precoated TLC plates
(layer 0.20 mm silica gel 60 with fluorescent indicator UV254,
from Merck). Developed plates were air-dried and analyzed under a
UV lamp (UV254/365 nm) and by staining with permanganate or ninhydrin.
Flash column chromatography was performed on prepacked silica gel
cartridges (230–400 mesh, 35–70 μm, from RediSep)
using a Teledyne ISCO Combiflash Rf or Combiflash Rf 200i. 1H (500 MHz), 13C (126 MHz), and 2D NMR spectra
were recorded in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)-d6 using a Bruker AVANCE spectrometer. Proton chemical shifts
are reported in ppm relative to the residual DMSO peak (δ =
2.50 ppm). Multiplicities are given as s (singlet), d (doublet),
t (triplet), q (quartet), hept (heptet), m (multiplet), brs (broad
singlet), dd (doublet of doublets), or a combination of these. Coupling
constants (J) are quoted to the nearest 0.1 Hz. 13C chemical shifts are reported in ppm relative to the residual
DMSO peak (δ = 39.5 ppm). Assignment of proton and carbon
signals was achieved using correlation spectroscopy, heteronuclear
single-quantum coherence, and heteronuclear multiple bond correlation
experiments, which are reported using the indole number scheme in Figure . High-resolution
electrospray measurements were performed on a Bruker Daltonics MicrOTOF
mass spectrometer.
tert-Butyl (1-(Triisopropylsilyl)-1H-indol-4-yl)carbamate 16 (4.38 g, 10.7 mmol,
1 equiv) was dissolved in THF (50 mL)
under nitrogen and cooled to −78 °C. n-Butyl lithium (2.5 M in hexane) (6.42 mL, 16.1 mmol, 1.5 equiv)
was added dropwise, and the reaction mixture was stirred at −78
°C for 30 min. Ditert-butyl dicarbonate (4.92
mL, 21.4 mmol, 2 equiv) was added, and the reaction mixture was allowed
to slowly warm up to room temperature. After 3 h, the reaction mixture
was quenched with 20 mL of saturated ammonium chloride solution, diluted
with 20 mL of water, and 50 mL of DCM. The layers were separated,
and the aqueous layer was extracted 2x with 50 mL of DCM. The combined
organics were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, passed
through a phase separator, and evaporated to dryness. The residue
was purified by flash chromatography (0–30% ethyl acetate in
heptane) to give tert-butyl (tert-butoxycarbonyl)(1-(triisopropylsilyl)-1H-indol-4-yl)carbamate 10 (5.26 g, 96%) as a colorless oil which crystallized on
standing. 1H (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 7.49 (1H, d, J = 8.3 Hz, H7), 7.39 (1H,
d, J = 3.1 Hz, H2), 7.11 (1H, t, J = 7.9 Hz, H6), 6.86 (1H, d, J = 7.5 Hz, H5), 6.38
(1H, d, J = 3.1 Hz, H3), 1.75 (3H, hept, J = 7.4 Hz, Si(CH)3), 1.35 (18H, s, Boc CH3), 1.09 (18H, d, J = 7.5 Hz, TIPS CH3); 13C{1H} (126 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 151.6 (C=O), 141.3 (C7a), 132.0 (C2),
130.9 (C4), 128.8 (C3a), 121.2 (C6), 118.8 (C5), 112.9 (C7), 101.6
(C3), 81.7 (C(CH3)3), 27.4 (Boc
CH3), 17.8 (TIPS CH3), 11.9 (SiCH(CH3)2); HRMS (ESI/TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C27H45N2O4Si, 489.3143; found, 489.3161.
tert-Butyl (3-Bromo-1-(triisopropylsilyl)-1H-indol-4-yl)carbamate 11 was dissolved in THF (75 mL)
under nitrogen and cooled to −78 °C. n-Butyl lithium (2.5 M in hexane) (8.44 mL, 21.1 mmol, 1.2 equiv)
was added portionwise over 30 min, and the reaction mixture was stirred
at −78 °C for a further 30 min. The reaction mixture was
quenched with 50 mL of saturated ammonium chloride solution, diluted
with 50 mL of water, and extracted 3x with 50 mL of diethyl ether.
The combined organic layers were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, passed through a phase separator, and evaporated to dryness.
The residue was purified by flash chromatography (0–20% ethyl
acetate in heptane) to give tert-butyl 4-((tert-butoxycarbonyl)amino)-1-(triisopropylsilyl)-1H-indole-3-carboxylate 12 (7.08 g, 82%) yield
as a white powder. 1H (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 10.91 (1H, br s, NH), 7.91 (1H, d, J = 7.9 Hz, H5), 7.89 (1H, s, H2), 7.23 (1H, d, J = 8.3 Hz, H7), 7.17 (1H, t, J = 8.1 Hz,
H6), 1.74 (3H, hept, J = 7.3 Hz, Si(CH)3), 1.57 (9H, s, CH3), 1.49 (9H, s, CH3), 1.09 (18H, d, J = 7.5, TIPS CH3); 13C{1H} (126 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 165.9
(C=O ester), 152.6 (C=O carbamate), 142.1 (C7a), 139.3
(C2), 132.7 (C4) 123.8 (C6), 117.4 (C3a), 110.5 (C3), 109.9 (C5),
108.5 (C7), 81.0 (C(CH3)3), 78.9
(C(CH3)3), 28.0 (CH3), 27.9 (CH3), 17.7 (TIPS CH3), 11.8 (SiCH(CH3)2); HRMS (ESI/TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C27H45N2O4Si, 489.3143; found, 489.3154.
4-Nitro-1-(triisopropylsilyl)-1H-indole 14
4-Nitroindole 13 (2.00 g, 12.3 mmol,
1 equiv) was dissolved in dry THF (20 mL) and cooled to 0 °C
under nitrogen. Sodium hydride (60% in mineral oil) (592 mg, 14.8
mmol, 1.2 equiv) was added, and the reaction mixture was stirred at
0 °C for 30 min. Triisopropylsilyl chloride (3.4 mL, 16.0 mmol,
1.3 equiv) was added dropwise, and the reaction mixtures were stirred
at 0 °C for 30 min. The reaction mixture was quenched with 20
mL of saturated ammonium chloride and extracted 3x with 20 mL of DCM.
The combined organics were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, passed through a phase separator, and evaporated to dryness.
The residue was purified by flash chromatography (0–30% ethyl
acetate in heptane) to give 4-nitro-1-(triisopropylsilyl)-1H-indole 14 (4.34 g, 100%) as a yellow powder. 1H (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ
8.10 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz, H5), 8.04 (1H, d, J = 8.2 Hz, H7), 7.78 (1H, d, J = 3.1 Hz,
H2), 7.36 (1H, t, J = 8.1 Hz, H6), 7.26 (1H, d, J = 3.0 Hz, H3), 1.81 (3H, hept, J = 7.5
Hz, Si(CH)3), 1.09 (18H, d, J = 7.5, CH3); 13C{1H} (126 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 142.5 (C7a), 139.5 (C4), 137.0 (C2), 124.8 (C3a), 121.0
(C7), 120.8 (C6), 117.4 (C5), 104.4 (C3), 17.7 (CH3), 11.8 (SiCH(CH3)2); HRMS (ESI/TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C17H27N2O2Si, 319.1836; found, 319.1836.
4-Nitro-1-TIPS-indole 14 (4.34 g,
12.3 mmol, 1 equiv) was suspended in ethanol (50 mL) with 10% Pd/C
(69 mg, 0.06 mmol, 0.5 mol %) under a nitrogen atmosphere. The reaction
mixture was purged 3x with hydrogen and then stirred under a hydrogen
atmosphere for 4 days. The reaction mixture was purged 3x with nitrogen,
filtered through Celite, and evaporated to dryness. The residue was
dissolved in 20 mL of diethyl ether, and 6 N HCl was added dropwise
until the precipitate stopped forming. The precipitate was isolated
by vacuum filtration and washed 3x with diethyl ether and then dried
under vacuum to give 1-(triisopropylsilyl)-1H-indol-4-amine
hydrochloride 15 (3.52 g, 83%) as a white powder. 1H (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ
10.09 (3H, br s, NH3), 7.53 (1H, d, J =
7.8 Hz, H7), 7.48 (1H, d, J = 2.3 Hz, H2), 7.17 (1H,
t, J = 7.8 Hz, H6), 7.06 (1H, br s, H5), 6.84 (1H,
br s, H3), 1.76 (3H, hept, J = 7.5 Hz, Si(CH)3), 1.08 (18H, d, J = 7.5 Hz, TIPS CH3); 13C{1H} (126 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 141.3 (C7a), 132.4 (C2), 121.6 (C6), 113.4
(C5), 113.3 (C7), 101.9 (C3), 17.7 (CH3), 11.8 (SiCH(CH3)2); HRMS (ESI/TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C17H29N2Si, 289.2095; found, 289.2105.
1-(Triisopropylsilyl)-1H-indol-4-amine
hydrochloride 15 (3.52 g, 10.8
mmol, 1 equiv) was dissolved in pyridine (20 mL) with DMAP (132 mg,
1.1 mmol, 10 mol %) and stirred under nitrogen. Ditert-butyl dicarbonate (2.59 g, 11.9 mmol, 1.1 equiv) was added, and
a rapid evolution of gas was observed after about 30 s. The reaction
mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight. The reaction mixture
was evaporated to dryness, and the residue was dissolved in 20 mL
of DCM and washed with 20 mL of 0.5 N HCl. The aqueous layer was extracted
2x with 10 mL of DCM, washed with saturated NaHCO3 solution
and brine, dried over MgSO4, passed through a phase separator,
and evaporated to dryness. The residue was purified by flash chromatography
(0–20% ethyl acetate in heptane) to give tert-butyl (1-(triisopropylsilyl)-1H-indol-4-yl)carbamate 16 (4.38 g, 99%) as a colorless oil which crystallized on
standing. 1H (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 8.96 (1H, br s, NH), 7.35 (1H, d, J =
7.7 Hz, H5), 7.27 (1H, d, J = 3.0 Hz, H2), 7.21 (1H,
d, J = 8.3 Hz, H7), 7.01 (1H, t, J = 8.0 Hz, H6), 6.90 (1H, d, J = 3.0 Hz, H3), 1.72
(3H, hept, J = 7.5 Hz, Si(CH)3), 1.50
(9H, s, Boc CH3), 1.08 (18H, d, J = 7.5
Hz, TIPS CH3); 13C{1H} (126 MHz,
DMSO-d6): δ 153.25 (C=O),
141.0 (C7a), 131.0 (C4), 130.0 (C2), 121.4 (C6), 110.7 (C5), 108.8
(C7), 102.9 (C3), 78.7 (Boc C(CH3)3), 28.1 (Boc CH3), 17.8 (TIPS CH), 11.9 (SiCH(CH3)2); HRMS (ESI/TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C22H37N2O2Si, 389.2614; found,
389.2619.
tert-Butyl 4-((tert-Butoxycarbonyl)amino)-1H-indole-3-carboxylate 17 (2.19 g, 6.57 mmol, 1 equiv) was dissolved in DCM (44 mL)
under nitrogen. TFA (44 mL, 65.7 mmol, 10 equiv) was added, and the
reaction mixture was stirred for 1 h. The reaction mixture was evaporated
to dryness to give the intermediate as an off-white powder. The residue
was dissolved in DCM (45 mL) under nitrogen, and pyridine (2.66 mL,
32.8 mmol, 5 equiv) was added. Benzyl chloroformate (1.84 mL, 13.1
mmol, 2 equiv) was added dropwise. The reaction mixture was stirred
at room temperature overnight. The reaction mixture was evaporated
to dryness to remove the residual pyridine, and the residue was dissolved
in 50 mL of water and acidified to pH 1 with concentrated HCl. The
resulting precipitate was isolated by vacuum filtration and then purified
by reverse phase flash chromatography (C18 column) (5–95%
acetonitrile in water (0.1% formic acid)) to give 4-(((benzyloxy)carbonyl)amino)-1H-indole-3-carboxylic acid 19 (1.31 g, 61%)
as a white powder. 1H (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 12.60 (1H, br s, COOH), 12.00 (1H, br s, H1),
11.85 (1H, br s, NH), 8.08 (1H, d, J = 2.8 Hz, H2),
7.91 (1H, d, J = 7.4 Hz, H5), 7.46–7.30 (5H,
m, Cbz-CH), 7.2–7.1 (2H, m, H6, H7), 5.19 (2H, s, CH2); 13C{1H} (126 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 168.7 (COOH), 153.0 (carbamate C=O),
138.0 (C7a), 136.8 (Cbz-C), 133.9 (C2), 132.2 (C4) 128.4 (Cbz-CH),
127.8 (Cbz-CH), 127.5 (Cbz-CH), 123.5 (C6), 115.4 (C3a), 108.6 (C5),
106.8 (C7), 106.4 (C3), 65.4 (CH2); HRMS (ESI/TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C17H15N2O4, 311.1026; found,
311.1027.
Caution! Azides are potentially explosive
substances and can decompose violently. 4-(((Benzyloxy)carbonyl)amino)-1H-indole-3-carboxylic acid 19 (500 mg, 1.53
mmol, 1 equiv) was suspended in DCM (25 mL) under nitrogen. Triethylamine
(0.43 mL, 3.06 mmol, 2 equiv) was added, and the mixture was stirred
until everything had dissolved. DPPA (0.38 mL, 1.68 mmol, 1.1 equiv)
was added dropwise, and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature
overnight. 25 mL of DCM was added, and the mixture was extracted with
25 mL of 1 N HCl. The aqueous layer was extracted a further 2x with
25 mL of DCM, and the combined organic layers were washed with 25
mL of saturated NaHCO3 and brine, dried over MgSO4, and passed through a phase separator into a well-dried flask, with
the volume reduced by half in vacuo. The solution was diluted with tert-butanol (25 mL), and then, the volume reduced to ∼20
mL to remove the residual DCM. Acetic acid (0.18 mL, 3.06 mmol, 2
equiv) was added, and the reaction mixture was heated to 60 °C
under nitrogen for 3 days. The reaction mixture was cooled to room
temperature and evaporated to dryness. The residue was dissolved in
25 mL of DCM and washed with 25 mL of water. The aqueous layer was
extracted 2x with 25 mL of DCM, and the combined organics were washed
with 25 mL of saturated NaHCO3 and 25 mL of brine, dried
over MgSO4, passed through a phase separator, and evaporated
to dryness. The residue was purified by flash chromatography (0–50%
ethyl acetate in heptane) to give benzyl tert-butyl
(1H-indole-3,4-diyl)dicarbamate 20 (389
mg, 63%) as a white powder. 1H (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 11.01 (1H, br s, H1) 8.83 (1H, br s, Cbz NH),
8.42 (1H, br s, Boc NH), 7.40 (5H, m, Cbz-CH), 7.25 (1H, d, J = 6.1 Hz, H5), 7.21 (1H, d, J = 1.4 Hz,
H2), 7.13 (1H, d, J = 8.2 Hz, H7), 7.05 (1H, t, J = 7.9 Hz, H6), 5.17 (2H, s, CH2), 1.41 (9H,
s, CH3); 13C{1H} (126 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 155.6 (Boc C=O), 153.9 (Cbz
C=O), 136.6 (Cbz C), 135.7 (C7a), 129.5 (C4), 128.4 (Cbz-CH),
128.0 (Cbz-CH), 128.0 (Cbz-CH), 121.4 (C5), 120.2 (C2), 116.3 (C3a),
112.6 (C3), 112.0 (C5), 108.1 (H7), 78.8 (C(CH3)3), 65.9 (CH2), 20.1 (CH3); 15N (50 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ
128.4 (N1), 109.7 (Boc NH), 967 (Cbz NH); HRMS (ESI/TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C21H24N3O4, 382.1761; found, 382.1763.
General Method 1—Synthesis of Trifluoroketone 25
The appropriate nitroindole (1 equiv) was dissolved in
DMF (5 mL/mmol) under nitrogen, and TFAA (2 equiv) was added. The
reaction mixture was heated to 80 °C overnight. The reaction
mixture was diluted with water and extracted 3x with ethyl acetate,
and the combined organic layers were washed 2x with 10% LiCl solution
and brine, dried over MgSO4, passed through a phase separator,
and evaporated to dryness azeotroping 3x from toluene to give the
products.
The appropriate trifluoroketone 25 (1 equiv)
was suspended in 4 M sodium hydroxide solution (20 equiv) and stirred
at 60 °C overnight. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature,
diluted with water, and extracted 3x with diethyl ether. The aqueous
layer was acidified by addition of concentrated HCl to pH 1, and the
precipitate was isolated by vacuum filtration. The precipitate was
washed 2x with water, 5x with diethyl ether, and then dried under
vacuum to give the desired products.
The appropriate carboxylic acid 26 (1 equiv)
was suspended in THF (5 mL/mmol) under nitrogen and cooled to 0 °C.
Triethylamine (3 equiv) was added, and the reaction mixture was stirred
at 0 °C for 5 min. MOMCl (1.5 equiv) was added dropwise, and
the reaction mixture was allowed to warm up to room temperature overnight.
The reaction mixture was diluted with water and extracted 3x with
ethyl acetate. The combined organic extracts were washed with saturated
NaHCO3 solution and brine, dried over MgSO4,
passed through a phase separator, and evaporated to dryness. The residue
was purified by flash chromatography (0–50% ethyl acetate in
heptane) to give the desired products.
The appropriate nitro compound 27 (1 equiv)
was dissolved in methanol, THF, and water (1:1:1) (25 mL/mmol). Ammonium
chloride (6.7 equiv) was added, followed by iron (4.2 equiv), and
the reaction mixture was stirred at 60 °C overnight. The reaction
mixture was filtered through Celite, rinsing with methanol, and the
volatiles were removed in vacuo. The aqueous residue
was diluted with water, saturated NaHCO3 solution, and
extracted 3x with ethyl acetate. The combined organics were washed
with brine, dried over MgSO4, passed through a phase separator,
and evaporated to dryness to give the desired products.
The appropriate
amine 28 (1 equiv) was dissolved in
DCM (10 mL/mmol) with pyridine (5 equiv) under nitrogen. CbzCl (2.4
equiv) was added, and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature
overnight. The reaction mixture was diluted with water and extracted
3x with DCM. The combined organics were washed with brine, dried over
MgSO4, passed through a phase separator, and evaporated
to dryness. The residue was purified by flash chromatography (0–100%
ethyl acetate in heptane) to give the desired products.
The appropriate protected ester 29 (1 equiv)
was dissolved in DCM (8 mL/mmol) under nitrogen and cooled to 0 °C.
TFA (10 equiv) was added, and the reaction mixture was stirred at
0 °C for 1 h. The reaction mixture was evaporated to dryness,
and the residue was purified by reverse-phase flash chromatography
(C18 column) [5–95% acetonitrile in water (0.1%
formic acid)] to give the desired products.
General Method 7—Synthesis of Boc-Protected Amine 31
Caution! Azides are potentially explosive
substances and can decompose violently. The appropriate carboxylic
acid 30 (1 equiv) was suspended in DCM (30 mL/mmol) under
nitrogen. Triethylamine (2 equiv) was added and stirred until everything
dissolved. DPPA (1.1 equiv) was added, and the reaction mixture was
stirred at room temperature overnight. The reaction mixture was washed
with 1 N HCl, and the aqueous layer was extracted 2x with DCM. The
combined organics were washed with saturated NaHCO3 solution
and brine, dried over MgSO4, and passed through a phase
separator, with the volume reduced to ∼5 mL in vacuo. t-Butanol (30 mL/mmol) was added, and the residual DCM was
removed in vacuo. Acetic acid (2 equiv) was added,
and the reaction mixture was stirred at 60 °C for 24 h under
nitrogen. The solvent was removed in vacuo, and the
residue was partitioned between DCM and water. The layers were separated,
and the aqueous layer was extracted 2x with DCM; the combined organics
were washed with saturated NaHCO3 solution and brine, dried
over MgSO4, passed through a phase separator, and evaporated
to dryness. The residue was purified by flash chromatography (0–50%
ethyl acetate in heptane) to give the desired products.
Authors: Shouming Wang; Nan Chi Wan; John Harrison; Warren Miller; Irina Chuckowree; Sukhjit Sohal; Timothy C Hancox; Stewart Baker; Adrian Folkes; Francis Wilson; Deanne Thompson; Simon Cocks; Hayley Farmer; Anthony Boyce; Caroline Freathy; Jan Broadbridge; John Scott; Paul Depledge; Richard Faint; Prakash Mistry; Peter Charlton Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2004-03-11 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Lawrence R Marcin; Mendi A Higgins; F Christopher Zusi; Yunhui Zhang; Michael F Dee; Michael F Parker; Jodi K Muckelbauer; Daniel M Camac; Paul E Morin; Vidhyashankar Ramamurthy; Andrew J Tebben; Kimberley A Lentz; James E Grace; Jovita A Marcinkeviciene; Lisa M Kopcho; Catherine R Burton; Donna M Barten; Jeremy H Toyn; Jere E Meredith; Charles F Albright; Joanne J Bronson; John E Macor; Lorin A Thompson Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Lett Date: 2011-01-01 Impact factor: 2.823