Literature DB >> 34351564

Efficacy and safety of pulsed dye laser for the treatment of surgical scars: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yujia Cai1, Xiaofang Zeng2, Jieya Ying1, Yuan Zhu1, Yu Qiu1, Wenzhong Xiang3.   

Abstract

Various clinical trials have explored whether the pulsed dye laser (PDL) method is safe to treat scars, especially surgical scars. However, comprehensive evidence confirming the exact outcomes of PDL for treating surgical scars is lacking. The efficacy and safety of PDL in the treatment of surgical scars were determined through a review of several studies. The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched, and the main clinical outcomes were Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) scores in terms of pigmentation, vascularity, pliability, and height. Review Manager 5.4 software was used for statistical analyses of the data; we chose a standardized mean difference (SMZ) to present the results with 95% confidence interval (CI). Overall, seven randomized controlled trials were used for this meta-analysis, all of these papers used 585 nm or 595 nm PDL with 7 mm or 10 mm spot size and a fluence of 3.5 to 10 J/cm2 for treating surgical scars; besides, the pulse duration ranged from 450 μs to 10 ms. We found that PDL significantly resulted in decreased VSS scores (P = 0.02) in four aspects: pigmentation (P = 0.0002), vascularity (P < 0.00001), pliability (P = 0.0002), and height (P = 0.0002). Moreover, scar improvement was similar when using 585 nm and 595 nm PDL in terms of pigmentation (P = 0.76), vascularity (P = 0.34), pliability (P = 0.64), and height (P = 0.57). Furthermore, our review indicated that PDL has no obvious adverse effects for most people, except transitory erythema and purpura. The meta-analysis showed that both 585 nm and 595 nm PDL therapy can effectively reduce the VSS score, suggesting that PDL can be a safe and effective method for the treatment of surgical scars.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Meta-analysis; Pulsed dye laser; Surgical scars

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34351564     DOI: 10.1007/s10103-021-03385-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lasers Med Sci        ISSN: 0268-8921            Impact factor:   3.161


  3 in total

1.  585-nm pulsed dye laser in the treatment of surgical scars starting on the suture removal day.

Authors:  Keyvan Nouri; Gloria P Jimenez; Catherine Harrison-Balestra; George W Elgart
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.398

2.  Pulsed Dye Laser for Early Treatment of Scars After Dermatological Surgery.

Authors:  Osvaldo Vazquez-Martinez; Kristian Eichelmann; Martha Garcia-Melendez; Ivette Miranda; Alberto Avila-Lozano; David Vega; Jorge Ocampo-Candiani
Journal:  J Drugs Dermatol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.114

3.  Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of Pulsed Dye Laser Treatment, CO<sub>2</sub> Ablative Fractional Resurfacing, and Combined Treatment for Surgical Scar Clearance.

Authors:  Joel L Cohen; Roy Geronemus
Journal:  J Drugs Dermatol       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 2.114

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.