| Literature DB >> 34351498 |
Jun Tanabe1, Ichiro Nakahara2, Shoji Matsumoto2, Yoshio Suyama2, Jun Morioka2, Akiko Hasebe2, Sadayoshi Watanabe2, Kenichiro Suyama2, Kiyonori Kuwahara2, Keiko Irie3.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Endovascular treatment of posterior communicating artery aneurysms with fetal-type posterior communicating artery originating from the aneurysm dome is often challenging because, with conventional techniques, dense packing of aneurysms for posterior communicating artery preservation is difficult; moreover, flow-diversion devices are reportedly less effective. Herein, we describe a novel method called the λ stenting technique that involves deploying stents into the internal carotid artery and posterior communicating artery.Entities:
Keywords: Aneurysm; Coiling; Endovascular; Posterior communicating artery; Stent
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34351498 PMCID: PMC8724119 DOI: 10.1007/s00234-021-02775-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuroradiology ISSN: 0028-3940 Impact factor: 2.804
Fig. 1Schematic image of the λ stenting technique used for fetal-type PCOM aneurysms (A). A low-profile stent is deployed in the PCOM after insertion of as many coils as possible using the balloon assisted technique (B). A braided stent is deployed in the ICA, covering the neck of the aneurysm (C). In-stent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty is performed to acquire complete stent apposition; the PCOM stent is crushed in the aneurysm neck between the coil mesh and the ICA stent (D). The ICA and PCOM stents form a complex stent in the lambda configuration, namely ‘the λ stent’ (E). PCOM, posterior communicating artery; ICA, internal carotid artery
Patients characteristics
| Patient | Age | Sex | Aneurysm diameter (mm) | Symptoms | Postoperative result by modified RROC | Packing density (%) | Procedure times | Perioperative complications | Follow-up angiography (month) | Reintervention | DAPT period (month) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 60 | M | 12 × 6 × 6 | Regrowth | 1 | NA | 210 | None | 3 | None | 3 |
| 2 | 68 | F | 8 × 7 × 7 | None | 2 | 29.6 | 150 | None | 38 | None | 6 |
| 3 | 45 | F | 7 × 6 × 6 | None | 1 | 30.1 | 200 | None | 18 | None | 6 |
| 4 | 85 | F | 6 × 5 × 4 | None | 1 | 33.9 | 100 | None | 34 | None | 6 |
| 5 | 53 | F | 7 × 5 × 4 | None | 1 | 39.1 | 120 | None | 20 | None | 6 |
| 6 | 79 | F | 10 × 8 × 7 | None | 2 | 26.8 | 270 | None | 12 | None | 3 |
| 7 | 48 | M | 6 × 5 × 5 | None | 1 | 38.2 | 120 | None | 16 | None | 12 |
| 8 | 71 | M | 8 × 5 × 5 | Regrowth | 1 | 31.4 | 190 | None | 6 | None | 3 |
DAPT, dual antiplatelet therapy; NA, not available; RROC, Raymond-Roy occlusion classification
Technical details of λ stenting
| Patient | Guiding catheter | Assist for PCOM cannulation | Balloon catheter | PCOM catheter | PCOM stent | ICA stent | In stent PTA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8-Fr Roadmaster | None | Scepter C 4 × 15 | SL10 J pre-shaped | NF 4.5 × 15 | LVIS 4.5 × 18 | Scepter C 4 × 15 |
| 2 | 7-Fr Shuttle sheath | Half deployment of ICA stent and coils of aneurysm | Scepter C 4 × 15 | SL10 J pre-shaped | NF 3 × 15 | LVIS 4.5 × 23 | Scepter C 4 × 15 |
| 3 | 8-Fr Roadmaster | None | Scepter XC 4 × 11 | Headway17 micro pigtail manual shaped | NF 3 × 15 | LVIS 4 × 22 | SHOURYU HR 7 × 7 |
| 4 | 8-Fr Roadmaster | Balloon assist | Scepter C 4 × 15 | SL10 C pre-shaped | NF 3 × 15 | NF 4.5 × 21 | none |
| 5 | 8-Fr Roadmaster | None | Scepter C 4 × 15 | SL10 J pre-shaped | NF 3 × 15 | LVIS 4.5 × 23 | Scepter C 4 × 15 |
| 6 | 8-Fr Roadmaster | None | Scepter C 4 × 15 | SL10 J pre-shaped | NF 3 × 15 | LVIS 4 × 22 | none |
| 7 | 8-Fr Roadmaster | Balloon assist | Scepter C 4 × 15 | SL10 J pre-shaped | NF 3 × 15 | LVIS 4 × 17 | SHOURYU HR 7 × 7 |
| 8 | 8-Fr Roadmaster | Balloon assist | Scepter XC 4 × 11 | SL10 J pre-shaped | NF 3 × 15 | LVIS 4.5 × 23 | Scepter XC 4 × 11 |
PCOM, posterior communicating artery; ICA, internal carotid artery; NF, Neuroform Atlas, SL 10 (Stryker); PTA, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty; Headway 17, Scepter C and XC, LVIS (Terumo); Roadmaster (Goodman); Shuttle sheath (Cook Medical); SHOURYU HR (Kaneka Medix)
Fig. 2A representative case. A 3D cerebral angiography image demonstrating a right PCOM aneurysm incorporating the orifice of the PCOM (A). Using the balloon-assisted technique, coil embolization is performed in the dome of the aneurysm after navigating a microcatheter for stent deployment in the PCOM, preserving the ICA and PCOM (B). The ICA and PCOM stents are deployed (C). Postoperative angiography shows complete obliteration of the aneurysm, with PCOM preservation (D). PCOM, posterior communicating artery; ICA, internal carotid artery
Fig. 3A representative case. A 3D cerebral angiography image demonstrating a right PCOM aneurysm incorporating the orifice of the PCOM (A). Using the balloon-assisted technique, coil embolization is performed in the dome of aneurysm after navigating a microcatheter for stent deployment in the PCOM, preserving the ICA and PCOM (B). In-stent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty is performed for complete stent apposition after the ICA and PCOM stents are deployed (C). Postoperative angiography shows complete obliteration of the aneurysm, with PCOM preservation (D). PCOM, posterior communicating artery; ICA, internal carotid artery
Fig. 4Schematic image of the various complex stenting techniques for fetal-type PCOM aneurysms. T configuration stenting (A), Y configuration stenting (kissing and crossing; B and C, respectively) and PCOM stenting (D) are depicted. PCOM, posterior communicating artery