Literature DB >> 34351457

Artificial intelligence in orthopedic implant model classification: a systematic review.

Mark Ren1,2, Paul H Yi3,4.   

Abstract

Although artificial intelligence models have demonstrated high accuracy in identifying specific orthopedic implant models from imaging, which is an important and time-consuming task, the scope of prior works and performance of prior models have not been evaluated. We performed a systematic review to summarize the scope, methodology, and performance of artificial intelligence algorithms in classifying orthopedic implant models. We performed a literature search in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for studies published up to March 10, 2021, using search terms related to "artificial intelligence", "orthopedic", "implant", and "arthroplasty". Studies were assessed using a modified version of the methodologic index for non-randomized studies. Reported outcomes included area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. The search identified 2689 records, of which 11 were included in the final review. The number of implant models evaluated ranged from 2 to 27. Five studies reported overall AUC across all included models which ranged from 0.94 to 1.0. Overall accuracy values ranged from 0.804 to 1.0. One study compared AI model performance with that of three surgeons, reporting similar performance. There was a large degree of variation in methodology and reporting quality. Artificial intelligence algorithms have demonstrated strong performance in classifying orthopedic implant models from radiographs. Further research is needed to compare artificial intelligence alone and as an adjunct with human experts in implant identification. Future studies should aim to adhere to rigorous artificial intelligence development methods and thorough, transparent reporting of methods and results.
© 2021. ISS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroplasty; Artificial intelligence; Deep learning; Hardware; Implant; Machine learning; Neural network; Orthopedic surgery; Radiology

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34351457     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-021-03884-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  3 in total

Review 1.  Methodologic Guide for Evaluating Clinical Performance and Effect of Artificial Intelligence Technology for Medical Diagnosis and Prediction.

Authors:  Seong Ho Park; Kyunghwa Han
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Design Characteristics of Studies Reporting the Performance of Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Diagnostic Analysis of Medical Images: Results from Recently Published Papers.

Authors:  Dong Wook Kim; Hye Young Jang; Kyung Won Kim; Youngbin Shin; Seong Ho Park
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 3.  Diagnostic accuracy of deep learning in medical imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ravi Aggarwal; Viknesh Sounderajah; Guy Martin; Daniel S W Ting; Alan Karthikesalingam; Dominic King; Hutan Ashrafian; Ara Darzi
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2021-04-07
  3 in total
  2 in total

1.  Automatic Brand Identification of Orthopedic Implants from Radiographs: Ready for the Next Step?

Authors:  Merel Huisman; Nikolas Lessmann
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2022-03-02

Review 2.  Current understanding on artificial intelligence and machine learning in orthopaedics - A scoping review.

Authors:  Vishal Kumar; Sandeep Patel; Vishnu Baburaj; Aditya Vardhan; Prasoon Kumar Singh; Raju Vaishya
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-08-26
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.