Literature DB >> 34350726

The effects of acute incremental hypocapnia on the magnitude of neurovascular coupling in healthy participants.

Taylor J Bader1, Jack K Leacy2, Joanna R G Keough1, Anna-Maria Ciorogariu-Ivan1, Joshua R Donald1, Anthony L Marullo1, Ken D O'Halloran2, Nicholas G Jendzjowsky3, Richard J A Wilson4, Trevor A Day1.   

Abstract

The high metabolic demand of cerebral tissue requires that local perfusion is tightly coupled with local metabolic rate (neurovascular coupling; NVC). During chronic altitude exposure, where individuals are exposed to the antagonistic cerebrovascular effects of hypoxia and hypocapnia, pH is maintained through renal compensation and NVC remains stable. However, the potential independent effect of acute hypocapnia and respiratory alkalosis on NVC remains to be determined. We hypothesized that acute steady-state hypocapnia via voluntary hyperventilation would attenuate the magnitude of NVC. We recruited 17 healthy participants and insonated the posterior cerebral artery (PCA) with transcranial Doppler ultrasound. NVC was elicited using a standardized strobe light stimulus (6 Hz; 5 × 30 s on/off) where absolute delta responses from baseline (BL) in peak, mean, and total area under the curve (tAUC) were quantified. From a BL end-tidal (PET )CO2  level of 36.7 ± 3.2 Torr, participants were coached to hyperventilate to reach steady-state hypocapnic steps of Δ-5 Torr (31.6 ± 3.9) and Δ-10 Torr (26.0 ± 4.0; p < 0.001), which were maintained during the presentation of the visual stimuli. We observed a small but significant reduction in NVC peak (ΔPCAv) from BL during controlled hypocapnia at both Δ-5 (-1.58 cm/s) and Δ-10 (-1.37 cm/s), but no significant decrease in mean or tAUC NVC response was observed. These data demonstrate that acute respiratory alkalosis attenuates peak NVC magnitude at Δ-5 and Δ-10 Torr PET CO2 , equally. Although peak NVC magnitude was mildly attenuated, our data illustrate that mean and tAUC NVC are remarkably stable during acute respiratory alkalosis, suggesting multiple mechanisms underlying NVC.
© 2021 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hypocapnia; neurovascular coupling; respiratory alkalosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34350726      PMCID: PMC8339533          DOI: 10.14814/phy2.14952

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Rep        ISSN: 2051-817X


INTRODUCTION

The human brain constitutes merely 2% of total body weight, yet is responsible for approximately 20% of total oxygen consumption at rest (Mergenthaler et al., 2013). To ensure that cerebral metabolic demand is met, the brain requires sophisticated and well‐regulated global and regional vascular perfusion. The spatial and temporal coordination between regional cerebral blood flow and metabolic demand is termed neurovascular coupling (NVC). NVC is mediated at the level of the neurovascular unit, and involves the interplay between astrocytes, neurons, vascular smooth muscle, and endothelial cells, as well as pericytes at the capillary level (Phillips et al., 2016; Willie et al., 2014), matching regional CBF to regional increases in neuronal activity in order to reliably meet metabolic demands (Fernández‐Klett et al., 2010; Phillips et al., 2016; Rosengarten et al., 2003). Astrocytes use their podocytes to modulate blood flow to metabolically active areas by bridging synaptic activity with metabolic activity (Blanco et al., 2008). The release of nitric oxide (NO) from both endothelial cells and astrocytes causes vasodilation in downstream vasculature, resulting in an increase in regional flow (Crecelius et al., 2011; Fathi et al., 2011; Hoiland et al., 2020). Controlling the spatial distribution of NVC allows greater precision in matching fluctuating local metabolic rates to vascular perfusion (Fernández‐Klett et al., 2010). Experimentally, NVC is commonly monitored non‐invasively via ultrasound of the posterior cerebral artery (PCA) due to its relatively small territory of perfusion involved in visual processing tasks (i.e., occipital lobes; Sturzenegger et al., 1996). Furthermore, cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) contributes to the regulation of cerebral blood flow, through the modulation of vessel tone, in response to perturbations in blood gases (e.g., CO2 and O2; Kim et al., 2015; Phillips et al., 2016; Willie et al., 2014). During blood gas perturbations, CVR is vital for maintaining cerebral homeostasis through adequate perfusion. Cerebrovascular tone is particularly sensitive to changes in arterial CO2 (PaCO2). A decrease in PaCO2, termed hypocapnia, induces the vasoconstriction of the cerebrovasculature. Furthermore, hypocapnia, particularly in the acute setting, can induce a profound acid–base disturbance resulting in progressive increases in arterial pH (pHa), with resultant alkalosis (Krapf et al., 1991; Norcliffe et al., 2005; Poulin et al., 2002). In contrast, reductions in O2 have a vasodilatory effect. Instances of acute and chronic hypoxia cause both vasodilation in cerebral blood vessels and an increase in ventilation, the latter termed the hypoxic ventilatory response (HVR; Teppema & Dahan, 2010). The HVR raises the partial pressure of arterial O2 (PaO2), while decreasing the partial pressure of arterial CO2 (PaCO2), and thus the pressure of end‐tidal PCO2 (PETCO2). The relationship between acute hypocapnia and/or respiratory alkalosis and NVC remains unclear. Prior research has investigated the effects of chronic and incremental hypocapnia on NVC during high altitude (HA) ascent with ventilatory acclimatization (Caldwell et al., 2017; Leacy et al., 2018). However, confounding variables of concomitant hypoxia and renal compensation of pH through bicarbonate (HCO3 −) elimination exists in these studies (Krapf et al., 1991; Zouboules et al., 2018). Both studies found that NVC was stable during steady‐state or incremental ascent (Caldwell et al., 2017; Leacy et al., 2018), potentially explained by conflicting cerebrovascular stimuli. In contrast with the results found at altitude, in a laboratory setting, Szabo et al. (2011) found that peak NVC magnitude decreased in acute hypocapnic conditions. However, this study only utilized a single hypocapnic step through coached hyperventilation, as opposed to targeting relative CO2 values. In addition, Szabo et al. (2011) assessed the magnitude of the NVC response using a single metric: %‐change in peak responses. What remains to be tested are the independent effects of controlled and graded hypocapnic steps without the confounding effects of superimposed and conflicting hypoxia and renal compensation. The aim of this study was to determine whether NVC response magnitude is affected during acute, incremental hypocapnia, and respiratory alkalosis in a laboratory setting, when compared with normocapnia. We hypothesized that there will be step‐wise decreases in NVC magnitude during each step of acute hypocapnia, specifically Δ‐5 and Δ‐10 Torr PETCO2 from eupnoeic values.

METHODS

Ethics approval and participant recruitment

This study abided by the Canadian Government Tri‐Council Policy on research with human participants, consistent with the Declaration of Helsinki, except for registration in a database. Ethical approval was received from the Mount Royal University Human Research Ethics Board (Protocol 101879) and the University of Calgary Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board (Protocol REB18‐0374) in advance. Participants were informed of the experimental procedures and provided written and verbal consent prior to data collection. Participants completed a detailed pre‐medical questionnaire, which was used to assess for any contraindications to study participation, prior to data collection. Participants were otherwise healthy with no previous or current medical history of cardiovascular, respiratory, neurological, and/or metabolic disease. In addition, participants with a body mass index of >30 kg/m2 or a history of epilepsy and/or seizures were excluded. Participants were asked to abstain from consuming caffeine for at least 12 h prior to data collection.

Instrumentation

Participants remained in the seated position throughout data collection. Participants were instrumented with a Finometer (Finometer Pro, Finapres Medical Systems; calibrated using the return to flow function for every participant), lead II electrocardiogram (ECG; ADI bioamp ML132), nose clip, mouthpiece, spirometer (800 L flow head and spirometer amplifier, 3813 series, Hans Rudolph, Shawnee, HS; and ADI ML141; calibrated with a 3‐L syringe), dual O2 and CO2 gas analyzer (ADI ML206; calibrated daily), and transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD; PMD150B, Spencer Technologies). Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were derived from the raw Finometer waveform and ECG signal, respectively. Specifically, MAP was calculated as the mean of the raw Finometer channel, and HR was calculated as 60/period from the ECG signal. The spirometer measured respiratory flow, with the resulting inspired minute ventilation (V̇I) calculated as the product of respiratory rate and inspired volume (calculated as the integral of the inspired flow). The gas analyzer measured CO2 and O2 in %, and PETCO2 and PETO2 were calculated and corrected for body temperature, atmospheric pressure, and saturated with water vapor (BTPS; ~669 mmHg PATM in Calgary, 1130 m). Using standardized TCD insonation procedures (Willie et al., 2011), we located and measured beat‐by‐beat cerebral blood velocity (CBV) through the PCA. The PCA was insonated on either the right or left side of the cranium, dependent upon the quality of the transtemporal acoustic window, allowing for the accurate measurement of beat‐by‐beat changes in CBV. Aside from accepted insonation criteria (e.g., probe placement, depth, mean velocity), a series of standardized techniques and functional tests (e.g., carotid compression and visual stimulation (VS)) were also used to confirm PCA insonation (Willie et al., 2011). Using TCD, NVC magnitude through the PCA can be measured as the change in CBV in response to VS, owing to the perfusion territory of the PCA within the occipital cortex, where visual processing occurs (Phillips et al., 2016; Willie et al., 2011).

Protocol

Following recruitment and pre‐screening, participants reported to the lab for a ~ 2‐h protocol between 10:00 am and 8:00 pm. Participants sat in a dimly lit, quiet room for 5‐min with their eyes closed to reach steady‐state before 1‐min of relaxed Δ 0 Torr PETCO2 baseline (BL) data were recorded. Following Δ 0 Torr PETCO2 BL, a standardized NVC assessment was carried out. NVC assessment involved a series of five intermittent 30‐s on/off visual stimulus (VS) trials using a flashing strobe light (6 Hz; Apple iPhone), held approximately 15 cm directly in front of the participant's eyes. Two step‐wise hypocapnic interventions, Δ‐5 and Δ‐10 Torr PETCO2, were then performed in a randomized order. Individuals hyperventilated until their PETCO2 was at the targeted value from their respective normocapnic PETCO2 (Δ 0 Torr PETCO2). Between 0, Δ‐5, and Δ‐10 Torr PETCO2, participants were coached to increase or decrease ventilation until they reached the desired PETCO2, which was maintained throughout the protocol with verbal cues as needed to maintain their PETCO2 at ±1 Torr for the duration of the NVC trial. An initial 1‐min BL was collected for each participant at each condition. The mean of this BL was used to compare with the average peak and mean of the five 30‐s intervals of eyes open during the VS intervention. The Henderson–Hasselbalch equation was utilized to estimate pHa in each participant from PETCO2 and normative [bicarbonate] values in Calgary (Krapf et al., 1991; Zouboules et al., 2018). Participants kept their eyes closed throughout the protocol unless told to open them during the VS for NVC assessment. The schematic of the protocol is illustrated in Figure 1a, with a representative NVC tracing in Figure 1b.
FIGURE 1

Protocol schematic and sample tracing. (a) Protocol schematic. There was a total of five 30‐s strobe light trials at resting PETCO2 and both hypocapnic conditions. Breathing was coached during each intervention to reach targeted PETCO2 (‐5 and ‐10 Torr). The order of hyperventilation and heavy hyperventilation trials was randomized between participants. (b) Raw tracing during one set of five light stimuli trials in a single participant. Visual stimulation was elicited with a 6 Hz strobe light, six inches from their eyes. Grey shaded regions denote periods of baseline and rest between VS trials with eyes closed

Protocol schematic and sample tracing. (a) Protocol schematic. There was a total of five 30‐s strobe light trials at resting PETCO2 and both hypocapnic conditions. Breathing was coached during each intervention to reach targeted PETCO2 (‐5 and ‐10 Torr). The order of hyperventilation and heavy hyperventilation trials was randomized between participants. (b) Raw tracing during one set of five light stimuli trials in a single participant. Visual stimulation was elicited with a 6 Hz strobe light, six inches from their eyes. Grey shaded regions denote periods of baseline and rest between VS trials with eyes closed

Data analysis

All data were collected using a 16‐channel PowerLab system with a sampling frequency of 200 Hz (PowerLab/16SP ML880; AD Instruments; ADI) and analyzed offline using commercially available software (LabChart Pro software v8.0), later analyzed offline using Microsoft Excel and Sigma Plot (SigmaPlot v14, Systat Software, Inc.).

Baseline data

One‐factor repeated measures ANOVA (1F RM ANOVAs) was used to assess for any significant differences in BL variables for each gas trial (Table 1). When significant F‐ratios were detected, Student–Newman–Keuls post hoc tests were used for pair‐wise comparisons.
TABLE 1

Cardiorespiratory and cerebrovascular parameters of all participants during baseline across each condition. Heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were not significantly different between each condition. Inspired minute ventilation (V̇I) increased with each intervention, with concomitant increases in PETO2. In addition, partial pressure of end‐tidal CO2 (PETCO2), posterior cerebral artery velocity (PCAv), PCA conductance (PCAcvc), significantly decreased with each intervention compared to Δ 0 Torr condition

VariableΔ 0 Torr PETCO2 Δ‐5 Torr PETCO2 Δ‐10 Torr PETCO2
HR (min−1)76.9 ± 6.176.4 ± 12.181.5 ± 11.9
MAP (mmHg)102.9 ± 11.8102.4 ± 12.6103.3 ± 9.3
PCAv (cm/s)39.3 ± 8.636.2 ± 7.3* 30.7 ± 6.4* ,
PCAcvc (cm/s/mmHg)0.44 ± 0.090.40 ± 0.09* 0.35 ± 0.07* ,
I (L/min)12.9 ± 2.815.7 ± 3.3* 20.6 ± 5.7* ,
PETO2 (Torr)84.2 ± 7.087.9 ± 7.3* 102.9 ± 5.4* ,
PETCO2 (Torr)36.7 ± 3.231.6 ± 3.9* 26.0 ± 4.0* ,
Estimated pHa7.43 ± 0.047.46 ± 0.06* 7.58 ± 0.08* ,

Indicates a significant difference from Δ 0.

Indicates a significant difference between Δ‐5 and Δ‐10 Torr PETCO2 interventions. Values are presented as mean ± SD.

Cardiorespiratory and cerebrovascular parameters of all participants during baseline across each condition. Heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were not significantly different between each condition. Inspired minute ventilation (V̇I) increased with each intervention, with concomitant increases in PETO2. In addition, partial pressure of end‐tidal CO2 (PETCO2), posterior cerebral artery velocity (PCAv), PCA conductance (PCAcvc), significantly decreased with each intervention compared to Δ 0 Torr condition Indicates a significant difference from Δ 0. Indicates a significant difference between Δ‐5 and Δ‐10 Torr PETCO2 interventions. Values are presented as mean ± SD.

NVC responses

From the raw and derived mean PCAv channel, NVC magnitude was analyzed using four distinct metrics: (a) peak, the highest PCAv during each VS trial, wherever it occurred, compared with BL (i.e., ΔPCAv; averaged for all five trials, within‐individual), (b) time‐to‐peak, from the onset of VS to the visually identified peak, (c) mean, the average PCAv across the entire VS trial, compared with BL (i.e., ΔPCAv; averaged for all five trials, within‐individual), and (d) total area under the curve (tAUC), the combined tAUC of the 30‐s VS, compared with a 30‐s pre‐VS BL (averaged for all five trials, within‐individual). Paired t tests were utilized to assess NVC magnitude by comparing BL and VS in each NVC metric for each gas trial to confirm the presence of an NVC response.

Comparison of NVC responses

Last, 1F RM ANOVAs were utilized to assess ΔPCAv magnitude between Δ 0, Δ‐5, and Δ‐10 Torr PETCO2 for each NVC metric (i.e., peak, time‐to‐peak, mean, and tAUC). In all cases, significant differences were assumed at p < 0.05. All tests fulfilled the parametric assumptions of normal distribution and equal variance, with the exception of HR and PETCO2 during BL (Table 1), where paired t‐tests were performed on ranks (i.e., non‐parametric).

RESULTS

Participants

A total of 22 participants were recruited for the protocol. Five participant data files were either incomplete or were excluded from analysis due to some combination of: (a) Δ PCAv falling out of the 1.5× interquartile range (i.e., statistical outlier), (b) a non‐responsive PCA in normoxia, (c) withdrawal from discomfort, feeling ill from hyperventilation and/or headache from the TCD headpiece, (d) inability to target PETCO2 with coached hyperventilation, and/or (e) poor signal quality in hypocapnia. A total of 17 participants (5 males and 12 females) were included for final data analysis. These participants had a mean age of 23.2 ± 3.8 and a mean body mass index of 23.2 ± 2.9 kg/m2. BL cardiorespiratory values are reported in (Table 1). At Δ 0, Torr PETCO2 participants had an average HR of 76.9 ± 6.1 BPM, which was not significantly different than 76.4 ± 12.1 and 81.5 ± 11.9 during Δ‐5 and Δ‐10 Torr PETCO2 conditions, respectively (BPM; p = 0.110). MAP was not significantly different between Δ 0, Δ‐5, and Δ‐10 Torr PETCO2 conditions (mmHg; p = 0.726, see Table 1). MAP did not significantly change between each BL period and its corresponding VS (p > 0.05), confirming no concomitant effects on CBV from changes in MAP (and thus conductance; e.g., Battisti‐Charbonney et al., 2011). Because participants were coached to hyperventilate, their V̇I increased between the Δ 0, Δ‐5, and Δ‐10 Torr PETCO2 conditions from 12.9 ± 2.8 to 15.7 ± 3.3 and 20.6 ± 5.7, respectively (L/min; p < 0.001). Resting (Δ 0) PETCO2 levels were 36.7 ± 3.2 Torr. In a randomized order, these levels were coached to Δ‐5 and Δ‐10 Torr PETCO2 (p < 0.001). Δ‐5 Torr PETCO2 had a mean BL of 31.6 ± 3.9 Torr and Δ‐10 Torr PETCO2 had a mean BL of 26.0 ± 4.0 Torr. During normocapnia, we estimated that participants had a pHa of 7.43 ± 0.04, with each graded step of hypocapnia increasing estimated pHa, with Δ‐5 Torr PETCO2 having an estimated pHa of 7.46 ± 0.06 and Δ‐10 Torr PETCO2 having an estimated pHa of 7.58 ± 0.08. There were no significant differences (<±2 Torr) in PETCO2 between BL, VS or across the entire VS protocol (p > 0.05), confirming that PETCO2 was relatively well‐maintained at target values throughout the assessment of NVC. Last, because participants were coached to hyperventilate, their PETO2 increased between the Δ 0, Δ‐5, and Δ‐10 Torr PETCO2 conditions from 84.2 ± 7.0 to 87.9 ± 7.3 and 102.9 ± 5.4, respectively (Torr; p < 0.001).

NVC analysis

Assessment of PCAv

A near‐even split of left and right PCAs were used, with nine left PCAs and eight right PCAs. Mean values of BL PCAv during Δ 0 PETCO2, Δ‐5 PETCO2, and Δ‐10 PETCO2 were 39.3 ± 8.6, 36.2 ± 7.3, and 30.7 ± 6.4 (cm/s; p = 0.001), respectively. A reduction in BL suggests the vasoconstriction resulting from relative hypocapnia, as expected. Despite reductions in BL PCAv, an NVC response was still preserved. Figure 1b illustrates a sample tracing of one participant's derived mean PCAv over the course of one intervention and the corresponding NVC response to VS. A significant NVC response was elicited during normo‐ and hypocapnic conditions across each NVC metric (see Figure 2).
FIGURE 2

PCAv at baseline (BL) and during visual stimuli (strobe) in all three conditions (Δ0, Δ‐5, Δ‐10). (a–c) Absolute PCAv at BL compared with peak PCAv during visual stimulation across each condition. (d–f) Absolute mean PCAv at BL compared with mean PCAv during visual stimulation across each condition. (g–i) Absolute PCAv tAUC during BL compared with PCAv tAUC during visual stimulation. PCAv peak represents visually identified peak within each of the five strobe light stimulation. PCAv mean was collected from a total average of strobe light sections. Values are presented as mean ± SD. (*) indicates values significantly different from baseline (p < 0.001). These data confirm the presence of an NVC response under each condition, for each NVC analysis metric

PCAv at baseline (BL) and during visual stimuli (strobe) in all three conditions (Δ0, Δ‐5, Δ‐10). (a–c) Absolute PCAv at BL compared with peak PCAv during visual stimulation across each condition. (d–f) Absolute mean PCAv at BL compared with mean PCAv during visual stimulation across each condition. (g–i) Absolute PCAv tAUC during BL compared with PCAv tAUC during visual stimulation. PCAv peak represents visually identified peak within each of the five strobe light stimulation. PCAv mean was collected from a total average of strobe light sections. Values are presented as mean ± SD. (*) indicates values significantly different from baseline (p < 0.001). These data confirm the presence of an NVC response under each condition, for each NVC analysis metric Figure 2a–c illustrate each of the 1‐min BLs and the corresponding intervention's peak PCAv (p < 0.001). Figure 2a illustrates a PCAv change from 39.3 ± 8.6 cm/s to 50.0 ± 10.2 cm/s (Δ 10.7 ± 3.4 cm/s) during Δ 0 PETCO2. Figure 2b illustrates a PCAv change from 36.2 ± 7.3 cm/s to 45.3 ± 8.7 cm/s (Δ 9.1 ± 3.5 cm/s) during Δ‐5 PETCO2. Figure 2c illustrates a PCAv change from 30.7 ± 6.4 cm/s to 40.00 ± 7.9 cm/s (Δ 9.3 ± 2.6 cm/s) during Δ‐10 PETCO2. Figure 2d–f illustrates a 1‐min BL of each intervention to its corresponding mean PCAv (p < 0.01). Figure 2d illustrates a PCAv from 39.3 ± 8.6 to 44.3 ± 9.0 cm/s (Δ 5.0 ± 2.2 cm/s) during Δ 0 PETCO2. Figure 2e illustrates a mean PCAv from 36.2 ± 7.3 to 40.3 ± 7.5 cm/s (Δ 4.2 ± 2.7 cm/s) during Δ‐5 PETCO2. Figure 2f illustrates a mean PCAv from 30.7 ± 6.4 to 35.6 ± 7.0 cm/s (Δ 3.7 ± 4.91 cm/s) during Δ‐10 PETCO2. Similar to the mean Δ PCAv, there were increases in AUC Δ PCAv during each VS (p < 0.001; Figure 2g–i). Figure 2g illustrates the AUC PCAv from 1177.7 ± 266.4 to 1333.2 ± 273.8 cm/s2 (Δ 155.6 ± 81.6 cm/s) during Δ 0 PETCO2. Figure 2h illustrates the AUC PCAv from 1092.7 ± 233.0 to 1226.3 ± 230.4 cm/s (Δ 126.6 ± 74.0 cm/s) during Δ‐5 PETCO2. Figure 2i illustrates the AUC PCAv from 914.4 ± 218.6 to 1077.4 ± 212.8 cm/s (Δ 151.7 ± 74.9 cm/s) during Δ‐10 PETCO2.

Comparison of NVC responses in hypocapnia

A comparison of response magnitude for each NVC metric is illustrated in Figure 3. A small but significant decrease in Δ peak PCAv was observed between Δ 0 and the Δ‐5 and Δ‐10 Torr PETCO2 conditions (p = 0.044; see Figure 3a). However, no further differences were observed for Δ peak PCAv response magnitude between Δ‐5 and Δ‐10 Torr PETCO2 interventions (p = 0.736). In addition, time‐to‐peak between the three CO2 trials (normocapnia, ‐5 and ‐10 Torr) was 14.5 ± 3.6, 13.4 ± 2.9, and 12.7 ± 4.2 s, respectively (p = 0.3; data not shown). No significant differences were observed Δ mean PCAv or Δ tAUC PCAv between any of the conditions (p = 0.193 and p = 0.19, respectively; see Figure 3b–c, respectively.
FIGURE 3

A comparison of NVC response magnitude for each metric during normal PETCO2 (Δ0) and both PETCO2 conditions (Δ‐5, Δ‐10). (a) The magnitude (Δ) of the peak change in PCAv from baseline during visual stimulation compared across all three conditions. (b) The magnitude (Δ) of the mean change in PCAv from baseline during visual stimulation compared across all three (c). The magnitude (Δ) of the tAUC in PCAv from baseline during visual stimulation compared across all three conditions. (*) indicates values significantly different from baseline (p < 0.05)

A comparison of NVC response magnitude for each metric during normal PETCO2 (Δ0) and both PETCO2 conditions (Δ‐5, Δ‐10). (a) The magnitude (Δ) of the peak change in PCAv from baseline during visual stimulation compared across all three conditions. (b) The magnitude (Δ) of the mean change in PCAv from baseline during visual stimulation compared across all three (c). The magnitude (Δ) of the tAUC in PCAv from baseline during visual stimulation compared across all three conditions. (*) indicates values significantly different from baseline (p < 0.05)

DISCUSSION

We assessed the magnitude of NVC responses to a standardized VS against the background of acute, incremental hypocapnia in 17 healthy participants. Our study revealed a small, but significant decrease in peak NVC response at both Δ‐5 Torr PETCO2 and Δ‐10 Torr PETCO2, while there were no significant reductions in either mean or tAUC NVC responses between normo‐ and hypocapnic conditions. The results of this study demonstrate that NVC is remarkably stable during acute respiratory alkalosis. In addition, this study illustrates the complexity of interpreting the NVC response and highlights the need to perform standardized quantification metrics to assess NVC (e.g., peak, average, and tAUC) to assess the comprehensive temporal and special NVC response.

The effects of hypocapnia on NVC magnitude

This study is one of the few that has investigated the isolated effects of acute hypocapnia and respiratory alkalosis on the NVC response, and the only study that introduced the interventions of incremental, acute hypocapnic steps without the presence of confounding variables in a laboratory setting. These results confirm findings from Szabo et al. (2011), who controlled participants’ ventilation instead of PETCO2, showing that hypocapnia blunts the peak NVC response at ~Δ‐10 Torr PETCO2. The results of the present study used a more specific control of PETCO2, ensuring greater control of the hypocapnic stimulus, revealing a significant decrease in peak PCAv response during Δ‐5 Torr PETCO2 with no further reduction at Δ‐10 Torr PETCO2, compared to normocapnia. However, we did not observe a similar trend in the mean PCAv or tAUC response magnitudes (Figure 3b,c), which showed no significant difference between hyperventilation interventions. Aside from demonstrating the relative stability of NVC in acute respiratory alkalosis, our data suggest that it is important to utilize standardized metrics in assessing NVC magnitude, such that meaningful comparisons can be made between studies. Similar to the present study, Leacy et al. (2018) measured peak, mean, and tAUC NVC response magnitudes during incremental ascent to 4240 m. In contrast, Szabo et al. (2011) exclusively reported on peak PCAv response during VS. The NVC response is complex due to the diversity of mediators, pathways, and redundant mechanisms which regulate vessel tone and the hemodynamic response, such as neurons, astrocytes, and endothelial cells (Attwell et al., 2010). Incorporating a standardized procedure for data analysis when investigating NVC might allow greater comparability between studies (Squair et al., 2020).

Potential mechanisms

The largest contributor to the NVC response appears to be neuronal NO, which when inhibited pharmacologically, decreased neurovascular reactivity by an average of 64% across 11 in vivo animal studies (Hosford & Gourine, 2019). A more recent study found that pharmacological NOS inhibition in humans decreased the peak NVC response ~30%, while having no effect on the mean NVC response, further illustrating multiple mechanisms underlying NVC (Hoiland et al., 2020). In addition, Fathi et al. (2011) found that during in vitro assessment of human cerebral microvascular endothelial cells, hypocapnia significantly reduced NO production from endothelial cells, while astrocyte‐mediated NO production was not affected. However, this later study was performed in an isohydric hypocapnic cell culture with a controlled pH (7.36–7.4), thus offering little insight into the effects of acute hypocapnia in vivo, where an acid–base disturbance is evident. Despite BL cerebral blood flow being lower with graded hypocapnia (see Table 1 and Figure 2), NVC from each new BL value was mostly unchanged with hypocapnia, aside from a mild but significant reduction in the transient peak (but not time‐to‐peak), potentially affected by hypocapnia‐mediated acute respiratory alkalosis. The results reported here and by Szabo et al. (2011), who measured capillary blood pH, implicate acute alkalosis as an underlying mechanism for the blunted peak NVC magnitude, however mild. Without similar attenuation for the time‐to‐peak, mean, and AUC NVC magnitude, the extended NVC response beyond the transient peak is likely controlled through differential mechanisms not impacted by acute changes in PCO2 or pHa. Specifically, the initial rise in PCAv during VS is thought to be neural feedforward NO signaling pathways, whereas feedback metabolic signaling is thought to contribute to the longer‐term, sustained elevation in PCAv (Hoiland et al., 2020; Iadecola et al., 2017; Phillips et al., 2016). Thus, the acute hypocapnia and associated respiratory alkalosis only mildly affected the initial feed‐forward NVC response, whereas the sustained feedback from metabolism‐dependent signaling appeared unaffected, given the overall NVC response was stable between CO2 levels. Studies at HA, where individuals are chronically hypocapnic, show no difference in NVC response (Caldwell et al., 2017; Leacy et al., 2018). During acute hypocapnia individuals are alkalotic, whereas during chronic hypocapnia, like that experienced with prolonged sojourns at altitude, the kidneys compensate for the respiratory alkalosis with a relative metabolic acidosis, returning blood pH back toward normal values (Barker et al., 1957; Leacy et al., 2018; Zouboules et al., 2018). Additionally, the hypoxia and hypocapnia experienced at HA may have antagonistic physiological effects, thus mitigating the blunted NVC response to hypocapnia due to the vasodilatory effects of hypoxia. Previous studies have also investigated the effect of hypercapnia on NVC, but found no changes in the NVC response (Rosengarten et al., 2003). These findings may suggest that the effects of CO2 and acid–base disturbance on NVC may be direction‐dependent. In addition, the relatively small decrease in peak ΔPCAv observed in the present study suggests that acute changes in PCO2 and pHa play only a small role in influencing the NVC response from a BL and appear to affect the transient peak response only.

Methodological considerations

In the present study, estimations of PaCO2 were made from PETCO2, which is less accurate than arterial blood sampling, although PaCO2 is limited to point measurements with arterial blood draws. Previous studies found that PETCO2 can reliably estimate PaCO2 in healthy individuals, without the need for specialized techniques or risk of infection and participant discomfort (Mcswain et al., 2010; Petersson & Glenny, 2014; Tymko et al., 2015). Specifically, measures of end‐tidal PCO2 (PETCO2) during hyperventilation are reflected in PaCO2 (e.g., Krapf et al., 1991; Szabo et al., 2011). Thus, PaCO2 values can be estimated using non‐invasive PETCO2 measurements (Tymko et al., 2015). During normocapnia, using mean bicarbonate values obtained in our lab, we estimated that participants had a pHa of ~7.43 ± 0.04, similar to normal physiological levels. Each graded step of hypocapnia increased pHa, with Δ‐5 Torr PETCO2 having an estimated pHa of ~7.46 ± 0.06 and Δ‐10 Torr PETCO2 having an estimated pHa of ~7.58 ± 0.08, suggesting appreciable acute respiratory alkalosis in our participants. We employed coached voluntary hyperventilation to achieve our graded hypocapnic steps. Although this method was successful in eliciting our desired intervention, PETO2 was increased slightly during hyperventilation. However, the increases in PETO2 were small (~15 Torr), and within the physiological range (85–105 Torr; see Table 1). Indeed, increases in PETO2 will theoretically cause vasoconstriction, in the same direction as the decreases in PETCO2. However, other studies have suggested that although there may be some interaction between PO2 and PCO2 (Mardimae et al., 2012), the known reductions in CBF in the hyperoxic direction are small (e.g., Willie et al., 2012). Coached hyperventilation is a standard technique utilized in studies investigating the effects of hypocapnia on CBF (e.g., Willie et al., 2012), and there is no other way to reduce CO2 non‐invasively in humans. Thus, although these small increases in PETO2 may have contributed to BL vasoconstriction in hypocapnia (see Table 1), the influence of these concomitant changes in blood gases on CBF are in the same direction, and likely negligible. Percent change values were not used in the present study, opting instead to present raw data (absolute and deltas), given that as expected, BL PCAv was affected by prevailing PETCO2 in each trial. Percent changes from lower BL variables in hypocapnia would likely over‐estimate observed changes, even if absolute ΔPCAv are unchanged. Thus, Szabo et al.'s study (2011), who only reported %‐changes in peak responses, may have reported exaggerated responses in relative hypocapnia compared to normocapnia. Using mean responses across the VS might be a better representation of ΔPCAv than peak, since it would account for the entire response during the VS. Szabo et al. (2011) only reported peak responses from the first 5‐s of the NVC response, while the present study used peaks from the entire 30‐s interval, wherever they occurred, similar to the previous literature (Leacy et al., 2018). However, the peak NVC response occurred early in the VS periods, and given that the peak response was reduced significantly, but not mean or tAUC PCAv response, suggests the possibility that acid–base disturbance may act only on specific mechanisms responsible for the immediate visually evoked hemodynamic response (e.g., Hoiland et al., 2020).

Potential significance

Developing a clear understanding of how blood gas perturbations and acid–base disturbances affect cerebrovascular control has obvious application to both high‐altitude acclimatization (e.g., Caldwell et al., 2017; Leacy et al., 2018) and during acute or chronic alterations in respiratory gases (e.g., Hoiland et al., 2016). In addition, NVC is impaired in several pathologies, including traumatic head injuries and stroke (Hinzman et al., 2014; Lin et al., 2011). Thus, elucidating the relationship between CBF regulation and hypocapnia and/or alkalosis could improve our fundamental understanding of CBF regulation in health and disease. In addition, the methods of eliciting and analyzing NVC responses vary between studies. Future studies should follow a standardized methodology to improve comparability between studies. In our study, alterations in peak, mean, and tAUC NVC in the PCA during VS resulted in varied deductions to the NVC response during hypocapnic conditions. Peak responses may be affected by acute alkalosis, while the sustained response observed with mean and tAUC analysis are not, suggesting differential and redundant mechanisms mediating NVC (e.g., Hoiland et al., 2020). The differences in outcome measures reported here depending upon analytical technique highlight the importance of a standardized model of studying NVC and quantification.

CONCLUSION

We aimed to isolate the effects of step‐wise acute hypocapnia and respiratory alkalosis on NVC magnitude. We observed a small but statistically significant reduction in NVC magnitude in peak PCAv, during both Δ‐5 Torr PETCO2 and Δ‐10 Torr PETCO2 interventions. However, no further reductions were observed between Δ‐5 Torr PETCO2 and Δ‐10 Torr PETCO2, suggesting a floor effect in acute respiratory alkalosis. In contrast, using mean and AUC PCAv metrics, there were no significant differences in NVC magnitude between BL and the two hypocapnic conditions. Our data illustrate that there may be differences in conclusions drawn depending on the analysis metric utilized. Thus, investigators are encouraged to utilize a more comprehensive and standardized analysis approach when assessing NVC in order to obtain a comprehensive overview of the NVC response.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None to report.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

TJB, JKL, JRGK, AC, JRD, and ALM ‐ data collection and analysis; TAD, KDOH, NGJ, and RJAW ‐ study design and data interpretation; TAD ‐ funding, lab equipment support, student training; all co‐authors ‐ intellectual contributions and edited and approved the final manuscript.
  35 in total

1.  The renal response in man to acute experimental respiratory alkalosis and acidosis.

Authors:  E S BARKER; R B SINGER; J R ELKINTON; J K CLARK
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1957-04       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Tone-dependent vascular responses to astrocyte-derived signals.

Authors:  Víctor M Blanco; Javier E Stern; Jessica A Filosa
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2008-05-02       Impact factor: 4.733

3.  Renal reactivity: acid-base compensation during incremental ascent to high altitude.

Authors:  Shaelynn M Zouboules; Hailey C Lafave; Ken D O'Halloran; Tom D Brutsaert; Heidi E Nysten; Cassandra E Nysten; Craig D Steinback; Mingma T Sherpa; Trevor A Day
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-10-28       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Visually evoked blood flow response assessed by simultaneous two-channel transcranial Doppler using flow velocity averaging.

Authors:  M Sturzenegger; D W Newell; R Aaslid
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Impaired neurovascular coupling in ischaemic stroke patients with large or small vessel disease.

Authors:  W H Lin; Q Hao; B Rosengarten; W H Leung; K S Wong
Journal:  Eur J Neurol       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 6.089

6.  Mechanisms of ATP-mediated vasodilation in humans: modest role for nitric oxide and vasodilating prostaglandins.

Authors:  Anne R Crecelius; Brett S Kirby; Jennifer C Richards; Leora J Garcia; Wyatt F Voyles; Dennis G Larson; Gary J Luckasen; Frank A Dinenno
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 4.733

7.  The cerebrovascular response to carbon dioxide in humans.

Authors:  A Battisti-Charbonney; J Fisher; J Duffin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 8.  Sugar for the brain: the role of glucose in physiological and pathological brain function.

Authors:  Philipp Mergenthaler; Ute Lindauer; Gerald A Dienel; Andreas Meisel
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 13.837

9.  Stability in neurovascular function at 3800m.

Authors:  Hannah G Caldwell; Philip N Ainslie; Lindsay A Ellis; Aaron A Phillips; Daniela Flück
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2017-09-28

10.  Nitric oxide is fundamental to neurovascular coupling in humans.

Authors:  Ryan L Hoiland; Hannah G Caldwell; Connor A Howe; Daniela Nowak-Flück; Benjamin S Stacey; Damian M Bailey; Julian F R Paton; Daniel J Green; Mypinder S Sekhon; David B Macleod; Philip N Ainslie
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  1 in total

1.  Variation within the visually evoked neurovascular coupling response of the posterior cerebral artery is not influenced by age or sex.

Authors:  Jack K Leacy; Emily M Johnson; Lauren R Lavoie; Diane N Macilwraith; Megan Bambury; Jason A Martin; Eric F Lucking; Andrea M Linares; Gurkarn Saran; Dwayne P Sheehan; Nishan Sharma; Trevor A Day; Ken D O'Halloran
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2022-06-30
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.