Literature DB >> 34350424

Autonomic Activity and Surgical Flow Disruptions in Healthcare Providers during Cardiac Surgery.

Lauren R Kennedy-Metz1, Andrea Bizzego2, Gianluca Esposito3, Roger D Dias4, Marco A Zenati1, Cesare Furlanello5.   

Abstract

Cardiac surgery represents a complex sociotechnical environment relying on a combination of technical and non-technical team-based expertise. Surgical flow disruptions (SFDs) may be influenced by a variety of sources, including social, environmental, and emotional factors affecting healthcare providers (HCPs). Many of these factors can be readily observed, except for emotional factors (i.e. distress), which represents an underappreciated yet critical source of SFDs. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the sensitivity of autonomic activity metrics to detect an SFD during cardiac surgery. We integrated heart rate variability (HRV) analysis with observation-based annotations to allow data triangulation. Following a critical medication administration error by the anesthesiologist in-training, data sources were consulted to identify events precipitating this near-miss event. Using pyphysio, an open-source physiological signal processing package, we analyzed the attending anesthesiologists' HRV, specifically the low frequency (LF) power, high frequency (HF) power, LF/HF ratio, standard deviation of normal-to-normal (SDNN), and root mean square of the successive differences (RMSSD) as indicators of ANS activity. A heightened SNS response in the attending anesthesiologists' physiological arousal was observed as elevations in LF power and LF/HF ratio, as well as depressions in HF power, SDNN, and RMSSD prior to the near-miss event. The attending anesthesiologist subjectively confirmed a state of high distress induced by task-irrelevant environmental factors during this time. Qualitative analysis of audio/video recordings objectively revealed that the autonomic nervous system (ANS) activation detected was temporally associated with an argument over operating room management. This study confirms that it is possible to recognize detrimental psychophysiological influences in cardiac surgery procedures via advanced HRV analysis. To our knowledge, ours is the first such case demonstrating ANS activity coinciding with strong self-reported emotion during live surgery using HRV. Despite extensive experience in the cardiac OR, transient but intense emotional changes may have the potential to disrupt attention processes in even the most experienced HCP. A primary implication of this work is the possibility to detect real-time ANS activity, which could enable personalized interventions to proactively mitigate downstream adverse events. Additional studies on our large database of surgical cases are underway and new studies are actively being planned to confirm this preliminary observation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiac surgery; cognitive engineering; emotion recognition; heart rate variability; neuroergonomics

Year:  2020        PMID: 34350424      PMCID: PMC8329755          DOI: 10.1109/cogsima49017.2020.9216076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Conf Cogn Comput Asp Situat Manag


  18 in total

1.  Effectiveness and efficiency of root cause analysis in medicine.

Authors:  Albert W Wu; Angela K M Lipshutz; Peter J Pronovost
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Cardiac Measures of Cognitive Workload: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ashley M Hughes; Gabriella M Hancock; Shannon L Marlow; Kimberly Stowers; Eduardo Salas
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 2.888

4.  Reference values for short-term resting-state heart rate variability in healthy adults: Results from the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health-ELSA-Brasil study.

Authors:  Eduardo Miranda Dantas; Andrew Haddon Kemp; Rodrigo Varejão Andreão; Valdo José Dias da Silva; André Russowsky Brunoni; Rosangela Akemi Hoshi; Isabela Martins Bensenor; Paulo Andrade Lotufo; Antonio Luiz Pinho Ribeiro; José Geraldo Mill
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Systematic review of measurement tools to assess surgeons' intraoperative cognitive workload.

Authors:  R D Dias; M C Ngo-Howard; M T Boskovski; M A Zenati; S J Yule
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Disruptions in surgical flow and their relationship to surgical errors: an exploratory investigation.

Authors:  Douglas A Wiegmann; Andrew W ElBardissi; Joseph A Dearani; Richard C Daly; Thoralf M Sundt
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 7.  An Overview of Heart Rate Variability Metrics and Norms.

Authors:  Fred Shaffer; J P Ginsberg
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2017-09-28

8.  Validity of the Polar V800 heart rate monitor to measure RR intervals at rest.

Authors:  David Giles; Nick Draper; William Neil
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-12-26       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 9.  Stress and Heart Rate Variability: A Meta-Analysis and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Hye-Geum Kim; Eun-Jin Cheon; Dai-Seg Bai; Young Hwan Lee; Bon-Hoon Koo
Journal:  Psychiatry Investig       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 2.505

Review 10.  Human Emotion Recognition: Review of Sensors and Methods.

Authors:  Andrius Dzedzickis; Artūras Kaklauskas; Vytautas Bucinskas
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.