Literature DB >> 34350407

Automated Identification of Orthopedic Implants on Radiographs Using Deep Learning.

Ravi Patel1, Elizabeth H E Thong1, Vineet Batta1, Anil Anthony Bharath1, Darrel Francis1, James Howard1.   

Abstract

Accurate identification of metallic orthopedic implant design is important for preoperative planning of revision arthroplasty. Surgical records of implant models are frequently unavailable. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a convolutional neural network for identifying orthopedic implant models using radiographs. In this retrospective study, 427 knee and 922 hip unilateral anteroposterior radiographs, including 12 implant models from 650 patients, were collated from an orthopedic center between March 2015 and November 2019 to develop classification networks. A total of 198 images paired with autogenerated image masks were used to develop a U-Net segmentation network to automatically zero-mask around the implants on the radiographs. Classification networks processing original radiographs, and two-channel conjoined original and zero-masked radiographs, were ensembled to provide a consensus prediction. Accuracies of five senior orthopedic specialists assisted by a reference radiographic gallery were compared with network accuracy using McNemar exact test. When evaluated on a balanced unseen dataset of 180 radiographs, the final network achieved a 98.9% accuracy (178 of 180) and 100% top-three accuracy (180 of 180). The network performed superiorly to all five specialists (76.1% [137 of 180] median accuracy and 85.6% [154 of 180] best accuracy; both P < .001), with robustness to scan quality variation and difficult to distinguish implants. A neural network model was developed that outperformed senior orthopedic specialists at identifying implant models on radiographs; real-world application can now be readily realized through training on a broader range of implants and joints, supported by all code and radiographs being made freely available. Supplemental material is available for this article. Keywords: Neural Networks, Skeletal-Appendicular, Knee, Hip, Computer Applications-General (Informatics), Prostheses, Technology Assess-ment, Observer Performance © RSNA, 2021. 2021 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34350407      PMCID: PMC8328106          DOI: 10.1148/ryai.2021200183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell        ISSN: 2638-6100


  15 in total

1.  Stability problems with artificial neural networks and the ensemble solution.

Authors:  P Cunningham; J Carney; S Jacob
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.326

2.  Training neural network classifiers for medical decision making: the effects of imbalanced datasets on classification performance.

Authors:  Maciej A Mazurowski; Piotr A Habas; Jacek M Zurada; Joseph Y Lo; Jay A Baker; Georgia D Tourassi
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2007-12-27

3.  Revision total hip and knee arthroplasty implant identification: implications for use of Unique Device Identification 2012 AAHKS member survey results.

Authors:  Natalia A Wilson; Megan Jehn; Sally York; Charles M Davis
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Detecting total hip replacement prosthesis design on plain radiographs using deep convolutional neural network.

Authors:  Alireza Borjali; Antonia F Chen; Orhun K Muratoglu; Mohammad A Morid; Kartik M Varadarajan
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks.

Authors:  Andre Esteva; Brett Kuprel; Roberto A Novoa; Justin Ko; Susan M Swetter; Helen M Blau; Sebastian Thrun
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Machine learning-based identification of hip arthroplasty designs.

Authors:  Yang-Jae Kang; Jun-Il Yoo; Yong-Han Cha; Chan H Park; Jung-Taek Kim
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Automated detection & classification of knee arthroplasty using deep learning.

Authors:  Paul H Yi; Jinchi Wei; Tae Kyung Kim; Haris I Sair; Ferdinand K Hui; Gregory D Hager; Jan Fritz; Julius K Oni
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Cardiac Rhythm Device Identification Using Neural Networks.

Authors:  James P Howard; Louis Fisher; Matthew J Shun-Shin; Daniel Keene; Ahran D Arnold; Yousif Ahmad; Christopher M Cook; James C Moon; Charlotte H Manisty; Zach I Whinnett; Graham D Cole; Daniel Rueckert; Darrel P Francis
Journal:  JACC Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-03-27

9.  Deep Learning to Improve Breast Cancer Detection on Screening Mammography.

Authors:  Li Shen; Laurie R Margolies; Joseph H Rothstein; Eugene Fluder; Russell McBride; Weiva Sieh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 4.996

10.  Improving ultrasound video classification: an evaluation of novel deep learning methods in echocardiography.

Authors:  James P Howard; Jeremy Tan; Matthew J Shun-Shin; Dina Mahdi; Alexandra N Nowbar; Ahran D Arnold; Yousif Ahmad; Peter McCartney; Massoud Zolgharni; Nick W F Linton; Nilesh Sutaria; Bushra Rana; Jamil Mayet; Daniel Rueckert; Graham D Cole; Darrel P Francis
Journal:  J Med Artif Intell       Date:  2020-03-25
View more
  1 in total

1.  Automatic Brand Identification of Orthopedic Implants from Radiographs: Ready for the Next Step?

Authors:  Merel Huisman; Nikolas Lessmann
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2022-03-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.