| Literature DB >> 34350100 |
L Pradeep1, Ganganna Kokila2, Pillai Arun Gopinathan3, Shwetha Guruswamy4, Salroo Humaira Nazir5, Ananjan Chatterjee6.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: In forensic science, the determination of age plays a vital role in the identification of bodies and persons associated with crimes. Teeth are frequently better conserved than any other human remains, so their use for identifying age at death is vital. The root portion of the teeth is covered by a thin calcified layer called cementum, the annulations of which is considered to be helpful in age estimation. The objective of the study was to ascertain and compare the accuracy and efficiency of age estimation between light, polarized, and phase-contrast microscopy in the ground and decalcified sections of the tooth stained with hematoxylin and eosin by light microscopy and picrosirius red (PSR) by polarized microscopy.Entities:
Keywords: Cemental annulations; phase contrast microscopy; picrosirius red stain; polarized microscopy
Year: 2021 PMID: 34350100 PMCID: PMC8291094 DOI: 10.4103/JMAU.JMAU_3_20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Microsc Ultrastruct ISSN: 2213-879X
Figure 1Photomicrograph of ground sections showing incremental lines of cementum with measurements under bright field microscopy (×20)
Figure 3Photomicrograph of ground sections showing incremental lines of cementum with measurements under phase contrast microscopy (×20)
Figure 4Photomicrograph of decalcified H and E stained sections showing incremental lines of cementum with measurements under bright field microscopy (×20)
Figure 5Photomicrograph of decalcified Picrosirius red stained incremental lines of cementum with measurements under polarized microscopy (×20)
Calculated age of ground and decalcified sections under different microscopy
| Calculated age by light microscope in ground sections | Calculated age by polarized microscope in ground sections | Calculated age by phase contrast microscope in ground sections | Calculated age by light microscope in decalcified h & e stained sections | Calculated age by polarized microscope in decalcified psr stained sections | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CALCULATED AGE (MEAN±SD) | 35.46±9.51 | 35±8.66 | 37.8±9.54 | 33.16±8.86 | 34.44±9.21 |
| ACTUAL AGE (MEAN±SD) | 38.34±10.60 | 38.34±10.60 | 38.34±10.60 | 38.34±10.60 | 38.34±10.60 |
| Z TEST VALUE | -1.43 | -1.73 | -0.27 | -2.65 | -1.96 |
| P VALUE | 0.15 | 0.08 | 0.79 | 0.01 | 0.05 |
| SIGNIFICANCE | Not significant | Not significant | Not significant | significant | Significant |
| KARL PEARSON’S | 0.9728 | 0.9617 | 0.9863 | 0.9652 | 0.9705 |
| CORRELATION COEFFICIENT (R) (correlation between calculated age & actual age ) | Strong positive correlation | Strong positive correlation | Strong positive correlation | Strong positive correlation | Strong positive correlation |
Graph 1Correlation coefficient between actual age and calculated age in light microscopy of ground sections
Graph 3Correlation coefficient between actual age and calculated age in phase contrast microscopy of ground sections
Graph 4Correlation coefficient between actual age and calculated age in light microscopy of decalcified sections stained with H and E
Graph 5Correlation coefficient between actual age and calculated age in polarized microscopy of decalcified sections stained with Picrosirius red