Literature DB >> 3434997

The effect of thoracic epidural analgesia on postoperative stress and morbidity.

H Hendolin1, J Lahtinen, E Länsimies, T Tuppurainen.   

Abstract

A hundred patients scheduled for cholecystectomy were randomized to either thoracic epidural anaesthesia and analgesia for 24 h with bupivacaine intraoperatively about 100 mg and 15 mg/h thereafter (TEA) for postoperative analgesia, TEA combined with general anaesthesia (low dose fentanyl) (TEA + GA) and general anaesthesia (GA) (low dose fentanyl). During TEA and TEA + GA the arterial pressure was significantly decreased as compared with GA. TEA was associated by an intense haemodilution in comparison with GA. Blood glucose and plasma cortisol responses were significantly suppressed by TEA. The decreases in peripheral blood lymphocyte and eosinophilic counts observed after operation under GA was significantly reduced by TEA. The increase in the neutrophil count was inhibited by TEA but the increase in non-filamented neutrophils was significantly augmented by TEA. The postoperative alleviation of the alteration of the above mentioned parameters by TEA was slightly diminished in the TEA + GA group. However, we found no significant reduction in cardiac dysrhythmias (TEA 7%, TEA + GA 7% and GA 10%), ST-segment depression (TEA 17%), TEA + GA 3.3% and GA 12.5%), wound complication (TEA 3%, TEA + GA 0%, GA 0%), pneumonia (TEA 3%, TEA + GA 3% and GA 0%), subphrenic abscess (TEA 6%, TEA + GA 0%, GA 3%), mortality (TEA 0%, TEA + GA 3%, GA 0%), and urinary tract infect (TEA 17%, TEA + GA 7% and GA 2.5%). Since an equal number of patients in each group, about 30%, suffered one or more of the postoperative complications this epidural analgesia was not effective in reducing postoperative morbidity albeit the significant alleviation of the postoperative stress response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3434997

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Chir Gynaecol        ISSN: 0355-9521


  6 in total

Review 1.  Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials.

Authors:  A Rodgers; N Walker; S Schug; A McKee; H Kehlet; A van Zundert; D Sage; M Futter; G Saville; T Clark; S MacMahon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-12-16

Review 2.  [Cardioprotection by thoracic epidural anesthesia? : meta-analysis].

Authors:  A Gauss; S K Jahn; L H J Eberhart; W Stahl; M Rockemann; M Georgieff; F Wagner; R Meierhenrich
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 3.  The benefits of adding epidural analgesia to general anesthesia: a metaanalysis.

Authors:  Joanne Guay
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Epidural analgesia versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia for pain following intra-abdominal surgery in adults.

Authors:  Jon H Salicath; Emily Cy Yeoh; Michael H Bennett
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-08-30

Review 5.  Epidural local anaesthetics versus opioid-based analgesic regimens for postoperative gastrointestinal paralysis, vomiting and pain after abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Joanne Guay; Mina Nishimori; Sandra Kopp
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-07-16

6.  Incidence of epidural haematoma and neurological injury in cardiovascular patients with epidural analgesia/anaesthesia: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wilhelm Ruppen; Sheena Derry; Henry J McQuay; R Andrew Moore
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2006-09-12       Impact factor: 2.217

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.