| Literature DB >> 34349865 |
Astri Astuti1, Erwinanto Erwinanto1, Muhammad Rizki Akbar1, Erwan Martanto1, Dharmayanti Fransisca Badudu2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy with fluorouracil, adriamycin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) regimen in breast cancer patients may cause myocardial injury and necrosis, thereby attenuating global and regional longitudinal strain (GLS and RLS). It is unclear whether the first chemotherapy cycle would cause GLS and RLS reduction and which segment would be most affected by the chemotherapy. The purpose of the study was to investigate the effect of the first chemotherapy cycle on GLS and RLS reduction.Entities:
Keywords: Breast cancer; Cardiotoxicity; Fluorouracil, adriamycin, and cyclophosphamide regimen; Global longitudinal strain; Regional longitudinal strain
Year: 2021 PMID: 34349865 PMCID: PMC8297038 DOI: 10.14740/cr1229
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiol Res ISSN: 1923-2829
Figure 1Subjects enrolment and assortment.
Baseline Characteristics
| Baseline characteristics | n = 36 |
|---|---|
| Age (years), mean ± SD | 46 ± 9 |
| Weight (kg), mean ± SD | 56 ± 8 |
| Height (m), mean ± SD | 1.54 ± 0.06 |
| BMI (kg/m2), mean ± SD | 23.66 ± 3.04 |
| BSA, mean ± SD | 1.53 ± 0.12 |
| Cancer type, n (%) | |
| Invasive ductal carcinoma mammae | 34 (94) |
| Invasive carcinoma of no specific type | 1 (3) |
| Clear cell carcinoma mammae | 1 (3) |
| Adjuvant, n (%) | 29 (80.6) |
| Neo-adjuvant, n (%) | 7 (19.4) |
| Cardiovascular risk factors, n (%) | |
| Obesity | 12 (33.3) |
| Hypertensive heart disease | 3 (8.3) |
| Hypertension | 3 (8.3) |
| Diabetes mellitus | 0 (0.0) |
| History of anthracycline chemotherapy | 0 (0.0) |
| History of radiotherapy | 0 (0.0) |
| Family history of premature CVD | 0 (0.0) |
| Smoking | 1 (2.8) |
SD: standard deviation; BMI: body mass index; BSA: body surface area; CVD: cardiovascular disease.
Figure 2Worsening of RLS during chemotherapy with anthracyclines regiment. The segments shown in dark blue represented significant worsening of RLS by the t-test. RLS: regional longitudinal strain.
Figure 3The Bland-Altman analysis showing that the difference in GLS value was less than 10% in our center. GLS: global longitudinal strain.
Comparative Study of GLS and LVEF at Baseline and 3 Weeks After the First Chemotherapy Cycle Using T-Test
| Characteristic | Baseline, mean ± SD (%) | 3 weeks, mean ± SD (%) | Difference, mean (95% CI) (%) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLS | -20.7 ± 2.4 | -19.1 ± 2.8 | -1.6 (-2.6 to -0.7) | 0.002* |
| LVEF biplane | 67.8 ± 4.5 | 65.8 ± 5.1 | 2.0 (-0.2 to 4.3) | 0.067 |
*The GLS was reduced significantly after 3 weeks. CI: confidence interval; GLS: global longitudinal strain; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; SD: standard deviation.
Comparison of the RLS Value at Baseline and 3 Weeks After the First Chemotherapy Cycle Using T-Test Analysis
| Segment | Baseline, mean ± SD (%) | 3 weeks, mean ± SD (%) | Difference, mean (95% CI) (%) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basal anterior | -16.8 ± 6.7 | -17.1 ± 6.2 | -0.3 (-2.8 - 2.2) | 0.805 |
| Basal anteroseptal | -15.0 ± 4.8 | -12.1 ± 6.4 | 2.9 (0.7 - 5.2) | 0.013* |
| Basal inferoseptal | -15.8 ± 3.7 | -15.6 ± 3.4 | 0.2 (-1.2 - 1.6) | 0.749 |
| Basal inferior | -17.5 ± 3.6 | -17.3 ± 3.6 | 0.2 (-1.4 - 1.7) | 0.828 |
| Basal inferolateral | -17.9 ± 7.1 | -16.8 ± 6.4 | 1.1 (-1.8 - 4.1) | 0.433 |
| Basal anterolateral | -19.5 ± 3.9 | -17.0 ± 5.7 | 2.5 (0.6 - 4.4) | 0.013* |
| Mid anterior | -19.3 ± 4.4 | -18.1 ± 4.8 | 1.2 (-0.6 - 3.0) | 0.186 |
| Mid anteroseptal | -19.6 ± 4.7 | -18.0 ± 4.2 | 1.6 (-0.3 - 3.6) | 0.092 |
| Mid inferoseptal | -21.1 ± 3.6 | -19.9 ± 3.0 | 1.3 (-0.1 - 2.6) | 0.062 |
| Mid inferior | -20.8 ± 2.9 | -20.3 ± 3.6 | 0.4 (-0.8 - 1.7) | 0.472 |
| Mid inferolateral | -21.5 ± 3.2 | -19.4 ± 3.2 | 2.1 (1.0 - 3.3) | 0.001* |
| Mid anterolateral | -18.9 ± 3.9 | -16.7 ± 5.0 | 2.2 (0.5 - 3.9) | 0.012* |
| Apicoanterior | -24.9 ± 5.1 | -21.0 ± 8.1 | 3.9 (1.3 - 6.5) | 0.004* |
| Apicoseptal | -26.3 ± 5.3 | -23.9 ± 4.6 | 2.3 (0.1 - 4.5) | 0.038* |
| Apicoinferior | -26.9 ± 4.6 | -24.0 ± 5.9 | 3.0 (0.7 - 5.2)) | 0.010* |
| Apicolateral | -24.7 ± 4.5 | -21.4 ± 5.3 | 3.3 (1.0 - 5.5) | 0.005* |
| Apical cap | -25.9 ± 4.2 | -22.6 ± 5.3 | 3.3 (1.2 - 5.3) | 0.003* |
The RLS of the basal anteroseptal, basal anterolateral, mid anterolateral, mid inferolateral, and all apical segments (*P < 0.05) were significantly reduced with the significant decline being found in apicoanterior, basal, and mid anterolateral segments. RLS: regional longitudinal strain; CI: confidence interval; SD: standard deviation.