Literature DB >> 34349856

Prevalence and Molecular Profile of Breast Carcinoma Using Immunohistochemistry Markers in Mexican Women.

Andres Macari1, Pamela Soberanis-Pina2, Edgar Varela-Santoyo2, Marco Antonio Valle-Sanchez2, Jorge Luis Leal-Hidalgo2, Valeria M Torres-Guillen3, Daniel Motola-Kuba2, Jose Manuel Ruiz-Morales2, Rita Dorantes-Heredia1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In Mexico, breast cancer is the leading cause of death by malignant tumors in women aged 20 and older. The World Health Organization estimates that 69% of deaths caused by breast cancer occur in developing countries. Little is known about the prevalence of breast carcinoma in Mexico and its molecular subclassification.
METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study included patients who underwent a mastectomy (single, radical or lumpectomy) or a breast tumor biopsy (core-needle or excisional) from January 2002 to December 2018. The primary purpose of the study was to determine the prevalence and molecular profile of breast in comprehensive cancer center in Mexico and compare our results with those published in the US. This study was approved by our scientific and bioethical committee.
RESULTS: The final analysis included 379 patients. The youngest patient was 23 years old and the oldest patient was 89; the mean age at diagnosis was 54.63 years. Patients of 40 years old or younger accounted for 48 of the cases (12.66%) and those older than 40 accounted for 331 of the cases (87.33%). The molecular subclassification showed luminal A subtype in 139 cases (36.67%), luminal B subtype in 143 cases (37.73%), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive carcinomas in 32 cases (8.44%) and triple-negative carcinomas in 65 cases (17.15%). Diabetes mellitus was present in 43 patients (11.34%), hypertension in 78 patients (20.58%), obesity in 82 patients (21.63%) and 66 patients reported being treated with exogenous hormone therapy (17.41%).
CONCLUSIONS: Breast carcinoma occurs at an earlier age in Mexican women compared to women in the US. Hormone-positive tumors were found to be more prevalent in older patients, while high-grade tumors were more frequently identified in younger patients. Copyright 2021, Macari et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Neoplasm; Obesity; Pathogenesis

Year:  2021        PMID: 34349856      PMCID: PMC8297051          DOI: 10.14740/wjon1392

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Oncol        ISSN: 1920-4531


Introduction

Breast carcinoma is the most frequent type of cancer in women and the second most frequent in the world, according to data from Globocan [1]. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates 1.38 million new cases and 458,000 deaths for 2020 [2]. The National Institute of Statistics and Geography (INEGI) states that breast cancer is the leading cause of death by malignant tumors in Mexican women of 20 years of age or older, and the WHO estimates that 69% of deaths caused by breast carcinoma occur in developing countries [3]. Breast cancer was first molecularly subclassified using DNA microarrays and variation in gene expression allowed the breast carcinoma to be subclassified into four groups: estrogen receptor (ER)+/luminal-like, basal-like, Erb-B2+ and normal breast [4]. The variation between the molecular profile of each tumor and a patient’s clinical outcome was later established [5, 6]. The molecular subclassification was later performed using immunohistochemistry markers, subclassifying the even further into: luminal A, luminal B, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive and triple-negative, with the same statistical significance and clinical outcomes [7, 8], compared with studies done with DNA microarrays. According to the WHO, in 2018, there were 27,283 new cases of breast cancer in Mexico, representing 26% of all types of cancer [1]. There is evidence that Mexican women have a higher prevalence of triple-negative breast carcinomas and an earlier age of onset than is typical in other countries [9]. Little is known about the prevalence and molecular subclassification of breast carcinoma in Mexico, and it is important to determine such prevalence and identify other co-factors (such as age) to improve medical treatment and prognostic values; therefore, we conducted a retrospective analysis.

Materials and Methods

Patients

Patients who underwent a mastectomy (single, radical or lumpectomy) or a breast tumor biopsy (core-needle or excisional) from January 2002 to December 2018 at our institution were eligible for inclusion in this study. Cases were identified and reviewed retrospectively under the microscope and subclassified using immunohistochemistry markers (ER, progesterone receptor (PR), HER2/Neu and Ki-67). A complete medical history was obtained, including the patient’s personal history of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, obesity and exogenous hormone therapy. This study was approved by the institutional Scientific and Bioethical committee (CONBIOETICA-09-CEI-018 2016729 Id: 2020-EXT-475).

Outcomes

The primary goal of the study was to determine the prevalence and molecular profile of breast carcinoma (luminal A, luminal B, HER2-positive and triple-negative) in patients of 40 years of age and younger, as well as patients of above 40 years of age, and determine the association of breast carcinoma with other factors, such as obesity, diabetes mellitus and hypertension.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were grouped as arithmetic means, medians and standard deviations. Categorical variables were exposed as proportions with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Percentages were calculated and shown in simple graphs. The Chi-square test was employed to calculate the statistical significance between categorical variables. Results with borderline and statistical significance (P < 0.1 and P < 0.05, respectively) were included in the logistic regression analysis. Disease-free interval stay was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and subgroups were compared with the Breslow test. Statistical significance was determined with a P ≤ 0.05 in a two-sided test. All statistical tests were performed with SPSS software (version 25.0; SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL).

Results

Between January 2002 and December 2018, 379 patients who had a mastectomy (single, radical or lumpectomy) or a breast tumor biopsy (core-needle or excisional) fulfilled protocol criteria and were included for the final analysis. The youngest patient was 23 years old, while the oldest patient was 89 years. The mean age at diagnosis was 54.63 years. Patients of 40 years or younger accounted for 48 of the cases (12.66%), while those older than 40 years accounted for 331 of the cases (87.33%). Of the 379 cases, the most common subtype was hormonal receptor-positive carcinoma with 282 cases (74.40%), of which 139 cases (36.67%) were luminal A and 143 cases (37.73%) were luminal B (Fig. 1). HER2-positive carcinomas (Fig. 2) accounted for 32 of all the cases (8.44%) and triple-negative tumors made 65 of the total cases (17.15%). The most frequent comorbidities were obesity with 82 cases (21.63%), followed by hypertension with 78 cases (20.58%) and diabetes mellitus with 43 cases (11.34%). Moreover, 66 patients (17.41%) had a history of exogenous hormone therapy such as hormonal contraceptives or postmenopausal hormone therapy (Tables 1 and 2).
Figure 1

Immunohistochemistry for ER and PR positives, intensity +++ in 95% tumor cells (× 40 field). ER: estrogen receptor; PR: progesterone receptor.

Figure 2

Immunohistochemistry for HER2 positive (× 40 field). HER2: human epidermal growth factor receptor 2.

Table 1

Detailed Characteristics of Each Molecular Subtype

Molecular subtypeAll patients (n = 379)Patients aged ≤ 40 years (n = 48)Patients aged > 40 years (n = 331)Carcinoma NST (n = 269)Lobular carcinoma (n = 51)Medullary carcinoma (n = 9)Mucinous carcinoma (n = 5)
Luminal Aa139 (36.67%)7 (14.58%)132 (39.87%)81 (30%)27 (53%)0 (0%)5 (100%)
Luminal Bb143 (37.73%)26 (54.16%)117 (35.34%)110 (41%)17 (33%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
HER2-positivec32 (8.44%)3 (6.25%)29 (8.76%)31 (12%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
Triple-negatived65 (17.15%)12 (25%)53 (16.01%)47 (17%)7 (14%)9 (100%)0 (0%)

aLuminal A: ER or PR+, HER2-, and Ki-67 low (< 14%). bLuminal B: ER or PR+, HER2-/+, and Ki-67 (HER2- > 14%, HER2+ any %). cHER2-positive: ER-, PR-, HER2+ (at least > 10% of tumor cells complete membrane) and Ki-67 low/high. dTriple-negative/basal-like: ER-, PR-, HER2-, Ki-67 low/high. ER: estrogen receptor; HER2: human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; PR: progesterone receptor; NST: no special type.

Table 2

Comorbidities Found by Age Group

ComorbiditiesAll patients (n = 379)Patients aged ≤ 40 years (n = 48)Patients aged > 40 years (n = 331)
Diabetes43 (11.34%)2 (4.16%)41 (12.38%)
Hypertension78 (20.58%)1 (2.08%)77 (23.26%)
Obesity82 (21.63%)1 (2.08%)81 (24.27%)
History of hormonal replacement/contraceptives66 (17.41%)5 (10.41%)61 (18.42%)
Immunohistochemistry for ER and PR positives, intensity +++ in 95% tumor cells (× 40 field). ER: estrogen receptor; PR: progesterone receptor. Immunohistochemistry for HER2 positive (× 40 field). HER2: human epidermal growth factor receptor 2. aLuminal A: ER or PR+, HER2-, and Ki-67 low (< 14%). bLuminal B: ER or PR+, HER2-/+, and Ki-67 (HER2- > 14%, HER2+ any %). cHER2-positive: ER-, PR-, HER2+ (at least > 10% of tumor cells complete membrane) and Ki-67 low/high. dTriple-negative/basal-like: ER-, PR-, HER2-, Ki-67 low/high. ER: estrogen receptor; HER2: human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; PR: progesterone receptor; NST: no special type. Patients who were 40 years of age or younger at the time of diagnosis represented 48 cases, of which seven cases were classified as luminal A (14.58%), 26 cases were classified as luminal B (54.16%), three cases were HER2-positive (6.25%) and 12 cases were regarded as triple-negative (25%). The most common comorbidity was diabetes mellitus in two patients (4.16%) followed by one case of hypertension (2.08%) and one case of obesity (2.08%). Finally, five patients (10.41%) had a history of exogenous hormone therapy. Patients who were over 40 years of age at the time of diagnosis represented the majority of the population with 331 cases. Luminal A subtype was the most frequent with 132 cases (39.87%), followed by luminal B subtype with 117 cases (35.34%). HER2-positive tumors were found in 29 patients (8.76%) and triple-negative tumors in 53 patients (16.01%). The most frequent comorbidity was obesity with 81 cases (24.27%), followed by high blood pressure with 77 cases (23.26%) and diabetes mellitus with 41 cases (12.38%). Exogenous hormone therapy was documented in 61 patients (18.42%) of older than 40 years of age with breast carcinoma.

Discussion

The mean age of diagnosis of breast carcinoma in the present study was 54.63 years. This contrasts with data from the US, where the mean age of diagnosis is 61 years [10]. Our results are more in line with the findings of Lara-Medina et al [9] and Rodriguez-Cuevas et al [11], where the mean age of diagnosis of breast carcinoma in Mexican women was 50 and 53.5 years, respectively. In our study, 66.75% of women were diagnosed with breast carcinoma before turning 60 years old, which differs from women in the US, where more than half the new cases of breast cancer occur in women of 65 years of age and over [12]. We acknowledge the limitations of our study, such as being conducted in one cancer center and limited number of patients. The prevalence of the different molecular subtypes of breast carcinoma was similar to previous findings with screening protocols, in which HER2-positive tumors represented 10-15% and triple-negative tumors 13-17% of the total of the patients analyzed. Hormone-positive tumors were more frequent in older patients, with luminal A tumors diagnosed at a mean age of 56.33 years, concurring with data from other studies. The mean age of diagnosis for luminal B tumors was 53.81 years, which also aligns with the findings of other studies in which luminal B tumors, especially ER+/PR+/HER2+, have been found more likely to occur in younger patients [13]. Triple-negative tumors represented 16.01% of the population of tumors, 80% of which displayed features of high histological grade (III). Also, in our study, 25% of triple-negative carcinomas were diagnosed in women below 40 years of age. This confirms that young, Hispanic women are an at-risk population for triple-negative breast carcinomas [14-16]. Among the triple-negative carcinoma patients, 54.38% were alive 3 years after diagnosis and 21.05% were alive after 5 years. At the time of diagnosis, 12% of the patients were stage IV. An association was found between hormonal contraceptives and triple-negative tumors, with 12.30% of patients reporting a history of use. Other studies have suggested that hormonal contraceptives are a potential risk factor, but the design of our study does not allow us to establish risk factors [17]. Of the patients with triple-negative breast carcinoma, 27.69% were either overweight or obese. However, it was only present in 7.69% of premenopausal women (< 50 years old), which differs from the findings in other studies. Nevertheless, regarding hormone-positive tumors (luminal A/luminal B), 4.96% of premenopausal women were overweight or obese, while 18.79% of postmenopausal women (> 50 years old) were overweight or obese. This association is in line with the findings of other studies in which obesity in premenopausal women is not associated with increased risk and may even be a protective factor for hormone-positive breast carcinoma [18]. Exogenous hormone therapy, such as hormonal contraceptives or postmenopausal hormone therapy, is widely regarded as an associated risk factor for breast cancer [19]; however, in our study, we did not find a strong association between the two, with only 17.41% of patients having a history of exogenous hormonal therapy. Of those, only 5.80% were below 50 years of age, while 11.60% were 50 years or older, indicating that the risk is higher in postmenopausal women.

Conclusion

Breast carcinoma occurs at an earlier age for Mexican women compared to women in the US. The mean age of diagnosis for women in this study was 54.63 years. Most of the patients (66.75%) were diagnosed before age 60. Hormone-positive tumors were found to be more prevalent older patients, while high-grade tumors were found more frequently in young patients, with triple-negative tumors present in 25% of patients of 40 years of age or younger.
  19 in total

1.  Evaluation of a beneficial effect of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage I triple-negative breast cancer: a population-based study using the SEER 18 database.

Authors:  Zhong-Li Du; Yang Wang; Ding-Yuan Wang; Li Zhang; Zhi-Min Bian; Ying Deng; Cheng-Shan Xu; Dong-Cai Lin; Li Xie; Yao Jia; Ji-Dong Gao; Bai-Lin Zhang
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 2.  Established breast cancer risk factors and risk of intrinsic tumor subtypes.

Authors:  Mollie E Barnard; Caroline E Boeke; Rulla M Tamimi
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2015-06-10

3.  Descriptive analysis of estrogen receptor (ER)-negative, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, and HER2-negative invasive breast cancer, the so-called triple-negative phenotype: a population-based study from the California cancer Registry.

Authors:  Katrina R Bauer; Monica Brown; Rosemary D Cress; Carol A Parise; Vincent Caggiano
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Triple-negative breast cancer in Hispanic patients: high prevalence, poor prognosis, and association with menopausal status, body mass index, and parity.

Authors:  Fernando Lara-Medina; Víctor Pérez-Sánchez; David Saavedra-Pérez; Monika Blake-Cerda; Claudia Arce; Daniel Motola-Kuba; Cynthia Villarreal-Garza; Ana Maria González-Angulo; Enrique Bargalló; Jose Luis Aguilar; Alejandro Mohar; Óscar Arrieta
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Molecular portraits of human breast tumours.

Authors:  C M Perou; T Sørlie; M B Eisen; M van de Rijn; S S Jeffrey; C A Rees; J R Pollack; D T Ross; H Johnsen; L A Akslen; O Fluge; A Pergamenschikov; C Williams; S X Zhu; P E Lønning; A L Børresen-Dale; P O Brown; D Botstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-08-17       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  First breast cancer mammography screening program in Mexico: initial results 2005-2006.

Authors:  Sergio Rodríguez-Cuevas; Fernando Guisa-Hohenstein; Sonia Labastida-Almendaro
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2009-08-17       Impact factor: 2.431

7.  Variation in breast cancer subtypes with age and race/ethnicity.

Authors:  Carol A Parise; Katrina R Bauer; Vincent Caggiano
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 6.312

8.  Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.

Authors:  Freddie Bray; Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rebecca L Siegel; Lindsey A Torre; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  [Quality of mammography and breast cancer screening in ArgentinaQualidade da mamografia e prevenção do câncer de mama na Argentina].

Authors:  Susana Blanco; Daniel Andisco; Pablo Jiménez; Silvana Luciani
Journal:  Rev Panam Salud Publica       Date:  2019-07-31

10.  Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets.

Authors:  Therese Sorlie; Robert Tibshirani; Joel Parker; Trevor Hastie; J S Marron; Andrew Nobel; Shibing Deng; Hilde Johnsen; Robert Pesich; Stephanie Geisler; Janos Demeter; Charles M Perou; Per E Lønning; Patrick O Brown; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; David Botstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 12.779

View more
  3 in total

1.  Expression of Programmed Death Ligand 1 in Breast Cancer in Mexican Women.

Authors:  Pablo Jose Erraez-Jaramillo; Evelyn Aguirre-Flores; Luis Fernando Athie-Meza; Mariana G Morales-Garcia; Carlos Daniel Izquierdo-Tolosa; Erika Adriana Martinez-Castaneda; Jose Manuel Ruiz-Morales; Rita Dorantes-Heredia
Journal:  World J Oncol       Date:  2022-08-23

2.  Epithelial-Cadherin Expression Is Associated With Better Recurrence-Free and Overall Survival in Invasive Lobular Breast Cancer in Mexican Women.

Authors:  Ricardo Fernandez-Ferreira; Rita Dorantes-Heredia; Daniel Motola-Kuba; Jose-Manuel Ruiz-Morales; Gabriela Alvarado-Luna; Ileana Mac Kinney-Novelo; Wendy-Rossemary Munoz-Montano; Kevin-Joseph Fuentes-Calvo
Journal:  World J Oncol       Date:  2021-12-28

Review 3.  Management of Male Breast Cancer: The Journey so Far and Future Directions.

Authors:  Quratulain Anna Sabih; Jessica Young; Kazuaki Takabe
Journal:  World J Oncol       Date:  2021-12-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.