| Literature DB >> 34349490 |
Umesh Kumar1,2, Supriya Sharma3, Manjunath Durgappa4, Nikhil Gupta1, Ritu Raj1, Alok Kumar4, Prabhat N Sharma4, V P Krishna4, R Venkatesh Kumar3, Anupam Guleria1, Vivek A Saraswat4, Gaurav Pande4, Dinesh Kumar1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), which develops in patients with underlying alcoholic liver disease (ALD), is characterized by acute deterioration of liver function and organ failures are secondary to that. The clear understanding of metabolic pathways perturbed in ALD-ACLF patients can greatly decrease the mortality and morbidity of patients through predicting outcome, guiding treatment, and monitoring response to treatment. The purpose of this study was to investigate the metabolic disturbances associated with ACLF using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)-based serum metabolomics approach and further to assess if the serum metabolic alterations are affected by the severity of hepatic impairment.Entities:
Keywords: 1H NMR; acute-on chronic liver failure; alcoholic liver disease; diagnostic panel of biomarkers; multivariate analysis; serum metabolomics
Year: 2020 PMID: 34349490 PMCID: PMC8291109 DOI: 10.4103/JPBS.JPBS_333_20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Pharm Bioallied Sci ISSN: 0975-7406
Biochemical, clinical, and demographic characteristics of patients with ALD-ACLF and control cohorts recorded at inclusion
| Variables/parameters | Case ( | Normal control ( |
|---|---|---|
| Age (in years) | 41.7 ± 7.54 | 45 ± 6.73 |
| Male gender | 100% | 100% |
| Alcoholic | 40 (100%) | 10 (20%) |
| Precipitant Active alcoholism | 32 (80%) | – |
| Sepsis (SBP) | 8 (20%) | |
| Ascites | 38 (95%) | – |
| Complete ascites mobilization | 32 (80%) | – |
| Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) | 2 (5%) | |
| HE grading >2 | 27 (67.5%) | – |
| ACLF grade >2 | 28 (70%) | – |
| 28 days nonsurvival | 10 | – |
| Blood urea (mg/dL) | 39.5 ± 19.06 | – |
| Hemoglobin g/dL | 9.19 ± 1.68 | – |
| TLC (cells/mm3) | 11.25 ± 6.35 | – |
| Platelet count (G/L) | 87.69 ± 36.47 | – |
| CRP/ESR | 3.0 ± 2.9/36.4 ± 25.5 | – |
| Total bilirubin (mg/dL) | 17.77 ± 11.83 | – |
| Albumin (g/dL) | 2.6 ± 0.5 | – |
| SGOT (SGPT) U/L | 108.13 ± 66.927 (48.32 ± 26.31) | – |
| Serum sodium (serum potassium) | 133.62 ± 5.54 (4.01 ± 0.44) | – |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) (INR) | 1.53 ± 0.99 (2.79 ± 0.77) | – |
| U Na (U K) | 34.66 ± 26.18 (48.2 ± 51.19) | – |
| CTP | 12.2 ± 1.34 | – |
| MELD | 28.0 ± 7.0 | – |
| Total OF | 1.76 ± 0.72 | – |
| CLIF SOFA | 10.35 ± 1.66 | – |
| CLIF C ACLF score | 52.4 ± 6.4 | – |
mL = milliliter, mq/dL = milligram per deciliter, g/dL = gram per deciliter, U/L = Units per liter, G/L = Giga/Litre, TLC = total leucocyte count, SGOT = serum glutamic-oxalacetic transaminase (also known as enzyme aspartate aminotransferase, AST), SGPT = serum glutamic-pyruvic transaminase (also known as alanine aminotransferase, ALT), ALP = alkaline phosphate, INR = international normalized ratio, SBP = spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, CTP score = Child–Turcotte–Pugh score, MELD score = model for endstage liver disease score.[4512] SOFA = sequential organ failure assessment, CLIF = EASL chronic liver failure
Figure 1(A,D) 2D score plots derived from PLS-DA model analysis involving normalized spectral features (A) and explicit concentration profiles (D) obtained for serum samples of ALD-ACLF patients (in red) and normal control subjects (in blue). The shaded or semi-transparent areas represent the 95% confidence regions of each group as depicted by their respective colors. (B,E) are barplots showing the three performance measures (prediction accuracy, multiple correlation coefficient R2 and the explained variance in prediction Q2) obtained after10 fold Cross Validation analysis. The validation parameters (R2 and Q2) obtained for PLS-DA model based on five and three components are displayed in the respective score plots in (A) and (D). (C,F) The VIP score plots derived from PLS-DA model based on five components in (C) and three components in (F). The symbol asterisk “*” represents the metabolic change is statistically significant as well
Key serum metabolic profiles of discriminatory relevance evaluated for diagnostic potential in differentiating ALD-ACLF from NC using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis
| Bin | Assignment | AUROC | Study A ACLF vs. CLF | Study B (severity) | Study C (LC vs. AAH) | Study D (severe CLF vs. mild CLF) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.81 | HDL | 0.95 | ↓*** | ↓* | ↓* | ||
| 2.03 | NAG+lipid | 0.94 | ↓*** | ||||
| 0.83 | LDL | 0.94 | ↓*** | ||||
| 1.57 | Lipid | 0.93 | ↓*** | ↓* | |||
| 3.21 | Choline | 0.92 | ↓*** | ↓* | ↓* | ↓* | |
| 3.19 | GPC | 0.92 | ↓*** | ↓* | ↓* | ||
| 2.01 | NAG | 0.91 | ↓*** | ↓* | |||
| 3.27 | Betaine | 0.90 | ↑*** | ||||
| 3.75 | Glucose | 0.88 | ↑*** | ↑* | |||
| 5.31 | PUFA | 0.88 | ↓*** | ||||
| 3.25 | TMAO | 0.85 | ↑*** | ||||
| 3.77 | Glucose | 0.82 | ↑*** | ||||
| 0.89 | VLDL | 0.82 | ↓*** | – | |||
| 3.03 | Creatinine | 0.81 | ↑*** | ↑* | ↑* | ||
| 0.87 | LDLVLDL | 0.79 | ↓*** | ||||
| 0.95 | Leucine | 0.79 | ↓*** | ↑* | |||
| 5.29 | PUFA | 0.78 | ↓*** | ||||
| 2.05 | NAG+lipid | 0.78 | ↓*** | ||||
| 1.99 | Lipid | 0.74 | ↓*** | ||||
| 4.11 | Lactate | 0.62 | – | ↑* | ↑* | ↑* | |
| 3.23 | Glucose+GPC | 0.56 | – | ||||
| 0.85 | LDL | 0.54 | – | ||||
| 1.91 | Acetate | – | – | ||||
| 2.13 | Methionine | – | – | ↑* | ↑* | ↑* | |
| 1.03 | Valine | – | – |
AUROC = area under ROC curve, CLF = chronic liver failure, ACLF = acute on chronic liver failure, LC = liver cirrhosis, AAH = acute alcoholic hepatitis. Study A: 500-MHz NMR-based serum metabolomics fingerprints of acute-on-chronic liver failure in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis.[20] Study B: NMR-based plasma metabolomics study,[23] which showed that NMR plasma levels accurately predict mortality in decompensated cirrhosis (DC). The NMR plasma profiles of nonsurvivors were attributed to reduced phosphatidylcholines and lipid resonances, with increased lactate, tyrosine, methionine, and phenylalanine signal intensities. Study C: Untargeted metabolomics study that compared the serum metabolic profiles of patients with acute alcoholic hepatitis and patients with liver cirrhotic.[24] Study D: NMR-based serum metabolomics study that compared the serum metabolic profiles of cirrhotic patients with mild chronic liver failure (CLF) condition and those with severe CLF condition.[25] *, **, and ***: Represent the metabolic change with p-value <0.05 <0.001 and <0.0001