| Literature DB >> 34348800 |
Dong-Joo Hwang1, Ki-Chun Kwon1, Dong-Hun Choi1, Hyun-Keun Song2, Kil-Soo Kim3, Young-Suk Jung4, Dae-Youn Hwang5, Joon-Yong Cho6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: As a laboratory animal resource, the ICR mouse is commonly used in a variety of research fields. However, information on differences in exercise-related characteristics in ICR mice derived from different lineages and the underlying mechanisms remains to be elucidated. In this study, we investigated the intrinsic exercise capacity and a magnitude of response to acute exercise, and sought to identify mechanisms contributing to difference in Korl:ICR (a novel ICR lineage recently established by the National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Korea) and two commercialized ICR lineages derived from different origins (viz., A:ICR mouse from Orient Bio Com, the United States, and B:ICR mouse from Japan SLC Inc., Japan).Entities:
Keywords: Exercise capacity; ICR mouse; Korl:ICR; Mitochondrial coupling efficiency
Year: 2021 PMID: 34348800 PMCID: PMC8335942 DOI: 10.1186/s42826-021-00094-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lab Anim Res ISSN: 1738-6055
Fig. 1Identification of the total work and lactate threshold (LT) as direct and indirect indicators of exercise capacity. A Schematics of the experimental design and protocol. B TW to exhaustion through the graded treadmill running was calculated using a formula. C, D, and E The LT was determined by blood sampling via a jugular vein catheter during the graded treadmill exercise test. The values are presented as mean ± SEM; each group consisted of five mice. *P < .05
Comparison of physiological profile among different lineages of ICR mouse
| Control | Low intensity | Moderate intensity | High intensity | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Korl:ICR | A:ICR | B:ICR | Korl:ICR | A:ICR | B:ICR | Korl:ICR | A:ICR | B:ICR | Korl:ICR | A:ICR | B:ICR | |
| Body Weight (g) | 41.6 ± 0.89 | 40.8 ± 1.16 | 40.3 ± 1.75 | 40.4 ± 1.14 | 42.0 ± 1.09 | 40.6 ± 1.30 | 41.4 ± 1.67 | 41.1 ± 0.98 | 39.7 ± 1.38 | 40.0 ± 1.58 | 41.5 ± 1.87 | 40.2 ± 1.49 |
| Soleus muscle / BW (%) | 0.05 ± 0.007 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.04 ± 0.005 | 0.04 ± 0.007 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.04 ± 0.007 | 0.05 ± 0.005 | 0.05 ± 0.004 | 0.05 ± 0.006 | 0.05 ± 0.009 | 0.04 ± 0.008 | 0.05 ± 0.01 |
| EDL muscle / BW (%) | 0.06 ± 0.004 | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 0.06 ± 0.009 | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 0.06 ± 0.008 | 0.06 ± 0.004 | 0.06 ± 0.006 | 0.07 ± 0.008 | 0.07 ± 0.005 | 0.07 ± 0.009 | 0.06 ± 0.004 | 0.07 ± 0.005 |
| Heart / BW (%) | 0.46 ± 0.02 | 0.45 ± 0.03 | 0.46 ± 0.03 | 0.51 ± 0.04 | 0.49 ± 0.03 | 0.49 ± 0.02 | 0.50 ± 0.05 | 0.54 ± 0.03 | 0.51 ± 0.01 | 0.49 ± 0.01 | 0.51 ± 0.045 | 0.50 ± 0.03 |
BW Body weight, EDL Extensor digitorum longus. The values are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD); each group consisted of 5–6 mice
Fig. 2Comparative analysis of the magnitude of response to different acute exercise intensities (low, moderate, and high) among different lineages of ICR mice. A Schematics of the experimental design and protocol. B Changes in the blood corticosterone and C malondialdehyde levels. D Changes in the blood glucose, and E lactate dehydrogenase. The values are presented as mean ± SEM; each group consisted of 5–6 mice. *P < .05, **P < .01, and ***P < .001
Fig. 3Comparative analysis of the cardiac mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) complex, mitochondrial function, and uncoupling protein (UCP) 3 expression levels among the ICR lineages. A Representative western blots showing the protein levels of the OXPHOS complex. B The densitometric analysis of blots normalized for COX-IV in the cardiac mitochondrial fraction of different ICR lineages. C Oxygen consumption rate (OCR) in the permeabilized cardiac muscles of different ICR lineages was recorded using the Oroboros O2K instrument. D The respiratory control ratio (RCR) was calculated as the ratio of oxygen consumption at state 3 (complex 1 and complex 1 + 2) to that at state 2. E Representative western blots showing the protein levels of UCP3 in the soleus, extensor digitorum longus (EDL), and cardiac muscle. F The densitometric analysis of blots normalized for the density of Ponceau staining in different muscles. The values are presented as mean ± SEM; each group consisted of 5–6 mice. *P < .05, **P < .01, and ***P < .001
Fig. 4Comparative analysis of the metabolic phenotypes of different ICR lineages during a 24-h period at resting metabolic rate (RMR). A Schematics of the experimental design and protocol. B Changes in oxygen uptake and total oxygen uptake during different phases (total, inactive, and active). C Changes in CO2 production and total CO2 production during different phases. D Changes in the respiratory exchange ratio (RER) and average RER during different phases. The shaded part of the line graph represents the dark period of the day cycle. The values are presented as mean ± SEM; each group consisted of four mice