Literature DB >> 34347220

Survival Outcomes of Salvage Metastasectomy After Failure of Modern-Era Systemic Therapy for Melanoma.

Andrew T Li1,2,3, Kavita Vakharia1, Serigne N Lo1,3, Alexander H R Varey1,3,4, Matteo S Carlino1,3,4, Robyn P M Saw1,2,3,5, Kerwin F Shannon1,2,5,6, Julie R Howle1,3,4, Thomas E Pennington1,2,3,5, Jonathan R Stretch1,2,3,5, Omgo E Nieweg1,2,3,5, Andrew J Spillane1,3,5,7, Georgina V Long1,3,5,7, Alexander M Menzies1,3,5,7, Richard A Scolyer1,2,3,8, John F Thompson1,2,3, Sydney Ch'ng9,10,11,12,13.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Metastasectomy for selected patients with melanoma was associated with improved survival in the era before effective systemic therapy. Emerging evidence shows that these benefits persist even in this era of BRAF-targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of salvage metastasectomy after failure of systemic therapy.
METHODS: Stage 3 or 4 melanoma patients with extracranial disease progression after at least 4 weeks of systemic treatment between 2009 and 2020 were identified and categorized as resected to no evidence of disease (NED), non-progressive residual disease (NPRD), or progressive residual disease (PRD). Systemic therapy was stratified into BRAF-targeted therapy, immune checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy, or both. The end points of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and locoregional disease control (LRC) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Uni- and multivariable Cox regression procedures were used to examine factors associated with OS, PFS and LRC.
RESULTS: The study enrolled 190 patients. Among all the patients, the 5-year OS from metastatectomy was 52%, the 3-year PFS was 21%, and the 5-year LRC was 61%. After resection to NED, NPRD, and PRD, the 5-year OS values were 69%, 62% and 8%, respectively. Fewer lines of preoperative therapy, use of preoperative immunotherapy, and resection to NED were predictors of improved OS. After resection to NED, NPRD, and PRD, the 3-year PFS values were 23%, 24% and 10%, and the 5-year LRC values were 61%, 72% and 34%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Salvage metastasectomy was associated with durable survival and disease control, particularly after resection to NED, preoperative immunotherapy, and fewer lines of preoperative systemic therapy.
© 2021. Society of Surgical Oncology.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34347220     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10489-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  4 in total

1.  Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group studies with DTIC (NSC-45388).

Authors:  P P Carbone; W Costello
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1976-02

2.  Survival with regional and distant metastases from cutaneous malignant melanoma.

Authors:  D F Roses; N S Karp; R Oratz; N Dubin; M N Harris; J Speyer; A Boyd; F M Golomb; J Ransohoff; M Dugan
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1991-04

3.  Metastasectomy in malignant melanoma.

Authors:  C P Karakousis; A Velez; D L Driscoll; H Takita
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Prognostic factors in 1,521 melanoma patients with distant metastases.

Authors:  A Barth; L A Wanek; D L Morton
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 6.113

  4 in total
  2 in total

1.  ASO Author Reflections: Surgical Resection May Improve the Outcome for Patients with Residual Metastatic Melanoma When Modern Systemic Therapies Have Not Achieved Complete Disease Control.

Authors:  Sydney Ch'ng; Richard A Scolyer; John F Thompson
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 2.  Outcomes After Curative Metastasectomy for Patients with Malignant Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Durgesh Wankhede; Sandeep Grover
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-02-06       Impact factor: 5.344

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.