Literature DB >> 34347069

Sociodemographic features and patterns of non-participation in colorectal cancer screening in Finland.

Maija Jäntti1, Sirpa Heinävaara1, Nea Malila1, Tytti Sarkeala1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening was run as a randomized health services programme in Finland between 2004 and 2016. This study evaluates sociodemographic features and patterns of non-participation among men and women invited to be screened.
METHODS: The study population in this register-based study includes 233 211 men and women invited to guaiac faecal occult blood test screening on consecutive screening rounds (n = 708 621 invitations). A generalized estimating equation (GEE) was used to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRR) between sociodemographic features and non-participation.
RESULTS: The overall proportion of non-participation was 31.6% and was higher in men (38.8%) than in women (24.6%). Birth cohort, education, marital status and country of birth were associated with non-participation. The birth cohort of 1950-54 was less likely to participate than the birth cohort of 1940-44. Men and women with primary education were more likely non-participants (IRR 1.26, CI 1.23-1.29 and IRR 1.22, CI 1.18-1.26, respectively) than men or women with tertiary education. Further, unmarried persons and immigrants had an increased risk of non-participation. Initial non-participation predicted subsequent behaviour, since, e.g. ∼80% of first-round non-participants also remained non-participants in the second round.
CONCLUSION: Education, gender and marital status had a significant effect on non-participation in the CRC screening programme. As high and comprehensive participation is essential for a successful screening programme, attention should be paid in ensuring participation of all sociodemographic groups. Special efforts should be invested in those not participating in the first invitational round, since initial non-participation predicts non-participation to subsequent invitations.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34347069     DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckab074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Public Health        ISSN: 1101-1262            Impact factor:   3.367


  4 in total

1.  Urban density differences in colorectal cancer screening participation and screening yield in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Clasine M de Klerk; Manon van der Vlugt; Bente A Smagge; Esther Toes-Zoutendijk; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Evelien Dekker; Patrick M Bossuyt
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2022-04-05

2.  Effect of WeChat-Based Health Education Combined with Satir Model on Self-Management Behaviors and Social Adaptation in Colorectal Cancer Patients during the Perioperative Period.

Authors:  Limin Feng; Weina Wang; Meiying Wu; Huili Ma
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 2.682

3.  Lifestyle predictors for inconsistent participation to fecal based colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Markus Dines Knudsen; Ane Sørlie Kvaerner; Edoardo Botteri; Øyvind Holme; Anette Hjartåker; Mingyang Song; Espen Thiis-Evensen; Kristin Ranheim Randel; Geir Hoff; Paula Berstad
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Characteristics of nonparticipants in a randomised colorectal cancer screening trial comparing sigmoidoscopy and faecal immunochemical testing.

Authors:  Edoardo Botteri; Geir Hoff; Kristin R Randel; Øyvind Holme; Thomas de Lange; Tomm Bernklev; Eline Aas; Mona Berthelsen; Erik Natvig; Benedicte Kirkøen; Markus D Knudsen; Ane S Kvaerner; Anna L Schult; Giske Ursin; Anita Jørgensen; Paula Berstad
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 7.316

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.