Literature DB >> 34346775

Assessment of Critical Care Surge Capacity During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan.

Takanori Yamamoto1, Masayuki Ozaki2,3, Daisuke Kasugai4, Gilbert Burnham5.   

Abstract

Japan has the highest proportion of older adults worldwide but has fewer critical care beds than most high-income countries. Although the COVID-19 infection rate in Japan is low compared with Europe and the United States, by the end of 2020, several infected people died in ambulances because they could not find hospitals to accept them. Our study aimed to examine the Japanese healthcare system's capacity to accommodate critically ill COVID-19 patients during the pandemic. We created a model to estimate bed and staff capacity at 3 levels of pandemic response (conventional, contingency, and crisis), as defined by the US National Academy of Medicine, and the function of Japan's healthcare system at each level. We then compared our estimates of the number of COVID-19 patients requiring intensive care at peak times with the national health system capacity using expert panel data. Our findings suggest that Japan's healthcare system currently can accommodate only a limited number of critically ill COVID-19 patients. It could accommodate the surge of pandemic demands by converting nonintensive care unit beds to critical care beds and using nonintensive care unit staff for critical care. However, bed and staff capacity should not be expanded uniformly, so that the limited number of physicians and nurses are allocated efficiently and so staffing does not become the bottleneck of the expansion. Training and deploying physicians and nurses to provide immediate intensive care is essential. The key is to introduce and implement the concept and mechanism of tiered staffing in the Japanese healthcare system. More importantly, most intensive care facilities in Japanese hospitals are small-scaled and thinly distributed in each region. The government needs to introduce an efficient system for smooth dispatching of medical personnel among hospitals regardless of their founding institutions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Critical care beds; Medical management/response; Public health preparedness/response

Year:  2021        PMID: 34346775     DOI: 10.1089/hs.2020.0227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Secur        ISSN: 2326-5094


  3 in total

1.  Disparities in adult critical care resources across Pakistan: findings from a national survey and assessment using a novel scoring system.

Authors:  Mustafa Ali Khan; Hamna Shahbaz; Ali Aahil Noorali; Anam Noor Ehsan; Mareeha Zaki; Fahham Asghar; Mohammed Moizul Hassan; Haroon Muhammad Arshad; Muhammad Sohaib; Muhammad Ali Asghar; Muhammad Faisal Khan; Amber Sabeen; Masooma Aqeel; Muhammad Haroon Khan; Tahir Munir; Syed Kashif Amin; Huba Atiq; Adil Hussain Haider; Zainab Samad; Asad Latif
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 19.334

2.  Control Centre for Intensive Care as a Tool for Effective Coordination, Real-Time Monitoring, and Strategic Planning During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Martin Komenda; Vladimír Černý; Petr Šnajdárek; Matěj Karolyi; Miloš Hejný; Petr Panoška; Jiří Jarkovský; Jakub Gregor; Vojtěch Bulhart; Lenka Šnajdrová; Ondřej Májek; Tomáš Vymazal; Jan Blatný; Ladislav Dušek
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 5.428

3.  Japan's Slow Response to Improve Access to Inpatient Care for COVID-19 Patients.

Authors:  Shinji Nakahara; Haruhiko Inada; Masao Ichikawa; Jun Tomio
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-01-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.