Literature DB >> 34346514

Practical strategies for qualitative inquiry in a virtual world.

Emma C Schlegel1,2, Judith A Tate1,3, Rita H Pickler1,2, Laureen H Smith1,2.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this article is to provide practical strategies for maintaining methodological rigour in executing a virtual qualitative study. Strategies are based on evidence from existing research about virtual qualitative methods and on the strategies used by the authors to convert a planned in-person qualitative, grounded theory study to an entirely virtual grounded theory study during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study began in-person in September 2019 and was converted to virtual in March 2020. Virtual data collection was completed in September 2020.
DESIGN: This article provides a case exemplar of virtual adaptations made to a study underway when the pandemic rendered all in-person research impractical and potentially dangerous. DATA SOURCES: The strategies discussed are based on our own experiences and the supporting theoretical assumptions of qualitative research, specifically grounded theory methods. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Nursing scholars conducting qualitative inquiry may find these strategies helpful in continuing research activities during periods of limited access to the phenomena or persons of interest. Furthermore, these strategies allow nursing scholars to conduct rigorous, in-depth research without geographical limitations, providing greater possibilities for international collaborations and cross-institution research.
CONCLUSION: Despite novel challenges, methodological adaptations that are carefully planned and purposeful allow qualitative and non-qualitative scholars to continue research activities in a fully virtual manner. IMPACT: This case exemplar and discussion provide practical strategies for qualitative scholars to consider while planning new studies or converting an in-person study to a virtual one. Despite the in-person nature of in-depth qualitative inquiry, a historic pandemic and a changing research environment require qualitative researchers to adapt to virtual methods while still conducting high quality, methodologically rigorous research. Qualitative scholars can use the strategies presented here to continue rigorous qualitative inquiry despite limited access to phenomena or persons.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  data collection; emerging adults; grounded theory; nursing; qualitative research; research design; research subject recruitment; research techniques; virtual methods; young adults

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34346514      PMCID: PMC8449808          DOI: 10.1111/jan.15000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.057


  6 in total

1.  Face-to-Face Compared With Online Collected Accounts of Health and Illness Experiences: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Louise Davies; Karissa L LeClair; Pamela Bagley; Heather Blunt; Lisa Hinton; Sara Ryan; Sue Ziebland
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2020-07-15

2.  Researching the researcher-as-instrument: an exercise in interviewer self-reflexivity.

Authors:  Anne E Pezalla; Jonathan Pettigrew; Michelle Miller-Day
Journal:  Qual Res       Date:  2012-04-01

3.  How the pandemic might play out in 2021 and beyond.

Authors:  Megan Scudellari
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  "It's just more personal": Using multiple methods of qualitative data collection to facilitate participation in research focusing on sensitive subjects.

Authors:  Jennifer Heath; Heidi Williamson; Lisa Williams; Diana Harcourt
Journal:  Appl Nurs Res       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 2.257

5.  Doing Internet research with hard-to-reach communities: methodological reflections on gaining meaningful access.

Authors:  Mareile Kaufmann; Meropi Tzanetakis
Journal:  Qual Res       Date:  2020-02-16

6.  Comparing Skype (video calling) and in-person qualitative interview modes in a study of people with irritable bowel syndrome - an exploratory comparative analysis.

Authors:  Matthew Krouwel; Kate Jolly; Sheila Greenfield
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 4.615

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.