Literature DB >> 3434616

Treatment of cholesteatoma.

J Sadé1.   

Abstract

Clinicians view cholesteatoma as a middle ear condition in which stratified squamous epithelium produces non-self-cleansing amounts of keratin. This clinical definition includes retraction pockets as well as big, deep-seated epidermoids. The two may have different origins, and they often require different therapeutic approaches. Clearance and control of shallow retraction pockets may be achieved with suction cleaning. Larger or longstanding retraction pockets, if not too deep, may be excised, and the tympanic membrane grafted. Deep-seated cholesteatomas require more elaborate surgery, whether they involve advanced retraction pockets or big and deep-seated middle ear epidermoids. The intact wall technique, though elegant, has about a 50% failure rate, regardless of the surgeon's skill. The failures are due to either retraction pocket formation, with or without posterior wall atrophy or the reappearance of epidermoids (so-called residual disease). Reconstruction of the bony defect in the scutum does not prevent retraction pocket formation. It is obvious that an approach that envisages successful removal of the matrix as curing the disease is too simplified. The intact wall operation should be reserved for ears with extensive mastoid pneumatization and small cholesteatomas. Most ears with cholesteatoma (85%) are, however, poorly pneumatized and they fare best with a small radical conservative (modified) mastoidectomy. The procedure should aim at creating the smallest mastoid cavity possible. Small mastoid cavities, possessing a tympanic membrane, an adequate mastoplasty, and no recess behind the facial ridge, will be found to be dry in about 90% of cases. A technique for achieving a minimal mastoid cavity is described.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3434616

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Otol        ISSN: 0192-9763


  8 in total

1.  The correlation of middle ear aeration with mastoid pneumatization. The mastoid as a pressure buffer.

Authors:  J Sadé
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Induced atelectasis of the middle ear and its clinical behavior.

Authors:  M Luntz; S Eisman; J Sade
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  [Principles of cholesteatoma surgery].

Authors:  T Stark; A Gurr; H Sudhoff
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Ears with Cholesteatoma: Outcomes of Canal Wall Up and Down Tympano-Mastoidectomies-A Comparative Prospective Study.

Authors:  Mehtab Alam; Kamlesh Chandra
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-04-18

5.  A Comparative Study of Outcomes and Quality of Life in Canal Wall up Mastoidectomies and Canal Wall down Mastoidectomies.

Authors:  Lisa Abraham; Ajay Philip; Anjali Lepcha; Ann Mary Augustine; Suma Susan Mathews; Roshna Rose Paul; Manju Deena Mammen
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-02-09

6.  Epitympanoplasty with cartilage obliteration in the preservation of posterior canal wall: a technique for surgical treatment of attic cholesteatoma.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Jianjun Sun; Danheng Zhao; Yongsheng Lin
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  The effect of mastoid surgery on atelectatic ears and retraction pockets.

Authors:  S Avraham; M Luntz; J Sadé
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Myeloperoxydase activity in the pathogenesis of cholesteatoma.

Authors:  Ozlem Celebi; Mustafa Paksoy; Sedat Aydin; Arif Sanlı; Omer Taşdemir; Aylin Ege Gül
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-06-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.