| Literature DB >> 34345186 |
Mohammad Hassan Hamrah1,2, Ali Baghalian1, Sara Ghadimi1, Saeedeh Mokhtari1, Mojgan Kargar3, Maryam Khosrozadeh1, Toba Dahi4, Abdurrahman Charkazi5, Mohammad Shoaib Hamrah6, Mohammad Hussain Hamrah2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fissured tongue is a common manifestation of the tongue, marked by the presence of multiple prominent grooves or fissures on the dorsal surface of the tongue. However, there is a lack of studies focusing on the prevalence and factors associated with fissured tongue among patients attending an outpatient clinic in Afghanistan. AIM: The purpose of the current study was to determine the prevalence and factors associated with fissured tongue and its effects on the general health of adult outpatients in Afghanistan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The cross-sectional survey was conducted among outpatient populations in Andkhoy City, Afghanistan, between September 2019 and December 2019. A convenience technique was applied by including 1182 patient aged 18-80 years. Socio-economic status, smoking, nass use (smokeless tobacco use) and medical data were collected using face-to-face interviews. We used logistic regression analysis to identify factors associated with fissured tongue. A convenience technique was applied by including patient aged 18-80 years.Entities:
Keywords: Afghanistan; Andkhoy; fissured tongue; prevalence; risk factors
Year: 2021 PMID: 34345186 PMCID: PMC8325757 DOI: 10.2147/CCIDE.S323428
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Cosmet Investig Dent ISSN: 1179-1357
Socio-Demographic and Clinical Variables of Patients with and without Fissured Tongue
| Variables | With FT | Without FT | |
|---|---|---|---|
| (n=322) | (n=860) | ||
| Gender, no (%) | |||
| Male | 272 (84.5) | 301 (35.0) | <0.001 |
| Female | 50 (15.5) | 559 (65.0) | |
| Age (in years) number, no (%) | 0.072 | ||
| <39 | 28 (8.7) | 68 (7.9) | |
| 40–49 | 28 (8.7) | 124 (14.4) | |
| 50–59 | 94 (29.2) | 244 (28.4) | |
| ≥60 | 172 (53.4) | 424 (49.3) | |
| Level of education, no (%) | 0.062 | ||
| Illiterate | 117 (36.3) | 278 (32.3) | |
| Primary/private education | 50 (15.5) | 122 (14.2) | |
| Secondary | 91 (28.3) | 223 (25.9) | |
| High school or more | 64 (19.9) | 237 (27.6) | |
| Marital status, no (%) | 0. 258 | ||
| Single | 16 (5.0) | 64 (7.4) | |
| Married | 276 (85.7) | 728 (84.7) | |
| Others | 30 (9.3) | 68 (7.9) | |
| Occupation, no (%) | 0.003 | ||
| Employed | 36 (11.2) | 158 (18.4) | |
| Unemployed | 114 (35.4) | 260 (30.2) | |
| Farmer | 11 (3.4) | 19 (2.2) | |
| Housewife | 130 (40.4) | 373 (43.4) | |
| Other types of jobs | 31 (9.6) | 31 (9.6) | |
| Nass use, no (%) | <0.001 | ||
| Yes | 210 (65.2) | 98 (11.4) | |
| No | 112 (34.8) | 762 (88.6) | |
| Smoking, no (%) | <0.001 | ||
| Yes | 126 (39.1) | 155 (18.0) | |
| No | 196 (60.9) | 705 (82.0) | |
| Hypertension, n (%) | <0.001 | ||
| Yes | 144 (44.7) | 292 (34.0) | |
| No | 178 (55.3) | 568 (66.0) | |
| Diabetes mellitus, n (%) | 0.001 | ||
| Yes | 120 (37.3) | 165 (19.2) | |
| No | 202 (62.7) | 695 (80.8) |
Abbreviation: FT, fissured tongue.
Figure 1The distribution patterns of fissured tongue among study participants.
Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis of Variables Correlated to with Fissured Tongue Among Study Sample
| Variables | Fissured Tongue | OR | (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N=322 | ||||
| Gender, n (%) | <0.001 | |||
| Female | 272 (84.5) | 1 | ||
| Male | 50 (15.5) | 7.1 | 4.8–10.3 | |
| Occupation, no (%) | ||||
| Employed | 1.0 | |||
| Unemployed | 114 (35.4) | 0.92 | 0. 53–1.6 | 0.754 |
| Farmer | 11 (3.4) | 0.66 | 0.22–1.9 | 0.477 |
| Housewife | 130 (40.4) | 1.0 | 0.6–1.8 | 0.887 |
| Other | 31 (9.6) | 1.7 | 0.80–3.8 | 0.164 |
| Nass use, n (%) | 0.91 | 0.4–2.2 | 0.843 | |
| No | 210 (65.2) | 1 | <0.001 | |
| Yes | 112 (34.8) | 12.0 | 8.1–17.6 | |
| Hypertension, n (%) | 0.159 | |||
| No | 144 (44.7) | 1 | ||
| Yes | 178 (55.3) | 1.3 | 0.90–1.87 | |
| Diabetes mellitus, n (%) | 0.02 | |||
| No | 120 (37.3) | 1 | ||
| Yes | 202 (62.7) | 1.6 | 1.1–2.3 | |
| Smoking, n (%) | 0.641 | |||
| Yes | 126 (39.1) | 1 | ||
| No | 196 (60.9) | 0.91 | 0.61–1.35 |
Note: P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.