Jie Sun1,2, Guo-Mei Chen1,2, Ji Huang1,2. 1. Department of Pharmacy, The First People's Hospital of Taicang, Taicang, People's Republic of China. 2. The Affiliated Taicang Hospital of Suzhou University, Taicang, People's Republic of China.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We aimed to determine the effects of using evidence-based pharmacy care on satisfaction and cognition among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and taking rivaroxaban. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between July 2018 and June 2019, 200 consecutive hospitalized patients taking oral rivaroxaban, who were diagnosed with NVAF and registered in the hospital information management system, were randomly assigned to a control group (n=100) and a study group (n=100) in a single-blind manner. The control group received pharmaceutical care based on the general pharmaceutical care model whereas the study group received care based on an evidence-based pharmaceutical care model. Patients' satisfaction and cognition were evaluated regularly using questionnaires. The follow-up time was 1 year. We compared differences in satisfaction and cognition between the two groups after pharmaceutical-related care administered by clinical pharmacists. RESULTS: The study group had higher satisfaction scores than the control group after the EBP intervention (14.58±0.88 vs.13.81±1.01, p<0.01); cognition scores were also higher in the study group (22.58±2.19 vs 20.80±3.02, p<0.01) after the intervention. In the study group, satisfaction was increased from a score of 10.15±1.33 before the EBP intervention. Cognition also increased after the intervention in the study group, from a score of 9.88±4.09 pre-intervention. In the control group, satisfaction was 10.04±1.29 before the traditional pharmaceutical care intervention, smaller than the 13.81±1.01 after the intervention (p<0.01). Cognition in the control group was 9.83±3.51 before traditional pharmaceutical care, smaller than the 20.80±3.02 after the intervention (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: The care model based on evidence-based pharmacy care can improve patient satisfaction and cognition, providing more comprehensive safety and efficacy of subsequent medication.
PURPOSE: We aimed to determine the effects of using evidence-based pharmacy care on satisfaction and cognition among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and taking rivaroxaban. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between July 2018 and June 2019, 200 consecutive hospitalized patients taking oral rivaroxaban, who were diagnosed with NVAF and registered in the hospital information management system, were randomly assigned to a control group (n=100) and a study group (n=100) in a single-blind manner. The control group received pharmaceutical care based on the general pharmaceutical care model whereas the study group received care based on an evidence-based pharmaceutical care model. Patients' satisfaction and cognition were evaluated regularly using questionnaires. The follow-up time was 1 year. We compared differences in satisfaction and cognition between the two groups after pharmaceutical-related care administered by clinical pharmacists. RESULTS: The study group had higher satisfaction scores than the control group after the EBP intervention (14.58±0.88 vs.13.81±1.01, p<0.01); cognition scores were also higher in the study group (22.58±2.19 vs 20.80±3.02, p<0.01) after the intervention. In the study group, satisfaction was increased from a score of 10.15±1.33 before the EBP intervention. Cognition also increased after the intervention in the study group, from a score of 9.88±4.09 pre-intervention. In the control group, satisfaction was 10.04±1.29 before the traditional pharmaceutical care intervention, smaller than the 13.81±1.01 after the intervention (p<0.01). Cognition in the control group was 9.83±3.51 before traditional pharmaceutical care, smaller than the 20.80±3.02 after the intervention (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: The care model based on evidence-based pharmacy care can improve patient satisfaction and cognition, providing more comprehensive safety and efficacy of subsequent medication.
Authors: Emelia J Benjamin; Paul Muntner; Alvaro Alonso; Marcio S Bittencourt; Clifton W Callaway; April P Carson; Alanna M Chamberlain; Alexander R Chang; Susan Cheng; Sandeep R Das; Francesca N Delling; Luc Djousse; Mitchell S V Elkind; Jane F Ferguson; Myriam Fornage; Lori Chaffin Jordan; Sadiya S Khan; Brett M Kissela; Kristen L Knutson; Tak W Kwan; Daniel T Lackland; Tené T Lewis; Judith H Lichtman; Chris T Longenecker; Matthew Shane Loop; Pamela L Lutsey; Seth S Martin; Kunihiro Matsushita; Andrew E Moran; Michael E Mussolino; Martin O'Flaherty; Ambarish Pandey; Amanda M Perak; Wayne D Rosamond; Gregory A Roth; Uchechukwu K A Sampson; Gary M Satou; Emily B Schroeder; Svati H Shah; Nicole L Spartano; Andrew Stokes; David L Tirschwell; Connie W Tsao; Mintu P Turakhia; Lisa B VanWagner; John T Wilkins; Sally S Wong; Salim S Virani Journal: Circulation Date: 2019-03-05 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: A John Camm; Gregory Y H Lip; Raffaele De Caterina; Irene Savelieva; Dan Atar; Stefan H Hohnloser; Gerhard Hindricks; Paulus Kirchhof Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2012-08-24 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Susan Colilla; Ann Crow; William Petkun; Daniel E Singer; Teresa Simon; Xianchen Liu Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2013-07-04 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Bouwe P Krijthe; Anton Kunst; Emelia J Benjamin; Gregory Y H Lip; Oscar H Franco; Albert Hofman; Jacqueline C M Witteman; Bruno H Stricker; Jan Heeringa Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2013-07-30 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Sumeet S Chugh; Rasmus Havmoeller; Kumar Narayanan; David Singh; Michiel Rienstra; Emelia J Benjamin; Richard F Gillum; Young-Hoon Kim; John H McAnulty; Zhi-Jie Zheng; Mohammad H Forouzanfar; Mohsen Naghavi; George A Mensah; Majid Ezzati; Christopher J L Murray Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-12-17 Impact factor: 29.690