| Literature DB >> 34344876 |
Lingling Hou1, Fang Xia2, Qihui Chen3, Jikun Huang4, Yong He5, Nathan Rose6, Scott Rozelle6.
Abstract
Many countries have undertaken large and high-profile payment-for-ecosystem-services (PES) programs to sustain the use of their natural resources. Nevertheless, few studies have comprehensively examined the impacts of existing PES programs. Grassland Ecological Compensation Policy (GECP) is one of the few pastorally focused PES programs with large investments and long duration, which aim to improve grassland quality and increase herder income. Here we present empirical evidence of the effects of GECP on grassland quality and herder income. Through a thorough and in-depth econometric analysis of remote sensing and household survey data, we find that, although GECP improves grassland quality (albeit to only a small extent) and has a large positive effect on income, it exacerbates existing income inequality among herders within their local communities. The analysis demonstrates that the program has induced herders to change their livestock production behavior. Heterogeneity analysis emphasizes the importance of making sure the programs are flexible and are adapted to local resource circumstances.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34344876 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-24942-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919