Literature DB >> 34344673

Association between allostatic load and mortality among Chinese older adults: the Chinese Longitudinal Health and Longevity Study.

Tianhang Zhang1,2, Lijing L Yan1,3, Hua-Shuai Chen4, Hai-Yu Jin1, Chenkai Wu5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Allostatic load (AL) has shown that high burden of AL is associated with increased risk of adverse outcomes, but little attention has been paid to China with largest ageing population in the world.
OBJECTIVE: This study is to examine the association between AL and all-cause mortality among Chinese adults aged at least 60 years.
DESIGN: Population-based prospective cohort study.
SETTING: In 2011-2012, an ancillary study, in which a blood test was added, including a total of 2439 participants, was conducted in eight longevity areas in the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey. PARTICIPANTS: The final analytical sample consisted of 1519 participants (mean±SD age: men 80.5±11.3 years; women 90.2±11.8 years and 53% women). PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Cox models were used to examine the association between AL and mortality among men and women, separately. Analyses were also adjusted for potential confounders including age, ethnicity, education and marital status, smoking and exercise.
RESULTS: Male with a medium AL burden (score: 2-4) and high AL burden (score: 5-9) had a 33% and 118% higher hazard of death, respectively, than those with a low AL burden (score: 0-1). We did not find significant difference between females with different levels of AL burden.
CONCLUSION: Higher AL burden was associated with increased all-cause mortality among Chinese men aged at least 60 years. However, we did not find strong association among women. In conclusion, Intervention programmes targeting modifiable components of the AL burden may help prolong lifespan for older adults, especially men, in China. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  epidemiology; mental health; public health

Year:  2021        PMID: 34344673     DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open        ISSN: 2044-6055            Impact factor:   2.692


  2 in total

1.  Quo Vadis Anesthesiologist? The Value Proposition of Future Anesthesiologists Lies in Preserving or Restoring Presurgical Health after Surgical Insult.

Authors:  Krzysztof Laudanski
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 4.241

2.  Allostatic load as predictor of mortality: a cohort study from Lolland-Falster, Denmark.

Authors:  Neda Esmailzadeh Bruun-Rasmussen; George Napolitano; Christian Christiansen; Stig Egil Bojesen; Christina Ellervik; Randi Jepsen; Knud Rasmussen; Elsebeth Lynge
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 3.006

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.