Literature DB >> 34343289

Compensatory feeding during early gestation for sows with a high weight loss after a summer lactation increased piglet birth weight but reduced litter size.

Fan Liu1, Casie J Braden1, Robert J Smits1, Jessica R Craig1, David J Henman1, Chris J Brewster1, Rebecca S Morrison1, Rebecca Z Athorn2, Brian J Leury3, Weicheng Zhao3, Jeremy J Cottrell3, Frank R Dunshea3,4, Alan W Bell5.   

Abstract

Sows mated in summer produce a greater proportion of born-light piglets (<1.1 kg) which contributes to increased carcass fatness in the progeny population. The reasons for the low birth weight of these piglets remain unclear, and there have been few successful mitigation strategies identified. We hypothesized that: 1) the low birth weight of progeny born to sows mated in summer may be associated with weight loss during the previous summer lactation; and 2) increasing early gestation feed allowance for the sows with high lactational weight loss in summer can help weight recovery and improve progeny birth weight. Sows were classified as having either low (av. 1%) or high (av. 7%) lactational weight loss in their summer lactation. All the sows with low lactational weight loss (LLStd) and half of the sows with high lactational weight loss received a standard gestation feeding regime (HLStd) (2.6 kg/d; day 0-30 gestation), whereas the rest of the sows with high lactational weight loss received a compensatory feed allowance (HLComp) (3.5 kg/d; day 0-30 gestation). A comparison of LLStd (n = 75) versus HLStd sows (n = 78) showed that this magnitude of weight loss over summer lactation did not affect the average piglet or litter birth weight, but such results may be influenced by the higher litter size (P = 0.030) observed in LLStd sows. A comparison of HLStd versus HLComp (n = 81) sows showed that the compensatory feeding increased (P = 0.021) weight gain of gestating sows by 6 kg, increased (P = 0.009) average piglet birth weight by 0.12 kg, tended to reduce (P = 0.054) the percentage of born-light piglets from 23.5% to 17.1% but reduced the litter size by 1.4 (P = 0.014). A subgroup of progeny stratified as born-light (0.8-1.1 kg) or -normal (1.3-1.7 kg) from each sow treatment were monitored for growth performance from weaning until 100 kg weight. The growth performance and carcass backfat of progeny were not affected by sow treatments. Born-light progeny had lower feed intake, lower growth rate, higher G:F, and higher carcass backfat than born-normal progeny (all P < 0.05). In summary, compensatory feeding from day 0 to 30 gestation in the sows with high weight loss during summer lactation reduced the percentage of born-light progeny at the cost of a lower litter size, which should improve growth rate and carcass leanness in the progeny population born to sows with high lactational weight loss.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  backfat; birth weight; feeding; gestation; sows; summer

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34343289      PMCID: PMC8418633          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skab228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.338


  25 in total

1.  Effects of dietary fiber on performance of multiparous lactating sows in a tropical climate.

Authors:  D Renaudeau; C Anaïs; J Noblet
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Nutritional restriction in lactating primiparous sows selectively affects female embryo survival and overall litter development.

Authors:  M D Vinsky; S Novak; W T Dixon; M K Dyck; G R Foxcroft
Journal:  Reprod Fertil Dev       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  An increased feed intake during early pregnancy improves sow body weight recovery and increases litter size in young sows.

Authors:  L L Hoving; N M Soede; C M C van der Peet-Schwering; E A M Graat; H Feitsma; B Kemp
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Impact of feed intake during late gestation on piglet birth weight and reproductive performance: a dose-response study performed in gilts.

Authors:  André L Mallmann; Elisar Camilotti; Deivison P Fagundes; Carlos E Vier; Ana Paula G Mellagi; Rafael R Ulguim; Mari Lourdes Bernardi; Uislei A D Orlando; Márcio A D Gonçalves; Rafael Kummer; Fernando P Bortolozzo
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Skeletal muscle and adipose tissue cellularity in runt and normal birth weight swine.

Authors:  S E Powell; E D Aberle
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  National Pork Producers Council Maternal Line National Genetic Evaluation Program: a comparison of sow longevity and trait associations with sow longevity.

Authors:  T Serenius; K J Stalder; T J Baas; J W Mabry; R N Goodwin; R K Johnson; O W Robison; M Tokach; R K Miller
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Exogenous insulin-like growth factor-I increases weight gain in intrauterine growth-retarded neonatal pigs.

Authors:  P A Schoknecht; S Ebner; A Skottner; D G Burrin; T A Davis; K Ellis; W G Pond
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.756

8.  Impact of piglet birth weight, birth order, and litter size on subsequent growth performance, carcass quality, muscle composition, and eating quality of pork.

Authors:  A D Beaulieu; J L Aalhus; N H Williams; J F Patience
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Insulin sensitivity in juvenile and adult Large White pigs of low and high birthweight.

Authors:  K R Poore; A L Fowden
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2004-01-14       Impact factor: 10.122

10.  The Greater Proportion of Born-Light Progeny from Sows Mated in Summer Contributes to Increased Carcass Fatness Observed in Spring.

Authors:  Fan Liu; Erin M Ford; Rebecca S Morrison; Chris J Brewster; David J Henman; Robert J Smits; Weicheng Zhao; Jeremy J Cottrell; Brian J Leury; Frank R Dunshea; Alan W Bell
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.