Cynthia Lu1, Paramita Dasgupta1, Jessica Cameron1,2, Lin Fritschi3, Peter Baade1,2,4. 1. Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. 2. School of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Gardens Point, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. 3. School of Public Health, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia. 4. Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Coal mine dust lung disease comprises a group of occupational lung diseases including coal workers pneumoconiosis. In many countries, there is a lack of robust prevalence estimates for these diseases. Our objective was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of published contemporary estimates on prevalence, mortality, and survival for coal mine dust lung disease worldwide. METHODS: Systematic searches of PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science databases for English language peer-reviewed articles published from 1/1/2000 to 30/03/2021 that presented quantitative estimates of prevalence, mortality, or survival for coal mine dust lung disease. Review was conducted per PRISMA guidelines. Articles were screened independently by two authors. Studies were critically assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute tools. Pooled prevalence estimates were obtained using random effects meta-analysis models. Heterogeneity was measured using the I2 statistics and publication bias using Egger's tests. RESULTS: Overall 40 studies were included, (31 prevalence, 8 mortality, 1 survival). Of the prevalence estimates, fifteen (12 from the United States) were retained for the meta-analysis. The overall pooled prevalence estimate for coal workers pneumoconiosis among underground miners was 3.7% (95% CI 3.0-4.5%) with high heterogeneity between studies. The pooled estimate of coal workers pneumoconiosis prevalence in the United States was higher in the 2000s than in the 1990s, consistent with published reports of increasing prevalence following decades of declining trends. Sub-group analyses also indicated higher prevalence among underground miners, and in Central Appalachia. The mortality studies were suggestive of reduced pneumoconiosis mortality rates over time, relative to the general population. CONCLUSION: The ongoing prevalence of occupational lung diseases among contemporary coal miners highlights the importance of respiratory surveillance and preventive efforts through effective dust control measures. Limited prevalence studies from countries other than the United States limits our understanding of the current disease burden in other coal-producing countries.
BACKGROUND: Coal mine dust lung disease comprises a group of occupational lung diseases including coal workers pneumoconiosis. In many countries, there is a lack of robust prevalence estimates for these diseases. Our objective was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of published contemporary estimates on prevalence, mortality, and survival for coal mine dust lung disease worldwide. METHODS: Systematic searches of PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science databases for English language peer-reviewed articles published from 1/1/2000 to 30/03/2021 that presented quantitative estimates of prevalence, mortality, or survival for coal mine dust lung disease. Review was conducted per PRISMA guidelines. Articles were screened independently by two authors. Studies were critically assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute tools. Pooled prevalence estimates were obtained using random effects meta-analysis models. Heterogeneity was measured using the I2 statistics and publication bias using Egger's tests. RESULTS: Overall 40 studies were included, (31 prevalence, 8 mortality, 1 survival). Of the prevalence estimates, fifteen (12 from the United States) were retained for the meta-analysis. The overall pooled prevalence estimate for coal workers pneumoconiosis among underground miners was 3.7% (95% CI 3.0-4.5%) with high heterogeneity between studies. The pooled estimate of coal workers pneumoconiosis prevalence in the United States was higher in the 2000s than in the 1990s, consistent with published reports of increasing prevalence following decades of declining trends. Sub-group analyses also indicated higher prevalence among underground miners, and in Central Appalachia. The mortality studies were suggestive of reduced pneumoconiosismortality rates over time, relative to the general population. CONCLUSION: The ongoing prevalence of occupational lung diseases among contemporary coal miners highlights the importance of respiratory surveillance and preventive efforts through effective dust control measures. Limited prevalence studies from countries other than the United States limits our understanding of the current disease burden in other coal-producing countries.
Authors: Rajen N Naidoo; Thomas G Robins; A Solomon; Neil White; Alfred Franzblau Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2004-09-09 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Jennifer L Perret; Brian Plush; Philippe Lachapelle; Timothy S C Hinks; Clare Walter; Philip Clarke; Louis Irving; Pat Brady; Shyamali C Dharmage; Alastair Stewart Journal: Respirology Date: 2017-03-30 Impact factor: 6.424
Authors: Lei Han; Ruhui Han; Xiaoming Ji; Ting Wang; Jingjin Yang; Jiali Yuan; Qiuyun Wu; Baoli Zhu; Hengdong Zhang; Bangmei Ding; Chunhui Ni Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2015-07-10 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Jennifer L Perret; Susan Miles; Fraser Brims; Katrina Newbigin; Maggie Davidson; Hubertus Jersmann; Adrienne Edwards; Graeme Zosky; Anthony Frankel; Anthony R Johnson; Ryan Hoy; David W Reid; A William Musk; Michael J Abramson; Bob Edwards; Robert Cohen; Deborah H Yates Journal: Respirology Date: 2020-10-13 Impact factor: 6.424