Literature DB >> 34342865

Adolescent novelty seeking is associated with greater ventral striatal and prefrontal brain response during evaluation of risk and reward.

Amanda C Del Giacco1, Scott A Jones1, Angelica M Morales1, Dakota Kliamovich2, Bonnie J Nagel3,4.   

Abstract

Adolescence is a period during which reward sensitivity is heightened. Studies suggest that there are individual differences in adolescent reward-seeking behavior, attributable to a variety of factors, including temperament. This study investigated the neurobiological underpinnings of risk and reward evaluation as they relate to self-reported pleasure derived from novel experiences on the revised Early Adolescent Temperament Questionnaire (EATQ-R). Healthy participants (N = 265, ~50% male), aged 12-17 years, underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging during a modified Wheel of Fortune task, where they evaluated choices with varying probability of winning different monetary rewards. Across all participants, there was increased brain response in salience, reward, and cognitive control circuitry when evaluating choices with larger (compared with moderate) difference in risk/reward. Whole brain and a priori region-of-interest regression analyses revealed that individuals reporting higher novelty seeking had greater activation in bilateral ventral striatum, left middle frontal gyrus, and bilateral posterior cingulate cortex when evaluating the choices for largest difference in risk/reward. These novelty seeking associations with brain response were seen in the absence of temperament-related differences in decision-making behavior. Thus, while heightened novelty seeking in adolescents might be associated with greater neural sensitivity to risk/reward, accompanying increased activation in cognitive control regions might regulate reward-driven risk-taking behavior. More research is needed to determine whether individual differences in brain activation associated with novelty seeking are related to decision making in more ecologically valid settings.
© 2021. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescence; Individual differences; Reward; Risk-taking; Temperament; fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34342865      PMCID: PMC8792307          DOI: 10.3758/s13415-021-00937-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  52 in total

1.  Dissociating valuation and saliency signals during decision-making.

Authors:  Ab Litt; Hilke Plassmann; Baba Shiv; Antonio Rangel
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Age differences in sensation seeking and impulsivity as indexed by behavior and self-report: evidence for a dual systems model.

Authors:  Laurence Steinberg; Dustin Albert; Elizabeth Cauffman; Marie Banich; Sandra Graham; Jennifer Woolard
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2008-11

3.  Psychometric evaluation of the Customary Drinking and Drug Use Record (CDDR): a measure of adolescent alcohol and drug involvement.

Authors:  S A Brown; M G Myers; L Lippke; S F Tapert; D G Stewart; P W Vik
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  1998-07

4.  Mothers know best: redirecting adolescent reward sensitivity toward safe behavior during risk taking.

Authors:  Eva H Telzer; Nicholas T Ichien; Yang Qu
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 5.  Understanding adolescence as a period of social-affective engagement and goal flexibility.

Authors:  Eveline A Crone; Ronald E Dahl
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 34.870

6.  Longitudinal changes in adolescent risk-taking: a comprehensive study of neural responses to rewards, pubertal development, and risk-taking behavior.

Authors:  Barbara R Braams; Anna C K van Duijvenvoorde; Jiska S Peper; Eveline A Crone
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Binge drinking impacts dorsal striatal response during decision making in adolescents.

Authors:  Scott A Jones; Anita Cservenka; Bonnie J Nagel
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  A self-report measure of pubertal status: Reliability, validity, and initial norms.

Authors:  A C Petersen; L Crockett; M Richards; A Boxer
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  1988-04

9.  Individual Differences in Cognitive Control Circuit Anatomy Link Sensation Seeking, Impulsivity, and Substance Use.

Authors:  Avram J Holmes; Marisa O Hollinshead; Joshua L Roffman; Jordan W Smoller; Randy L Buckner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Ventral striatal dopamine synthesis capacity is associated with individual differences in behavioral disinhibition.

Authors:  Andrew D Lawrence; David J Brooks
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.