Literature DB >> 34342753

Delayed Endoscopic Management of Esophageal Sharp-Pointed Food Impaction: An Analysis of 829 Cases in China.

Guangyao Li1, Daquan Wu1, Lei Zhou1, Dan You1, Xinsheng Huang2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Esophageal foreign body impaction is the most common cause of endoscopic emergency. However, there are limited available data on delayed endoscopic management of esophageal sharp-pointed food impaction. AIMS: To investigate cases of esophageal sharp-pointed food impaction with endoscopic removal findings.
METHODS: This single-center retrospective study collected medical records to identify patients with esophageal sharp-pointed food impaction who underwent endoscopic removal between April 2018 and April 2020. The patients were divided into the early (endoscopic removal <12 h) and delayed intervention (>12 h) cohorts.
RESULTS: Overall, 133 and 696 patients received early and delayed intervention, respectively. The success rate of endoscopic foreign body removal was 96.45%. The most common foreign body was fish bone (66.90%), and the most common shape was "I" (56.26%). Patients from the delayed intervention cohort received general anesthesia with a higher risk for perforation, and no foreign body was identified. The duration of endoscopy, distance between the foreign body/wound and the incisor, and longest diameter of the foreign body were not different between the groups. In multivariate analysis, male sex (odds ratio = 1.792 [1.159, 2.771]; P = 0.009), longer duration of impaction (odds ratio = 2.212 [1.121, 4.365]; P = 0.022) and endoscopy (odds ratio = 1.502 [1.253, 1.800]; P < 0.001), and longest diameter of the foreign body (odds ratio = 1.632 [1.329, 2.003]; P < 0.001) were associated with a higher incidence of perforation in patients with foreign body impaction.
CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic removal is a safe and effective treatment method for sharp-pointed food impaction. Delayed endoscopic removal can increase the risk of esophageal perforation.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endoscopic removal; Esophageal perforation; Foreign bodies; Ulcer

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34342753     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-021-07133-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.487


  3 in total

1.  [Review of 209 cases of foreign bodies in the upper gastrointestinal tract and clinical factors for successful endoscopic removal].

Authors:  Jeong Ho Park; Chang Hwan Park; Jae Hong Park; Soo Jung Lee; Wan Sik Lee; Young Eun Joo; Hyun Soo Kim; Sung Kyu Choi; Jong Sun Rew; Sei Jong Kim
Journal:  Korean J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-04

2.  [Endoscopic management of ingested foreign bodies in the upper gastrointestinal tract in childhood: a retrospective study of 1 334 cases].

Authors:  L Q Zhou; H Zhao; K R Peng; L J Tang; Y Y Luo; J D Yu; J G Lou; F B Li; Y H Fang; F B Chen; J Chen
Journal:  Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2018-07-02

3.  Endoscopic management of foreign bodies in the upper gastrointestinal tract: An analysis of 846 cases in China.

Authors:  Fangfang Yuan; Xiaowei Tang; Wei Gong; Lei Su; Yali Zhang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 2.447

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.