Literature DB >> 34342095

Body Composition as an Independent Predictive and Prognostic Biomarker in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

Dylan J Martini1,2, Julie M Shabto1,3, Subir Goyal4, Yuan Liu4, T Anders Olsen1,3, Sean T Evans1,3, Benjamin L Magod1,5, Deepak Ravindranathan1,3, Jacqueline T Brown1,3, Lauren Yantorni1, Greta Anne Russler1, Sarah Caulfield1,6, Jamie M Goldman1,3, Bassel Nazha1,3, Shreyas Subhash Joshi7, Haydn T Kissick7, Kenneth E Ogan7, Wayne B Harris1,3, Omer Kucuk1,3, Bradley C Carthon1,3, Viraj A Master7, Mehmet Asim Bilen1,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are approved for the treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC). There are limited biomarkers for ICI-treated patients with UC. We investigated the association between body composition and clinical outcomes in ICI-treated UC patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 70 ICI-treated patients with advanced UC at Winship Cancer Institute from 2015 to 2020. Baseline computed tomography images within 2 months of ICI initiation were collected at mid-L3 and muscle and fat compartments (subcutaneous, intermuscular, and visceral) were segmented using SliceOMatic v5.0 (TomoVision, Magog, Canada). A prognostic body composition risk score (high: 0-1, intermediate: 2-3, or low-risk: 4) was created based on the β coefficient from the multivariate Cox model (MVA) following best-subset variable selection. Our body composition risk score was skeletal muscle index (SMI) + 2 × attenuated skeletal muscle (SM) mean + visceral fat index (VFI). Concordance statistics (C-statistics) were used to quantify the discriminatory magnitude of the predictive model.
RESULTS: Most patients (70%) were men and the majority received ICIs in the second- (46%) or third-line (21%) setting. High-risk patients had significantly shorter overall survival (OS; hazard ratio [HR], 6.72; p < .001), progression-free survival (HR, 5.82; p < .001), and lower chance of clinical benefit (odds ratio [OR], 0.02; p = .003) compared with the low-risk group in MVA. The C-statistics for our body composition risk group and myosteatosis analyses were higher than body mass index for all clinical outcomes.
CONCLUSION: Body composition variables such as SMI, SM mean, and VFI may be prognostic and predictive of clinical outcomes in ICI-treated patients with UC. Larger, prospective studies are warranted to validate this hypothesis-generating data. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study developed a prognostic body composition risk scoring system using radiographic biomarkers for patients with bladder cancer treated with immunotherapy. The study found that the high-risk patients had significantly worse clinical outcomes. Notably, the study's model was better at predicting outcomes than body mass index. Importantly, these results suggest that radiographic measures of body composition should be considered for inclusion in updated prognostic models for patients with urothelial carcinoma treated with immunotherapy. These findings are useful for practicing oncologists in the academic or community setting, particularly given that baseline imaging is routine for patients starting on treatment with immunotherapy.
© 2021 AlphaMed Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adiposity; Biomarkers; Body composition; Immune checkpoint inhibitors; Myosteatosis; Prognostic model; Sarcopenia; Urothelial carcinoma

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34342095      PMCID: PMC8649001          DOI: 10.1002/onco.13922

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  33 in total

1.  Carrying out streamlined routine data analyses with reports for observational studies: introduction to a series of generic SAS ® macros.

Authors:  Yuan Liu; Dana C Nickleach; Chao Zhang; Jeffrey M Switchenko; Jeanne Kowalski
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-12-19

Review 2.  The Importance of Body Composition in Explaining the Overweight Paradox in Cancer-Counterpoint.

Authors:  Bette J Caan; Elizabeth M Cespedes Feliciano; Candyce H Kroenke
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2018-04-15       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Adiposity may predict survival in patients with advanced stage cancer treated with immunotherapy in phase 1 clinical trials.

Authors:  Dylan J Martini; Meredith R Kline; Yuan Liu; Julie M Shabto; Milton A Williams; Amir Ishaq Khan; Colleen Lewis; Hannah Collins; Mehmet Akce; Haydn T Kissick; Bradley C Carthon; Walid L Shaib; Olatunji B Alese; Rathi N Pillai; Conor E Steuer; Christina S Wu; David H Lawson; Ragini R Kudchadkar; Bassel F El-Rayes; Suresh S Ramalingam; Taofeek K Owonikoko; R Donald Harvey; Viraj A Master; Mehmet Asim Bilen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 4.  The Obesity Paradox in Cancer-Moving Beyond BMI.

Authors:  Shlomit Strulov Shachar; Grant R Williams
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Nivolumab in metastatic urothelial carcinoma after platinum therapy (CheckMate 275): a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial.

Authors:  Padmanee Sharma; Margitta Retz; Arlene Siefker-Radtke; Ari Baron; Andrea Necchi; Jens Bedke; Elizabeth R Plimack; Daniel Vaena; Marc-Oliver Grimm; Sergio Bracarda; José Ángel Arranz; Sumanta Pal; Chikara Ohyama; Abdel Saci; Xiaotao Qu; Alexandre Lambert; Suba Krishnan; Alex Azrilevich; Matthew D Galsky
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Approaches to Assessment of Muscle Mass and Myosteatosis on Computed Tomography: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Behrang Amini; Sean P Boyle; Robert D Boutin; Leon Lenchik
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2019-09-15       Impact factor: 6.053

Review 7.  Sarcopenia in older adults.

Authors:  Jeremy D Walston
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 5.006

8.  The evolution of body composition in oncology-epidemiology, clinical trials, and the future of patient care: facts and numbers.

Authors:  Justin C Brown; Elizabeth M Cespedes Feliciano; Bette J Caan
Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle       Date:  2019-01-13       Impact factor: 12.910

9.  Novel risk group stratification for metastatic urothelial cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Authors:  Julie M Shabto; Dylan J Martini; Yuan Liu; Deepak Ravindranathan; Jacqueline Brown; Emilie E Hitron; Greta A Russler; Sarah Caulfield; Haydn Kissick; Mehrdad Alemozaffar; Kenneth Ogan; Wayne B Harris; Viraj A Master; Omer Kucuk; Bradley C Carthon; Mehmet A Bilen
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 4.452

10.  Combined Effect of Sarcopenia and Systemic Inflammation on Survival in Patients with Advanced Stage Cancer Treated with Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Mehmet Asim Bilen; Dylan J Martini; R Donald Harvey; Viraj A Master; Yuan Liu; Julie M Shabto; Jacqueline T Brown; Milton Williams; Amir I Khan; Alexandra Speak; Colleen Lewis; Hannah Collins; Haydn T Kissick; Bradley C Carthon; Mehmet Akce; Walid L Shaib; Olatunji B Alese; Rathi N Pillai; Conor E Steuer; Christina S Wu; David H Lawson; Ragini R Kudchadkar; Bassel F El-Rayes; Suresh S Ramalingam; Taofeek K Owonikoko
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-12-05
View more
  2 in total

1.  Sarcopenia in Urinary Bladder Cancer: Definition, Prevalence and Prognostic Value in Survival.

Authors:  Themistoklis Ch Bellos; Lazaros I Tzelves; Ioannis S Manolitsis; Stamatios N Katsimperis; Marinos V Berdempes; Andreas Skolarikos; Nikolaos D Karakousis
Journal:  Maedica (Bucur)       Date:  2022-06

2.  Preoperative sarcopenia and systemic immune-inflammation index can predict response to intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin instillation in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Peng Liu; Shouzhen Chen; Xingzhe Gao; Hao Liang; Daqian Sun; Benkang Shi; Qiujie Zhang; Hu Guo
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 8.786

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.