Literature DB >> 34341840

Comparison of allergen quantification strategies for egg, milk, and peanut in food using targeted LC-MS/MS.

Weili Xiong1,2, Christine H Parker1, Chelsea C Boo1,3, Katherine L Fiedler4.   

Abstract

Methods for the detection and quantification of food allergens in complex matrices are necessary to ensure compliance with labeling regulations and assess the effectiveness of food allergen preventive controls. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) has emerged as an orthogonal technique in complement to immunochemical-based assays. However, the absence of established guidelines for MS-based quantification of allergens in food has limited harmonization among the method development community. In this study, different quantification strategies were evaluated using a previously developed multiplexed LC-MS/MS method for the detection of egg, milk, and peanut. Peptide performance criteria (retention time, signal-to-noise ratio, and ion ratio tolerance) were established and quantification approaches using varying calibrants, internal standards, background matrices, and calibration curve preparation schemes were systematically evaluated to refine the previous method for routine laboratory use. A matrix-matched calibration curve using allergen ingredients as calibrants and stable isotope-labeled peptides as internal standards provided the most accurate quantitative results. The strategy was further verified with commercially available reference materials and allowed for the confident detection and quantification of food allergens. This work highlights the need for transparency in calibration strategy and peptide performance requirements for effective evaluation of mass spectrometric methods for the quantification of food allergens.
© 2021. This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Food allergens; Mass spectrometry; Quantification strategies; Reference materials; Targeted MRM proteomics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34341840     DOI: 10.1007/s00216-021-03550-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem        ISSN: 1618-2642            Impact factor:   4.142


  34 in total

1.  Effect of processing on recovery and variability associated with immunochemical analytical methods for multiple allergens in a single matrix: sugar cookies.

Authors:  Sefat Khuda; Andrew Slate; Marion Pereira; Fadwa Al-Taher; Lauren Jackson; Carmen Diaz-Amigo; Elmer C Bigley; Thomas Whitaker; Kristina M Williams
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 5.279

2.  Multi-allergen Quantitation and the Impact of Thermal Treatment in Industry-Processed Baked Goods by ELISA and Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Christine H Parker; Sefat E Khuda; Marion Pereira; Mark M Ross; Tong-Jen Fu; Xuebin Fan; Yan Wu; Kristina M Williams; Jonathan DeVries; Brian Pulvermacher; Binaifer Bedford; Xi Zhang; Lauren S Jackson
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 5.279

3.  Multiplex detection of food allergens and gluten.

Authors:  Chung Y Cho; William Nowatzke; Kerry Oliver; Eric A E Garber
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 4.142

4.  Extension of xMAP Food Allergen Detection Assay To Include Sesame.

Authors:  Chung Y Cho; Katherine O Ivens; William L Nowatzke; Jason Robotham; Mansour Samadpour; Thomas Grace; Kerry G Oliver; Eric A E Garber
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.077

5.  Cross-reactivity profiles of legumes and tree nuts using the xMAP® multiplex food allergen detection assay.

Authors:  Chung Y Cho; Carolyn Oles; William Nowatzke; Kerry Oliver; Eric A E Garber
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 4.142

6.  Multi-laboratory validation of the xMAP-Food Allergen Detection Assay: A multiplex, antibody-based assay for the simultaneous detection of food allergens.

Authors:  Eric A E Garber; Chung Y Cho; Prasad Rallabhandi; William L Nowatzke; Kerry G Oliver; Kodumudi Venkat Venkateswaran; Neeraja Venkateswaran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Are current analytical methods suitable to verify VITAL® 2.0/3.0 allergen reference doses for EU allergens in foods?

Authors:  Thomas Holzhauser; Philip Johnson; James P Hindley; Gavin O'Connor; Chun-Han Chan; Joana Costa; Christiane K Fæste; Barbara J Hirst; Francesca Lambertini; Michela Miani; Marie-Claude Robert; Martin Röder; Stefan Ronsmans; Zsuzsanna Bugyi; Sándor Tömösközi; Simon D Flanagan
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 6.023

Review 8.  Food allergy: A review and update on epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, prevention, and management.

Authors:  Scott H Sicherer; Hugh A Sampson
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 10.793

9.  Presence of Undeclared Food Allergens in Cumin: The Need for Multiplex Methods.

Authors:  Eric A E Garber; Christine H Parker; Sara M Handy; Chung Y Cho; Rakhi Panda; Mansour Samadpour; Danica H Reynaud; George C Ziobro
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 5.279

Review 10.  Commercialized rapid immunoanalytical tests for determination of allergenic food proteins: an overview.

Authors:  Patricia Schubert-Ullrich; Judith Rudolf; Parisa Ansari; Brigitte Galler; Manuela Führer; Alexandra Molinelli; Sabine Baumgartner
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 4.142

View more
  1 in total

1.  Improved Sensitivity of Allergen Detection by Immunoaffinity LC-MS/MS Using Ovalbumin as a Case Study.

Authors:  Martin Röder; Claudia Wiacek; Frauke Lankamp; Jonathan Kreyer; Wolfgang Weber; Elke Ueberham
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-11-27
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.