Literature DB >> 34341726

Stress distribution in the walls of major arteries: implications for atherogenesis.

Siamak Mishani1, Hanane Belhoul-Fakir2, Chris Lagat1, Shirley Jansen3,4,5,6, Brian Evans1, Michael Lawrence-Brown2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a correlation between the sites of atheroma development and stress points in the arterial system. Generally, pulse pressure results in stresses acting on the vascular vessel, including longitudinal stress, radial or normal stress, tangential stress or hoop stress and shear stress. This paper explores the relationship between arterial wall shear stress and pulsatile blood pressure with the aim of furthering the understanding of atherogenesis and plaque progression.
METHODS: We computed the magnitude of the shear stresses within the carotid bifurcation geometry of a patient and calculated the increase in shear stress levels that would occur when the blood pressure and pulse pressures rise during exertion. We also determined in which layer of the artery wall the maximum shear stress is located, and computed the shear stress at different levels within the media. We used the theory of laminate analysis, (Classical Laminate Plate Theory), to analyse the stress distribution on the carotid artery wall. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) analysis was used on anatomy based on a CT angiogram of the carotid bifurcation of a patient with a 90% stenosis on the right side and 10% on the left. The pulsatile non-Newtonian blood flow with a resting blood pressure of 120/80 mmHg and an exertion pressure of 200/100 mmHg was simulated and the resultant forces were transferred to an ANSYS Composite PrepPost (ACP) model for wall shear stress analysis. A multilayer elastic, anisotropic, and inhomogeneous arterial wall (intima, internal elastic lamina, media, external elastic lamina, and adventitial layers) was modelled and the shear stress magnitudes and change over time between the layers was calculated.
RESULTS: Shear stress in the individual composite layers is far greater than that acting on the endothelium (less than 5 Pa). At rest, the maximum variation of shear stress in the arterial wall occurs in the intima (138 Pa) and adventitia (135 Pa). The medial layer has the lowest variation of shear stress. Under severe exertion, the maximum shear stress magnitude in the intimal layer and the adjacent medial layer is near the ultimate stress level. The maximum/minimum shear stress ratios during the cardiac cycle vary most widely in the innermost part of the media, adjacent to the intima, with a four-fold ratio increase. This compares with a less than two-fold increase in all the other layers including the intima and adventitia, making the inner media the most vulnerable layer to mechanical injury.
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the magnitude of exertion-induced shear stress approaches the ultimate stress limit in the intima and the immediate adjacent medial layer. The variation in stress is maximal in the inner layer of the media. These findings correlate the site of atheroma development with the most vulnerable site for injury in the media and emphasise the impact of pulse pressure. Further biological studies are required to ascertain whether this leads to injury that initiates atheroma that then precipitates an injury/healing cycle. 2021 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ANSYS Composite PrepPost (ACP); Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD); Wall shear stress; atherogenesis; isotropic; laminate; multi-layer arterial wall; orthotropic; pulsatile blood flow

Year:  2021        PMID: 34341726      PMCID: PMC8245957          DOI: 10.21037/qims-20-614

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg        ISSN: 2223-4306


  26 in total

1.  Reconstruction of blood flow patterns in a human carotid bifurcation: a combined CFD and MRI study.

Authors:  Q Long; X Y Xu; B Ariff; S A Thom; A D Hughes; A V Stanton
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Stress and strain behaviour modelling of the carotid bifurcation.

Authors:  Michael Lawrence-Brown; Brendan M Stanley; Zhonghua Sun; James B Semmens; Kurt Liffman
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.872

3.  Quantitative analysis of bulk flow in image-based hemodynamic models of the carotid bifurcation: the influence of outflow conditions as test case.

Authors:  Umberto Morbiducci; Diego Gallo; Raffaele Ponzini; Diana Massai; Luca Antiga; Franco M Montevecchi; Alberto Redaelli
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 4.  Neovascularization in human atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Pedro R Moreno; K-Raman Purushothaman; Marc Sirol; Andrew P Levy; Valentin Fuster
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-05-09       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Biaxial mechanical properties of intact and layer-dissected human carotid arteries at physiological and supraphysiological loadings.

Authors:  Gerhard Sommer; Peter Regitnig; Lukas Költringer; Gerhard A Holzapfel
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 4.733

6.  Experimental Study of Anisotropic Stress/Strain Relationships of Aortic and Pulmonary Artery Homografts and Synthetic Vascular Grafts.

Authors:  Yueqian Jia; Yangyang Qiao; I Ricardo Argueta-Morales; Aung Maung; Jack Norfleet; Yuanli Bai; Eduardo Divo; Alain J Kassab; William M DeCampli
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 2.097

7.  Effect of carotid artery geometry on the magnitude and distribution of wall shear stress gradients.

Authors:  D R Wells; J P Archie; C Kleinstreuer
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.268

8.  Carotid bifurcation atherosclerosis. Quantitative correlation of plaque localization with flow velocity profiles and wall shear stress.

Authors:  C K Zarins; D P Giddens; B K Bharadvaj; V S Sottiurai; R F Mabon; S Glagov
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 9.  Shear stress and the endothelium.

Authors:  B J Ballermann; A Dardik; E Eng; A Liu
Journal:  Kidney Int Suppl       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 10.545

10.  Arterial mechanics considering the structural and mechanical contributions of ECM constituents.

Authors:  Yunjie Wang; Shahrokh Zeinali-Davarani; Yanhang Zhang
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.