| Literature DB >> 34341656 |
Anichur Rahman1, Chinmay Chakraborty2, Adnan Anwar3, Md Razaul Karim4, Md Jahidul Islam5, Dipanjali Kundu1, Ziaur Rahman4, Shahab S Band6.
Abstract
The industrial ecosystem has been unprecedentedly affected by the COVID-19 pandemic because of its immense contact restrictions. Therefore, the manufacturing and socio-economic operations that require human involvement have significantly intervened since the beginning of the outbreak. As experienced, the social-distancing lesson in the potential new-normal world seems to force stakeholders to encourage the deployment of contactless Industry 4.0 architecture. Thus, human-less or less-human operations to keep these IoT-enabled ecosystems running without interruptions have motivated us to design and demonstrate an intelligent automated framework. In this research, we have proposed "EdgeSDN-I4COVID" architecture for intelligent and efficient management during COVID-19 of the smart industry considering the IoT networks. Moreover, the article presents the SDN-enabled layer, such as data, control, and application, to effectively and automatically monitor the IoT data from a remote location. In addition, the proposed convergence between SDN and NFV provides an efficient control mechanism for managing the IoT sensor data. Besides, it offers robust data integration on the surface and the devices required for Industry 4.0 during the COVID-19 pandemic. Finally, the article justified the above contributions through particular performance evaluations upon appropriate simulation setup and environment.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; Industry 4.0; IoT; NFV; OpenFlow; Privacy; SDN; Security
Year: 2021 PMID: 34341656 PMCID: PMC8318841 DOI: 10.1007/s10586-021-03367-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cluster Comput ISSN: 1386-7857 Impact factor: 2.303
Fig. 1Working from Home and cloud scenario in COVID-19 situation
Technical terms and abbreviations
| Terms | Description |
|---|---|
| Artificial Intelligence | |
| Application Plane | |
| Blockchain | |
| Cluster Head | |
| Cluster Head Selection | |
| Convolutional Neural Network | |
| 2019 Novel Coronavirus | |
| Control Plane | |
| Denial of Service | |
| Distributed Denial of Service | |
| Data Plane | |
| Internet of Medical Things | |
| Internet of Things | |
| Industrial Revolution 4.0 | |
| Machine Learning | |
| Network Function Virtualization | |
| Quality of Service | |
| Radio Frequency Identification | |
| Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 | |
| Smart Contact | |
| Software Defined Networking | |
| Transport Layer Security |
Fig. 2Applications of industry 4.0 fight against Covid-19
Fig. 3Applications of IoT to fight against COVID-19
Summary of current research works
| Work and Year | Technologies | Research Objective | Comparison of recent research work with regard to: |
|---|---|---|---|
| Javaid et al. (2020) [ | AI, IR 4.0 | Managing COVID-19 | An in depth review on the technologies of IR 4.0 to manage the pandemic stage. |
| Ndiaye et al. (2020) [ | IoT, AI, Big data | Electronic health management system | A survey on the existing technologies such as, IoT, artificial intelligent to assist the health system in order to survive in this pandemic situation. |
| Ranaweera et al. (2020) [ | 5G, Multi access edge computing | Remote patient monitoring and without contact support to patient | A edge computing mechanism based on multi accessibility for providing treatment or health advice to COVID-19 affected patients remotely. |
| Abdel-Basset et al. (2020) [ | Blockchain, IR 4.0, IoMT, 5G | Assist physicians to take quick actions to serve the patients. | Smart architecture to track the COVID-19 patients and manage PPE. |
| Garg et al. (2020) [ | IoT, Blockchain | Development of a framework to minimize the outspread of the Covid 19 | A framework on block chain’s trust mechanism and RFID based tracing system to track the movement of animals and humans to control the spread of this infection. |
| Singh et al. (2020) [ | IoT | Prediction of an outbreak and screening patients remotely | An IoT based smart framework to fight in the pandemic situation in every aspect. |
| Otoom et al. (2020) [ | IoT, machine learning, cloud architecture | Collecting and analyzing past record of patient affected by coronavirus | Collection of data for detection of COVID-19 patient at early stage using machine learning algorithms. |
| Kolhar et al. (2020) [ | CNN, IoT, Edge and Cloud computing | Face detection mechanism to assist the imposing of mask | Implemented a three layer framework to detect the face of human to monitor the movement of human. |
| Rahman et al. (2020) [ | IoT, web tool, m-health | Defend pandemic using benefits of IoT | The technological assessment to help the whole world to survive in this pandemic. |
| Marbouh et al. (2020) [ | Blockchain, Ethereum | Secured tracking mechanism | A comprehensive review on the scopes and applications of the secured blockchain technology. |
| Tsang et al. (2021) [ | IoT, Blockchain | Examining the layered architecture of BIoT | Nine broad categories of the combined Blockchain and IoT structure in the perspective of research and development that is actually the core part of any industry. |
| Xu et al. (2019) [ | IoT, Industry 4.0, Cloud computing, Cyber-physical systems, and Big data | Highlighted the potential guideline for Industry 4.0 to obtain a fully autonomous system | Big data methods are being used to enhance the scalability and security of Industry 4.0. In addition, in industry 4.0, a connection between cyber-physical systems and big data being developed. |
| Aheleroff et al. (2021) [ | IoT, Cloud computing, Industry 4.0 | Identified appropriate Industry 4.0 technologies and a holistic reference framework to finish the most difficult Digital Twin-enabled applications | Establish a strong connection between Digital Twin capabilities as a service and mass personalization. Smart scheduled maintenance, real-time tracking, and remote control are among the additional resources available. |
Fig. 4Proposed Framework
Fig. 5IoT data selection scenario
Challenges and solutions
| Challenges | Solutions |
|---|---|
| Security of the Data | SDN and OpenFlow Protocol |
| Time Management | SDN–IoT Gateway |
| Difference of Sensor Domain | IoT and NFV |
| Scalability and Load Balancing | NFV |
| Data Capturing and Monitoring | Wireshark |
| Life time and Energy Consumption | IoT Data Selection Procedure |
Fig. 6SDN architecture
Fig. 7Most challenge facing industry 4.0 technologies during COVID-19 outbreak
Fig. 8Industry 4.0 smart services
Considered parameters for simulation setup
| Parameters name | Values | |
|---|---|---|
| General parameters | Emulator | Mininet 2.2.2 |
| Packet Analyzer | Wireshark | |
| Simulation Area | 3000m X 3000m | |
| SDN Parameters | No. of SDN Controllers | 7 |
| OpenFlow switches | 8 | |
| Gateways | 4 | |
| SDN Routing Protocol | OpenFlow | |
| Measured parameters | Throughput comparisons | 3000 Mb/s |
| Data response time analysis | - | |
| Data failure rate | - | |
| Tcp Trace (Sequence number) | - | |
| Others parameters | Number of IoT devices | 300 |
| Simulation Times | 500s | |
| Data Rate | 10 Mbps | |
| Node Transmit Packet Size | 512-1024 bytes |
Fig. 9Network topology design in mininet-WiFi platform
Fig. 10Throughput comparisons (50 vs. 100 vs. 200 nodes) with Respect to Transaction Time
Fig. 11Throughput comparisons with respect to transaction time
Fig. 12Response time comparisons with respect to the number of devices
Fig. 13Nodes failure rate comparisons with respect to the number of packets
Fig. 14Response issues with respect to the technologies [10, 28]
Comparative summary among different architectures and the proposed one
| Works | Technologies | COVID-19 | Findings | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IoT | SDN | NFV | IR 4.0 | |||
| Kumar et al. [ | X | X | X | A monitoring system to decrease the spread of COVID-19 viral disease | ||
| Javaid et al. [ | X | X | X | Industry 4.0 technology can assist in the proper isolation of an infected patient, thus minimizing disease spread | ||
| Kumar et al. [ | X | X | X | Recognized twelve significant problems in the retail sector and adopted Industry 4.0 technology to tackle them. | ||
| Abdel et al. [ | X | X | The disruptive technologies are utilized to dissolve and restrict the spread of COVID-19 and COVID-19’s patients assure the consequence of an intelligent model | |||
| Garg et al. [ | X | X | X | Study the different type of contact tracing application available and provided a better solution for tracing in order to restrict or identify the spread of the virus | ||
| Ndiaye et al. [ | X | X | An overview of IoT based healthcare system to fight against pandemic and future of healthcare system incorporating big data, drone and other latest technologies. | |||
| Singh et al. [ | X | X | X | Identified framework of IoT to handle the lockdown situation due to pandemic worldwide by ensuring secured virtual meeting monitoring healthcare system remotely and online education system as well. | ||
| Otoom et al. [ | X | X | X | With the aid of machine learning algorthims the authors in this work proposed a framework that can identify cases of COVID-19 by analysis the sysmptoms accurately and without delay. | ||
| Kolhar et al. [ | X | X | X | Biometric system with the assistance of IoT to restrict the movement of the people during lockdown also to detect whether there is a mask on the face or not. | ||
| Rahman et al. [ | X | X | X | Studied the possibilities of IoT models to fight against enquoteHCoV-19 | ||
| Proposed Work | Provided an SDN–IoT based intelligent model for Industry 4.0 and Incorporated among the technologies such as IoT, SDN, NFV, and Cloud to meet the demands for the COVID-19 situation | |||||