| Literature DB >> 34341195 |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The descriptive clinical study was conducted to analyse the clinical profile as well as the outcome of congenital right diaphragmatic defects among children including neonates in a tertiary care referral neonatal and paediatric centre in southern Karnataka, India.Entities:
Keywords: Diaphragmatic; hernia; neonates; right sided and congenital
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34341195 PMCID: PMC8362922 DOI: 10.4103/ajps.AJPS_29_20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Afr J Paediatr Surg ISSN: 0974-5998
Figure 1Clinical images of right CDH. (a) Pre-operative chest X-ray. (b) Intraoperative appearance of right CDH with sac. Blue arrow pointing at sac. (c) Blue arrow pointing at repaired diaphragmatic defect. (d) Post-operative chest X-ray. CDH: Congenital diaphragmatic hernia
Comparison of various factors among grouped subjects
| Study subjects ( | Whole group ( | Group I CDH ( | Group II CDH+sac ( | Group III DE ( | Group IV-Paraesophageal and morgagni hernia ( |
| Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age at presentation (days), mean±SD | 271±399.12 | 244±353.8 | 403±624.5 | 270±374.8 | 112.5±95.46 | 0.804285 | NS |
| Sex, | |||||||
| Male | 19 (57.57) | 11 (33.33) | 3 (9.09) | 4 (12.12) | 1 (3.03) | 0.030202 | S |
| Female | 14 (42.42) | 7 (21.21) | 3 (9.09) | 3 (9.09) | 1 (3.03) | ||
| Male:female ratio | 1:0.74 | 1:0.64 | 1:1 | 1:0.75 | 1:1 | ||
| MOD, | |||||||
| Preterm | 2 (6.06) | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| NVD | 1 (3.03) | 1 (3.03) | 0 | ||||
| LSCS | 1 (3.03) | 0 | 1 (3.03) | ||||
| NVD:LSCS ratio | 1:1 | 1:0 | 1:0 | 0:0 | 0:0 | ||
| Full term | 31 (93.93) | 16 (48.48) | 6 (18.18) | 7 (21.21) | 2 (6.06) | 0.049282 | S |
| NVD | 19 (57.57) | 8 (24.24) | 4 (12.12) | 5 (15.15) | 2 (6.06) | ||
| LSCS | 12 (36.36) | 8 (24.24) | 2 (6.06) | 2 (6.06) | |||
| NVD:LSCS ratio | 1:0.63 | 1:1 | 1:0.5 | 1:0.4 | 1:0 | ||
| Gestational age weeks, mean±SD | 38.54±1.71557 | 38.39±1.79 | 37.83±1.33 | 39.42±1.81 | 39±1.414 | 0.378637 | NS |
| Associated congenital anomalies, | 6 (18.18) | 2 (11.11) | 2 (33.33) | 1 (14.29) | 1 (50) | ||
| ARM | 2 (12.12) | 1 (5.55) | 1 (16.16) | 0 | 0 | ||
| Cardiac | 4 (6.06) | 1 (5.55) | 1 (16.16) (PDA) | 1 (14.28) (ASD) | 1 (50) (OSASD) | ||
| Others | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Birth weight (kg) | 2.74±0.573504 | 2.65±0.51 | 2.78±0.53 | 2.5±0.79 | 3.25±0.3535 | 0.55076 | NS |
| Surgery weight (kg) | 4.742±2.451 | 4.54±2.97 | 5.04±2.25 | 5.09±2.57 | 4.73±1.796 | 0.945741 | NS |
| Pre-operative ventilation, | 3 (9.09) | 3 (9.09) | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Post-operative ventilation, | 3 (9.09) | 3 (9.09) (2–5) | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| MOS, | 32 (96.96)* | 17/32 (53.12)* | 6 (18.75)* | 7 (21.88)* | 2 (6.25)* | 0.168 | |
| Open, | 10/17 (58.82) | 2/6 (33.33) | 2/7 (28.58) | 1 (50) | |||
| Thoraco, | 5/17 (29.41) | 4/6 (66.66) | 5/7 (71.42) | 0 (0) | |||
| Lapar, | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |||
| TAO, | 1/17 (5.88) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |||
| LAO, | 1/17 (5.88) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (50) | |||
| DOHS (days), mean±SD | 16.27±10.05694 | 16.89±11.68 | 14±8.84 | 18±8 | 11±5.657 | 0.796622 | NS |
| Reccurence, | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| SSI, | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Other surgeries, | 2 (6.25) | 1/17 (5.88) (ARM-3) | 1 (16.66) (ARM-3) | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Survival, | 31 (93.93) | 15/17 (88.24) | 6 (100) | 7 (100) | 2 (100) | 100% |
NS: Not significant, S: Significant, SD: Standard deviation, CDH: Congenital diaphragmatic hernia, LSCS: Lower segment caesarean section, NVD: Normal vaginal delivery, MOD: Mode of delivery, SSI: Surgical site infection, ASD: Anterior septal defect, OSASD: Ostium secundum ASD, PDA: Patent ductus arteriosus, ARM: Anorectal malformations, MOS: Mode of surgery, TAO: Thoracoscopic assisted open, LAO: Laparoscopic assisted Open, DOHS: Duration of hospital stay
Figure 2Graphical representation of modes of surgical interventions
Figure 3Consort diagram