Literature DB >> 34341115

The evolution of parasitism from mutualism in wasps pollinating the fig, Ficus microcarpa, in Yunnan Province, China.

Ting Zhang1,2,3, K Charlotte Jandér4, Jian-Feng Huang1,2, Bo Wang1,2, Jiang-Bo Zhao1, Bai-Ge Miao1,2,3, Yan-Qiong Peng5,2, Edward Allen Herre6.   

Abstract

Theory identifies factors that can undermine the evolutionary stability of mutualisms. However, theory's relevance to mutualism stability in nature is controversial. Detailed comparative studies of parasitic species that are embedded within otherwise mutualistic taxa (e.g., fig pollinator wasps) can identify factors that potentially promote or undermine mutualism stability. We describe results from behavioral, morphological, phylogenetic, and experimental studies of two functionally distinct, but closely related, Eupristina wasp species associated with the monoecious host fig, Ficus microcarpa, in Yunnan Province, China. One (Eupristina verticillata) is a competent pollinator exhibiting morphologies and behaviors consistent with observed seed production. The other (Eupristina sp.) lacks these traits, and dramatically reduces both female and male reproductive success of its host. Furthermore, observations and experiments indicate that individuals of this parasitic species exhibit greater relative fitness than the pollinators, in both indirect competition (individual wasps in separate fig inflorescences) and direct competition (wasps of both species within the same fig). Moreover, phylogenetic analyses suggest that these two Eupristina species are sister taxa. By the strictest definition, the nonpollinating species represents a "cheater" that has descended from a beneficial pollinating mutualist. In sharp contrast to all 15 existing studies of actively pollinated figs and their wasps, the local F. microcarpa exhibit no evidence for host sanctions that effectively reduce the relative fitness of wasps that do not pollinate. We suggest that the lack of sanctions in the local hosts promotes the loss of specialized morphologies and behaviors crucial for pollination and, thereby, the evolution of cheating.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cheating; coevolution; fig wasps; host sanctions; pollination mutualism

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34341115      PMCID: PMC8364199          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2021148118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  41 in total

1.  Molecular phylogeny of the Ceratosolen species pollinating Ficus of the subgenus Sycomorus sensu stricto: biogeographical history and origins of the species-specificity breakdown cases.

Authors:  C Kerdelhue; I Le Clainche; J Y Rasplus
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.286

2.  The evolution of mutualisms: exploring the paths between conflict and cooperation.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 3.  Fig-eating by vertebrate frugivores: a global review.

Authors:  M Shanahan; S So; S G Compton; R Corlett
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2001-11

Review 4.  The evolution of cooperation.

Authors:  Joel L Sachs; Ulrich G Mueller; Thomas P Wilcox; James J Bull
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.875

Review 5.  The evolution of mutualism.

Authors:  E G Leigh
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 2.411

6.  An empirical test of partner choice mechanisms in a wild legume-rhizobium interaction.

Authors:  Ellen L Simms; D Lee Taylor; Joshua Povich; Richard P Shefferson; J L Sachs; M Urbina; Y Tausczik
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  Partner selection in the mycorrhizal mutualism.

Authors:  Gijsbert D A Werner; E Toby Kiers
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 10.151

8.  Inferring processes of coevolutionary diversification in a community of Panamanian strangler figs and associated pollinating wasps.

Authors:  Jordan D Satler; Edward Allen Herre; K Charlotte Jandér; Deren A R Eaton; Carlos A Machado; Tracy A Heath; John D Nason
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Why mutualist partners vary in quality: mutation-selection balance and incentives to cheat in the fig tree-fig wasp mutualism.

Authors:  K Charlotte Jandér; Brian S Steidinger
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 9.492

10.  Fitness reduction for uncooperative fig wasps through reduced offspring size: a third component of host sanctions.

Authors:  K C Jandér; A Dafoe; E A Herre
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 5.499

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.