Caihong Wu1, Yan Liu1, Lin Yang2, Yifang Tang1, Lijun Zhou1, Xin Wang3. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China; Anesthesia Medical Research Center of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China; Department of Clinical Nursing, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China. 2. Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China; Anesthesia Medical Research Center of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China. 3. Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China; Anesthesia Medical Research Center of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China. Electronic address: wangxin6688@csu.edu.cn.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Postoperative thirst is a common clinical issue. The discomfort caused by thirst during the perioperative period is strong and significant. Postoperative thirst is associated with emotional changes, giving rise to a series of adverse psychological and physical problems to patients. This study aimed to explore the effect of 0.75% citric acid spray on thirst relief during the anesthesia recovery period in China. DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial was conducted on subjects immediately after the removal of the endotracheal tube in a postanesthesia care unit. METHODS: A total of 112 patients with TI scores ≥3 on 0-10 numeric rating scale were randomized to the intervention group (0.75% citric acid spray group; n = 56) or control group (cool water spray; n = 56) by computerized randomization. Thirst assessment was performed before and 5 minutes after the intervention. Five minutes after the intervention, if the TI score was still ≥3 points, the spray would be added and the thirst assessment would be performed again until the TI score was <3 points. The onset time, duration time, and the number of additional sprays within 20 minutes was recorded. FINDINGS: Five minutes after the intervention, the thirst intensity score of the 0.75% citric acid spray group decreased from 5.57 ± 1.35 to 3.09 ± 1.20. The onset and duration times were 0.77 ± 0.47 min and 4.41 ± 2.59 min, respectively, and the number of spray additions in 20 min was 1.09 ± 0.92. The thirst intensity score of the cool water spray group decreased from 5.29 ± 1.52 to 3.73 ± 1.54. The onset and duration time were 0.84 ± 0.42 min and 2.77 ± 1.80 min, respectively, and the number of spray additions was 1.91 ± 1.24. No incidence of adverse events, including choking, aspiration, and allergies occurred. CONCLUSION: For thirsty patients during the anesthesia recovery period, the spray method is safe and has fewer side effects, including choking, aspiration, and allergies. Thus, 0.75% citric acid spray and cool water spray are both safe and effective; however, the 0.75% citric acid spray has a better thirst relief effect that lasts longer than the cool water spray.
PURPOSE: Postoperative thirst is a common clinical issue. The discomfort caused by thirst during the perioperative period is strong and significant. Postoperative thirst is associated with emotional changes, giving rise to a series of adverse psychological and physical problems to patients. This study aimed to explore the effect of 0.75% citric acid spray on thirst relief during the anesthesia recovery period in China. DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial was conducted on subjects immediately after the removal of the endotracheal tube in a postanesthesia care unit. METHODS: A total of 112 patients with TI scores ≥3 on 0-10 numeric rating scale were randomized to the intervention group (0.75% citric acid spray group; n = 56) or control group (cool water spray; n = 56) by computerized randomization. Thirst assessment was performed before and 5 minutes after the intervention. Five minutes after the intervention, if the TI score was still ≥3 points, the spray would be added and the thirst assessment would be performed again until the TI score was <3 points. The onset time, duration time, and the number of additional sprays within 20 minutes was recorded. FINDINGS: Five minutes after the intervention, the thirst intensity score of the 0.75% citric acid spray group decreased from 5.57 ± 1.35 to 3.09 ± 1.20. The onset and duration times were 0.77 ± 0.47 min and 4.41 ± 2.59 min, respectively, and the number of spray additions in 20 min was 1.09 ± 0.92. The thirst intensity score of the cool water spray group decreased from 5.29 ± 1.52 to 3.73 ± 1.54. The onset and duration time were 0.84 ± 0.42 min and 2.77 ± 1.80 min, respectively, and the number of spray additions was 1.91 ± 1.24. No incidence of adverse events, including choking, aspiration, and allergies occurred. CONCLUSION: For thirsty patients during the anesthesia recovery period, the spray method is safe and has fewer side effects, including choking, aspiration, and allergies. Thus, 0.75% citric acid spray and cool water spray are both safe and effective; however, the 0.75% citric acid spray has a better thirst relief effect that lasts longer than the cool water spray.