| Literature DB >> 34340720 |
Ashutosh Kumar1,2, Ravi K Narayan1,2, Maheswari Kulandhasamy1,3, Pranav Prasoon1,4, Chiman Kumari1,5, Sujeet Kumar1,6, Vikas Pareek1,7, Kishore Sesham1,8, Prakash S Shekhawat1,9, Kamla Kant1,10, Santosh Kumar1,11.
Abstract
Recent epidemiological studies analysing sex-disaggregated patient data of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) across the world revealed a distinct sex bias in the disease morbidity as well as the mortality - both being higher for the men. Similar antecedents have been known for the previous viral infections, including from coronaviruses, such as severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and middle-east respiratory syndrome (MERS). A sound understanding of molecular mechanisms leading to the biological sex bias in the survival outcomes of the patients in relation to COVID-19 will act as an essential requisite for developing a sex-differentiated approach for therapeutic management of this disease. Recent studies which have explored molecular mechanism(s) behind sex-based differences in COVID-19 pathogenesis are scarce; however, existing evidence, for other respiratory viral infections, viz. SARS, MERS and influenza, provides important clues in this regard. In attempt to consolidate the available knowledge on this issue, we conducted a systematic review of the existing empirical knowledge and recent experimental studies following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The qualitative analysis of the collected data unravelled multiple molecular mechanisms, such as evolutionary and genetic/epigenetic factors, sex-linkage of viral host cell entry receptor and immune response genes, sex hormone and gut microbiome-mediated immune-modulation, as the possible key reasons for the sex-based differences in patient outcomes in COVID-19.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; epigenetic mechanisms; evolution; genetics; sex; sex hormones
Year: 2021 PMID: 34340720 DOI: 10.1017/erm.2021.9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Expert Rev Mol Med ISSN: 1462-3994 Impact factor: 5.600