Ian Coulter1, Tamara Timic Stamenic1, Pierce Eggan1, Brier R Fine1, Timothy Corrigan2, Douglas F Covey3, Lingling Yang4, Jen Q Pan4, Slobodan M Todorovic5. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, 80045, USA. 2. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neurology, Translational Epilepsy Research Program, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. 3. Department of Developmental Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA; Taylor Family Institute for Innovative Psychiatric Research, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA. 4. Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, USA. 5. Department of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, 80045, USA; Neuroscience and University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, 80045, USA; Pharmacology Graduate Programs, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, 80045, USA. Electronic address: slobodan.todorovic@cuanschutz.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Many neuroactive steroids induce sedation/hypnosis by potentiating γ-aminobutyric acid (GABAA) currents. However, we previously demonstrated that an endogenous neuroactive steroid epipregnanolone [(3β,5β)-3-hydroxypregnan-20-one] (EpiP) exerts potent peripheral analgesia and blocks T-type calcium currents while sparing GABAA currents in rat sensory neurons. This study seeks to investigate the behavioral effects elicited by systemic administration of EpiP and to characterize its use as an adjuvant agent to commonly used general anesthetics (GAs). METHODS: Here, we utilized electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings to characterize thalamocortical oscillations, as well as behavioral assessment and mouse genetics with wild-type (WT) and different knockout (KO) models of T-channel isoforms to investigate potential sedative/hypnotic and immobilizing properties of EpiP. RESULTS: Consistent with increased oscillations in slower EEG frequencies, EpiP induced an hypnotic state in WT mice when injected alone intra-peritoneally (i.p.) and effectively facilitated anesthetic effects of isoflurane (ISO) and sevoflurane (SEVO). The CaV3.1 (Cacna1g) KO mice demonstrated decreased sensitivity to EpiP-induced hypnosis when compared to WT mice, whereas no significant difference was noted between CaV3.2 (Cacna1h), CaV3.3 (Cacna1i) and WT mice. Finally, when compared to WT mice, onset of EpiP-induced hypnosis was delayed in CaV3.2 KO mice but not in CaV3.1 and CaV3.3 KO mice. CONCLUSION: We posit that EpiP may have an important role as novel hypnotic and/or adjuvant to volatile anesthetic agents. We speculate that distinct hypnotic effects of EpiP across all three T-channel isoforms is due to their differential expression in thalamocortical circuitry.
BACKGROUND: Many neuroactive steroids induce sedation/hypnosis by potentiating γ-aminobutyric acid (GABAA) currents. However, we previously demonstrated that an endogenous neuroactive steroid epipregnanolone [(3β,5β)-3-hydroxypregnan-20-one] (EpiP) exerts potent peripheral analgesia and blocks T-type calcium currents while sparing GABAA currents in rat sensory neurons. This study seeks to investigate the behavioral effects elicited by systemic administration of EpiP and to characterize its use as an adjuvant agent to commonly used general anesthetics (GAs). METHODS: Here, we utilized electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings to characterize thalamocortical oscillations, as well as behavioral assessment and mouse genetics with wild-type (WT) and different knockout (KO) models of T-channel isoforms to investigate potential sedative/hypnotic and immobilizing properties of EpiP. RESULTS: Consistent with increased oscillations in slower EEG frequencies, EpiP induced an hypnotic state in WT mice when injected alone intra-peritoneally (i.p.) and effectively facilitated anesthetic effects of isoflurane (ISO) and sevoflurane (SEVO). The CaV3.1 (Cacna1g) KO mice demonstrated decreased sensitivity to EpiP-induced hypnosis when compared to WT mice, whereas no significant difference was noted between CaV3.2 (Cacna1h), CaV3.3 (Cacna1i) and WT mice. Finally, when compared to WT mice, onset of EpiP-induced hypnosis was delayed in CaV3.2 KO mice but not in CaV3.1 and CaV3.3 KO mice. CONCLUSION: We posit that EpiP may have an important role as novel hypnotic and/or adjuvant to volatile anesthetic agents. We speculate that distinct hypnotic effects of EpiP across all three T-channel isoforms is due to their differential expression in thalamocortical circuitry.
Authors: Alexis M Ziemba; Andrea Szabo; David W Pierce; Marian Haburcak; Alex T Stern; Anahita Nourmahnad; Elizabeth S Halpin; Stuart A Forman Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 7.892