| Literature DB >> 34339576 |
Jolanta Kowalewska1, Ismail El Moudden2, Agnieszka Perkowska-Ptasinska3, Meghan E Kapp4, Agnes B Fogo4, Mercury Y Lin5, Alamgir Mirza6, Dean A Troyer1, Magdalena Durlik3, Rana Sandhu7, Michal Ciszek3, Dominika Deborska-Materkowska3, Daniel Kuczynski3, Thomas R McCune6.
Abstract
Polyomavirus associated nephropathy (PyVAN) continues to be a burden in renal transplantation leading to allograft insufficiency or graft failure. A presumptive diagnosis of PyVAN is made based on the presence of BK polyomavirus in patients' plasma; however, kidney biopsy remains the gold standard to establish a definitive diagnosis. The Banff Working Group on PyVAN proposed a novel classification of definitive PyVAN based on polyomavirus replication/load level and the extent of interstitial fibrosis. The aim of our study was to test the newly defined classes of PyVAN using independent cohorts of 124 kidney transplant patients with PyVAN with respect to the initial presentation and outcome, and to compare our analysis to that previously reported. Detailed analysis of our cohort revealed that the proposed classification of PyVAN did not stratify or identify patients at increased risk of allograft failure. Specifically, while class 3 was associated with the worst prognosis, there was no significant difference between the outcomes in classes 1 and 2. We also found that the timing post-transplantation and inflammation in areas of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy might be additional factors contributing to an unfavorable allograft outcome in patients with PyVAN.Entities:
Keywords: BK associated polyomavirus nephropathy; classification; renal transplantation
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34339576 DOI: 10.1111/tri.14003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transpl Int ISSN: 0934-0874 Impact factor: 3.782