Importance: Direct transfer to angiography suite (DTAS) for patients with suspected large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke has been described as an effective and safe measure to reduce workflow time in endovascular treatment (EVT). However, it is unknown whether DTAS improves long-term functional outcomes. Objective: To explore the effect of DTAS on clinical outcomes among patients with LVO stroke in a randomized clinical trial. Design, Setting, and Participants: The study was an investigator-initiated, single-center, evaluator-blinded randomized clinical trial. Of 466 consecutive patients with acute stroke screened, 174 with suspected LVO acute stroke within 6 hours of symptom onset were included. Enrollment took place from September 2018 to November 2020 and was stopped after a preplanned interim analysis. Final follow-up was in February 2021. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to follow either DTAS (89 patients) or conventional workflow (85 patients received direct transfer to computed tomographic imaging, with usual imaging performed and EVT indication decided) to assess the indication of EVT. Patients were stratified according to their having been transferred from a primary center vs having a direct admission. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a shift analysis assessing the distribution of the 90-day 7-category (from 0 [no symptoms] to 6 [death]) modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score among patients with LVO whether or not they received EVT (modified intention-to-treat population) assessed by blinded external evaluators. Secondary outcomes included rate of EVT and door-to-arterial puncture time. Safety outcomes included 90-day mortality and rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Results: In total, 174 patients were included, with a mean (SD) age of 73.4 (12.6) years (range, 19-95 years), and 78 patients (44.8%) were women. Their mean (SD) onset-to-door time was 228.0 (117.9) minutes, and their median admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 18 (interquartile range [IQR], 14-21). In the modified intention-to-treat population, EVT was performed for all 74 patients in the DTAS group and for 64 patients (87.7%) in the conventional workflow group (P = .002). The DTAS protocol decreased the median door-to-arterial puncture time (18 minutes [IQR, 15-24 minutes] vs 42 minutes [IQR, 35-51 minutes]; P < .001) and door-to-reperfusion time (57 minutes [IQR, 43-77 minutes] vs 84 minutes [IQR, 63-117 minutes]; P < .001). The DTAS protocol decreased the severity of disability across the range of the mRS (adjusted common odds ratio, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.2-4.1; P = .009). Safety variables were comparable between groups. Conclusions and Relevance: For patients with LVO admitted within 6 hours after symptom onset, this randomized clinical trial found that, compared with conventional workflow, the use of DTAS increased the odds of patients undergoing EVT, decreased hospital workflow time, and improved clinical outcome. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04001738.
Importance: Direct transfer to angiography suite (DTAS) for patients with suspected large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke has been described as an effective and safe measure to reduce workflow time in endovascular treatment (EVT). However, it is unknown whether DTAS improves long-term functional outcomes. Objective: To explore the effect of DTAS on clinical outcomes among patients with LVO stroke in a randomized clinical trial. Design, Setting, and Participants: The study was an investigator-initiated, single-center, evaluator-blinded randomized clinical trial. Of 466 consecutive patients with acute stroke screened, 174 with suspected LVO acute stroke within 6 hours of symptom onset were included. Enrollment took place from September 2018 to November 2020 and was stopped after a preplanned interim analysis. Final follow-up was in February 2021. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to follow either DTAS (89 patients) or conventional workflow (85 patients received direct transfer to computed tomographic imaging, with usual imaging performed and EVT indication decided) to assess the indication of EVT. Patients were stratified according to their having been transferred from a primary center vs having a direct admission. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a shift analysis assessing the distribution of the 90-day 7-category (from 0 [no symptoms] to 6 [death]) modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score among patients with LVO whether or not they received EVT (modified intention-to-treat population) assessed by blinded external evaluators. Secondary outcomes included rate of EVT and door-to-arterial puncture time. Safety outcomes included 90-day mortality and rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Results: In total, 174 patients were included, with a mean (SD) age of 73.4 (12.6) years (range, 19-95 years), and 78 patients (44.8%) were women. Their mean (SD) onset-to-door time was 228.0 (117.9) minutes, and their median admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 18 (interquartile range [IQR], 14-21). In the modified intention-to-treat population, EVT was performed for all 74 patients in the DTAS group and for 64 patients (87.7%) in the conventional workflow group (P = .002). The DTAS protocol decreased the median door-to-arterial puncture time (18 minutes [IQR, 15-24 minutes] vs 42 minutes [IQR, 35-51 minutes]; P < .001) and door-to-reperfusion time (57 minutes [IQR, 43-77 minutes] vs 84 minutes [IQR, 63-117 minutes]; P < .001). The DTAS protocol decreased the severity of disability across the range of the mRS (adjusted common odds ratio, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.2-4.1; P = .009). Safety variables were comparable between groups. Conclusions and Relevance: For patients with LVO admitted within 6 hours after symptom onset, this randomized clinical trial found that, compared with conventional workflow, the use of DTAS increased the odds of patients undergoing EVT, decreased hospital workflow time, and improved clinical outcome. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04001738.
Authors: Guillaume Turc; Georgios Tsivgoulis; Heinrich J Audebert; Hieronymus Boogaarts; Pervinder Bhogal; Gian Marco De Marchis; Ana Catarina Fonseca; Pooja Khatri; Mikaël Mazighi; Natalia Pérez de la Ossa; Peter D Schellinger; Daniel Strbian; Danilo Toni; Philip White; William Whiteley; Andrea Zini; Wim van Zwam; Jens Fiehler Journal: Eur Stroke J Date: 2022-02-17
Authors: Jakub Sulženko; Boris Kožnar; Dušan Kučera; Tomáš Peisker; Peter Vaško; Ivan Poledník; Ondřej Richter; Marek Neuberg; Petr Mašek; Ivana Štětkářová; Petr Widimský Journal: Eur Heart J Suppl Date: 2022-03-30 Impact factor: 1.624
Authors: Alex Brehm; Ioannis Tsogkas; Johanna M Ospel; Christian Appenzeller-Herzog; Junya Aoki; Kazumi Kimura; Johannes A R Pfaff; Markus A Möhlenbruch; Manuel Requena; Marc J Ribo; Amrou Sarraj; Alejandro M Spiotta; Peter Sporns; Marios-Nikos Psychogios Journal: Ther Adv Neurol Disord Date: 2022-03-02 Impact factor: 6.570
Authors: Noemie Ligot; Sophie Elands; Charlotte Damien; Lise Jodaitis; Niloufar Sadeghi Meibodi; Benjamin Mine; Thomas Bonnet; Adrien Guenego; Boris Lubicz; Gilles Naeije Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2022-02-21 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Santiago Ortega-Gutierrez; Darko Quispe-Orozco; Sebastian Schafer; Mudassir Farooqui; Cynthia B Zevallos; Sudeepta Dandapat; Alan Mendez-Ruiz; Beverly Aagaard-Kienitz; Nils Petersen; Colin P Derdeyn Journal: J Neuroimaging Date: 2022-03-21 Impact factor: 2.324
Authors: Jan Hendrik Schaefer; Natalia Kurka; Fee Keil; Marlies Wagner; Helmuth Steinmetz; Waltraud Pfeilschifter; Ferdinand O Bohmann Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2022-08-23 Impact factor: 4.086