| Literature DB >> 34337446 |
Di Wu1,2, Liguo Wang3, Haojie Huang2,4,5.
Abstract
Inhibition of histone deacetylases causes rapid and robust acetylation of histones. In this case, histone acetylation is likely increased on nearly every nucleosome, and the per-cell DNA/chromatin yield in chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) experiments is significantly increased. Spike-in controls are essential for normalizing ChIP sequencing (ChIP-seq) data to capture this massive effect. Here, we report a detailed protocol of H3K27-ac ChIP-seq in human cells with chromatin from an ancestral species as a spike-in control. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Wu et al. (2021).Entities:
Keywords: Bioinformatics; Cell Biology; Cell-based Assays; ChIP-seq; Genomics; Sequence analysis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34337446 PMCID: PMC8313745 DOI: 10.1016/j.xpro.2021.100681
Source DB: PubMed Journal: STAR Protoc ISSN: 2666-1667
Figure 1PC-3 cells are treated with DMSO or 1 μM SAHA for 12 h before acid extraction of histones and western blotting
Figure 2Workflow of spike-in ChIP-DNA sequencing and analysis
Figure 3Typical outcomes of spike-in ChIP-seq
(A) The number of ChIP-DNA sequencing reads from a spike-in ChIP experiment. This experiment was performed in PC-3 GDC0068 resistant cell lines (PC-3 GDC-R) treated with or without HDAC inhibitor SAHA.
(B) H3K27-ac profiles in a specific region of PC-3 cell genome. These ChIP-seq tracks are not normalized with spike-in control.
(C) H3K27-ac profiles in the same region of PC-3 cell genome as in (B). However, these ChIP-seq tracks are normalized with spike-in control.
| REAGENT or RESOURCE | SOURCE | IDENTIFIER |
|---|---|---|
| Rabbit Polyclonal Anti-Histone H3 (1 in 1000) | Cell Signaling Technology | Cat# 9715; RRID: |
| Rabbit polyclonal Anti-Histone H3K27-ac | Abcam | Cat# ab4729; RRID: |
| Vorinostat (SAHA) | Cayman | Cat# 10009929 |
| ChIP-seq data | GEO database | |
| Human: PC-3 | ATCC | CRL-1435 |
| Drosophila: S2 | ATCC | CRL-1963 |
| SPIKER | N/A | |
| MACS2 | N/A | |
| Bowtie2 | N/A | |
| Samtools | N/A | |
| UCSC genome browser | N/A | |
| Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferring system | Bio-Rad | N/A |
| Sonicator | Misonix 3000 | N/A |
| A rotator working at 4°C | N/A | N/A |
| A centrifuge that spins to 11,000 × | N/A | N/A |
| Thermoshaker | N/A | N/A |
| dsDNA quantification system | Qubit 4 | N/A |
Other solutions
| Formaldehyde solution | Final concentration | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| 1M Hepes-KOH, pH 7.5 | 50 mM | 2.5 mL |
| 5M NaCl | 100 mM | 1 mL |
| 0.5M EDTA | 1 mM | 50.0 μL |
| 0.5M EGTA | 0.5 mM | 100.0 μL |
| 37% Formaldehyde | 11% | 100.0 μL |
| ddH2O | n/a | 31.5 mL |
| Block solution | Final concentration | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| 10×PBS | 1×PBS | 10 mL |
| BSA | 0.5% BSA (w/v) | 500.0 mg |
| ddH2O | n/a | 90 mL |
| Final concentration | Amount | |
|---|---|---|
| 1M Hepes-KOH, pH 7.5 | 50 mM | 5 mL |
| 5M NaCl | 140 mM | 2.8 mL |
| 0.5M EDTA | 1 mM | 0.2 mL |
| 50% glycerol | 10% | 20.0 mL |
| 10% NP-40 | 0.5% | 5.0 mL |
| 10% Triton X-100 | 0.25% | 2.5 mL |
| ddH2O | n/a | 64.5 mL |
| Final concentration | Amount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tris-HCl, pH 8.0 | 10 mM | 1 mL |
| 5M NaCl | 200 mM | 4 mL |
| 0.5M EDTA | 1 mM | 0.2 mL |
| 0.5M EGTA | 0.5 mM | 0.1 mL |
| ddH2O | n/a | 94.7 mL |
| Final concentration | Amount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tris-HCl, pH 8.0 | 10 mM | 1 mL |
| 5M NaCl | 100 mM | 2 mL |
| 0.5M EDTA | 1 mM | 0.2 mL |
| 0.5M EGTA | 0.5 mM | 0.1 mL |
| 10% Na-Deoxycholate | 0.1% | 1 mL |
| 20% N-lauroylsarcosine | 0.5% | 2.5 mL |
| ddH2O | n/a | 93.2 mL |
| Final concentration | Amount | |
|---|---|---|
| 1M Hepes-KOH, pH 7.6 | 50 mM | 12.5 mL |
| 5M LiCl | 500 mM | 25 mL |
| 0.5M EDTA | 1 mM | 0.5 mL |
| 10% NP-40 | 1% | 25 mL |
| 10% Na-Deoxycholate | 0.7% | 17.5 mL |
| ddH2O | n/a | 169.5 mL |
| Final concentration | Amount | |
|---|---|---|
| 1M Tris-HCl, pH 8.0 | 50 mM | 5 mL |
| 0.5M EDTA | 10 mM | 2 mL |
| 10% SDS | 1% | 10 mL |
| ddH2O | n/a | 83 mL |
| Sample | Before normalization | Scaling factors | After normalization | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Human_reads (million) | Human_reads (million) | ||||
| A | 55 | 2.5 | 2/2.5 = 0.8 | 55∗0.8 = 44 | 2 |
| B | 53 | 2.1 | 2/2.1 = 0.9524 | 53∗0.9524 = 50.48 | 2 |
| C | 52 | 2.4 | 2/2.4 = 0.8333 | 52∗0.8333 = 43.33 | 2 |
| D | 51 | 2 | 1 | 51 | 2 |
| Sample | Before normalization | Scaling factors | After normalization | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Human_reads (million) | Human_reads (million) | ||||
| A | 55 | 2.5 | 2.25/2.5 = 0.9 | 55∗0.9 = 49.5 | 2.25 |
| B | 53 | 2.1 | 2.25/2.1 = 1.0714 | 53∗1.0714 = 56.78 | 2.25 |
| C | 52 | 2.4 | 2.25/2.4 = 0.9375 | 52∗0.9375 = 48.75 | 2.25 |
| D | 51 | 2 | 2.25/2 = 1.125 | 51∗1.125 = 57.375 | 2.25 |
| Sample | Before normalization | Scaling factors | After normalization | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Human_reads (million) | Human_reads (million) | ||||
| A | 55 | 2.5 | 1/2.5 = 0.4 | 55∗0.4= 22 | 1 |
| B | 53 | 2.1 | 1/2.1 = 0.4762 | 53∗0.4762 = 25.24 | 1 |
| C | 52 | 2.4 | 1/2.4 = 0.4166 | 52∗0.4166 = 21.66 | 1 |
| D | 51 | 2 | 1/2 = 0.5 | 51∗0.5 = 25.5 | 1 |