| Literature DB >> 34337248 |
Mohd Hizami Mohd Yusoff1, Muhammad Ayoub1, Naveed Ramzan2, Muhammad Hamza Nazir1, Imtisal Zahid1, Nadir Abbas3, Noureddine Elboughdiri3,4, Cyrus Raza Mirza5, Tayyab Ashfaq Butt5.
Abstract
The energy demand of the world is skyrocketing due to the exponential economic growth and population expansion. To meet the energy requirement, the use of fossil fuels is not a good decision, causing environmental pollution such as CO2 emissions. Therefore, the use of renewable energy sources like biofuels can meet the energy crisis especially for countries facing oil shortages such as Pakistan. This review describes the comparative study of biodiesel synthesis for various edible oils, non-edible oils, and wastes such as waste plastic oil, biomass pyrolysis oil, and tyre pyrolysis oil in terms of their oil content and extraction, cetane number, and energy content. The present study also described the importance of biodiesel synthesis via catalytic transesterification and its implementation in Pakistan. Pakistan is importing an extensive quantity of cooking oil that is used in the food processing industries, and as a result, a huge quantity of waste cooking oil (WCO) is generated. The potential waste oils for biodiesel synthesis are chicken fat, dairy scum, WCO, and tallow oil that can be used as potential substrates of biodiesel. The implementation of a biodiesel program as a replacement of conventional diesel will help to minimize the oil imports and uplift the country's economy. Biodiesel production via homogeneous and heterogeneous catalyzed transesterification is more feasible among all transesterification processes due to a lesser energy requirement and low cost. Therefore, biodiesel synthesis and implementation could minimize the imports of diesel by significantly contributing to the overall Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Although, waste oil can meet the energy needs, more available cultivation land should be used for substrate cultivation. In addition, research is still needed to explore innovative solvents and catalysts so that overall biodiesel production cost can be minimized. This would result in successful biodiesel implementation in Pakistan.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34337248 PMCID: PMC8320110 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.1c02402
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Characteristics of Biomass Pyrolysis Oila
| physical property | parameter range |
|---|---|
| moisture content (wt. %) | 15–30 |
| pH | 2.5 |
| specific gravity | 1.2 |
| C | 54–58 |
| H | 5.5–7.0 |
| O | 35–40 |
| N | 0–0.2 |
| ash | 16–19 |
| viscosity (cP) | 40–100 |
| distillation residue | up to 50 |
Reproduced with permission from ref (12). Copyright 1999 ACS.
Characteristics of Tyre Pyrolysis Oil and Diesela
| physical property | tyre pyrolysis oil | diesel |
|---|---|---|
| moisture content (wt %) | 0.1793 | 0.0161 |
| specific gravity | 0.9313 | 0.8406 |
| C | 85.71 | 86.23 |
| H | 10.01 | 13.00 |
| N | 0.32 | 0.10 |
| H/C ratio | 0.12 | 0.15 |
| viscosity (m cP) | 5.54 | 3.42 |
| flash point (°C) | 43 | 50 |
| fire point (°C) | 50 | 56 |
Reproduced with permission from ref (17). Copyright 2021 Elsevier.
Physical Properties Comparison of Waste Plastic Oil with Biodiesela
| physical property | waste plastic oil | biodiesel |
|---|---|---|
| specific gravity | 0.836 | 0.842 |
| C | 45 | 76.31 |
| H | 2.5 | 12.15 |
| O | 11.54 | |
| kinematic viscosity (cSt) | 2.52 | 4.82 |
| flash point (°C) | 42 | ≤130 |
| fire point (°C) | 45 | |
| gross calorific value (MJ/kg) | 44 | 39.9 |
| cetane number | 51 | 58.60 |
Reproduced with permission from ref (20). Copyright 2021 Elsevier.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Biodiesel and Other Waste Oils
| advantages | disadvantages | |
|---|---|---|
| biodiesel | It is a renewable source of energy having a high cetane number. | NO |
| It causes less CO, CO2, and hydrocarbon emissions than other sources of energy. | The storage time of biodiesel is shorter (100 days) than those of other waste oils. | |
| It has higher lubricity and can be directly used in the diesel engine without any modifications. | The gross calorific value for biodiesel is a bit lesser than those of other waste oils, which makes the use of biodiesel higher to produce the same amount of energy. | |
| It has a high flash point as compared to other waste oils including biomass pyrolysis oil, waste plastic oil, and tyre pyrolysis oil. | ||
| diesel | It has high energy content and low viscosity, which make it suitable for proper burning in diesel engines. | It has high carbon content, which causes CO, CO2, and hydrocarbon emissions. |
| The higher gross calorific value of diesel causes its lesser consumption for the same amount of energy production. | The higher amount of sulfur present in diesel causes the release of carcinogenic compounds and atmospheric pollution. | |
| biomass pyrolysis oil | It is a decent way of energy utilization as well as of using biomass for energy recovery purposes. | It has high moisture content, which causes the loss of energy produced. |
| It helps to decrease the solid and liquid biomass since it is utilized for biomass pyrolysis oil. | ||
| It has low carbon and sulfur contents, which cause the decrease of emissions of carcinogenic compounds. | The consumption of biomass pyrolysis oil is higher than those of other oils to produce the same amount of energy. | |
| tyre pyrolysis oil | It is an alternative oil that can be used as a substitute of energy in diesel engines and an excellent way of using waste tyres for energy production. | It has a low gross calorific value (42 MJ/kg) as compared to diesel, which causes its higher consumption. |
| It has low emissions of SO | The viscosity of tyre pyrolysis oil is higher, which causes difficulty in the flow of oils. | |
| waste plastic oil | It can be produced from almost all types of plastics, which makes its availability easier and vast. | It has higher cost due to sophisticated unit operations involved during the oil extraction from the burning of waste plastic materials. |
| It causes less environmental pollution than tyre pyrolysis and biomass pyrolysis oil. |
Figure 1Overall cost breakdown of biodiesel synthesis.
Figure 2Classification of feedstocks for biodiesel synthesis. Reproduced with permission from ref (22). Copyright 2019 Elsevier.
Figure 3Capacity of biodiesel production in billion liters. Reproduced with permission from ref (22). Copyright 2019 Elsevier.
Oil Contents in Kernels and Seeds of Non-Edible Plant Sources
| oil
content, % | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| sr. no. | botanical name | local name | kernel, wt % | seed, wt % | ref |
| 1 | 10.3–23.2 | ( | |||
| 2 | 30 | ( | |||
| 3 | 12–29 | ( | |||
| 4 | 48 | ( | |||
| 5 | field pennycress | 20–36 | ( | ||
| 6 | moringa | 2.9 | 33–41 | ( | |
| 7 | yellow oleander | 67 | 8.41 | ( | |
| 8 | jojoba | 45–55 | ( | ||
| 9 | Persian lilac | 10 | ( | ||
| 10 | rubber tree | 40–50 | 40–60 | ( | |
| 11 | Mexican prickly poppy | 22–36 | ( | ||
| 12 | tobacco | 17 | 36–41 | ( | |
| 13 | cotton | 17–25 | ( | ||
| 14 | sea mango | 6.4 | 54 | ( | |
| 15 | linseed | 35–45 | ( | ||
| 16 | castor | 45–50 | ( | ||
| 17 | kusum | 10–65 | ( | ||
| 18 | mahua | 50 | 35–50 | ( | |
| 19 | neem | 25–45 | 20–30 | ( | |
| 20 | karanja, pungam | 30–50 | 25–50 | ( | |
| 21 | Jatropha, ratanjyot | 40–60 | 20–60 | ( | |
Advantages and Disadvantages of Methanol and Ethanol
| methanol | ethanol |
|---|---|
| advantages | |
| It has high reactivity as compared to ethanol. | It is a renewable source of energy and can be easily produced from molasses. |
| It is cheaper in nature than ethanol. | The huge quantity of ethanol can be produced, which makes its availability easier. |
| disadvantages | |
| It has higher flammability as compared to ethanol. | It is less reactive than methanol. |
| It is non-renewable in nature. | It is a bit expensive in nature as compared to methanol. |
Figure 4Land distribution survey map for Pakistan. Reproduced with permission from ref (85). Copyright 2009 Elsevier.
Figure 5Import and production of cooking oil in Pakistan (2005–2017). Reproduced with permission from ref (22). Copyright 2019 Elsevier.
Figure 6Import and production of petroleum products in Pakistan. Reproduced with permission from ref (93). Copyright 2021 MDPI.
Figure 7Jatropha cultivation by PSO. Reproduced with permission from ref (102). Copyright 2015 Intech.
Challenges for Biodiesel Production from the Cultivated Feedstocks and Suggested Solutionsa
| no. | challenging issues | measures | feasible facts |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | difficulties in cultivation, harvesting, and collection | well planned crop cultivation and rotation that can help to minimize deforestation | extensive quantity of feedstocks available |
| 2 | constraints of the equipment | the installation of biorefining plants by the development of new and more energy efficient equipment | feasible technologies available to develop energy efficient equipment |
| 3 | low energy densities feedstocks | sustainability standards of the forest for the cultivation of first- and second-generation feedstocks | energy can be delivered in all ways such as solid, liquid, and gaseous fuels for combustion engines, heating, and electricity production |
| 4 | expensive transportation, handling, and storage | regulations development plan for proper use of labor and land | significant development in rural areas |
| 5 | food security | measures to protect the biodiversity | the steps taken to create job opportunities for local people |
Reproduced with permission from ref (107). Copyright 2018 Elsevier.
Figure 8Classification of transesterification for biodiesel synthesis. Reproduced with permission from ref (112). Copyright 2017 Elsevier.
Literature Summary of Homogeneous-Catalyzed Transesterification
| feedstock | catalyst | reaction time (h) | molar ratio | biodiesel yield (%) | ref | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| jojoba oil-wax | sodium methoxide | 4 | 60 | 7.5:1 | 55 | ( |
| canola oil | KOH | 0.33 | 25 | 6:1 | 86.1 | ( |
| waste cooking oil | KOH | 0.33–2 | 30–50 | 7:1–8:1 | 88–90 | ( |
| cottonseed oils | NaOH | 1 | 55 | 77 | ( | |
| tobacco seed oil | NaOH | 1.5 | 55 | 3:1 | 100 | ( |
| soybean oil | potassium methoxide | 0.25 | 80 | 6:1 | 99 | ( |
| sunflower oil | KOH | 0.5 | 25 | 6:1 | 100 | ( |
| karanja oil | KOH | 1.5 | 60 | 10:1 | 92 | ( |
| palm kernel oil | KOH | 1 | 60 | 6:1 | 96 | ( |
| soybean oil | HCl | 45 | 70 | 20:1 | 70 | ( |
| waste cooking oil | H2SO4 | 10 | 95 | 20:1 | >90 | ( |
| canola oil | AlCl3 | 18 | 100 | 24:1 | 98 | ( |
| soybean oil | trifluoroacetic acid | 5 | 120 | 20:1 | 98.4 | ( |
| algal oil | KOH | 0.7–0.1 | 60 | 20:1 | 92.4 | ( |
| algal oil | H2SO4 | 1.5 | 60 | 12:1 | 86.1 | ( |
| algal oil | NaOH | 1.1 | 50 | 8:1 | 87 | ( |
| algal oil | H2SO4 | 1.05 | 50 | 8:1 | 89 | ( |
| waste cooking oil | H2SO4 | 2 | 70 | 2:1 | 98 | ( |
| cooking oil | H2SO4 | 1.05 | 69.79 | 4.62:1 | 97.2 | ( |
Summary of Biodiesel Production Using Heterogeneous-Catalyzed Transesterification
| feedstock | catalyst | reaction time (h) | molar ratio | biodiesel yield (%) | ref | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| soybean oil | CaO | 1 | 93 | ( | ||
| sunflower oil | CaO/SBA-14 | 5 | 160 | 1:12 | 95 | ( |
| palm oil | CaO/Al2O3 | 5 | 65 | 1:12 | 98.64 | ( |
| crude palm kernel oil | SO42–/ZrO2 | 1 | 200 | 6:1 | 90.3 | ( |
| canola oil | nano-g-Al2O3 | 8 | 65 | 15:1 | 97.7 | ( |
| sunflower oil | WO3/ZrO2 | 5 | 200 | 20:1 | 97 | ( |
| waste cooking oil | Zn/CaO | 1.4 | 65 | 12:1 | 98.5 | ( |
| waste cooking oil | CaO | 3 | 65 | 12:1 | 95 | ( |
| canola oil | KF/Al2O3 | 8 | 65 | 15:1 | 97.7 | ( |
| canola oil | K2CO3/Al2O3 | 8 | 60 | 15:1 | 97 | ( |
| RBD palm oil | brick bar ash | 3 | 60 | 12:1 | 88.06 | ( |
| algal oil | CaO | 3 | 70 | 10:1 | 92.03 | ( |
| algal oil | CaO/Al2O3 | 2 | 50 | 10:3 | 88 | ( |
| WCO | biochar CaO/Al2O3 | 3.25 | 65 | 18:1 | 98.3 | ( |
| algal oil | CaO/dolomite catalyst | 3 | 65 | 6:1 | 90 | ( |
| waste cooking oil | CaO/MgO | 2 | 90 | 15:1 | 96.47 | ( |
| algal oil | Ca(OH3)2 | 3 | 80 | 30:1 | 99 | ( |
| waste cooking oil | CaO/MgO | 7.8 | 69.37 | 16.7:1 | 98.37 | ( |
| sunflower oil | MgO/MgAl2O4 | 3 | 110 | 12:1 | 95 | ( |
Comparison of Acid and Alkali-Catalysts for Biodiesel Synthesis
| alkali-catalysts | acid-catalysts |
|---|---|
| advantages | |
| cheaper and easily available | can be produced from waste resources |
| higher reaction rate | insensitive to FFA content of feedstock |
| higher product yield | reusable and environment-friendly |
| highly effective at low temperatures and atmospheric pressure | can be used for biodiesel synthesis using waste feedstocks |
| disadvantages | |
| not reusable | lower reaction rate than alkali-catalysts |
| highly affect the environment sustainability | lesser yield of the product |
| sensitive to FFA and water present in the feedstock | cause product contamination if not separated |