| Literature DB >> 34337087 |
Larissa Benvenutti1, Roberta Nunes1, Ivonilce Venturi1, Silvia Aparecida Ramos1, Milena Fronza Broering1, Fernanda Capitanio Goldoni2, Sarah Eskelsen Pavan2, Maria Verônica Dávila Pastor2, Angela Malheiros1,2, Nara Lins Meira Quintão1,2, Elizabeth Soares Fernandes3,4, José Roberto Santin1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Solanum diploconos (Mart.) Bohs is a native Brazilian plant belonging to the Solanaceae family, popularly known as "tomatinho do mato" and poorly investigated. Herein, we presented for the first time evidence for the anti-inflammatory and wound healing activities of S. diploconos fruit hydroalcoholic extract. Material and Methods. In vitro fMLP-induced chemotaxis, LPS-induced inflammatory mediator levels (cytokines by ELISA and NO release by Griess reaction), and adhesion molecule expression (CD62L, CD49d, and CD18, by flow-cytometry) were assessed in neutrophils treated with different concentrations of the extract. Inflammation resolution was measured by the efferocytosis assay and the healing activity by in vivo and in vitro assays. The air pouch model of carrageenan-induced inflammation in Swiss mice was used to investigate the in vivo anti-inflammatory effects of the extract. Leukocyte influx (by optical microscopy) and cytokine release were quantified in the pouch exudates. Additionally, the acute and subacute toxic and genotoxic effects of the extract were evaluated.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34337087 PMCID: PMC8315888 DOI: 10.1155/2021/9957451
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Immunol Res ISSN: 2314-7156 Impact factor: 4.818
Figure 1Chromatogram of the S. diploconos fruit extract at λ = 320 nm (a) and respective UV absorption spectra (b).
Figure 2Effects of the S. diploconos fruit extract on neutrophils. Neutrophils obtained from the peritoneal cavity of Swiss mice (1% oyster glycogen) were incubated in the presence or absence of LPS (5 μg/mL) and with S. diploconos (1, 10, or 100 μg/mL). Nitrite levels were measured by the Griess reaction (a). The levels of (b) TNFα, (c) IL-1β, and (d) IL-6 were determined by ELISA. For the chemotaxis assay (e), a neutrophil suspension (1 × 107) was incubated with different concentrations of S. diploconos (1, 10, or 100 μg/mL) for 15 minutes and placed in front of the fMLP (1 μM) on an agarose plate. Quantification was made from the margin of the peripheral perforations towards the chemotactic agent (central perforation). Neutrophils (1 × 106) were incubated in the presence or absence of LPS (5 μg/mL) along with S. diploconos (1, 10, or 100 μg/mL) for evaluation of the neutrophil adhesion molecules. Adhesion molecule expression was assessed by labeling with (f) CD62L, (g) CD18, and (h) CD49 detection antibodies by flow cytometry. Values express the mean ± SEM of tests performed with cells obtained from 8 animals per group. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001; and ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001 vs. the LPS group significantly different from the basal group ####p < 0.0001 (one-way ANOVA followed by Turkey's post hoc test).
Figure 3Effects of S. diploconos on efferocytosis. Quantification of efferocytosis (a) and supernatant levels of TNFα (b) and IL-10 (c). Data is expressed as a mean ± SEM of cells obtained from four animals. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001 vs. basal.
Figure 4S. diploconos actions in mouse air pouches challenged with carrageenan. Air pouch was induced in the dorsal subcutaneous tissue of Swiss mice. The animals were treated orally one hour before the injection of 2 mL of carrageenan (1%). Representative H.E. histological sections of skin biopsies obtained from mice with air pouches (40, 100, and 400x). Black arrows indicate PMN leukocytes, dashed black arrows indicate macrophages, and arrowheads indicate fibroblasts (a-l). Air space pouch “a”; pouch membrane “pm.” The lavage of the inflammatory infiltrate was collected 4 hours after the injection of carrageenan into the air pouch. The determination of the (m) total number of exudate cells was performed on a Neubauer chamber, and the (n) differential value was performed. (o) The protein concentration was measured in a spectrophotometer at 590 nm using the Bradford reagent. The levels of (P) TNFα, (q) IL-1β, and (r) IL-6 were determined by the ELISA method. Values express the mean ± SEM of tests performed with the inflammatory exudate obtained from 6 animals per group. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001, vs. the control group significantly different from the naïve group ####p < 0.0001 (one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test).
Figure 5Analysis of the effects of the S. diploconos fruit extract in fibroblast migration and wound healing. (a) Representative image of the in vitro scratch migration assay in fibroblasts (L929) and (b) percentage of fibroblast migration. Skin ulcers were treated individually with S. diploconos 1% cream or vehicle (base cream). Progression of wound healing area over time after extract treatment (c) and area under the curve (AUC) (d). Values express the mean ± SEM from 6 animals per group. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test (cell migration assay) with ∗∗p < 0.01 vs. basal and t-test (AUC assessment) ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001 vs. base cream.
Percentage of polychromatic erythrocyte (PCE) micronuclei (PCEMN) in animals treated with S. diploconos fruit extract. Percentage of polychromatic erythrocyte (PCE) micronuclei (PCEMN) in the micronucleus assay performed in erythrocytes obtained from the bone marrow (the values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 5). ∗∗∗p < 0.001 vs. the vehicle group).
| Group | Dose (mg/kg) | PCEMN/2000 PCE (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Vehicle | — | 0.33 ± 0.33 |
| MMS | 50 | 11.90 ± 1.09∗∗∗ |
|
| 2000 | 1.75 ± 0.52 |
Effects of Solanum diploconos extract treatment on the organ weights of mice following the acute oral toxicity experiments (values expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 5)).
| Organ | Acute toxicity | Subacute toxicity | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vehicle | 2000 (mg/kg) | Vehicle | 30 (mg/kg) | 100 (mg/kg) | 300 (mg/kg) | ||
| Heart | Absolute (g) | 0.853 ± 0.071 | 0.763 ± 0.053 | 0.676 ± 0.027 | 0.625 ± 0.012 | 0.623 ± 0.031 | 0.679 ± 0.039 |
| Relative (%) | 0.326 ± 0.013 | 0.307 ± 0.017 | 0.351 ± 0.008 | 0.319 ± 0.008 | 0.335 ± 0.015 | 0.352 ± 0.020 | |
| Lung | Absolute (g) | 1.191 ± 0.097 | 1.098 ± 0.124 | 0.975 ± 0.023 | 0.936 ± 0.032 | 0.941 ± 0.020 | 0.962 ± 0.024 |
| Relative (%) | 0.455 ± 0.029 | 0.442 ± 0.041 | 0.506 ± 0.007 | 0.477 ± 0.016 | 0.506 ± 0.012 | 0.499 ± 0.017 | |
| Liver | Absolute (g) | 9.182 ± 0.522 | 8.123 ± 0.840 | 5.300 ± 0.248 | 5.364 ± 0.141 | 5.071 ± 0.155 | 5.202 ± 0.122 |
| Relative (%) | 3.515 ± 0.256 | 3.273 ± 0.316 | 2.751 ± 0.098 | 2.734 ± 0.058 | 2.725 ± 0.741 | 2,699 ± 0.070 | |
| Spleen | Absolute (g) | 0.635 ± 0.047 | 0.593 ± 0.056 | 0.542 ± 0.038 | 0.554 ± 0.033 | 0.480 ± 0.008 | 0.496 ± 0.022 |
| Relative (%) | 0.242 ± 0.012 | 0.238 ± 0.014 | 0.280 ± 0.015 | 0.282 ± 0.017 | 0.258 ± 0.003 | 0.257 ± 0.012 | |
| Left kidney | Absolute (g) | 0.998 ± 0.076 | 0.914 ± 0.057 | 0.765 ± 0.034 | 0.862 ± 0.038 | 0.737 ± 0.017 | 0.779 ± 0.024 |
| Relative (%) | 0.381 ± 0.024 | 0.368 ± 0.013 | 0.397 ± 0.012 | 0.439 ± 0.017 | 0.396 ± 0.008 | 0.404 ± 0.014 | |
| Right kidney | Absolute (g) | 1.021 ± 0.071 | 0.910 ± 0.100 | 0.802 ± 0.034 | 0.836 ± 0.043 | 0.753 ± 0.012 | 0.756 ± 0.029 |
| Relative (%) | 0.391 ± 0.038 | 0.366 ± 0.030 | 0.416 ± 0.013 | 0.426 ± 0.019 | 0.405 ± 0.007 | 0.392 ± 0.015 | |
Biochemical markers and hematological parameters following the acute administration of the S. diploconos fruit extract (values expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 5)). ∗p < 0.05 vs. the vehicle group.
| Parameters | Acute toxicity | Subacute toxicity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vehicle | 2000 (mg/kg) | Vehicle | 30 (mg/kg) | 100 (mg/kg) | 300 (mg/kg) | |
| Biochemical parameters | ||||||
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 261.60 ± 16.93∗ | 157.30 ± 16.23 | 131.6 ± 6.30 | 148.20 ± 11.10 | 125.20 ± 10.54 | 125.80 ± 3.48 |
| AST (U/L) | 91.60 ± 5.97 | 128.81 ± 14.45 | 108.21 ± 10.79 | 100.69 ± 7.02 | 104.23 ± 6.16 | 89.22 ± 7.97 |
| ALT (U/L) | 56.40 ± 5.14 | 38.61 ± 9.69 | 39.89 ± 4.39 | 37.86 ± 2.11 | 37.36 ± 1.89 | 33.07 ± 2.09 |
| ALP (U/L) | 61.20 ± 7.94 | 73.80 ± 15.65 | 53.12 ± 4.30 | 60.59 ± 6.01 | 56.68 ± 2.06 | 56.30 ± 6.25 |
| Urea (mg/dL) | 41.60 ± 1.21 | 53.50 ± 3.03∗ | 35.00 ± 1.70 | 32.60 ± 1.50 | 36.80 ± 2.78 | 36.80 ± 1.39 |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 0.53 ± 0.02 | 0.39 ± 0.053 | 0.30 ± 0.01 | 0.28 ± 0.01 | 0.25 ± 0.01 | 0.29 ± 0.02 |
| Hematological parameters | ||||||
| Leukocyte (mil/mm3) | 1.120 ± 0.149 | 0.800 ± 0.152 | 3.425 ± 0.118 | 2.900 ± 0.207 | 4.020 ± 0.497 | 2.520 ± 0.323 |
| Neutrophil (%) | 10.600 ± 1.805 | 13.333 ± 2.333 | 2.750 ± 0.250 | 2.400 ± 0.245 | 2.400 ± 0.245 | 3.600 ± 0.678 |
| Lymphocyte (%) | 87.400 ± 2.014 | 84.667 ± 2.403 | 95.500 ± 0.288 | 95.800 ± 0.374 | 96.200 ± 0.374 | 94.400 ± 1.886 |
| Monocytes (%) | 2.000 ± 0.707 | 1.333 ± 0.333 | 1.750 ± 0.250 | 1.800 ± 0.374 | 1.400 ± 0.245 | 2.000 ± 1.265 |
| Eosinophil (%) | 0.000 ± 0.000 | 0.666 ± 0.333 | 0.000 ± 0.000 | 0.000 ± 0.000 | 0.000 ± 0.000 | 0.000 ± 0.000 |
| Basophil (%) | 0.000 ± 0.000 | 0.000 ± 0.000 | 0.000 ± 0.000 | 0.000 ± 0.000 | 0.000 ± 0.000 | 0.000 ± 0.000 |
| Erythrocyte (millions/mm3) | 5.562 ± 0.067 | 4.960 ± 0.496 | 7.050 ± 0.131 | 7.000 ± 0.092 | 7.146 ± 0.129 | 6.698 ± 0.113 |
| Hemoglobin (g/dL) | 11.540 ± 0.153 | 10.266 ± 1.185 | 14.050 ± 0.342 | 13.940 ± 0.150 | 13.960 ± 0.265 | 13.220 ± 0.587 |
| Hematocrit (%) | 31.100 ± 0.389 | 27.533 ± 2.936 | 40.600 ± 0.849 | 40.220 ± 0.414 | 40.560 ± 0.867 | 38.120 ± 0.587 |
| Platelets (103/mm3) | 408.400 ± 34.993 | 293.000 ± 142.815 | 702.250 ± 46.424 | 657.400 ± 44.800 | 651.800 ± 39.328 | 715.600 ± 69.974 |