| Literature DB >> 34336541 |
Jiajia Lin1,2, Jana E Compton2, Chris Clark3, Shabtai Bittman4, Donna Schwede5, Peter S Homann6, Peter Kiffney7, David Hooper8, Gary Bahr9, Jill S Baron10.
Abstract
Watershed nitrogen (N) budgets provide insights into drivers and solutions for groundwater and surface water N contamination. We constructed a comprehensive N budget for the transboundary Nooksack River Watershed (British Columbia, Canada and Washington, US) using locally-derived data, national statistics and standard parameters. Feed imports for dairy (mainly in the US) and poultry (mainly in Canada) accounted for 30 and 29% of the total N input to the watershed, respectively. Synthetic fertilizer was the next largest source contributing 21% of inputs. Food imports for humans and pets together accounted for 9% of total inputs, lower than atmospheric deposition (10%). N imported by returning salmon representing marine derived nutrients accounted for <0.06 % of total N input. Quantified N export was 80% of total N input, driven by ammonia emission (32% of exports). Animal product export was the second largest output of N (31%) as milk and cattle in the US and poultry products in Canada. Riverine export of N was estimated at 28% of total N export. The commonly used crop nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) metric alone did not provide sufficient information on farming activities but in combination with other criteria such as farm-gate NUE may better represent management efficiency. Agriculture was the primary driver of N inputs to the environment as a result of its regional importance; the N budget information can inform management to minimize N losses. The N budget provides key information for stakeholders across sectors and borders to create environmentally and economically viable and effective solutions.Entities:
Keywords: Nitrogen budget; agriculture; ammonia emission; land use; nitrogen use efficiency; transboundary watershed
Year: 2020 PMID: 34336541 PMCID: PMC8318187 DOI: 10.1029/2019jg005577
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Geophys Res Biogeosci ISSN: 2169-8953 Impact factor: 3.822