| Literature DB >> 34336034 |
Cyril Cyrus1, Chittibabu Vatte1, Shahanas Chathoth1, Abdul Azeez Sayed2, J Francis Borgio2, Mohammed Abdullah Alrubaish3, Rawan Alfalah3, Jana Alsaikhan3, Amein K Al Ali1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Haemoglobin A2 (HbA2), the tetramer of α- and δ-globin chains, is used as a diagnostic biomarker for β-thalassaemia carriers. The HbA2 levels are regulated by the presence of HPFH, δ-thalassaemia, HbA1/2 gene triplication, and variants of KLF1, β-globin gene, and HbF regulating QTLs. Saudi Arabia has a high incidence of borderline HbA2 levels, thereby making it difficult to classify the haemoglobinopathies. This study aims to investigate the association of known HbF enhancer QTL gene SNPs with HbA2 levels.Entities:
Keywords: OR51B6; SNPs; haemoglobin A2; tetramer; β-thalassaemia
Year: 2019 PMID: 34336034 PMCID: PMC8314410 DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2019.86705
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Med Sci ISSN: 1734-1922 Impact factor: 3.318
Allelic association of 14 SNPs related to BCL11A, HBS1L-MYB, and HBG2 promoter region in cohorts with normal, borderline and high HbA2 levels
| HbA2 vs. SNP | HMIP region | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs2071348 | rs7482144 | rs5006884 | rs766432 | rs11886868 | rs4671393 | rs7557939 | rs28384513 | rs9376090 | rs9399137 | rs4895441 | rs9389269 | rs9402686 | rs9494142 | ||
| Normal vs. 2.9–3.1 | Associated allele | G | T | C | C | T | A | A | T | T | T | A | G | T | |
| χ2 | 10.30 | 5.23 | 0.78 | 0.24 | 0.03 | 0.39 | 0.034 | 0.41 | 0.62 | 1.80 | 0.62 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.49 | |
| 0.38 | 0.63 | 0.85 | 0.53 | 0.854 | 0.52 | 0.43 | 0.18 | 0.43 | 0.32 | 0.32 | 0.49 | ||||
| Normal vs. 3.2–3.9 | Associated allele | G | T | T | A | T | G | G | T | C | C | G | C | A | C |
| χ2 | 6.57 | 2.25 | 3.31 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.006 | 1.94 | 0.14 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.13 | |
| 0.13 | 0.07 | 0.79 | 0.86 | 0.89 | 0.939 | 0.16 | 0.71 | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.72 | |||
| Normal vs. 4.2 | Associated allele | T | C | T | C | T | A | A | T | T | T | A | T | G | T |
| χ2 | 3.41 | 0.81 | 5.08 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0.01 | 0.497 | 0.00 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.92 | |
| 0.06 | 0.37 | 1.00 | 0.48 | 0.94 | 0.481 | 0.97 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.37 | 0.37 | 0.34 | |||
| 2.9–3.1 vs. 3.2–3.9 | Associated allele | T | C | T | A | – | G | G | T | C | C | G | C | A | C |
| χ2 | 0.18 | 0.29 | 4.32 | 0.35 | 0.00 | 0.35 | 0.042 | 0.46 | 0.88 | 3.17 | 1.64 | 1.64 | 1.64 | 0.72 | |
| 0.67 | 0.59 | 0.56 | 1.00 | 0.56 | 0.838 | 0.50 | 0.35 | 0.08 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.40 | |||
| 2.9–3.1 vs. 4.2 | Associated allele | G | T | C | C | C | A | G | T | C | C | G | C | A | C |
| χ2 | 8.11 | 2.80 | 6.45 | 0.04 | 0.34 | 0.04 | 0.338 | 0.07 | 0.38 | 0.19 | 0.38 | 0.38 | 0.38 | 0.58 | |
| 0.09 | 0.84 | 0.56 | 0.84 | 0.561 | 0.80 | 0.54 | 0.66 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.45 | ||||
| 3.2–3.9 vs. 4.2 | Associated allele | T | C | T | C | T | A | A | G | T | T | A | T | G | T |
| χ2 | 6.95 | 1.99 | 1.19 | 0.02 | 0.33 | 0.02 | 0.48 | 0.46 | 0.86 | 1.09 | 1.09 | 1.09 | 1.09 | 1.09 | |
| 0.16 | 0.28 | 0.90 | 0.56 | 0.90 | 0.488 | 0.50 | 0.35 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 | |||
Figure 1Diagram exhibiting the SNP and haplotype associated with the elevation of HbA2 levels between low to borderline and borderline to high
Frequency of haplotypes of SNPs in HBG2, BCL11A and HBS1L-MYB compared between normal, borderline and high HbA2 level cohorts
| Block | Haplotype | Normal vs. 2.9–3.1 | Normal vs. 3.2–3.9 | Normal vs. 4.2 | 2.9–3.1 vs. 3.2–3.9 | 2.9–3.1 vs. 4.2 | 3.2–3.9 vs. 4.2 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Freq. | χ2 | Freq. | χ2 | Freq. | χ2 | Freq. | χ2 | Freq. | χ2 | Freq. | χ2 | ||||||||
| TCC | 0.526 | 3.02 | 0.08 | 0.53 | 4.54 | 0.548 | 0.70 | 0.40 | 0.423 | 0.16 | 0.69 | 0.355 | 0.16 | 0.69 | 0.396 | 0.55 | 0.46 | ||
| GTC | 0.156 | 6.52 | 0.14 | 1.27 | 0.26 | 0.123 | 1.46 | 0.23 | 0.232 | 0.72 | 0.40 | 0.29 | 4.85 | 0.23 | 3.59 | 0.06 | |||
| TCT | 0.134 | 2.24 | 0.13 | 0.145 | 0.12 | 0.73 | 0.163 | 7.80 | 0.103 | 2.80 | 0.09 | 0.201 | 6.15 | 0.217 | 2.35 | 0.13 | |||
| GCC | 0.09 | 1.83 | 0.18 | 0.073 | 0.29 | 0.59 | 0.074 | 0.84 | 0.36 | 0.102 | 0.53 | 0.47 | 0.116 | 1.55 | 0.21 | 0.024 | 0.30 | 0.59 | |
| GTT | 0.057 | 0.49 | 0.48 | 0.065 | 3.67 | 0.06 | 0.048 | 0.52 | 0.47 | 0.102 | 0.43 | 0.51 | 0.033 | 0.40 | 0.53 | ||||
| TTC | 0.038 | 0.26 | 0.61 | 0.034 | 1.53 | 0.22 | 0.041 | 0.42 | 0.52 | 0.012 | 0.80 | 0.37 | 0.036 | 1.01 | 0.31 | ||||
| GCT | 0.014 | 1.95 | 0.16 | 0.026 | 1.11 | 0.29 | 0.08 | 1.04 | 0.31 | ||||||||||
| TTT | 0.02 | 3.80 | 0.05 | ||||||||||||||||
| ATGA | 0.489 | 0.03 | 0.85 | 0.485 | 0.01 | 0.94 | 0.491 | 0.50 | 0.48 | 0.49 | 0.04 | 0.84 | 0.516 | 0.34 | 0.56 | 0.5 | 0.48 | 0.49 | |
| CCAG | 0.299 | 0.39 | 0.53 | 0.288 | 0.02 | 0.89 | 0.29 | 0.01 | 0.94 | 0.308 | 0.35 | 0.56 | 0.328 | 0.04 | 0.84 | 0.283 | 0.02 | 0.90 | |
| ACGG | 0.205 | 0.62 | 0.43 | 0.216 | 0.01 | 0.94 | 0.21 | 0.76 | 0.38 | 0.192 | 0.48 | 0.49 | 0.156 | 0.28 | 0.59 | 0.2 | 0.75 | 0.39 | |
| ATGG | 0.017 | 0.20 | 0.65 | ||||||||||||||||
| HMIP region | TTTATGT | 0.747 | 0.75 | 0.39 | 0.752 | 1.15 | 0.28 | 0.74 | 0.19 | 0.66 | 0.806 | 0.08 | 0.78 | 0.797 | 0.00 | 0.98 | 0.815 | 0.02 | 0.90 |
| GTTATGT | 0.167 | 0.12 | 0.73 | 0.149 | 3.15 | 0.08 | 0.17 | 0.07 | 0.80 | 0.107 | 2.03 | 0.15 | 0.156 | 0.17 | 0.68 | 0.085 | 2.02 | 0.15 | |
| TTTATGC | 0.015 | 0.06 | 0.81 | 0.012 | 0.12 | 0.73 | 0.016 | 0.19 | 0.66 | ||||||||||
| GCCGCAC | 0.024 | 0.20 | 0.66 | 0.031 | 0.87 | 0.35 | 0.024 | 0.26 | 0.61 | 0.037 | 1.16 | 0.28 | 0.016 | 0.19 | 0.66 | 0.048 | 0.61 | 0.44 | |
| TCCGCAC | 0.021 | 1.06 | 0.30 | 0.026 | 0.02 | 0.90 | 0.025 | 0.27 | 0.61 | 0.011 | 1.09 | 0.30 | 0.019 | 0.23 | 0.63 | ||||
| TTTGCAC | 0.011 | 0.41 | 0.52 | 0.017 | 0.20 | 0.65 | |||||||||||||
| TTCATGT | 0.017 | 0.20 | 0.65 | ||||||||||||||||
| TCTGCAC | 0.016 | 0.19 | 0.66 | ||||||||||||||||
Figure 2Haploview output of LD across 14 SNPs from the genotyping data in the Saudi population. Linkage Disequilibrium (LD) analysis patterns between 3 HBG2, 4 BCL11A, and 7 HMIP SNPs compared in thalassaemia patients. The pairwise correlation between the SNPs were measured as r2 and shown (x100) in each diamond. Enhancer haplotypes are in red boxes and diminisher haplotypes are in blue boxes. Coordinates are according to the NCBI build dbSNP 144 Homo sapiens annotation release 107 (reference sequence NT_025741.16)
Figure 3Three-dimensional (3D) protein structure of OR51B6. A – Entire wild protein. B – Focused region indicating the L172. C – Entire mutated protein. D – Focused region indicating the L172F. E – Superimposed structure. In the superimposed model: Helix with green colour indicates mutant, helix with red colour indicates wild
Figure 4OR51B6 protein and globin protein interaction. Column 1 indicates the template OR51B6 protein and interacting globin protein; column 2 denotes the target globin protein and wild OR51B6 protein. Column 3 denotes the target globin protein and mutant OR51B6 protein
Figure 5Influence of the mutated OR51B6 gene in the binding energy of the OR51-target protein complex
*Significantly varied binding energy at 25% compared with the wild type.