Literature DB >> 34336034

Haemoglobin switching modulator SNPs rs5006884 is associated with increased HbA2 in β-thalassaemia carriers.

Cyril Cyrus1, Chittibabu Vatte1, Shahanas Chathoth1, Abdul Azeez Sayed2, J Francis Borgio2, Mohammed Abdullah Alrubaish3, Rawan Alfalah3, Jana Alsaikhan3, Amein K Al Ali1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Haemoglobin A2 (HbA2), the tetramer of α- and δ-globin chains, is used as a diagnostic biomarker for β-thalassaemia carriers. The HbA2 levels are regulated by the presence of HPFH, δ-thalassaemia, HbA1/2 gene triplication, and variants of KLF1, β-globin gene, and HbF regulating QTLs. Saudi Arabia has a high incidence of borderline HbA2 levels, thereby making it difficult to classify the haemoglobinopathies. This study aims to investigate the association of known HbF enhancer QTL gene SNPs with HbA2 levels.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: 14 Specific SNPs in BCL11A, HMIP, OR51B6, HBBP1, and HBG2 loci were genotyped in 164 Saudi β-thalassaemia carriers by TaqMan assay to validate their role as regulators of HbA2 levels. HbA2 levels were determined using the Variant II β-Thalassemia Short Program Recorder kit. The non-random association of these SNPs was tested using HaploView software. Protein interaction was assessed using 3D structure modelling for OR51B6 (rs5006884), comparative energy minimisation, and root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) prediction.
RESULTS: Elevated HbA2 levels were associated with SNPs in HBBP1, OR51B6, and TCT haplotype from HBG2 promoter region. The bioinformatics modelling and prediction revealed that the exonic rs5006884 had RMSD value deviations and significantly varied binding energy minimisation. α-globin variations were found in 57.92% of individuals but were not associated with elevated HbA2.
CONCLUSIONS: The haemoglobin switching modulators rs2071348, rs7482144, and rs5006884 are involved in regulation of HbA2 level with rs5006884 influencing the tetramer formation. Screening for haemoglobinopathies should take these SNPs into consideration, specifically in borderline HbA2 cases. Assiduous analysis of rs5006884 as HbA2 modulator for amelioration of disease severity is recommended. Copyright:
© 2019 Termedia & Banach.

Entities:  

Keywords:  OR51B6; SNPs; haemoglobin A2; tetramer; β-thalassaemia

Year:  2019        PMID: 34336034      PMCID: PMC8314410          DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2019.86705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Med Sci        ISSN: 1734-1922            Impact factor:   3.318


Introduction

Haemoglobin A2 (HbA2) is a tetramer of α- and δ-globin chains, which constitutes approximately 2-3% of the total circulating haemoglobin. The HBD-coded HbA2 prevents the polymerisation of deoxy-sickle haemoglobin and is a reliable diagnostic biomarker for β-thalassaemia trait. The globin genes are arranged in the order of their expression and are activated sequentially as embryonic (HBE1, ε), foetal (HBG1/2, γ), and adult (HBD/HBB, δ/β) genes during development. The globin promoters initiate the molecular switching between these genes by gaining access to the upstream regulatory elements, namely the β locus control region (β-LCR) [1] and autonomous silencing of the preceding gene. Thus, the gene closest to the β-LCR is activated first (HBE1) and the furthest (HBB) is activated last. Inactivation of the HBB promoter results in extended interaction of β–LCR with the HBD and HBG promoters, thereby leading to elevated HbA2 and HbF levels. The deficit of β-globin and profusion of α-globin results in the post-translational elevation of HbA2 levels in β-thalassaemia carriers [2]. However, HbA2 is not characteristically elevated in all β-thalassaemia carriers, making it difficult to classify haemoglobinopathies in patients with borderline HbA2 levels. Saudi Arabia has a high incidence of borderline HbA2 levels. HbF level-associated QTLs are differentially distributed among populations and a reciprocal relationship among the HbA2 and HbF levels has been inferred. Regulation of HbA2 level which is heritable with genetic variations accounting for 42% of total HbA2 variability [2], which is either attributed to a variation in the β-globin gene or its regulators, in addition to other factors such as the presence of δ-thalassaemia, triplication of HbAgenes, hereditary persistence of foetal haemoglobin (HPFH) and Krueppel-like factor 1 (KLF1) variants, all of which make it difficult to classify haemoglobinopathies [3]. KLF1 variants are an important modulator of haemoglobin switching [4] by transcriptional repression of the δ-globin gene and activation of the HbA2 gene (HBD), resulting in increased HbA2 levels [5-8]. KLF1 also increases HbF levels. Our recent study on KLF1 variations reported no significant association with borderline HbA2 among Saudis [9]. In northern Europeans, altered transcription within the HBB cluster and SNPs in HBS1L-MYB locus were associated with HbA2 [2]. HbA2 has an advantage over HbF as it is pancellularly distributed and expressed [10]. Therefore, in sickle cell disease (SCD), increased levels might have therapeutic potential compared with HbF [11]. Few studies have been conducted on the role of other HbF-regulating QTLs on the level of HbA2. An increased level of HbA2 may ameliorate the severity of SCD and β-thalassaemia in the same manner that an increased level of HbF does. Haematopoiesis and HbF level associated SNPs of the HBS1L-MYB interval are reported to induce higher HbF levels in SCD and are differentially distributed among populations [12, 13]. A reciprocal relationship among the HbA2 and HbF levels has been inferred in acquired disorders [10]. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of HbA2 level with 14 SNPs of the HbF enhancer QTL genes. The molecular interactions involved on the variations in the level of HbA2 synthesis is not completely understood. Shedding light on the role of SNPs that act as triggering factors of HbA2 may indicate that inducing elevated levels of HbA2 could be of clinical importance.

Material and methods

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments. Written, informed consent was obtained from each participant.

Pheno- and genotyping

This study was conducted on 164 β-thalassaemia carriers residing in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. The blood samples were collected in EDTA anti-coagulated vacutainers for HbA2 level estimation using Bio-Rad Variant II (Variant II β-Thalassaemia Short Program Recorder kit) and DNA extraction using blood mini kit (Qiagen, USA). SNP genotyping of 14 SNPs, namely rs2071348, rs7482144, rs5006884 (HBG2 promoter region), rs766432, rs11886868, rs4671393, rs7557939 (BCL11A region), rs28384513, rs9376090, rs9399137, rs4895441, rs9389269, rs9402686, and rs9494142 (HMIP region) was carried out by nuclease allelic discrimination assay. The target-specific forward and reverse primers along with TaqMan probes labelled with VIC and FAM for each allele (TaqMan Assay, Applied Biosystems) were amplified on the ABI 7500 real time PCR system (ABI, Foster City, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The α-3.7 deletion and variations were identified using ViennaLab StripAssays and PCR-Sequencing method. The globin gene was amplified as previously described [14]. In summary, the amplicons were purified using QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), and the purified PCR products were cycle sequenced using a Big Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystem, Foster City, CA, USA). The cycle-sequenced products were then purified and electrophoresed in a Genetic Analyzer 3500 (Life Technologies Corporation, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Sequencing Analysis Software Version 5.4 (Applied Biosystem, USA) was used for data analysis.

Structure modelling and root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) prediction

Three-dimensional (3D) protein structure of OR51B6 native chain was designed using automated homology modelling [15] and the mutated OR51B6 protein using SWISS MODEL (http://swissmodel.expasy.org/). The 3D structure was generated based on template Protein Data Bank (PDB) ID: 5cxv with highest resolution of 2.7Å. PROCHECK (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/thornton-srv/software/PROCHECK/) online was used to validate the native and modelled structure [16]. The mutant models were generated using SWISS PDB Viewer Ver. 4.1 (http://spdbv.vital-it.ch/) [17]. The energy minimisation and its RMSD were checked for the native and mutants using the GROMACS 5.1.1 (http://www.gromacs.org/) program [18].

Protein-protein interaction

Protein-protein interaction was conducted using a PRISM server [19-21] because it predicts the interface structures between two interacting proteins. We submitted the haemoglobin proteins with both OR51B6 wild and mutant models to check the possible interaction variations between the wild and mutant proteins towards the haemoglobin proteins.

Statistical analysis

Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was tested for all the SNPs, and χ2 and odds ratio were determined by SPSS ver. 19 to evaluate allele association. Linkage disequilibrium (LD) test was carried out using HaploView 4.2 software [22] to identify the non-random association of these 14 SNPs. Haplotype blocks were constructed using HaploView 4.2 program. Haplotypes associated with the study subjects were inferred based on the partition-ligation approach through an EM algorithm. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant for all statistical analyses.

Results

The independent segregation genotype for all the SNPs was in agreement with the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Standard allelic association analysis of the 14 SNPs tested in the patient cohort showed that only three SNPs, namely rs2071348 (HBBP1), rs7482144 (HBG2), and rs5006884 (OR51B6), were significantly associated with borderline and higher HbA2 levels. The rs5006884 (p = 0.02; χ2 = 5.08) was the key SNP associated with elevated HbA2 levels compared to the normal and borderline levels. There were no significant differences in allele frequencies of SNPs in the HBS1L-MYB region and BCL11A region between the normal and HbA2-elevated cohorts (Table I, Figure 1).
Table I

Allelic association of 14 SNPs related to BCL11A, HBS1L-MYB, and HBG2 promoter region in cohorts with normal, borderline and high HbA2 levels

HbA2 vs. SNPHBG2 promoter regionBCL11A regionHMIP region
rs2071348rs7482144rs5006884rs766432rs11886868rs4671393rs7557939rs28384513rs9376090rs9399137rs4895441rs9389269rs9402686rs9494142
Normal vs. 2.9–3.1Associated alleleGTCCTAATTTAGT
χ210.305.230.780.240.030.390.0340.410.621.800.620.980.980.49
P-value0.001*0.02*0.380.630.850.530.8540.520.430.180.430.320.320.49
Normal vs. 3.2–3.9Associated alleleGTTATGGTCCGCAC
χ26.572.253.310.070.030.020.0061.940.140.730.730.350.350.13
P-value0.01*0.130.070.790.860.890.9390.160.710.390.390.550.550.72
Normal vs. 4.2Associated alleleTCTCTAATTTATGT
χ23.410.815.080.000.500.010.4970.000.700.700.700.810.810.92
P-value0.060.370.02*1.000.480.940.4810.970.400.400.400.370.370.34
2.9–3.1 vs. 3.2–3.9Associated alleleTCTAGGTCCGCAC
χ20.180.294.320.350.000.350.0420.460.883.171.641.641.640.72
P-value0.670.590.04*0.561.000.560.8380.500.350.080.200.200.200.40
2.9–3.1 vs. 4.2Associated alleleGTCCCAGTCCGCAC
χ28.112.806.450.040.340.040.3380.070.380.190.380.380.380.58
P-value0.004*0.090.01*0.840.560.840.5610.800.540.660.540.540.540.45
3.2–3.9 vs. 4.2Associated alleleTCTCTAAGTTATGT
χ26.951.991.190.020.330.020.480.460.861.091.091.091.091.09
P-value0.01*0.160.280.900.560.900.4880.500.350.300.300.300.300.30
Figure 1

Diagram exhibiting the SNP and haplotype associated with the elevation of HbA2 levels between low to borderline and borderline to high

Allelic association of 14 SNPs related to BCL11A, HBS1L-MYB, and HBG2 promoter region in cohorts with normal, borderline and high HbA2 levels Diagram exhibiting the SNP and haplotype associated with the elevation of HbA2 levels between low to borderline and borderline to high The predominant haplotypes in the borderline and higher HbA2 cohort consisted of GTC, TCC, and TCT in the HBG2 promoter region comprising SNPs rs2071348 (HBBP1 gene), rs7482144 (HBG2 gene), and rs5006884 (OR51B6), respectively (Table II, Figure 2). The TCT (rs2071348T, rs7482144C, rs5006884T) haplotype pattern was the most significant HbA2 enhancer haplotype (p = 0.01, χ2 = 7.8) (Table II).
Table II

Frequency of haplotypes of SNPs in HBG2, BCL11A and HBS1L-MYB compared between normal, borderline and high HbA2 level cohorts

BlockHaplotypeNormal vs. 2.9–3.1Normal vs. 3.2–3.9Normal vs. 4.22.9–3.1 vs. 3.2–3.92.9–3.1 vs. 4.23.2–3.9 vs. 4.2
Freq.χ2pFreq.χ2pFreq.χ2pFreq.χ2pFreq.χ2pFreq.χ2p
HBG2 promoter regionTCC0.5263.020.080.534.540.030.5480.700.400.4230.160.690.3550.160.690.3960.550.46
GTC0.1566.520.01*0.141.270.260.1231.460.230.2320.720.400.294.850.03*0.233.590.06
TCT0.1342.240.130.1450.120.730.1637.800.01*0.1032.800.090.2016.150.01*0.2172.350.13
GCC0.091.830.180.0730.290.590.0740.840.360.1020.530.470.1161.550.210.0240.300.59
GTT0.0570.490.480.0653.670.060.0480.520.470.1020.430.510.0330.400.53
TTC0.0380.260.610.0341.530.220.0410.420.520.0120.800.370.0361.010.31
GCT0.0141.950.160.0261.110.290.081.040.31
TTT0.023.800.05
BCL11A regionATGA0.4890.030.850.4850.010.940.4910.500.480.490.040.840.5160.340.560.50.480.49
CCAG0.2990.390.530.2880.020.890.290.010.940.3080.350.560.3280.040.840.2830.020.90
ACGG0.2050.620.430.2160.010.940.210.760.380.1920.480.490.1560.280.590.20.750.39
ATGG0.0170.200.65
HMIP regionTTTATGT0.7470.750.390.7521.150.280.740.190.660.8060.080.780.7970.000.980.8150.020.90
GTTATGT0.1670.120.730.1493.150.080.170.070.800.1072.030.150.1560.170.680.0852.020.15
TTTATGC0.0150.060.810.0120.120.730.0160.190.66
GCCGCAC0.0240.200.660.0310.870.350.0240.260.610.0371.160.280.0160.190.660.0480.610.44
TCCGCAC0.0211.060.300.0260.020.900.0250.270.610.0111.090.300.0190.230.63
TTTGCAC0.0110.410.520.0170.200.65
TTCATGT0.0170.200.65
TCTGCAC0.0160.190.66
Figure 2

Haploview output of LD across 14 SNPs from the genotyping data in the Saudi population. Linkage Disequilibrium (LD) analysis patterns between 3 HBG2, 4 BCL11A, and 7 HMIP SNPs compared in thalassaemia patients. The pairwise correlation between the SNPs were measured as r2 and shown (x100) in each diamond. Enhancer haplotypes are in red boxes and diminisher haplotypes are in blue boxes. Coordinates are according to the NCBI build dbSNP 144 Homo sapiens annotation release 107 (reference sequence NT_025741.16)

Frequency of haplotypes of SNPs in HBG2, BCL11A and HBS1L-MYB compared between normal, borderline and high HbA2 level cohorts Haploview output of LD across 14 SNPs from the genotyping data in the Saudi population. Linkage Disequilibrium (LD) analysis patterns between 3 HBG2, 4 BCL11A, and 7 HMIP SNPs compared in thalassaemia patients. The pairwise correlation between the SNPs were measured as r2 and shown (x100) in each diamond. Enhancer haplotypes are in red boxes and diminisher haplotypes are in blue boxes. Coordinates are according to the NCBI build dbSNP 144 Homo sapiens annotation release 107 (reference sequence NT_025741.16)

The α globin variations

The detailed study on the α globin genotype revealed that the –α23.7/α1α2 is the most frequent, with an overall prevalence of 57.92% (n = 95) of Saudi individuals included in the study. The other α globin variations included α1–4.2/α1α2, α1polyA-1, α2/α1α2, and –3.7α2/α1polyA-1α2. None of these variants were found to be significantly associated with the level of HbA2.

Structure modelling and RMSD prediction

Of the three SNPs (rs2071348, rs7482144, and rs5006884) that were significantly associated with borderline and higher HbA2 levels, only rs5006884 was an exonic polymorphism that made an amino acid change. The three-dimensional (3D) structural modelling for rs5006884 native using a Protein Data Bank template and mutant models using SWISS MODEL and PROCHECK [16, 23–25] were studied to elucidate the effects of the amino acid changes, and were also compared for the energy minimisation and its RMSD using the GROMACS 5.1.1 program [18]. Binding energy minimisation varied significantly, and the total energy values for rs5006884 (7529.6 kJ/mol) variegated proteins were deviated from the wild (7227.9 kJ/mol) protein. In addition, the RMSD values, which are directly proportional to structural deviations with RMSD –0.01 Å, play a significant role during disease initiation. The superimposed position of wild OR51B6 (red colour) and mutant L172F (green colour) model was generated by SWISS PDB Viewer, as shown in Figure 3. This observation suggests that the variation rs5006884 at the OR51B6 gene affects the protein-protein interaction.
Figure 3

Three-dimensional (3D) protein structure of OR51B6. A – Entire wild protein. B – Focused region indicating the L172. C – Entire mutated protein. D – Focused region indicating the L172F. E – Superimposed structure. In the superimposed model: Helix with green colour indicates mutant, helix with red colour indicates wild

Three-dimensional (3D) protein structure of OR51B6. A – Entire wild protein. B – Focused region indicating the L172. C – Entire mutated protein. D – Focused region indicating the L172F. E – Superimposed structure. In the superimposed model: Helix with green colour indicates mutant, helix with red colour indicates wild OR51B6 wild and mutant models were checked for possible interaction variations towards the globin proteins (HBB, HBD, HBE, HBA1, HBA2, and HBG) using PRISM server. Based on the template and target protein interface, model complex was generated by prism, with multiple prediction of interaction of molecules bound with free binding energies. Only the lowest free binding energy complexes were selected. The influence of the mutated OR51B6 gene in the binding energy of the OR51B6-target protein complex varied significantly with other haemoglobins (Figure 4). This observation suggests that the variation rs5006884 at the OR51B6 gene affects the protein-protein interaction. Binding energies varied significantly between native and mutant OR51B6 with respect to globin protein, with the greatest shift between OR51B6/HBA2 and the least between OR51B6/HBA1. The influence and sensitivity of the binding energy upon amino acid substitution is significant at a threshold of 10% variation in the binding energy [26]. In the present study, the threshold to predict the most influential effect of the amino acid substitution on the binding energy is 25% variation, which indicated the most deleterious effect of the amino acid substitution among the tested combinations (Figure 5).
Figure 4

OR51B6 protein and globin protein interaction. Column 1 indicates the template OR51B6 protein and interacting globin protein; column 2 denotes the target globin protein and wild OR51B6 protein. Column 3 denotes the target globin protein and mutant OR51B6 protein

Figure 5

Influence of the mutated OR51B6 gene in the binding energy of the OR51-target protein complex

*Significantly varied binding energy at 25% compared with the wild type.

OR51B6 protein and globin protein interaction. Column 1 indicates the template OR51B6 protein and interacting globin protein; column 2 denotes the target globin protein and wild OR51B6 protein. Column 3 denotes the target globin protein and mutant OR51B6 protein Influence of the mutated OR51B6 gene in the binding energy of the OR51-target protein complex *Significantly varied binding energy at 25% compared with the wild type.

Discussion

Screening for β-thalassaemia trait is important in genetic and pre-marital counselling. This screening is based on the determination of the level of HbA2, which is usually elevated in subjects heterozygous for the β-thalassaemia mutation. However, there are several factors that may influence this level, such as coinheritance of α-thalassaemia or δ-thalassaemia, where the HbA2 concentration is reduced to normal and remains < 3.5%. Also, the presence of silent HBB mutations projects normal RBC indices and normal or borderline HbA2 levels [27]. HbA2 levels are lower in β+-thalassaemia mutation carriers than in β0-thalassaemia mutation carriers, and normal HbA2 levels are reported in a small subset of traits with non-mutant δ-globin gene [28, 29]. These studies with divergent results entrench the confusion about the reliability of the HbA2 level [30]. A genome-wide association study identified rs5006884 SNP in the olfactory genes OR51B5/OR51B6 locus on chromosome 11 to exceed the stringent genome-wide significance threshold of 10–8, and is considered to be the most significant SNP explaining 5.6% of the variability in HbF level [31]. The effect of rs5006884 on HbF levels was independent of the Xmn1 site, sickle cell haplotype, β-globin gene-like complex, and LCR region. A recent study also showed a lack of association between the rs5006884 SNP with HbF in β-thalassaemia among the Saudi population [32]. An additional regulatory region modulating HbF expression was reported to be centromeric to the β-globin gene cluster, with genetic modifiers rs2071348 and rs7482144 influencing disease severity [33]. The rs2071348 polymorphism on the HBB pseudogene (HBBP1) was previously significantly associated with a milder disease phenotype in Asian β(0)-thalassaemia/haemoglobin E patients [34], but causality due to the rs7482144 marker represented by the Xmn1-HBG2 site has not been fully demonstrated [35]. Detailed analysis of the association of HbF QTL – HBG2 promoter region, BCL11A region, and HMIP region genes on Saudis with various levels of HbA2 revealed that these three SNPs, rs2071348, rs7482144, and rs5006884, were significantly associated with borderline and higher HbA2 levels in the present study, which are reported as insignificant SNPs for HbF level in Saudis [32] confirming the reciprocal relationship among the HbA2 and HbF levels [10]. The predominant haplotypes in the borderline and higher HbA2 cohort consisted of GTC, TCC, and TCT in the HBG2 promoter region comprising the same SNPs: rs2071348, rs7482144, and rs5006884, respectively. The bioinformatics tool-based, systematic, in silico approach to ascertain the impact of genetic variation rs5006884C>T on the structure of OR51B6 protein and its significant impact on the interaction with globin proteins were predicted. The single amino acid change, rs5006884 in the OR51B6, resulted in structural modification with RMSD –0.01 Å that suggests it plays a significant role during disease initiation. The binding energy minimisation also varied significantly, indicating that the variation rs5006884 affects the protein-protein interaction. Molchanova et al. [36] reported the α-2 expression level to be twice the level seen in α-1, with less efficient translation of the α-2-mRNA, to maintain a relative level of α-2 protein. The protein interface energy between HBB/HBA2 and HBD/HBA2 is almost the same, but among haemoglobin proteins with variants of OR51B6, the greatest shift is between OR51B6/HBA2 (78.7%) and the least between OR51B6/HBA1 (5.07%) (Figure 5). It was evident from the interaction of OR51B6 and HBA2 that a functional modification due to the presence of rs5006884C>T on the structure of OR51B6 that has doubled the binding energy might be the reason for the slight increase in the level of HBA2. Previous studies on the HBA2 protein interaction reported a significant variation in the interface energy between mutant-template and wild-template protein complex [37]. The OR51B6 can be considered as a HbA2 modulator for large-scale studies. In conclusion, the haemoglobin switching modulator SNPs in the HBG2 gene region in general and OR51B6 (rs5006884) variation in particular might intervene in the tetramer formation of α2 with β and δ globin, thereby playing a significant role in the regulation of HbA2 level in β-thalassaemia carriers. Therefore, these variations need to be considered when screening haemoglobinopathies. Furthermore, the OR51B6 can be studied in detail for the HbA2 modulator to ameliorate disease severity.
  35 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Is HbA2 level a reliable diagnostic measurement for β-thalassemia trait in people with iron deficiency?

Authors:  Madeleine Verhovsek; Chi-Chiu So; Timothy O'Shea; Geoffrey T Gibney; Edmond S K Ma; Martin H Steinberg; David H K Chui
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 10.047

3.  Predicting protein-protein interactions on a proteome scale by matching evolutionary and structural similarities at interfaces using PRISM.

Authors:  Nurcan Tuncbag; Attila Gursoy; Ruth Nussinov; Ozlem Keskin
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 13.491

4.  SWISS-MODEL and the Swiss-PdbViewer: an environment for comparative protein modeling.

Authors:  N Guex; M C Peitsch
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.535

Review 5.  The multifunctional role of EKLF/KLF1 during erythropoiesis.

Authors:  Miroslawa Siatecka; James J Bieker
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Mutation near the binding interfaces at α-hemoglobin stabilizing protein is highly pathogenic.

Authors:  Jesu Francis Borgio; Mohammed S Al-Madan; Sayed AbdulAzeez
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2016-10-15       Impact factor: 4.060

7.  Krüppel-like factor 1 mutations and expression of hemoglobins F and A2 in homozygous hemoglobin E syndrome.

Authors:  Wanicha Tepakhan; Supawadee Yamsri; Goonnapa Fucharoen; Kanokwan Sanchaisuriya; Supan Fucharoen
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 3.673

8.  Genetic modifiers of Hb E/beta0 thalassemia identified by a two-stage genome-wide association study.

Authors:  Richard Sherva; Orapan Sripichai; Kenneth Abel; Qianli Ma; Johanna Whitacre; Vach Angkachatchai; Wattanan Makarasara; Pranee Winichagoon; Saovaros Svasti; Suthat Fucharoen; Andreas Braun; Lindsay A Farrer
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 2.103

9.  HbA2 levels in normal adults are influenced by two distinct genetic mechanisms.

Authors:  Stephan Menzel; Chad Garner; Helen Rooks; Tim D Spector; Swee Lay Thein
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 6.998

10.  PRISM: protein interactions by structural matching.

Authors:  Utkan Ogmen; Ozlem Keskin; A Selim Aytuna; Ruth Nussinov; Attila Gursoy
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.