| Literature DB >> 34335655 |
Shao-Fen Jian1,2, Xue-Jing Huang3, Xiao-Nan Yang1,2, Chu Zhong1,2, Jian-Hua Miao1,2.
Abstract
Nitrogen (Entities:
Keywords: Andrographis paniculata (Burm.f.) Nees; andrographolide accumulation; nitrogen; phytohormone; sulfur
Year: 2021 PMID: 34335655 PMCID: PMC8317024 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.687954
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Figure 1Growth evaluation of A. paniculata plants grown under different nitrogen and sulfur conditions. (A) Plants treated with different N and S levels were pictured after harvesting. (B) Plant height. (C) Leaf area measured by photographing. (D) Leaf dry weight. (E) The ratio of leaf/shoot dry weight. Data were presented as mean ± SE (n = 4). Different letters on the bars indicate significant difference among treatments at p < 0.05 using the method of LSD. Scar bars = 10 cm. LN, low nitrogen; HN, high nitrogen; LS, low sulfur; HS, high sulfur.
Figure 2Diterpene lactones, nitrogen, and sulfur concentration and the relationship between N and lactone in leaves of A. paniculata plants grown under different nitrogen and sulfur conditions. (A) Andrographolide concentration. (B) Dehydroandrographolide concentration. (C) Total lactone (andrographolide + dehydroandrographolide) concentration. (D) Total leaf N concentration. (E) Total leaf S concentration. (F) The relationship between total leaf N concentration and total lactone concentration. Data were presented as mean ± SE (n = 4). Different letters on the bars indicate significant difference among treatments at p < 0.05 using the method of LSD. LN, low nitrogen; HN, high nitrogen; LS, low sulfur; HS, high sulfur.
Figure 3Activity of N metabolic enzymes in leaves of A. paniculata plants grown under different nitrogen and sulfur conditions. (A) Nitrate reductase. (B) Glutamine synthase. (C) Glutamic-oxalacetic transaminase. (D) Glutamic-pyruvic transaminase. Data were presented as mean ± SE (n = 4). Different letters on the bars indicate significant difference among treatments at p < 0.05 using the method of LSD. LN, low nitrogen; HN, high nitrogen; LS, low sulfur; HS, high sulfur.
Figure 4Simplified diagram of changes in carbon and nitrogen metabolites in leaves of A. paniculata plants grown under different nitrogen and sulfur conditions. (A) Changes in metabolites in high S compared with low S under low N conditions. (B) Changes in metabolites in high S compared with low S under high N conditions. Red represents significantly increased, green represents significantly decreased, and white represent not significant. Heat map in the rectangle meant relative values under low S and high S conditions on the left and right, respectively. Data were presented as means obtained from four biological replicates.
Figure 5Intermetabolites of terpene metabolism in leaves of A. paniculata plants grown under different nitrogen and sulfur conditions. (A) A Relative value of mevalonate. (B) Relative value of mevalonate 5-phosphate. (C) Relative value of mevalonate diphosphate. (D) Relative value of isopentenyl pyrophosphate (IPP). Data were presented as mean ± SE (n = 4). Different letters on the bars indicate significant difference among treatments at p < 0.05 using the method of LSD. LN, low nitrogen; HN, high nitrogen; LS, low sulfur; HS, high sulfur.
Figure 6Phytohormones in leaves of A. paniculata plants grown under different nitrogen and sulfur conditions. (A) Relative value of jasmonate. (B) Relative value of methyl jasmonate. (C) Relative value of salicylic acid. (D) Relative value of abscisic acid (ABA). (E) Relative value of gibberellic acid 4 (GA4). (F) Relative value of gibberellic acid 7 (GA7). Data were presented as mean ± SE (n = 4). Different letters on the bars indicate significant difference among treatments at p < 0.05 using the method of LSD. LN, low nitrogen; HN, high nitrogen; LS, low sulfur; HS, high sulfur.
Figure 7Trehalose (A) and trehalose 6-phosphate (B) levels in leaves of A. paniculata plants grown under different nitrogen and sulfur conditions. Data were presented as mean ± SE (n = 4). Different letters on the bars indicate significant difference among treatments at p < 0.05 using the method of LSD. LN, low nitrogen; HN, high nitrogen; LS, low sulfur; HS, high sulfur.
| Term | Definitions |
| ABA | Abscisic acid |
| AGCs | Andrographolide compounds |
| CNBH | Carbon/nutrient balance hypothesis |
| Cys | Cysteine |
| E4P | Erythrose 4-phosphate |
| GA | Gibberellic acid |
| GS | Glutamine synthetase |
| GOT | Glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase |
| GPT | Glutamic-pyruvic transaminase |
| JA | Jasmonate |
| MEP | Methylerythritol phosphate |
| MeJA | Methyl jasmonate |
| Met | Methionine |
| MVA | Mevalonic acid |
| N | Nitrogen |
| NR | Nitrate reductase |
| PEP | Phosphoenolpyruvate |
| PPP | Pentose phosphate pathway |
| S | Sulfur |
| SA | Salicylic acid |
| SAH | S-Adenosyl- |
| SAM | S-Adenosyl-methionine |
| Tre | Trehalose |
| Tre6P | Trehalose 6-phosphate |