| Literature DB >> 34335509 |
Zuxian Pan1, Shahzad Munir1, Yongmei Li1, Pengbo He1, Pengfei He1, Yixin Wu1, Yan Xie2, Zongwei Fu2, Yongzhan Cai2, Yueqiu He1.
Abstract
Tobacco leaf mildew caused by Rhizopus oryzae (Mucorales, Zygomycota) is an important and devastating post-harvest disease during flue-cured tobacco period, and also is known to cause diseases of fruits and vegetables. In this study, assessment of several candidate biological control agents were first tested in vitro to determine their antifungal activities and potential strains were further applied to tobacco leaves to prevent pathogen colonization during the tobacco-curing process. In vitro screening of 36 bacteria and the isolates of one fungus were performed for their antifungal activities against R. oryzae using dual culture method. Potential five isolates viz. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens B9601-Y2 (Y2), B. amyloliquefaciens YN201728 (YN28), Pseudomonas sp. (Pb), and B. amyloliquefaciens YN201732 (YN32) and T. harzianum B (Th-B) from total screened isolates have shown remarkable results for controlling the mycelial growth of R. oryzae. Finally, out of these five isolates, B. amyloliquefaciens B9601-Y2 potentially reduced the mycelial growth of fungal pathogen with great inhibitory effect. In order to get a better understanding of the biocontrol effect of B9601-Y2 in a flue-curing barn, various suspension density tests with two application methods involving spraying and soaking were examined. Two application methods of B. amyloliquefaciens B9601-Y2 had 98.60 and 98.15% control effects, respectively. In curing barn, the incidence in the treatment group was significantly reduced and tobacco leaves did not get mildew. Altogether, the study demonstrated that candidate bacterial strain B. amyloliquefaciens B9601-Y2 is a potential antagonist for the management of tobacco leaf mildew during flue-curing.Entities:
Keywords: Bacillus; Nicotiana tabacum; Rhizopus oryzae; fungi; tobacco
Year: 2021 PMID: 34335509 PMCID: PMC8317063 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.683365
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
FIGURE 1Lab screening of antagonist against fungal pathogen. Biocontrol agents with different inhibitory effects against Rhizopus oryzae. Pseudomonas sp. (Pb), B. amyloliquefaciens YN201732 (YN32), B. amyloliquefaciens B9601-Y2 (Y2), and B. amyloliquefaciens YN201728 (YN28) were tested in vitro. Trichoderma (Th-B) displaying antifungal activity against fungal pathogen, which occupied all the space in the plate. Inverted section of Th-B showing that the candidate strain antagonizes the pathogen. The red circle indicates that the control treatments showed no inhibition.
FIGURE 2Tobacco leaf disc interaction test. Both sides of leaf discs were sprayed by prepared spore suspension using a manual sprayer. Spore suspension of the pathogen and candidate biocontrol strains brought in interaction in the growth chamber for 5 h. An aliquot of 200 μL of dilutions was spread on a PDA plate and incubated at 32°C for 3 days.
Effect of various concentrations of five treatments on tobacco mildew disease.
| Isolate | Concentration (CFU/mL) | Disease index | Disease rate (%) | Control efficacy (%) |
| Control | NA | 19.64 ± 0.09a | 43.12 ± 0.77a | NA |
| Y2 | 106 | 0.04 ± 0.04b | 0.43 ± 0.43b | 99.80 ± 0.20d |
| 105 | 0.25 ± 0.07bc | 2.75 ± 0.77c | 98.74 ± 0.35bcd | |
| Pb | 106 | 0.10 ± 0.06b | 1.16 ± 0.72bc | 99.47 ± 0.33cd |
| 105 | 0.26 ± 0.12bc | 2.90 ± 1.31c | 98.67 ± 0.60bcd | |
| YN28 | 106 | 0.11 ± 0.04b | 1.21 ± 0.40bc | 99.45 ± 0.18cd |
| 105 | 0.24 ± 0.06bc | 2.67 ± 0.67b | 98.78 ± 0.31bcd | |
| YN32 | 106 | 0.14 ± 0.06b | 1.61 ± 0.64bc | 99.27 ± 0.29bcd |
| 105 | 0.29 ± 0.09bc | 3.18 ± 0.96c | 98.55 ± 0.44bc | |
| Th-B | 108 | 0.36 ± 0.06bc | 4.06 ± 0.70c | 98.15 ± 0.32b |
| 107 | 0.67 ± 0.09c | 7.45 ± 0.97cd | 96.59 ± 0.44a |
Effect of different application methods on tobacco mildew.
| Application method | Isolate | Disease index | Disease rate (%) | Control efficacy (%) |
| Spray | Control | 21.24 ± 0.23a | 61.33 ± 0.91a | NA |
| Y2 | 0.48 ± 0.16b | 4.28 ± 1.45b | 97.76 ± 0.76e | |
| Pb | 1.08 ± 0.04b | 9.69 ± 0.35bc | 94.93 ± 0.18cd | |
| Th-B | 1.78 ± 0.26bc | 16.01 ± 2.31c | 91.62 ± 1.21a | |
| Soak | Control | 21.18 ± 0.11a | 59.22 ± 0.52a | NA |
| Y2 | 0.54 ± 0.11b | 4.88 ± 1.02b | 97.45 ± 0.53e | |
| Pb | 0.89 ± 0.05b | 8.02 ± 0.44b | 95.81 ± 0.23de | |
| Th-B | 1.79 ± 0.13bc | 16.14 ± 1.19c | 91.56 ± 0.62a | |
| Y2/Pb | 1.67 ± 0.22bc | 15.07 ± 1.94c | 92.12 ± 1.02ab | |
| Th-B/Pb | 1.46 ± 0.12b | 13.16 ± 1.06bc | 93.12 ± 0.56abc | |
| Y2/Th-B | 1.22 ± 0.05b | 11.02 ± 0.46bc | 94.24 ± 0.24bcd |
FIGURE 3Effect of B. amyloliquefaciens Y2 was used as a biocontrol agent against R. oryzae in vivo. (a) The control showed white hair like mycelium of the fungal pathogen; (b) treatment with B. amyloliquefaciensY2 indicated the inhibition of pathogen). The experiment was repeated three times.
Effect of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Y2 on tobacco mildew in laboratory.
| Site | Application | Concentration (CFU/mL) | Disease index | Disease rate (%) | Control efficacy (%) |
| Laboratory | Soak | Control | 53.23 ± 0.23a | 85.00 ± 1.64a | NA |
| 3.2 × 107 | 0.00 ± 0.00b | 0.00 ± 0.00b | 100 ± 0.00a | ||
| 3.2 × 106 | 1.48 ± 0.64bc | 13.33 ± 5.77c | 97.22 ± 1.15ab | ||
| 3.2 × 105 | 2.59 ± 0.64c | 23.22 ± 5.77d | 95.14 ± 1.15b |
FIGURE 4Inhibition of pathogen in curing barn. The experiment was conducted in field conditions naturally infested with fungal pathogen R. oryzae. (a) Infested tobacco leaves with R. oryzae. (b) Effect of B. amyloliquefaciensY2 was used as a biocontrol agent against R. oryzae under field condition.
Effect of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Y2 on tobacco rot in curing barns (Shimo, Yunnan and Seka, Yunnan) experiments.
| Site | Application | Concentration (CFU/mL) | Disease index | Disease rate (%) | Control efficacy (%) |
| Shimo | Soak | Control | 20.95 ± 0.04a | 42.12 ± 0.71a | NA |
| 1.5 × 107 | 0.04 ± 0.06b | 0.33 ± 0.58b | 99.82 ± 0.58a | ||
| 7.5 × 106 | 0.22 ± 0.11bc | 2.00 ± 1.00c | 98.95 ± 0.58ab | ||
| 1.5 × 105 | 0.30 ± 0.06bc | 2.67 ± 0.58c | 98.60 ± 0.58ab | ||
| Seka | Spray | Control | 31.35 ± 0.43a | 51.33 ± 0.34a | NA |
| 1.1 × 105 | 0.58 ± 0.37b | 5.00 ± 2.94b | 98.15 ± 1.23 |