Literature DB >> 34334892

COVISHIELD (AZD1222) VaccINe effectiveness among healthcare and frontline Workers of INdian Armed Forces: Interim results of VIN-WIN cohort study.

Subhadeep Ghosh1, Subramanian Shankar2, Kaustuv Chatterjee3, Kaushik Chatterjee4, Arun Kumar Yadav5, Kapil Pandya6, Vani Suryam7, Sunil Agrawal8, Sougat Ray9, Vivek Phutane10, Rajat Datta11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: On 16 Jan 2021, India launched its immunization program against COVID-19. Among the first recipients were 1.59 million Health Care Workers (HCWs) and Frontline Workers (FLWs) of the Indian Armed Forces, who were administered COVISHIELD (Astra Zeneca). We present an interim analysis of vaccine effectiveness (VE) estimates till 30 May 2021.
METHODS: The VIN-WIN cohort study was carried out on anonymized data of HCWs and FLWs of Indian Armed Forces. The existing surveillance system, enhanced for COVID-19 monitoring, was sourced for data. The cohort transitioned from Unvaccinated (UV) to Partially Vaccinated (PV) to Fully Vaccinated (FV), serving as its own internal comparison. Outcomes studied in the three groups were breakthrough infections and COVID related deaths. Incidence Rate Ratio (IRR) was used to compare outcomes among the three groups to estimate VE.
RESULTS: Data of 1,595,630 individuals (mean age 27.6 years; 99% male) over 135 days was analysed. Till 30 May 21, 95.4% and 82.2% were partially and fully vaccinated. The UV, PV and FV compartments comprised 106.6, 46.7 and 58.7 million person-days respectively. The number of breakthrough cases in the UV, PV and FV groups were 10061, 1159 and 2512; while the deaths were 37, 16 and 7 respectively. Corrected VE was 91.8-94.9% against infections.
CONCLUSION: Interim results of the VIN-WIN cohort study of 1.59 million HCWs and FLWs of Indian Armed Forces showed a ∼93% reduction in COVID-19 breakthrough infections with COVISHIELD vaccination.
© 2021 Director General, Armed Forces Medical Services. Published by Elsevier, a division of RELX India Pvt. Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breakthrough infections; COVISHIELD; Covid-19; VIN-WIN cohort; Vaccine effectiveness

Year:  2021        PMID: 34334892      PMCID: PMC8313084          DOI: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2021.06.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India        ISSN: 0377-1237


Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic produced the swiftest ever worldwide healthcare effort. Though initially intimidated by rising numbers, the multi-pronged response focused on understanding transmission, disease and Non-Pharmacological Interventions (NPIs) in the population. This was followed by search for effective treatments. The focus next shifted to planning for mass vaccination. Vaccine development, which had hitherto taken a decade or more, was now telescoped to a few months. The Pfizer vaccine was the first to get emergency use authorization by Food and Drug Administration in USA, followed by Moderna. Initial vaccine efficacy data was provided by the manufacturers., Some early studies of vaccine effectiveness among population have been carried out in a few countries., In India, two vaccine candidates, COVISHIELD (Astra Zeneca) and COVAXIN (Bharat Biotech), were accorded emergency use approval on 03 Jan 2021. COVISHIELD (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) is an adenovirus vector-nonreplicating virus vaccine carrying recombinant spike protein of SARS-CoV-2. It had shown acceptable safety profile in phase I/II trials and an efficacy of 74% in preventing infections in interim analysis of phase III trials.10, 11, 12 The effectiveness of this vaccine among the Indian population requires to be established. Effectiveness has been defined as reduced risk of infection or disease among individuals which is attributed to vaccination, in real world conditions. World Health Organization has provided interim guidance for evaluation of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness. When COVID-19 vaccination commenced in India, all healthcare workers (HCWs) and frontline workers (FLWs) were initially vaccinated. Armed Forces personnel were vaccinated rapidly, affording a unique opportunity to study vaccine effectiveness among a large cohort in India. The VIN-WIN study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of COVISHIELD vaccine on occurrence of breakthrough infections and COVID-19 related deaths. Here we provide the interim results after 4.5 months of vaccination drive.

Materials and methods

The VIN-WIN cohort study was carried out on anonymized data of HCWs and FLWs of the Armed Forces. The existing surveillance system, which had been enhanced for COVID-19 monitoring, was sourced for data. The vaccination drive commenced on 16 Jan 2021 and the second dose was administered four weeks later, from 13 Feb 2021. Data recorded for the VIN-WIN study included date-wise parameters from 16 Jan to 30 May 21 regarding number of persons vaccinated with first dose, second dose, date of testing positive for COVID-19 and deaths due to COVID-19. Individuals were tested for COVID infection according to prevailing policy which was uniformly applicable across the cohort. They were tested with molecular diagnostic tests (RT-PCR or Rapid antigen) if they developed symptoms of illness or were high risk contacts of confirmed COVID-19 cases or related to travel requirements. Symptomatic individuals who tested negative by rapid antigen test, were confirmed using RT-PCR. Those who tested positive by either test were considered as cases. Individuals were considered unvaccinated (UV) from 16 Jan 21 till their status changed to partially vaccinated. They were deemed partially vaccinated (PV) and fully vaccinated (FV) two weeks after the first and second vaccine dose respectively. Any person (PV or FV) who tested positive for COVID-19 after vaccination, was labelled as a case of breakthrough infection. All deaths among COVID-19 positive individuals were counted as COVID-19 related deaths. Over the study period, three groups were naturally formed as most UV individuals moved sequentially to PV and FV compartments. Data from individuals was censored on 30 May 2021 or if they tested COVID-19 positive at any point in time. Population at risk for groups was calculated in terms of person-days. If one person remained in a group for 100 days or 2 persons for 50 days each, both were counted as 100 person-days. Crude incidence rates (IR) were calculated for each group by dividing the total number of cases by the population at risk in that group. Crude Incidence Rate Ratio (IRR) was calculated for PV/UV and FV/UV. Confidence intervals were estimated. The population experienced a changing risk of infection over time that was determined by the progress of the pandemic. Thus, corrected IR and IRR were calculated to account for the changing risk and the composition of the three groups on a daily basis. This correction was done by using two different methods. Method # 1: Daily IR of infections/deaths for each group (UV/PV/FV) was calculated by dividing the number of daily cases by population at risk in the group on that day. Mean of daily IR was calculated for each group. Ratio of means PV:UV and FV:UV was calculated yielding corrected IRR #1. This method followed the sequence Daily IR → Mean→ Ratio. Method # 2: In this method an adaptation of time-dependent Cox analysis was used. Risk of infection, which was a time-varying risk factor, was accounted for by calculating the Relative Risk (RR) between PV/UV and FV/UV, on a daily basis. Weighted mean of IRR was calculated. The steps were - Daily IR of infections/deaths for each group (UV/PV/FV) was determined. Daily ratio of PV:UV and FV:UV was then calculated. Weighted mean of these ratios yielded corrected IRR # 2. This method followed the sequence Daily IR→ Ratio → Mean. VE was calculated as 1 - IRR. Method # 1 yielded corrected IR, Absolute Risk reduction (ARR) and Number needed to vaccinate (NNV). Both methods yielded corrected IRR and Vaccine effectiveness (VE). Median time to breakthrough infection was calculated in the PV and FV groups. The effect of partial or complete vaccination was assumed to be constant as long as the individual remained in that group. Ethics clearance was obtained from Institutional ethics committee. Data was collated using MS Excel and analysed using Python scripts NumPy, SciPy and Lifelines modules. Differences in IRR between the groups were tested for statistical significance using Z-test. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

A total of 1,595,630 (∼1.59 million) HCWs and FLWs located all across India formed the VIN-WIN study cohort. They had a mean age of 27.6 (SD 6.16) years and had minimal co-morbidities. They were predominantly males (99%). The mean duration between the 1st and 2nd dose in cases who tested COVID positive subsequently was 31.43 (SD 7.23) days. The VIN-WIN cohort was observed from 16 Jan to 30 May 2021 for 135 days. The UV, PV and FV compartments comprised 106.6, 49.7 and 58.7 million person-days respectively (Table 1, Fig. 1a). By 30 May 2021, a total of 95.4% (1,523,347) had been at least partially vaccinated, while 82.2% (1,312,938) had been fully vaccinated (Table 1, Fig. 1b). The number of fresh COVID-19 infections in the cohort among the UV, PV and FV groups were 10061, 1159 and 2512 respectively (Fig. 2a). The daily IR (per million) for cases is depicted in Fig. 2c. The crude and corrected IR for cases is shown in Table 1 and Fig. 3a and b, while the IRR and VE (crude and corrected) is depicted in Table 2. Among the fully vaccinated, corrected VE as calculated by both the methods ranged from 91.8 to 94.9% for breakthrough infections (Table 2). The ARR for breakthrough infections was 486 per million and the NNV to prevent one case was 2054.
Table 1

Impact of vaccination on cases and deaths (16 Jan–30 May 2021).

Un-vaccinatedPartially VaccinatedFully Vaccinated
Numbers at start of study1,595,63000
Numbers vaccinated1,523,347 (95.4%)1,312,938 (82.2%)
Duration of observation (person days)106,594,49249,653,91858,674,639
Total cases10,06111592512
Total Deaths37167
Crude Incidence rate (cases per million person days)94.423.342.8
Corrected Incidence Rate (cases per million)512.925.426.2
Fig. 1

a: Vaccine drive among HCWs and FLWs of Indian Armed Forces (16 Jan–30 May 2021). b: VIN-WIN cohort: Un-vaccinated (UV) – Partially vaccinated (PV) – Fully vaccinated (FV).

Fig. 2

a: COVID infections in cohort: daily cases. b: COVID infections in cohort: daily deaths. c: Corrected Incidence rates (cases per million). d: Corrected Incidence rates (deaths per million).

Fig. 3

a: Crude Incidence rate, b: Corrected Incidence rate.

Table 2

Vaccine effectiveness (Crude and Corrected) in VIN-WIN cohort.

CasesCrudeIncidence Rate Ratio (IRR)Crude Vaccine Effectiveness (VE)Corrected Incidence Rate Ratio (IRR)∗
CorrectedVaccine Effectiveness (VE)
Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR)
Number Needed to Vaccinate (NNV)
Method# 1Method# 2Method# 1Method# 2Method# 1Method# 2
PV: UV0.253 (0.232–0.262)75.2% (73.8–76.8)0.049 (0.033–0.073)0.057 (0.039–0.082)95.13% (92.72–96.74)94.35% (91.78–96.11)4872051
FV:UV0.454 (0.434–0.474)54.6% (52.6–56.6)0.051 (0.034–0.075)0.082 (0.060–0.112)94.93% (92.49–96.58)91.81% (88.79–94.02)4862054
Impact of vaccination on cases and deaths (16 Jan–30 May 2021). a: Vaccine drive among HCWs and FLWs of Indian Armed Forces (16 Jan–30 May 2021). b: VIN-WIN cohort: Un-vaccinated (UV) – Partially vaccinated (PV) – Fully vaccinated (FV). a: COVID infections in cohort: daily cases. b: COVID infections in cohort: daily deaths. c: Corrected Incidence rates (cases per million). d: Corrected Incidence rates (deaths per million). a: Crude Incidence rate, b: Corrected Incidence rate. Vaccine effectiveness (Crude and Corrected) in VIN-WIN cohort. During the study period, deaths in the UV, PV and FV groups were 37, 16 and 7 respectively (Fig. 2b). The daily incidence of deaths is depicted in Fig. 2d. Mean age of those who died was 43.17 (SD 8.22) years and 40% (24/60) of them had one or more co-morbidities. Crude IRRs of COVID related deaths for PV/UV and FV/UV were 0.93 (95% CI: 0.48–1.71) and 0.34 (95% CI 0.13–0.78) respectively. Corrected IRRs (method #2) for PV/UV and FV/UV were 0.13 (95% CI: 0.001–19.34) and 0.02 (95% CI: 0.00 to >100) respectively. Vaccine effectiveness relating to prevention of COVID related deaths was 98.53% (95% CI: 0.00–99.99). The wide confidence intervals observed in corrected IRR and VE which occurred due to very few deaths in the vaccinated group, did not allow meaningful conclusions to be drawn (Fig. 2d). The number of daily breakthrough cases among the partially and fully vaccinated is depicted in Fig. 4a. The mean age of patients with breakthrough infections was 33.16 (SD 8.46) years. Median time to infection after the first dose was 21 days (95% CI: 19–22) and after second dose was 31 days (95% CI: 30–33) (Fig. 4b and c).
Fig. 4

a: Breakthrough infections: COVID cases after first and second vaccine dose. b: Cumulative COVID cases among partially vaccinated. c: Cumulative COVID cases among fully vaccinated.

a: Breakthrough infections: COVID cases after first and second vaccine dose. b: Cumulative COVID cases among partially vaccinated. c: Cumulative COVID cases among fully vaccinated.

Discussion

The VIN-WIN study, conducted among 1.59 million HCWs and FLWs of Indian Armed Forces showed that vaccination with COVISHIELD reduced the risk of breakthrough infections by around 91–94% (Table 2). Studies from across the world have yielded various results.,, (Table 3) Vaccination was shown to reduce hospitalization by 88% in a large cohort of 1.3 million in Scotland. Other studies showed a 60–70% reduction in breakthrough infections.,, Due to the very small number of deaths in the vaccinated groups, the observed confidence intervals were extremely wide. Thus, no valid statistical inference could be drawn.
Table 3

COVISHIELD vaccine efficacy/effectiveness studies.

VIN-WIN StudyBernal et al.Voysey et al.Madhi et al.Vasileiou et al.
CountryIndiaUKUK, Brazil, South AfricaSouth AfricaUK
Sample characteristicsMalesMean age 27.6Age >70Age >1818-65,HIV negativeMean age 65
Sample Size1,595,630156,93011,63620261,331,993
Type of studyCohortCase controlRCTRCTCohort
Outcome measuresVaccine Effectiveness. Cases,DeathsVaccine Effectiveness. Cases,HospitalisationVaccine Efficacy.CasesVaccine Efficacy.CasesVaccine Effectiveness. Hospitalisation after 1 dose
ResultsReduction of 95.4% in casesReduced odds of 73% in cases, 43% in admissionsReduction of 62.1% in casesReduction of 21.9% cases against B.1.351 variantReduction of hospitalisation by 88%
COVISHIELD vaccine efficacy/effectiveness studies. In the initial period of pandemic, the Armed Forces followed a vigorous contact tracing policy in 2020. A large number of asymptomatic cases were thus detected which is reflected in the higher rate of infections compared to the Indian population (Fig. 5a). In the first wave, despite the higher detection of infections, deaths in the Armed Forces were lower than in the Indian population (Fig. 5b). During the second wave, while both cases and deaths surged across the country (which had larger proportion of unvaccinated population compared to the VIN-WIN cohort), there was a discernible lower incidence of both among the Armed Forces (Fig. 5a and b). The only major way in which VIN-WIN cohort differed was the very high rate of vaccination.
Fig. 5

a: COVID infections (cases per million) before and after vaccination drive: Indian population vs. Armed Forces. b: COVID related deaths (deaths per million) before and after vaccination drive: Indian population vs. Armed Forces.

a: COVID infections (cases per million) before and after vaccination drive: Indian population vs. Armed Forces. b: COVID related deaths (deaths per million) before and after vaccination drive: Indian population vs. Armed Forces. When the first wave peaked in India on 16 Sep 2020 with 97,894 fresh COVID cases, the Armed Forces had 485 cases that day. The maximum number of daily fresh cases in the first wave among Armed Forces personnel was 686 on 19 Sep 2020. However, in the second wave, when fresh cases in India climbed to 414,188 on 06 May 2021, the Armed Forces experienced only 386 fresh cases, with a peak of 496 on 04 May 2021. The number of fresh cases in the Armed Forces did not rise in the second wave as was expected. Studies have shown a better response among younger population with various vaccines ranging from 95 to 100%, compared to 60–70% among the elderly populations.,, This study was carried out on a relatively young cohort with a mean age of 27.6 years which might have contributed to the higher observed vaccine efficacy. In this study, the same set of individuals moved across the three groups over 135 days of observation, allowing for internal comparison as they transitioned from one vaccination status to the next. Over 82% of the cohort had been fully vaccinated by 30 May 2021. Though a few personnel did retire from service during the course of the study or died from other causes, they were less than 0.1% of the entire cohort and were not taken into consideration. The study has certain limitations. The VIN-WIN cohort differed from the Indian population. While the mean age of this cohort (27.6 years) was similar to that of the Indian population, the confidence interval was much narrower as it did not represent almost 50% of the population (age <18 years ∼40% and >60 years∼10% ). Also, it was a predominantly male cohort comprising of individuals with minimal co-morbidities. Thus, the results of this study may not generalize across the entire population which includes elderly, children, females and those with co-morbidities. Vaccine effectiveness may or may not be similar in these sub-groups. However, the ∼93% vaccine effectiveness seen in this study is quite promising. Similar results may be expected among healthy females. As it was surveillance data that was analysed, details of the more than 1.58 million individuals who did not become COVID positive during the course of the study was only available as summary statistics. Hence, we were unable to perform a Cox proportional hazard regression. All HCWs and FLWs were included in the vaccination drive regardless of an individual's serological or previous COVID positive status. We are thus unable to quantify the impact of the previous infection on vaccine effectiveness. Additionally, though the reduction in deaths appears promising, the extremely small numbers of deaths among the vaccinated leads to very wide confidence intervals for corrected IRR and VE, and needs to be interpreted with caution. A possible limitation is also that vaccine effectiveness was analysed for a gap of four weeks between the two doses, not 6–12 weeks as recommended by the manufacturer. The study has many strengths. This is the largest study from India evaluating COVID vaccine effectiveness so far. This study method, which utilised existing surveillance data to evaluate vaccine effectiveness, offered the advantage of low cost. There was almost no attrition or loss to follow-up, with preservation of herd structure throughout the study. This cohort also had negligible vaccine refusal rate resulting in more than 95% being at least partially vaccinated. This study was carried out on Armed Forces population which is representative of the ethnic heterogeneity of India. The existing infrastructure, functioning processes and swift implementation in the Armed Forces, allowed for effective data gathering and policy implementation. The second wave struck during the latter half of the study, changing the risk of infection on an almost daily basis. We used two methods of calculating corrected IRR that enabled us to take the changing epidemiological situation into consideration. The difference seen between crude and corrected IRR is a reflection of this (Table 2). To conclude, the VIN-WIN cohort study comprising 1.59 million HCWs and FLWs of the Indian Armed Forces which was observed from 16 Jan – 30 May 21, has shown a ~93% reduction in COVID-19 infections as a result of the vaccination drive.

Disclosure of competing interest

The authors have none to declare.
  15 in total

Review 1.  COVID-19 Vaccine Concerns: Fact or Fiction?

Authors:  Antoine Barbari
Journal:  Exp Clin Transplant       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 0.945

2.  Coronavirus disease 2019 in India: Post-lockdown scenarios and provisioning for health care.

Authors:  Kaushik Chatterjee; Subramanian Shankar; Kaustuv Chatterjee; Arun Kumar Yadav
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2020-06-18

3.  Effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines on covid-19 related symptoms, hospital admissions, and mortality in older adults in England: test negative case-control study.

Authors:  Jamie Lopez Bernal; Nick Andrews; Charlotte Gower; Chris Robertson; Julia Stowe; Elise Tessier; Ruth Simmons; Simon Cottrell; Richard Roberts; Mark O'Doherty; Kevin Brown; Claire Cameron; Diane Stockton; Jim McMenamin; Mary Ramsay
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2021-05-13

4.  Safety and immunogenicity of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2: a preliminary report of a phase 1/2, single-blind, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pedro M Folegatti; Katie J Ewer; Parvinder K Aley; Brian Angus; Stephan Becker; Sandra Belij-Rammerstorfer; Duncan Bellamy; Sagida Bibi; Mustapha Bittaye; Elizabeth A Clutterbuck; Christina Dold; Saul N Faust; Adam Finn; Amy L Flaxman; Bassam Hallis; Paul Heath; Daniel Jenkin; Rajeka Lazarus; Rebecca Makinson; Angela M Minassian; Katrina M Pollock; Maheshi Ramasamy; Hannah Robinson; Matthew Snape; Richard Tarrant; Merryn Voysey; Catherine Green; Alexander D Douglas; Adrian V S Hill; Teresa Lambe; Sarah C Gilbert; Andrew J Pollard
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Immunogenicity and protective efficacy of BBV152, whole virion inactivated SARS- CoV-2 vaccine candidates in the Syrian hamster model.

Authors:  Sreelekshmy Mohandas; Pragya D Yadav; Anita Shete-Aich; Priya Abraham; Krishna Mohan Vadrevu; Gajanan Sapkal; Chandrashekhar Mote; Dimpal Nyayanit; Nivedita Gupta; Vellimedu Kannappa Srinivas; Manoj Kadam; Abhimanyu Kumar; Triparna Majumdar; Rajlaxmi Jain; Gururaj Deshpande; Savita Patil; Prasad Sarkale; Deepak Patil; Raches Ella; Sai D Prasad; Sharda Sharma; Krishna M Ella; Samiran Panda; Balram Bhargava
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-01-09

6.  Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine.

Authors:  Lindsey R Baden; Hana M El Sahly; Brandon Essink; Karen Kotloff; Sharon Frey; Rick Novak; David Diemert; Stephen A Spector; Nadine Rouphael; C Buddy Creech; John McGettigan; Shishir Khetan; Nathan Segall; Joel Solis; Adam Brosz; Carlos Fierro; Howard Schwartz; Kathleen Neuzil; Larry Corey; Peter Gilbert; Holly Janes; Dean Follmann; Mary Marovich; John Mascola; Laura Polakowski; Julie Ledgerwood; Barney S Graham; Hamilton Bennett; Rolando Pajon; Conor Knightly; Brett Leav; Weiping Deng; Honghong Zhou; Shu Han; Melanie Ivarsson; Jacqueline Miller; Tal Zaks
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Outcome Reporting Bias in COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Ronald B Brown
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 2.430

8.  Impact and effectiveness of mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 infections and COVID-19 cases, hospitalisations, and deaths following a nationwide vaccination campaign in Israel: an observational study using national surveillance data.

Authors:  Eric J Haas; Frederick J Angulo; John M McLaughlin; Emilia Anis; Shepherd R Singer; Farid Khan; Nati Brooks; Meir Smaja; Gabriel Mircus; Kaijie Pan; Jo Southern; David L Swerdlow; Luis Jodar; Yeheskel Levy; Sharon Alroy-Preis
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine in a Nationwide Mass Vaccination Setting.

Authors:  Noa Dagan; Noam Barda; Eldad Kepten; Oren Miron; Shay Perchik; Mark A Katz; Miguel A Hernán; Marc Lipsitch; Ben Reis; Ran D Balicer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Efficacy of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern 202012/01 (B.1.1.7): an exploratory analysis of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Katherine R W Emary; Tanya Golubchik; Parvinder K Aley; Cristina V Ariani; Brian Angus; Sagida Bibi; Beth Blane; David Bonsall; Paola Cicconi; Sue Charlton; Elizabeth A Clutterbuck; Andrea M Collins; Tony Cox; Thomas C Darton; Christina Dold; Alexander D Douglas; Christopher J A Duncan; Katie J Ewer; Amy L Flaxman; Saul N Faust; Daniela M Ferreira; Shuo Feng; Adam Finn; Pedro M Folegatti; Michelle Fuskova; Eva Galiza; Anna L Goodman; Catherine M Green; Christopher A Green; Melanie Greenland; Bassam Hallis; Paul T Heath; Jodie Hay; Helen C Hill; Daniel Jenkin; Simon Kerridge; Rajeka Lazarus; Vincenzo Libri; Patrick J Lillie; Catherine Ludden; Natalie G Marchevsky; Angela M Minassian; Alastair C McGregor; Yama F Mujadidi; Daniel J Phillips; Emma Plested; Katrina M Pollock; Hannah Robinson; Andrew Smith; Rinn Song; Matthew D Snape; Rebecca K Sutherland; Emma C Thomson; Mark Toshner; David P J Turner; Johan Vekemans; Tonya L Villafana; Christopher J Williams; Adrian V S Hill; Teresa Lambe; Sarah C Gilbert; Merryn Voysey; Maheshi N Ramasamy; Andrew J Pollard
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  11 in total

1.  Cutting edge medical research.

Authors:  Subramanian Shankar
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2022-09-15

2.  Effectiveness of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Coronavirus Vaccine (CovishieldTM) in Preventing SARS-CoV2 Infection, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, 2021.

Authors:  Sharan Murali; Manikandanesan Sakthivel; Kamaraj Pattabi; Vettrichelvan Venkatasamy; Jeromie Wesley Vivian Thangaraj; Anita Shete; Alby John Varghese; Jaganathan Arjun; Chethrapilly Purushothaman Girish Kumar; Pragya D Yadav; Rima Sahay; Triparna Majumdar; Manisha Dudhmal; Azhagendran Sivalingam; Sudha Rani Dhanapal; Augustine Durai Samy; Vijayaprabha Radhakrishnan; Murali Mohan Muni Krishnaiah; Suresh Arunachalam; Punita Muni Krishna Gandhi; Elavarasu Govindasamy; Prabhakaran Chinnappan; Dhana Priya Vadhani Sekar; Prakash Marappan; Ezhil Pounraj; Parasuraman Ganeshkumar; Murugesan Jagadeesan; Manish Narnaware; Gagandeep Singh Bedi; Prabhdeep Kaur; Manoj Murhekar
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-17

3.  First and second doses of Covishield vaccine provided high level of protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection in highly transmissible settings: results from a prospective cohort of participants residing in congregate facilities in India.

Authors:  Tenzin Tsundue; Tenzin Namdon; Tenzin Tsewang; Sonam Topgyal; Tashi Dolma; Dekyi Lhadon; Tsering Choetso; Tenzin Woesal; Tenzin Yangkyi; Amita Gupta; David Peters; Zorba Paster; Dawa Phunkyi; Tsetan Dorji Sadutshang; Richard E Chaisson; Kunchok Dorjee
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2022-05

4.  Vaccine effectiveness to protect against moderate or severe disease in COVID cases: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Rajneesh K Joshi; C G Muralidharan; Ankur Ahuja; Reema Mukherjee; Sachin Chaurasia; Linto Manjaly; A K Sahoo; Jayesh Gosavi; Alok Thomas
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2022-04-04

5.  Adverse events and breakthrough infections associated with COVID-19 vaccination in the Indian population.

Authors:  Geetika Arora; Jyoti Taneja; Priya Bhardwaj; Shorya Goyal; Kumar Naidu; Sunita K Yadav; Daman Saluja; Sunita Jetly
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 20.693

6.  Is it a challenging task to work with personal protective equipment in a COVID-19 ICU: Findings from a hospital-based cross-sectional study from north India.

Authors:  Karthikeyan Mahalingam; Akshaya Balaji; Ragul Ganesh; Roy Arokiam Daniel; Richa Aggarwal; Kapil Dev Soni; Akhil Kant Singh; Puneet Khanna; Viney Gupta; Anjan Trikha
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2022-05-14

7.  Clinical manifestations of COVID-19 breakthrough infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christine J Lee; Wongi Woo; Ah Young Kim; Dong Keon Yon; Seung Won Lee; Ai Koyanagi; Min Seo Kim; Kalthoum Tizaoui; Elena Dragioti; Joaquim Radua; Sungsoo Lee; Lee Smith; Jae Il Shin
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 20.693

8.  Differential persistence of neutralizing antibody against SARS-CoV-2 in post immunized Bangladeshi population.

Authors:  Dipa Roy; Md Mosfequr Rahman; Arnaba Saha Chaity; Md Abu Reza; Ariful Haque
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 4.996

9.  The effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in reducing the incidence, hospitalization, and mortality from COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kazem Rahmani; Rasoul Shavaleh; Mahtab Forouhi; Hamideh Feiz Disfani; Mostafa Kamandi; Rozita Khatamian Oskooi; Molood Foogerdi; Moslem Soltani; Maryam Rahchamani; Mohammad Mohaddespour; Mostafa Dianatinasab
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-08-26

10.  Molecular epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 in healthcare workers and identification of viral genomic correlates of transmissibility and vaccine break through infection: A retrospective observational study from a cancer hospital in eastern India.

Authors:  Sanjay Bhattacharya; Soumyadip Chatterji; Mammen Chandy; Aseem Yogishwar Mahajan; Gaurav Goel; Deepak Mishra; Priyanka Vivek; Parijat Das; Sudipto Mandal; Anup Chugani; Antra Mittal; Rajadurai Chinnasamy Perumal; Vedam L Ramprasad; Ravi Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Med Microbiol       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 1.347

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.