K K Larsen1, D Wielandta1, M Schillera1, A N Krot1,2, M Bizzarro1. 1. Centre for Star and Planet Formation, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen DK-1350, Denmark. 2. Hawai'i Institute of Geophysics and Planetology, University of Hawai'i at Manoa, HI 96822, USA.
Abstract
Refractory inclusions [Ca-Al-rich Inclusions (CAIs) and Amoeboid Olivine Aggregates (AOAs)] in primitive meteorites are the oldest Solar System solids. They formed in the hot inner protoplanetary disk and, as such, provide insights into the earliest disk dynamics and physicochemical processing of the dust and gas that accreted to form the Sun and its planetary system. Using the short-lived 26Al to 26Mg decay system, we show that bulk refractory inclusions in CV (Vigarano-type) and CR (Renazzo-type) carbonaceous chondrites captured at least two distinct 26Al-rich (26Al/27Al ratios of ~5 × 10-5) populations of refractory inclusions characterized by different initial 26Mg/24Mg isotope compositions (μ26Mg*0). Another 26Al-poor CAI records an even larger μ26Mg*0 deficit. This suggests that formation of refractory inclusions was punctuated and recurrent, possibly associated with episodic outbursts from the accreting proto-Sun lasting as short as <8000 yr. Our results support a model in which refractory inclusions formed close to the hot proto-Sun and were subsequently redistributed to the outer disk, beyond the orbit of Jupiter, plausibly via stellar outflows with progressively decreasing transport efficiency. We show that the magnesium isotope signatures in refractory inclusions mirrors the presolar grain record, demonstrating a mutual exclusivity between 26Al enrichments and large nucleosynthetic Mg isotope effects. This suggests that refractory inclusions formed by incomplete thermal processing of presolar dust, thereby inheriting a diluted signature of their isotope systematics. As such, they record snapshots in the progressive sublimation of isotopically anomalous presolar carriers through selective thermal processing of young dust components from the proto-Solar molecular cloud. We infer that 26Al-rich refractory inclusions incorporated 26Al-rich dust which formed <5 Myr prior to our Sun, whereas 26Al-poor inclusions (such as FUN- and PLAC-type CAIs) incorporated >10 Myr old dust.
Refractory inclusions [Ca-Al-rich Inclusions (CAIs) and Amoeboid Olivine Aggregates (AOAs)] in primitive meteorites are the oldest Solar System solids. They formed in the hot inner protoplanetary disk and, as such, provide insights into the earliest disk dynamics and physicochemical processing of the dust and gas that accreted to form the Sun and its planetary system. Using the short-lived 26Al to 26Mg decay system, we show that bulk refractory inclusions in CV (Vigarano-type) and CR (Renazzo-type) carbonaceous chondrites captured at least two distinct 26Al-rich (26Al/27Al ratios of ~5 × 10-5) populations of refractory inclusions characterized by different initial 26Mg/24Mg isotope compositions (μ26Mg*0). Another 26Al-poor CAI records an even larger μ26Mg*0 deficit. This suggests that formation of refractory inclusions was punctuated and recurrent, possibly associated with episodic outbursts from the accreting proto-Sun lasting as short as <8000 yr. Our results support a model in which refractory inclusions formed close to the hot proto-Sun and were subsequently redistributed to the outer disk, beyond the orbit of Jupiter, plausibly via stellar outflows with progressively decreasing transport efficiency. We show that the magnesium isotope signatures in refractory inclusions mirrors the presolar grain record, demonstrating a mutual exclusivity between 26Al enrichments and large nucleosynthetic Mg isotope effects. This suggests that refractory inclusions formed by incomplete thermal processing of presolar dust, thereby inheriting a diluted signature of their isotope systematics. As such, they record snapshots in the progressive sublimation of isotopically anomalous presolar carriers through selective thermal processing of young dust components from the proto-Solar molecular cloud. We infer that 26Al-rich refractory inclusions incorporated 26Al-rich dust which formed <5 Myr prior to our Sun, whereas 26Al-poor inclusions (such as FUN- and PLAC-type CAIs) incorporated >10 Myr old dust.
Entities:
Keywords:
26Al; Mg isotope; Solar System formation; episodic outburst; presolar dust; refractory inclusion
Our Solar System formed through the collapse of a well-mixed molecular cloud core made up of dust and gas originating from a multitude of nucleosynthetic sources (Vasileiadis et al., 2013; Kuffmeier et al., 2016). This nucleosynthetic diversity is preserved in presolar grains from primitive meteorites. Through gravitational core collapse, the earliest energetic phase of protostellar evolution was characterized by high mass accretion rates onto the forming proto-Sun (~10−5 M⊙ yr−1) (D’Alessio et al., 2005), punctuated by protostellar episodic outbursts (Frimann et al., 2016; Hsieh et al., 2018). This resulted in a very hot inner protoplanetary disk. Based on their high-temperature mineralogy and irradiation signatures (Wielandt et al., 2012; Sossi et al., 2017), refractory inclusions [Ca-Al-rich Inclusions (CAIs) and Amoeboid Olivine Aggregates (AOAs)] are thought to have condensed at this stage from a gas in the innermost region of the protoplanetary disk (Scott and Krot, 2014). As such, CAIs from CV (Vigarano-type) carbonaceous chondrites record an absolute age of 4,567.30 ± 0.16 Myr (Connelly et al., 2012), defining the onset of our Solar System. Hence, refractory inclusions captured the earliest physicochemical processing of the presolar dust that accreted to form the Sun and its planetary system.Our understanding of the formation of refractory inclusions primarily comes from petrographic, chemical, and isotopic analysis of the large, mm- to cm-sized CAIs in CV chondrites (MacPherson, 2014). Except for a few rare refractory inclusions, CV CAIs and AOAs generally exhibit excesses in 26Mg that correlate with their 27Al/24Mg ratio, signifying the former presence of short-lived radioactive 26Al with an initial (26Al/27Al)0 ratio of (5.25 ± 0.02) × 10−5 (Larsen et al., 2011). This has been interpreted to reflect formation of these inclusions within less than ~ 8000 yr from a CAI-forming gas enriched in 26Al via chemical processing of 26Al-rich presolar carriers (Larsen et al., 2011). The idea of enrichment of 26Al in the CAI-forming reservoir is supported by correlated minor enrichments in neutron-rich isotopes of the iron peak elements (48Ca, 50Ti, 54Cr) in 26Al-rich CV CAIs; interpreted to be the result of selective thermal processing of isotopically anomalous presolar carriers (Trinquier et al., 2009; Larsen et al., 2011; Schiller et al., 2015, 2018). Much larger nucleosynthetic effects are known to exist in 26Al-poor FUN/UN-type (Fractionation and Unidentified Nuclear effects) CAIs from CV chondrites, as well as 26Al-poor PLAC-type CAIs (PLAty hibonite Crystals) from CM chondrites, indicating residual nucleosynthetic variability in some refractory inclusions (Ireland, 1990; Liu et al., 2009; Kööp et al., 2016; 2018). This has been proposed to result from incomplete chemical homogenization of isotopically diverse presolar dust components and that refractory inclusions, contrary to current belief, did not form exclusively from a single, completely homogenized gas of solar composition (Ireland, 1990). These observations are not compatible with complete sublimation of all presolar material into a gaseous state prior to CAI-formation. As such, it is not clear if the 26Al-26Mg isotope systematics of 26Al-rich CV-type CAIs and AOAs are representative for refractory inclusions in other types of carbonaceous chondrites or if they merely represent a snapshot of isotopically evolving protoplanetary gas and dust reservoirs.It is well known that features such as size, type, mineralogy and abundance of refractory inclusions differ between different groups of carbonaceous chondrites (Scott and Krot, 2014), which are believed to have accreted at various heliocentric distances from the Sun in the outer Solar System (Warren, 2011). For example, in CR chondrites (Renazzo-type carbonaceous chondrites) refractory inclusions are typically very small (10–300 μm), about an order of magnitude less abundant (<1 vol%) than in CV chondrites and on average mineralogically distinct (Krot et al., 2002). Thus, it is conceivable that their isotope systematics also record differences in their formation conditions and reveal whether refractory inclusions in different chondrite groups represent distinct populations with unique isotope signatures. Importantly, CR chondrites are some of the most pristine early Solar System materials that escaped secondary asteroidal thermal metamorphism and experienced only minor aqueous alteration (Krot et al., 2002; Makide et al., 2009). As such, CR CAIs represent ideal targets to search for primordial isotopic differences to other CAIs that is associated with their formation process. Here, we report on the first high-precision Multiple-Collector Inductively-Coupled-Plasma source Mass-Spectrometry (MC-ICPMS) magnesium isotope analysis of 17 bulk refractory inclusions [including six AOAs, five finegrained spinel-rich (FG) CAIs and six CAIs with evidence for partial or complete melting] from five CR chondrites, as well as three additional FG CAIs from the reduced CV chondrite Efremovka and mineral fractions from the KT-1 FUN-type CV CAI (Thrane et al., 2008).
Materials and methods
Petrographic characterization of refractory inclusions was carried out using the JEOL JXA-8500F Field Emission electron microprobe and JEOL JSM-5900LV scanning electron microscope (SEM) equipped with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS) at the University of Hawaii at Manoa, as well as the Phillips XL40 SEM equipped with EDS located at the Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS) in Copenhagen. Given the very low abundance of refractory inclusions in CR2 chondrites (typically <1 vol%) (Scott and Krot, 2014), a systematic survey for refractory inclusions in a range of pristine CR2 chondrites was carried out based on combined X-ray elemental maps (Mg – red, Ca – green, and Al – blue) of polished meteorite sections. The X-ray elemental maps in Mg, Ca, Al, Ti and Na K α were acquired with JEOL JXA-8500F using a 15 keV accelerating voltage, 50–100 nA beam current, and a beam size of ~1 μm.A subset of larger inclusions from five CR2 chondrites [North West Africa (NWA) 6043, NWA 7837, NWA 7655, Elephant Moraine (EET) 92161, Graves Nunataks (GRA) 95229] and one reduced CV3 chondrite (Efremovka) was selected for sampling and isotope analysis. Sampling was performed using the New Wave Research MicroMill at the Centre for Star and Planet Formation, University of Copenhagen, equipped with tungsten carbide (WC) or diamond coated microdrill bits (200–500 μm) by drilling into a small droplet of MilliQ water and extracting the sample using a thin, elongated custom made Pasteur pipette. Samples were then transferred to small pre-cleaned Savillex PFA Teflon beakers in preparation for digestion in ultra-clean distilled acids prior to chromatographic purification following the procedures outlined in Larsen et al., 2018. In brief, samples were digested in a mixture of concentrated HF:HNO3 (3:1) for 2 days at 120 °C, followed by digestion in aqua regia (HCl(3):HNO3 (1)) for 2 days at 120 °C and conversion to NO3-salts through two evaporation-cycles with HNO3. All chemical procedures were performed in an ultra-clean laboratory environment using double distilled acids and distilled MilliQ water. Ion chromatographic purification of Mg was performed using a series of cation and anion exchange resins (AG50w-x8, TODGA, Ni-spec) as described in detail in Larsen et al., 2018.Magnesium-isotope analysis was performed using the Thermo-Finnigan Neptune Plus Multiple-Collector Inductively-Coupled-Plasma source Mass-Spectrometer (MC-ICP-MS) located at the Centre for Star and Planet Formation (Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen), following procedure out-lined in Bizzarro et al., 2011 and Larsen et al., 2018. In brief, purified Mg was introduced into the plasma source by means of an Apex IR desolvating nebulizer in a 2% HNO3 run solution at 50 ml min−1 using a Thermo Fisher Jet sample cone and skimmer X-cone interface in high-resolution mode. Corrections for instrumental mass bias were obtained by sample–standard bracketing with sample/standard peak intensities matching to better than 5%. Samples and standards were analyzed 10 times with each analysis consisting of 100 cycles of 16.78 second integrations separated by a total of 822 seconds of on-peak zero blank measurements in clean 2% HNO3 solution.Stable magnesium isotope ratios are reported in parts per million (ppm) deviation relative to the composition of the Mg reference standard DTS-2B (Olsen et al., 2013) according to: μ25Mg = [(25Mg/24Mg)sample/(25Mg/24Mg)DTS-2B − 1] × 106. The mass-independent μ26Mg* (non-radiogenic 26Mg + radiogenic 26Mg ingrowth from 26Al decay) is reported in the same fashion after mass bias correction using the exponential fractionation law and internal normalization to 25Mg/24Mg = 0.126896 (Bizzarro et al., 2011). Data reduction was conducted offline using the software package Iolite (Paton et al., 2011) and is reported in Table 1.
Table 1
Mg isotope data for refractory inclusions in CR2 and CV3 chondrites.
Sample ID
Meteorite
Type of inclusion
μ25 Mg
2se
μ26Mg*
2se
n
27Al/24Mg
2se
CV3 inclusions
EK14
Efremovka (CV3red)
Fine-grained CAI
181
12
305.9
2.6
8
0.856
0.017
EK12
Efremovka (CV3red)
Fine-grained CAI
−580
4
542.6
3.4
10
1.480
0.030
EK3
Efremovka (CV3red)
Fine-grained spinel-rich CAI
−370
4
989.0
3.4
10
2.955
0.059
CR2 inclusions
NWA6043-2b-#9
NWA 6043 (CR2)
AOA
105
4
10.3
3.1
10
0.061
0.002
NWA6043-2b-#6
NWA 6043 (CR2)
AOA
−457
5
18.6
3.8
10
0.049
0.002
GRA-#3
GRA 95229 (CR2)
AOA
−101
5
18.7
2.8
10
0.086
0.003
NWA7837-D#2
NWA 7837 (CR/CV?)
AOA
−88
5
52.1
2.9
10
0.169
0.007
GRA-#1
GRA 95229 (CR2)
AOA
−193
5
126.9
5.0
10
0.295
0.012
NWA6043-2b-#l
NWA 6043 (CR2)
AOA
−151
3
127.9
2.2
10
0.271
0.011
NWA6043-l-#3
NWA 6043 (CR2)
Fine-grained CAI
−28
3
164.6
2.2
10
0.763
0.069
NWA7837-D#3
NWA 7837 (CR/CV?)
Fine-grained CAI
467
6
419.3
2.4
10
1.391
0.028
NWA6043-0A-#17
NWA 6043 (CR2)
Fine-grained CAI
551
1
548.4
2.0
8
1.704
0.068
NWA7655-P6
NWA 7655 (CR2)
Fine-grained CAI
805
5
563.9
5.3
3
1.799
0.036
NWA6043-0A-# 11
NWA 6043 (CR2)
Flyffy type A CAI
−69
17
764.2
4.8
6
2.488
0.149
EET921 61-18a-#l
EET 92161 (CR2)
Fine-grained spinel-rich CAI
606
10
967.1
2.9
10
2.930
0.059
NWA7837-D#1
NWA 7837 (CR/CV?)
Type B CAI
6780
4
1005.2
4.1
10
3.013
0.060
NWA6043-2A-#2
NWA 6043 (CR2)
Sp-rich CAI
1840
11
1010.7
0.4
3
2.903
0.058
N-53
NWA 6043 (CR2)
Compound type B/C CAI
4902
7
1022.3
7.6
10
2.942
0.059
NWA6043-l-#6
NWA 6043 (CR2)
Melilite-rich CTA CAI
4738
3
1388.5
2.3
10
3.979
0.080
NWA6043-1 A-#8
NWA 6043 (CR2)
Hib-rich CAI
−98
4
1696.6
5.7
3
5.108
0.102
KT-I FUN CU CAI mineral fractions
KT-f5
NWA 779 (CV3)
FUN CAI, spinel-rich mineral fragment
39630
9
−387.9
3.9
7
3.101
0.124
KT-f6
NWA 779 (CV3)
FUN CAI, spinel + melilite-rich mineral fragment
35977
51
−368.4
5.1
3
3.362
0.134
KT-fl
NWA 779 (CV3)
FUN CAI, melilite-rich mineral fragment
34300
2
−277.0
4.4
3
4.617
0.462
KT-f3
NWA 779 (CV3)
FUN CAI, melilite-rich mineral fragment
36082
11
−302.2
5.8
1
5.166
0.155
27Al/24Mg ratios were determined using the Thermo Fisher Scientific quadrupole ICP-MS located at the Centre for Star and Planet Formation (Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen), by standard-sample bracketing on sample-matched gravimetric standards with 27Al/24Mg ratios of 0.1, 1.3, 3.4 and 5.7, thereby covering the range of 27Al/24Mg ratios for refractory inclusions reported in this study. Repeat measurements of two basaltic USGS standards (BHVO-2 and BCR-2) and two CAIs (Cp1 and Cp2) showed that accurate 27Al/24Mg ratios, as compared to spiked 27Al/24Mg ratios reported in Paton et al., 2012 and nominal USGS values, can be obtained to a precision of <2% (Fig. S1). Data reduction was conducted using the software package Iolite (Paton et al., 2011).
26Al-26Mg isotope systematics of refractory inclusions from CR and CV chondrites
In the 26Al-26Mg isochron diagram, two FG CV CAIs (EK12 and EK14) plot on the bulk CV CAI-AOA isochron [(26Al/27Al)0 = (5.252 ± 0.019) × 10−5, μ26Mg*0 = − 15.9 ± 1.4 ppm] previously determined for refractory inclusions in the reduced CV chondrite Efremovka (Larsen et al., 2011), while all of the CR CAIs and one FG CV CAI (EK3) plot consistently below it (Fig. 1a). Three of the CR AOAs plot on the CV isochron, while another three CR AOAs plot slightly above it. Refining the CV isochron using the old data including the two new FG CV CAIs results in an isochron with a (26Al/27Al)0 ratio of (5.252 ± 0.018) × 10−5 and μ26Mg*0 of − 15.9 ± 1.4 ppm (MSWD = 0.98), i.e. identical to that reported in Larsen et al., 2011. A regression solely using bulk CV CAIs (i.e. excluding AOAs) also defines an isochron with an indistinguishable (26Al/27 Al)0 ratio of (5.26 ± 0.05) × 10−5 and intercept of μ26Mg*0 = − 17.8 ± 9.6 ppm. This is distinct from the isochron intercept of −34 ppm predicted for a homogeneous distribution of 26Al in the Solar protoplanetary disk (Kita et al., 2013). Mineral fractions from the KT-1 FUN CV CAI record significant deficits in μ26 Mg* corresponding to a μ26Mg*0 value of − 545 ± 300 ppm with no evidence for the former presence of 26Al, i.e. (26Al/27Al)0 of (0.7 ± 1.0) × 10−5 (Fig. 1a).
Fig. 1
a) 26Al-26Mg isochron diagram for bulk refractory inclusions from CR and CV chondrites showing the presence of at least two distinct populations of refractory inclusions with significantly different μ26Mg*0 (where μ26Mg*0 is the intercept of the isochron defined as the parts per million deviation of the initial 26Mg/24Mg ratio relative to Earth after mass-dependent fractionation correction using the exponential law and normalization to the solar 25Mg/24Mg ratio of 0.126896; Bizzarro et al., 2011). Also shown is the internal mineral isochron for the Egg-3 CV3 CAI from Wasserburg et al., 2012, which coincides with the CR isochron. b) Magnesium isotope evolution diagram for refractory inclusions, in which each data point represents the slope (26Al/27Al) and intercept (μ26Mg*0) in the 26Al-26Mg isochron diagram. The red shaded area represents the range of Mg isotope compositions that can be explained by in-situ 26Al decay from a ‘canonical’ CV CAI reservoir (26Al/27Al = 5.25 × 10−5 and μ26Mg*0 = – 15.9 ppm, reservoir A), along trajectories determined by their bulk 27Al/24Mg ratios. The green shaded area represents the evolution from a CR CAI reservoir for 27Al/24Mg ratios up to 2 typical for forsterite-rich type B (FoB) CAIs. Most CV CAIs (MacPherson et al., 2010; 2012; Kita et al., 2012) can be explained by evolution from the CV reservoir, whereas most FoB CAIs (MacPherson et al., 2016), the type B CAI Egg-3 (Wasserburg et al., 2012) and an igneous CR CAI (Makide et al., 2009) require evolution from a distinct isotope reservoir with deficient μ26Mg*0 similar to CR CAIs (reservoir B, this study). Hence, these inclusions belong to a separate population characterized by isotopically anomalous μ26 Mg* relative to ‘normal’ CV CAIs. To facilitate comparison, literature data was recalculated using β = 0.511. (For interpretation of the colors in the figure(s), the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fine-grained spinel-rich CV and CR refractory inclusions have textural and mineralogical characteristics consistent with their primary condensation origin, which is also corroborated by the pristine internal isochrons for FG CV CAIs [average (26Al/27Al)0 ratio of (5.1 ± 0.2) × 10−5 (MacPherson et al., 2012)], i.e., consistent with the (26Al/27Al)0 ratio defined by bulk CV CAIs. Other, typically coarse-grained igneous CAI types record (26Al/27Al)0 ratios as low as ~4.3 × 10–5, suggesting their later resetting up to ~200,000 yr after formation of FG CAIs (MacPherson et al., 2012). CR CAIs are typically fragmented in nature such that individual fragments may not reflect their true bulk 26Al-26Mg isotope systematics (Simon and Grossman, 2006), especially for coarse-grained igneous CAIs. Therefore, we restrict our analysis to the five fine-grained CR CAIs to constrain the primary condensation history for CR CAIs. An isochron using these data results in an (26Al/27Al)0 ratio of (5.1 ± 0.2) × 10−5, consistent with the bulk CV isochron and internal isochrons for CR CAIs recording (26Al/27Al)0 of ~(4.4–5.4) × 10−5 (Makide et al., 2009), but with lower initial μ26Mg*0 of −95 ± 26 ppm, i.e. 79 ± 26 ppm lower than the CV isochron. Four of the re-molten CR CAIs analyzed here are not well-constrained by the CR isochron, a feature that we attribute to their fragmental nature and, hence, unrepresentative sampling of their bulk composition as mentioned above.While the initial μ26Mg*0 values determined from internal 26Al-26Mg CAI isochrons measured by secondary ion mass-spectrometry are generally poorly constrained, one CR CAI [with the inferred (26Al/27Al)0 of (5.4 ± 0.6) × 10−5] shows a resolvable μ26Mg*0 deficit of –400 ± 300 ppm (Makide et al., 2009), i.e. within error of the bulk CR CAI isochron. Moreover, a high-precision internal isochron for a type B CV CAI (‘Egg-3’; Wasserburg et al., 2012) has identical (26Al/27Al)0 and μ26Mg*0 to the CR isochron (Fig. 1a). Similarly, a few FoB (Forsterite-rich type B) CAIs (MacPherson et al., 2016) record identical μ26Mg*0 values within error to that defined here for CR CAIs. We further note that another bulk CV CAI (EK3) measured in this study plots on the CR isochron. When comparing the isochron intercepts, μ26Mg*0, versus their slope, 26Al/27Al, for these inclusions, (Fig. 1b) it is evident that the 26Al-26Mg isotope composition of such CV and CR CAIs cannot be explained by their formation from an evolving reservoir constrained by the CV isochron. Instead they must have formed from a reservoir characterized by non-Solar Mg-isotope composition with a lower μ26Mg*0 similar to that defined here for CR CAIs (unrelated to radiogenic decay of 26Al). Thus, μ26Mg* in such inclusions record both a radiogenic 26Mg component related to 26Al decay and a non-radiogenic 26Mg component.
Episodic formation of refractory inclusions and their transport to the accretion region of the giant planets
The distinct μ26Mg*0 values for bulk refractory inclusions in CV and CR chondrites indicate at least two separate CAI-forming reservoirs/episodes with (26Al/27Al)0 of ~5 × 10−5. The three CR AOAs that plot above the CV isochron cannot be regressed with any other AOAs from this study to define a statistically meaningful regression line. Thus, we speculate that these objects hint at the possibility of yet another population of refractory inclusions with a different initial 26Mg* although additional data is required to test this hypothesis. Thus, the existence of different CAI populations with contrasting μ26Mg*0 suggests that formation of 26Al-rich refractory inclusions was a punctuated and recurrent process, plausibly associated with protostellar episodic outbursts from the active proto-Sun (Frimann et al., 2016; Hsieh et al., 2018). Such episodic outbursts are observed for young stellar objects in the process of accreting mass via their disks from the surrounding envelope with episodes lasting for less than a few thousand years (Hsieh et al., 2018), which is consistent with the timeframe deduced from the error envelopes of CV and CR isochrons of <8,000 and <82,000 yr, respectively. Therefore, episodic accretion and CAI-formation may be intrinsically linked, reflecting a generic process inherent to the evolution of protostars.The presence of CAI material in the comet 81P/Wild 2 has been taken as evidence for CAI transport and recycling into distant regions of the Solar protoplanetary disk (Brownlee et al., 2006). The near absence of such refractory materials in the inner accretion regions of the terrestrial planets (Trinquier et al., 2009; Olsen et al., 2016; Bizzarro et al., 2017) can be explained if refractory inclusions were episodically lofted above the disk midplane and recycled back into the outer disk. Carbonaceous chondrites, such as CV and CR, accreted in the outer volatile-rich part of the disk beyond the orbits of Jupiter, with the CR chondrites most likely accreting at larger heliocentric distances compared to the close proximity of the accretion region of CV chondrites to the orbit of Jupiter (Van Kooten et al., 2016, 2017; Kruijer et al., 2017). If correct, the fact that our new data supports evidence for formation of two distinct populations of refractory inclusions, which now resides in two different types of chondrites (CV and CR), suggests that refractory inclusions belonging to the CV isochron (population A) were predominantly transported to disk regions just beyond Jupiter. On the other hand, population B inclusions (all CR CAIs and some CV CAIs) were present in both the CV and CR accretion regions (Fig. 2). In other words, CR chondrites only captured the inclusions belonging to population B, whereas CV chondrites captured inclusions of both populations A and B. This can be explained if population B inclusions were transported to larger orbital distances than those from population A. Successive inward drift could have introduced inclusions from population B to the CV accretion region, but not vice versa (Fig. 2). Following this reasoning, the high abundance (~85%) and small size of 26Al-poor CAIs in CH chondrites, inferred to have accreted even beyond CR chondrites (Krot et al., 2012) implies that such 26Al-poor inclusions were transported further out in the disk, plausibly at much earlier times. Variable travel distance of refractory inclusions can plausibly be explained by secular changes in the outward transport efficiency of the disk winds associated with episodic outbursts (Audard et al., 2014) and/or size-sorting effects during transport above the disk midplane and subsequently within the outer disk (Hansen, 2014). The latter possibility seems consistent with the size distribution of refractory inclusions in CV and CR chondrites, for which the characteristically large inclusions present in CV chondrites are expected to re-enter the disk midplane at smaller orbital radii, as well as drift faster inwards compared to the much smaller inclusions typical of CR chondrites.
Fig. 2
Disk sketch diagram showing the transport routes and recycling of inner disk refractory material to the accretion regions of the giant planets. 26Al-rich population A inclusions, which represent refractory inclusions from the bulk CV isochron, end up in the accretion region of the CV chondrite parent body close to the orbit of Jupiter, whereas population B inclusions are distributed between the accretion regions of both CV and CR chondrite parent bodies at larger orbital distance. Early-formed 26Al-poor refractory inclusions are transported to larger heliocentric distances to accrete with CH carbonaceous chondrites.
This distribution of refractory inclusions is also consistent with recent numerical simulations showing that an early formation (<1 Myr) of Jupiter can trap CAIs in a pressure maximum beyond it (Desch et al., 2018). In this model, the high abundance of CAIs in CV chondrites is explained by trapping and locally enhancing their modal abundance at the far-Sun side of Jupiter. CR parent bodies accreting at larger orbital distances do not experience this enhancement and consequently contain a lower abundance of CAIs. Apart from the size and abundance differences of refractory inclusions in CV and CR chondrites, the presence of both population A and B in CV chondrites contrasting the apparent exclusive presence of population B in CR chondrites (Figs. 1 and 2) supports this idea. Further, it is generally believed that the isotopically anomalous composition of 26Al-poor inclusions, such as FUN CAIs, requires their formation prior to sufficient isotopic homogenization and admixing of 26Al to the CAI-forming reservoir (Holst et al., 2013). Hence, the predominance of 26Al-poor refractory inclusions at larger heliocentric distances compared to 26Al-rich inclusions suggests that the transport efficiency was progressively decreasing. As such, refractory inclusions record the dynamical evolution of the Solar protoplanetary disk, where populations of inner disk refractory inclusions are periodically lofted above the disk midplane and redistributed to the outer Solar System through large-scale mass transport processes with progressively decreasing efficiency.
The presolar heritage of isotopic signatures in refractory inclusions
Through continuous Galactic Chemical Evolution (GCE), stellar nucleosynthesis progressively enriches 25Mg and 26Mg relative to 24Mg in the interstellar medium (Fenner et al., 2003). We note that this results in an anticorrelation between 25Mg/24Mg and μ26Mg*, trending towards μ26Mg* deficits in young dust generations compared to the average dust – a trend which is also corroborated by type-II supernova (SNII) models (Fig. 3). Thus, it appears unavoidable that presolar dust generations of different age on average record divergent Mg-isotope compositions (Clayton, 1988).
Fig. 3
Galactic chemical evolution (GCE) model and supernova-II (SNII) yields for magnesium isotopes predicted from astrophysical models as a function of stellar mass (M) and metallicity (Z). GCE and SNII yields were extracted from the SNII ejecta tool at the Clemson University web site; URL: http://photon.phys.clemson.edu/gce.html (Meyer et al., 2001). Z⊙ refers to solar metallicity and M⊙ to solar mass.
Presolar grains from pristine chondritic meteorites are samples of the molecular cloud dust that made up our Solar System. We find that the presolar grain data for graphites, silicates and oxides agree with the theoretical predictions from GCE and SNII models for an anticorrelation between 25Mg/24Mg and μ26Mg*, thereby reflecting the galactically inherited non-radiogenic 26Mg* background (Fig. 4a). Nucleosynthetic addition of 26Al would produce a radiogenic spike in its decay product 26Mg* in young dust through radioactive decay, thereby overprinting this galactic background. Indeed, a clear 26Mg* spike is observed for presolar grains with about solar 25Mg/24Mg. This is most noticeably in low-density presolar graphite grains believed to originate from SNII (Lodders and Amari, 2005) and group 3 and 4 oxide grains originating from either SNII or low-mass and low-metallicity Asymptotic Giant Branch (AGB) stars (Lodders and Amari, 2005; Nittler et al., 2008) (Fig. 4a). It is also consistent with the Mg-isotope systematics in SNII presolar SiC grains of the X type (Lodders and Amari, 2005). Thus, the presolar grain record demonstrates a mutual exclusivity between large 25Mg/24Mg excesses (coupled with μ26 Mg* deficits) and evidence for 26Al, and reveal three main dust components/generations; 1) an ancient galactically inherited component with excess μ26 Mg* (coupled with deficit 25Mg/24Mg), 2) a newer molecular cloud component with deficit μ26Mg* (coupled with excess 25Mg/24Mg), and 3) a young 26Al-rich component with about solar non-radiogenic μ26Mg* (coupled with about solar 25Mg/24Mg) (Fig. 4a inset). Hence, if refractory inclusions indeed formed by incomplete vaporization of such dust components, they are predicted to capture diluted signatures of its isotopically anomalous compositions. The distinct Mg-isotopic signatures of refractory inclusions reported here indicate progressive admixing of exotic presolar dust to the hot inner disk CAI-forming region.
Fig. 4
μ25Mg (25Mg/24Mg) versus μ26Mg* diagrams similar to Fig. 3. a) Magnesium isotope composition of presolar grains extracted from the presolar grain database (Hynes and Gyngard, 2009); the curved line defines an exponential fit to presolar silicates (low Al/Mg) representing the non-radiogenic 26Mg component (no radiogenic 26Mg from 26Al decay). b) Magnesium isotope systematics of refractory inclusions in chondritic meteorites, incl. ‘normal’ CV/CR, FUN/UN, SHIBs and PLACs. Inclusions marked in red (‘normal’ CV/CR CAIs and SHIBs) record clear evidence for the former presence of 26Al by correlated δ26Mg* (radiogenic) and Al/Mg excesses (inset), whereas inclusions marked in blue (FUN/UN CAIs and PLACs) shows no evidence for 26Al with many recording resolvable δ26Mg* deficits. Inset shows the 26Al-26Mg isochron diagram for the same types of refractory inclusions, demonstrating the radiogenic contribution on 26Mg* from 26Al decay in SHIBs and ‘normal’ CAIs at an initial 26Al/27Al ratio of ~5.25 × 10−5. SHIBs = Spinel-HIBonite inclusions, PLACs = PLAty hibonite Crystals, FUN = Fractionation and Unknown Nuclear effects.
For example, a characteristic feature of FUN-type CAIs is the presence of large mass-independent nucleosynthetic isotope effects in 48Ca, 50Ti and 54Cr, as well as 26Mg* deficits coupled with the general lack of evidence for the former presence of 26Al (Schiller et al., 2015; Kööp et al., 2018; Lee et al., 1979; Holst et al., 2013). The KT-1 FUN CV CAI reported here (μ26Mg*0 = – 545 ± 300 ppm, [26Al/27 Al]0 <1.7 × 10−5) is an example of this. Although the extreme 25Mg/24Mg enrichments typical for FUN-type refractory inclusions could in principle be explained by kinetic mass-dependent fractionation effects (Davis et al., 2015), these processes cannot account for their large μ26 Mg* deficits, down to ~−4000 ppm (Makide et al., 2009; Kööp et al., 2016), and not either those observed in 26Al-poor PLAC-type CAIs (Liu et al., 2009; Kööp et al., 2016). This is because the range of beta values (0.511-0.513) experimentally determined for Mg isotope fractionation through evaporation of such CAI compositions cannot account for such large deficits (e.g. Davis et al., 2015). Instead, we propose that these features can be explained if FUN- and PLAC-type refractory inclusions formed from a gas dominated by vaporized new, but 26Al-poor (i.e. >10 Myr prior to Solar System formation), presolar dust characterized by μ26Mg* deficits (component 2 in Fig. 4a). As such, these types of CAI’s may represent a diluted signature of the more extreme presolar component 2, for which FUN-type inclusions potentially record a secondary mass-fractionation overprint (Fig. 4b).On the other hand, 26Al-rich refractory inclusions [with (26Al/27Al)0 of ~5 × 10−5], such as ‘normal’ CV CAIs and SHIB-type (Spinel-HIBonite inclusions) CAIs in CM chondrites lack the extreme nucleosynthetic effects seen in FUN/UN CAIs and PLACs (Fig. 3b), thereby mirroring the mutual exclusivity between 26Al and μ26Mg* deficits recorded by presolar grains (Fig. 4). The formation of 26Al-rich refractory inclusions can be explained by their formation from a gas dominated by vaporized young dust (component 3 in Fig. 4a inset) rich in 26Al and of roughly solar non-radiogenic μ26Mg* and solar 25Mg/24Mg. Thus, these 26 Al-rich CAI types seem to represent diluted signatures of the more extreme presolar component 3. If this dust originated from SNII ejecta in the protosolar molecular cloud, as indicated by the presolar grain record (Fig. 4a), we find that the average free-decay age of this dust, resulting from the difference between the (26Al/27Al)0 ratio of ~5 × 10−5 in ‘normal’ CAIs and the average (26Al/27Al)0 yields of ~5 × 10 −3 from SNII nucleosynthesis models of solar metallicity massive stars (M⊙ = 30 – 35) with near solar 25Mg/24Mg (Fig. S11 in the supplementary material), is less than 5 Myr depending on the relative proportion of SNII-derived 26Al in CAIs. Hence, this dust was less than 5 Myr old on average when it became incorporated into 26Al-rich CAIs.Finally, we note that all of the fine-grained CR CAI condensates measured in this study record solar to super-solar 25Mg/24Mg (up to ~ 800 ppm; Table 1). This is unexpected from theoretical predictions for condensation from a solar composition gas, in which the lighter isotopes are preferentially partitioned into the condensate (Davis and Richter, 2014). This suggests that the CR CAI-forming gas was characterized by a slight enrichment in 25Mg/24Mg (>800 ppm) and deficit in μ26Mg*0 (<–5 ppm) relative to the average solar composition. This further mirrors the anticorrelated 25Mg/24Mg and μ26Mg*0 observed for the presolar grains record and suggest that the CR CAI-forming gas was of slightly non-solar composition generated via preferential selective admixing of isotopically anomalous young dust components (2 & 3).
Thermal processing and the distribution of Mg isotopes and 26Al in the early Solar System
The CAI-forming gas was generated by thermal processing of presolar dust accreting to the proto-Sun. However, the presence of widespread nucleosynthetic isotope anomalies in a range of elements (e.g., Mg, Al, Cr, Ca, Ti) in refractory inclusions is not compatible with a homogeneous solar composition gas (Ireland, 1990). As such, dust sublimation was incomplete prior to formation of these solids. We infer that this gas composition was governed by the thermal properties of isotopically anomalous presolar carriers. Our analysis suggests that populations of refractory inclusions formed through episodic transient heating events, thereby capturing distinct snapshots of an isotopically evolving CAI-forming reservoir. Some CAIs (PLACs and FUN/UN CAIs) clearly preserved nucleosynthetic ‘nugget’ effects (% range for 48Ca and 50Ti [Kööp et al., 2018]) from refractory oxide residues rich in Ca and Ti (e.g., presolar hibonite and corundum), whereas nucleosynthetic effects in more volatile elements, such as Mg (enriched in presolar silicates such as pyroxene and olivine), were significantly reduced (26Mg*0 < 0.5%; Fig. 4b). These observations corroborate a volatility-controlled sublimation of mineralogically diverse presolar carriers, implying a closer to solar isotope composition in the gas for volatile elements, such as Mg, than those of refractory elements such as Ca and Ti.Extraction of new dust components (2 & 3), carrying μ26Mg* deficits and 26Al/27Al enrichments, into the CAI-forming gas suggests a relatively volatile mineralogy. This generates a complementarity in the residual thermally processed midplane dust in the inner protoplanetary disk, resulting in a net non-radiogenic μ26Mg* excess coupled with a 25Mg/24Mg and 26Al/27Al deficit relative to the solar average (Fig. 5). This dust accretes to form the terrestrial planets, thereby providing a mechanism for explaining the reduced initial (26Al/27Al)0 in the inner solar protoplanetary disk relative to CI chondrites (Larsen et al., 2011; 2016; Schiller et al., 2015). The μ26Mg* deficit recorded by inner Solar System bodies (such as ordinary chondrites and angrites (Larsen et al., 2011)) can therefore only be explained by a reduced radiogenic 26Mg* ingrowth relative to the solar average represented by CI chondrites (Fig. 5 and Fig. S12 in the supplementary material).
Fig. 5
δ
25Mg versus δ
26Mg* diagram (similar to Fig. 3 and 4, but with a 3rd dimension representing 26Al) showing the predicted complementarity between the CAI-forming gas and residual midplane solids formed through progressive thermal processing of isotopically anomalous presolar carriers. Sublimation of thermally labile presolar carriers (e.g., silicates) from a relatively new generation of presolar dust (solar metallicity, component 2) generates a gaseous reservoir enriched in 25Mg/24Mg and deficient in μ26Mg*. 26Al-poor FUN-type CAIs form from this reservoir. Subsequent higher-temperature sublimation of 26Al-rich young presolar carriers with about solar 25Mg/24Mg (e.g., oxides) enriches the gas in 26Al from which ‘normal’ 26Al-rich CV/CR CAIs form. The complimentary residual solids become depleted in these components (26Al-depleted) and accretes to form the terrestrial planets. This effect generates a non-radiogenic μ26Mg* excess combined with a radiogenic μ26Mg* deficit [from a reduced initial (26Al/27Al)0] in the terrestrial planet-forming region as compared to the Solar average, i.e. a net μ26Mg* deficit relative to CI chondrites after 26Al decay as represented by the black dot. The dotted line is the 3rd dimension representing 26Al. Decay of 26Al to 26Mg (1:1) is shown by the dotted red curved arrow.
We conclude that the Mg-isotope systematics of the Solar System can be justified by chemical unmixing by thermal processing of the three molecular cloud components; 1) an ancient galactically inherited and thermally resilient 26Al-poor presolar dust component enriched in non-radiogenic 26Mg*, which became enriched in the inner terrestrial planet-forming region by virtue of loss of some of the other components, 2) a newer 26Al-poor thermally labile dust component deficient in non-radiogenic 26Mg*, plausibly inherited from the proto-solar molecular cloud >10 Myr prior to Solar System formation, which is recorded in FUN/UN/PLAC-type CAIs, and 3) a freshly synthesized (on average <5 Myr old) 26Al-rich molecular cloud component, which was enriched in the CAI-forming gas and subsequently incorporated into 26Al-rich refractory inclusions, such as ‘normal’ CV, CR and SHIB-type CAIs.
Supplementary Material
Supplementary material related to this article can be found on-line at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116088.
Authors: Anne Trinquier; Tim Elliott; David Ulfbeck; Christopher Coath; Alexander N Krot; Martin Bizzarro Journal: Science Date: 2009-04-17 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Don Brownlee; Peter Tsou; Jérôme Aléon; Conel M O'd Alexander; Tohru Araki; Sasa Bajt; Giuseppe A Baratta; Ron Bastien; Phil Bland; Pierre Bleuet; Janet Borg; John P Bradley; Adrian Brearley; F Brenker; Sean Brennan; John C Bridges; Nigel D Browning; John R Brucato; E Bullock; Mark J Burchell; Henner Busemann; Anna Butterworth; Marc Chaussidon; Allan Cheuvront; Miaofang Chi; Mark J Cintala; B C Clark; Simon J Clemett; George Cody; Luigi Colangeli; George Cooper; Patrick Cordier; C Daghlian; Zurong Dai; Louis D'Hendecourt; Zahia Djouadi; Gerardo Dominguez; Tom Duxbury; Jason P Dworkin; Denton S Ebel; Thanasis E Economou; Sirine Fakra; Sam A J Fairey; Stewart Fallon; Gianluca Ferrini; T Ferroir; Holger Fleckenstein; Christine Floss; George Flynn; Ian A Franchi; Marc Fries; Z Gainsforth; J-P Gallien; Matt Genge; Mary K Gilles; Philipe Gillet; Jamie Gilmour; Daniel P Glavin; Matthieu Gounelle; Monica M Grady; Giles A Graham; P G Grant; Simon F Green; Faustine Grossemy; Lawrence Grossman; Jeffrey N Grossman; Yunbin Guan; Kenji Hagiya; Ralph Harvey; Philipp Heck; Gregory F Herzog; Peter Hoppe; Friedrich Hörz; Joachim Huth; Ian D Hutcheon; Konstantin Ignatyev; Hope Ishii; Motoo Ito; Damien Jacob; Chris Jacobsen; Stein Jacobsen; Steven Jones; David Joswiak; Amy Jurewicz; Anton T Kearsley; Lindsay P Keller; H Khodja; A L David Kilcoyne; Jochen Kissel; Alexander Krot; Falko Langenhorst; Antonio Lanzirotti; Loan Le; Laurie A Leshin; J Leitner; L Lemelle; Hugues Leroux; Ming-Chang Liu; K Luening; Ian Lyon; Glen Macpherson; Matthew A Marcus; Kuljeet Marhas; Bernard Marty; Graciela Matrajt; Kevin McKeegan; Anders Meibom; Vito Mennella; Keiko Messenger; Scott Messenger; Takashi Mikouchi; Smail Mostefaoui; Tomoki Nakamura; T Nakano; M Newville; Larry R Nittler; Ichiro Ohnishi; Kazumasa Ohsumi; Kyoko Okudaira; Dimitri A Papanastassiou; Russ Palma; Maria E Palumbo; Robert O Pepin; David Perkins; Murielle Perronnet; P Pianetta; William Rao; Frans J M Rietmeijer; François Robert; D Rost; Alessandra Rotundi; Robert Ryan; Scott A Sandford; Craig S Schwandt; Thomas H See; Dennis Schlutter; J Sheffield-Parker; Alexandre Simionovici; Steven Simon; I Sitnitsky; Christopher J Snead; Maegan K Spencer; Frank J Stadermann; Andrew Steele; Thomas Stephan; Rhonda Stroud; Jean Susini; S R Sutton; Y Suzuki; Mitra Taheri; Susan Taylor; Nick Teslich; Kazu Tomeoka; Naotaka Tomioka; Alice Toppani; Josep M Trigo-Rodríguez; David Troadec; Akira Tsuchiyama; Anthony J Tuzzolino; Tolek Tyliszczak; K Uesugi; Michael Velbel; Joe Vellenga; E Vicenzi; L Vincze; Jack Warren; Iris Weber; Mike Weisberg; Andrew J Westphal; Sue Wirick; Diane Wooden; Brigitte Wopenka; Penelope Wozniakiewicz; Ian Wright; Hikaru Yabuta; Hajime Yano; Edward D Young; Richard N Zare; Thomas Zega; Karen Ziegler; Laurent Zimmerman; Ernst Zinner; Michael Zolensky Journal: Science Date: 2006-12-15 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Jesper C Holst; Mia B Olsen; Chad Paton; Kazuhide Nagashima; Martin Schiller; Daniel Wielandt; Kirsten K Larsen; James N Connelly; Jes K Jørgensen; Alexander N Krot; Ake Nordlund; Martin Bizzarro Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-05-13 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: James N Connelly; Martin Bizzarro; Alexander N Krot; Åke Nordlund; Daniel Wielandt; Marina A Ivanova Journal: Science Date: 2012-11-02 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Elishevah M M E Van Kooten; Daniel Wielandt; Martin Schiller; Kazuhide Nagashima; Aurélien Thomen; Kirsten K Larsen; Mia B Olsen; Åke Nordlund; Alexander N Krot; Martin Bizzarro Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2016-02-08 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Mia B Olsen; Daniel Wielandt; Martin Schiller; Elishevah M M E Van Kooten; Martin Bizzarro Journal: Geochim Cosmochim Acta Date: 2016-10-15 Impact factor: 5.010
Authors: David V Bekaert; Maureen Auro; Quinn R Shollenberger; Ming-Chang Liu; Horst Marschall; Kevin W Burton; Benjamin Jacobsen; Gregory A Brennecka; Glenn J MacPherson; Richard von Mutius; Adam Sarafian; Sune G Nielsen Journal: Sci Adv Date: 2021-09-29 Impact factor: 14.136