Literature DB >> 34334639

Preemptive Endoluminal Vacuum Therapy to Reduce Morbidity after Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy: Including a Novel Grading System For Postoperative Endoscopic Assessment of GI-Anastomoses.

Philip C Müller1, Bernhard Morell, Diana Vetter, Dimitri A Raptis, Joshua R Kapp, Christoph Gubler, Christian A Gutschow.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Preemptive endoluminal vacuum therapy (pEVT) is a novel concept to reduce postoperative morbidity and has the potential to disrupt current treatment paradigms for patients undergoing esophagectomy. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Endoluminal vacuum therapy is an accepted treatment for anastomotic leakage (AL) after esophagectomy.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (MILE) with pEVT between 11/2017 and 10/2020. The sponge was removed endoscopically after 4-6 days, and anastomosis and gastric conduit were assessed according to a novel endoscopic grading system. Further management was customized according to endoscopic appearance and clinical course. Endpoints were postoperative morbidity and AL rate, defined according to the Clavien-Dindo (CD) and International Esodata Study Group classifications.
RESULTS: PEVT was performed in 67 consecutive patients, 57 (85%) were high-risk patients with an ASA score >2, WHO/ECOG score >1, age >65 years, or BMI >29 kg/m2. Thirty patients experienced textbook outcome, and overall minor (≤CD IIIa) and major (≥CD IIIb) morbidity was 40.3% and 14.9% respectively. 30-day-mortality was 0%. Forty-nine patients (73%) had uneventful anastomotic healing after pEVT without further endoscopic treatment. The remaining 18 patients (27%) underwent prolonged EVT with uneventful anastomotic healing in 13 patients (19%), contained AL in 4 patients (6%), and one uncontained leakage (1.5%) in a case with proximal gastric conduit necrosis, resulting in an overall AL rate of 7.5%.
CONCLUSIONS: PEVT is an innovative and safe procedure with a promising potential to reduce postoperative morbidity after MILE and may be particularly valuable in highly comorbid cases.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34334639     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  5 in total

Review 1.  Esophagectomy-prevention of complications-tips and tricks for the preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative stage.

Authors:  Uberto Fumagalli Romario; Stefano de Pascale
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-07-18

Review 2.  Role of transanal drainage tubes in preventing anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  S Zhao; K Hu; Y Tian; Y Xu; W Tong
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 3.699

3.  Endoscopic Management of Large Leakages After Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery.

Authors:  Stanislaus Reimer; Johan F Lock; Sven Flemming; Alexander Weich; Anna Widder; Lars Plaßmeier; Anna Döring; Ilona Hering; Mohammed K Hankir; Alexander Meining; Christoph-Thomas Germer; Kaja Groneberg; Florian Seyfried
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-05-09

4.  To sponge or not to sponge: that is the leak question.

Authors:  Arfon G Powell; Javed Sultan
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 3.005

Review 5.  Endoscopic vacuum therapy in the upper gastrointestinal tract: when and how to use it.

Authors:  Christian A Gutschow; Christoph Schlag; Diana Vetter
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 2.895

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.