Tina E Brinkley1, Iris Leng2, Margie J Bailey3, Denise K Houston1, Christina E Hugenschmidt1, Barbara J Nicklas1, W Gregory Hundley4. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, Section on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine (T.E.B., D.K.H., C.E.H., B.J.N.). 2. Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Biostatistics and Data Science (I.L.). 3. Hypertension and Vascular Research Center (M.J.B.), Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC. 4. Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (W.G.H.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Obesity may accelerate age-related increases in aortic stiffness. Although aerobic exercise training generally has favorable effects on aortic structure and function, exercise alone may not be sufficient to improve aortic stiffness in older adults with obesity. We determined the effects of aerobic exercise training with and without moderate- to high-caloric restriction (CR) on the structure and function of the proximal aorta in 160 older (65-79 years) men and women with obesity (body mass index=30-45 kg/m2). METHODS: Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: aerobic exercise training only (treadmill 4 days/week for 30 minutes at 65% to 70% of heart rate reserve; n=56), aerobic exercise training plus moderate CR (n=55), or aerobic exercise training plus more intensive CR (n=49) for 20 weeks. Aortic pulse wave velocity, aortic distensibility, and other measures of aortic structure and function were assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Pearson correlation coefficients were examined to assess associations between changes in proximal aortic stiffness and changes in fitness, fatness, and other potential confounders. RESULTS: Weight loss in the aerobic exercise training plus moderate CR (-8.0 kg [95% CI, -9.17 to -6.87]) and aerobic exercise training plus more intensive CR (-8.98 kg [95% CI, -10.23 to -7.73) groups was significantly greater compared with the aerobic exercise training-only group (-1.66 kg [95% CI, -2.94 to -0.38]; P<0.017 for both). There were significant treatment effects for descending aorta distensibility (P=0.008) and strain (P=0.004) and aortic arch pulse wave velocity (P=0.01) with the aerobic exercise training plus moderate CR group having a 21% increase in distensibility (P=0.016) and an 8% decrease in pulse wave velocity (P=0.058). None of the aortic stiffness measures changed significantly in the aerobic exercise training-only or aerobic exercise training plus more intensive CR groups, and there were no significant changes in any other measure of aortic structure or function in these groups. Overall, increases in aortic distensibility were correlated with improvements in body weight and body fat distribution, but these associations were not statistically significant after adjustment for multiple comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: In older adults with obesity, combining aerobic exercise with moderate CR leads to greater improvements in proximal aortic stiffness than exercise alone. Registration: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01048736.
BACKGROUND: Obesity may accelerate age-related increases in aortic stiffness. Although aerobic exercise training generally has favorable effects on aortic structure and function, exercise alone may not be sufficient to improve aortic stiffness in older adults with obesity. We determined the effects of aerobic exercise training with and without moderate- to high-caloric restriction (CR) on the structure and function of the proximal aorta in 160 older (65-79 years) men and women with obesity (body mass index=30-45 kg/m2). METHODS: Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: aerobic exercise training only (treadmill 4 days/week for 30 minutes at 65% to 70% of heart rate reserve; n=56), aerobic exercise training plus moderate CR (n=55), or aerobic exercise training plus more intensive CR (n=49) for 20 weeks. Aortic pulse wave velocity, aortic distensibility, and other measures of aortic structure and function were assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Pearson correlation coefficients were examined to assess associations between changes in proximal aortic stiffness and changes in fitness, fatness, and other potential confounders. RESULTS: Weight loss in the aerobic exercise training plus moderate CR (-8.0 kg [95% CI, -9.17 to -6.87]) and aerobic exercise training plus more intensive CR (-8.98 kg [95% CI, -10.23 to -7.73) groups was significantly greater compared with the aerobic exercise training-only group (-1.66 kg [95% CI, -2.94 to -0.38]; P<0.017 for both). There were significant treatment effects for descending aorta distensibility (P=0.008) and strain (P=0.004) and aortic arch pulse wave velocity (P=0.01) with the aerobic exercise training plus moderate CR group having a 21% increase in distensibility (P=0.016) and an 8% decrease in pulse wave velocity (P=0.058). None of the aortic stiffness measures changed significantly in the aerobic exercise training-only or aerobic exercise training plus more intensive CR groups, and there were no significant changes in any other measure of aortic structure or function in these groups. Overall, increases in aortic distensibility were correlated with improvements in body weight and body fat distribution, but these associations were not statistically significant after adjustment for multiple comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: In older adults with obesity, combining aerobic exercise with moderate CR leads to greater improvements in proximal aortic stiffness than exercise alone. Registration: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01048736.
Entities:
Keywords:
aging; diet; exercise; magnetic resonance imaging; obesity
Authors: Thomas Weber; Marcus Ammer; Martin Rammer; Audrey Adji; Michael F O'Rourke; Siegfried Wassertheurer; Stefan Rosenkranz; Bernd Eber Journal: J Hypertens Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 4.844
Authors: Bouke P Adriaans; Samuel Heuts; Suzanne Gerretsen; Emile C Cheriex; Rein Vos; Ehsan Natour; Jos G Maessen; Peyman Sardari Nia; Harry J G M Crijns; Joachim E Wildberger; Simon Schalla Journal: Heart Date: 2018-03-28 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Kerry J Stewart; Anita C Bacher; Katherine L Turner; Jerome L Fleg; Paul S Hees; Edward P Shapiro; Matthew Tayback; Pamela Ouyang Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2005-04-11
Authors: Kristina S Petersen; Natalie Blanch; Jennifer B Keogh; Peter M Clifton Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2014-11-20 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Eric J Brunner; Martin J Shipley; Sara Ahmadi-Abhari; Adam G Tabak; Carmel M McEniery; Ian B Wilkinson; Michael G Marmot; Archana Singh-Manoux; Mika Kivimaki Journal: Hypertension Date: 2015-06-08 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Emily S Lau; Lindsay G Panah; Emily K Zern; Elizabeth E Liu; Robyn Farrell; Mark W Schoenike; Mayooran Namasivayam; Timothy W Churchill; Lisa Curreri; Rajeev Malhotra; Matthew Nayor; Gregory D Lewis; Jennifer E Ho Journal: J Card Fail Date: 2021-12-23 Impact factor: 5.712
Authors: Martin Röhling; Kerstin Kempf; Winfried Banzer; Klaus Michael Braumann; Dagmar Führer-Sakel; Martin Halle; David McCarthy; Stephan Martin; Jürgen Scholze; Hermann Toplak; Aloys Berg; Hans-Georg Predel Journal: Nutrients Date: 2022-03-30 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Sibylle Stoll; Solomon A Sowah; Matthias A Fink; Tobias Nonnenmacher; Mirja E Graf; Theron Johnson; Christopher L Schlett; Oyunbileg von Stackelberg; Romy Kirsten; Fabian Bamberg; Jeffrey Keller; Cornelia M Ulrich; Rudolf Kaaks; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Fabian Rengier; Tilman Kühn; Johanna Nattenmüller Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2022-09-20 Impact factor: 4.755