Literature DB >> 34332856

Rationalizing constraints on the capacity for cognitive control.

Sebastian Musslick1, Jonathan D Cohen2.   

Abstract

Humans are remarkably limited in: (i) how many control-dependent tasks they can execute simultaneously, and (ii) how intensely they can focus on a single task. These limitations are universal assumptions of most theories of cognition. Yet, a rationale for why humans are subject to these constraints remains elusive. This feature review draws on recent insights from psychology, neuroscience, and machine learning, to suggest that constraints on cognitive control may result from a rational adaptation to fundamental, computational dilemmas in neural architectures. The reviewed literature implies that limitations in multitasking may result from a trade-off between learning efficacy and processing efficiency and that limitations in the intensity of commitment to a single task may reflect a trade-off between cognitive stability and flexibility.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  information processing limitations; multitasking; task switching; visual attention; working memory

Year:  2021        PMID: 34332856     DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  6 in total

1.  Balance between breadth and depth in human many-alternative decisions.

Authors:  Alice Vidal; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Rubén Moreno-Bote
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 8.713

2.  Associations between resting-state functional connectivity changes and prolonged benefits of writing training in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Joni De Vleeschhauwer; Evelien Nackaerts; Nicholas D'Cruz; Britt Vandendoorent; Letizia Micca; Wim Vandenberghe; Alice Nieuwboer
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 6.682

3.  Cognitive Control as a Multivariate Optimization Problem.

Authors:  Harrison Ritz; Xiamin Leng; Amitai Shenhav
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Intentional mind-wandering as intentional omission: the surrealist method.

Authors:  Santiago Arango-Muñoz; Juan Pablo Bermúdez
Journal:  Synthese       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 2.908

5.  Time-Based Binding as a Solution to and a Limitation for Flexible Cognition.

Authors:  Mehdi Senoussi; Pieter Verbeke; Tom Verguts
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-01-24

6.  Neuronal congruency effects in macaque prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Tao Yao; Wim Vanduffel
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 17.694

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.